The Blood Royal

How often has public calamity been arrested on the very brink of ruin by the seasonable energy of a single man? Have we no such man amongst us? I am as sure as I am of my being, that one vigorous mind without office, without situation, without public functions of any kind (at a time when the want of such a thing is felt, as I am sure it is) I say, one such man, confiding in the aid of God, and full of just reliance in his own fortitude, vigour, enterprize and perseverance, would first draw to him some few like himself, and then that multitudes, hardly thought to be in existence, would appear and troop about him. – Edmund Burke

A few American conservatives, who are not conservatives in the Burkean sense of the word, have discovered, in the wake of Romney’s defeat, the colored immigration issue. Those few are trying to explain to Republicans what has been obvious for the last fifty years: colored people vote Democratic because the Democrats promise unlimited welfare benefits. So conservative Republicans who want to win elections should try to stem, or better yet, turn back the colored tide. But those new anti-colored immigration conservatives are a tiny minority. The great majority of conservatives have decided to “win the colored people over to their side.” They talk of making “aggressive inroads” into the Hispanic and black communities by explaining to them that conservatives are pro-family and hard-working, values which, the conservatives constantly tell us, are shared by the family-oriented Mexicans and blacks. I think the old Westerns and the old jungle movies had a more realistic view of the Mexicans and the blacks than the modern Republication conservatives. In the old movies, the Mexicans were slimy banditos who would kill, rape, and plunder white people for the sheer perverse pleasure of murder, rape, and plunder. Likewise the blacks, in the old politically incorrect jungle movies, captured the whites in order to torture, rape, and murder them. No amount of liberal or conservative gibberish about prejudice will change the fact that the old stereotypes are true and the new utopian theories of the noble black savage and the hard-working pro-family Mexican are false.

Closely allied to and often one and the same as the conservatives are the members of the Christian right. I would not call them Christian or rightist, but the liberal media who calls anyone to the right of themselves Christian right-wingers does call them that. The Roman Catholic Church and the mainstream Protestant churches have been in favor of white genocide through massive colored immigration and inter-racial marriage for quite some time. The “Christian right” has only jumped on board in recent years, becoming more militantly anti-white and pro-colored since Romney’s defeat. What are we to make of such goings on amongst the Christian right? In this case the obvious answer is the correct answer. The Christian right is not Christian. Let’s go through this carefully.

The European governments have all institutionalized the principles of the French Jacobins, which were (1) regicide, (2) democracy, and (3) atheism. We won’t quibble over whether a nation killed their monarchs outright as in France or divested them of all power as in England; the end result was the same: the monarchy as a preserver of the Christian traditions of the nation was eliminated in every European country. And the democratic heresy, which states “all government, not being a democracy, is an usurpation,” was institutionalized throughout the European countries. The end result of the new anti-traditional, pro-democracy governments was atheistic governments. Most followed the American model of a proclaimed neutrality toward Christianity while in reality maintaining a rigid anti-Christian bias After the victory of the North in the Civil War, the American government became more and more openly anti-European and anti-Christian right up to the present day in which European Christians are a proscribed people. And every European nation has followed a path similar to the United States. Jacobinism, based on regicide, democracy, and atheism, is the ruling ideology of the European countries.

Part and parcel of liberal Jacobinism is negro worship, because “the people” must replace the Christian God. The white proletariat eventually had to give way to the negro, because even a white from the working class had a Christian taint upon him. How can you destroy the image of God in man if you don’t destroy the Christ-bearing white race? You can’t, which is why the more advanced Jacobins of the 20^th century shifted their allegiance from working class whites to colored barbarians: “Hope for the future has been transferred to the peoples of the developing countries, to disaffected national minorities, for example, the blacks in the U.S.A…”

When you dissolve all ties to the past, as the European Jacobins have, you must build your society of the future completely by theory. This enables the liberal to attack all Christian Europeans with impunity because all who impede the future theoretical happiness of mankind must be eliminated. The Christian right-wingers and the conservatives are part of the liberal conglomerate that wants the blood of the antique Europeans as badly as the Giant in Jack and the Beanstalk wanted the blood of an Englishman. The Christian right-wingers and the conservatives are like the European liberals in Britain and on the continent who were quite willing to deal with the Jacobins once they deposed of Robespierre. Never mind that every single member of the new anti-Robespierre, Jacobin government had approved of the execution of the King, the Queen, and their children. The European liberals didn’t mind dealing with the regicides so long as they espoused democracy and refrained from the overt, bloody executions of Robespierre. Our modern conservatives and their “Christian” counterpart also stay within the Jacobin fold so long as their liberal cousins execute white people at a moderate rate and allow the Christian right-wingers to worship a theoretical Christ, who is subordinate to the negro gods of Liberaldom. It’s a great deal for the secular and religious conservatives. They can wave flags and attend church while betraying their nation, which is their race, and their God, who is Jesus Christ. In spirit and intent the modern liberals are in perfect accord with the French Jacobins. They are motivated by a maniacal hatred of Christ, and their hatred drives them to strike out against Christ’s people. Like the Jacobins who deposed Robespierre, they have learned that you can get the lukewarm Christians to hang themselves and kill their more steadfast countrymen by using the former channels of grace, such as the churches, as channels of satanic hate. This tactic is more effective than the wholesale destruction of Christian churches and Christian symbols.

What we always need to keep before us is the essential battle between good and evil. Life, at its deepest level, is a fairy tale. The liberals’ hearts are full of a malignant hatred for everything that stems from Christ. They will not permit any person connected to Christian Europe to become part of Liberaldom. The conservatives and the Christian right-wingers have grasped that truth. And because they want to survive they have become part of Liberaldom. But he that would save his life must be prepared to lose it for His sake. The pagan gods who demand sacrifice always end up consuming their devotees. The negro will demand more and more sacrifice from the white man until he has consumed the white man. Better to stand with Christ, the God who demands mercy rather than sacrifice, and set one’s life in His merciful hands.

What is missing in the fairy tale that we have ever before our eyes – if we have eyes to see – is the good. The evil kingdom of Liberaldom remains standing because no Europeans have attacked it. Fortress Liberaldom is not impregnable: we need only remove our materialist glasses and see life through the eyes of the spirit, which are located in the human heart. The liberals built Liberaldom on a theory of a future state of existence where there are no white Europeans and there is no Jesus Christ. The baseless fabric of their vision can be destroyed by Europeans who have not let go of their Christian past. Such men will have sacred ground to stand on, from which to launch an attack on Liberaldom that will result in the destruction of Liberaldom.

The story of the modern European is not a drama, because in a drama we need a protagonist and an antagonist. We have the liberals, the antagonists who are determined to destroy God by destroying His image in His people, but where is the hero, the protagonist, who will step forward and defend his people and his God? One hero will spawn others once the initial break with Spenglerian logic is made. Civilizations that are of the spirit are not subject to the same laws of biological determinism as the human body. Burke, anticipating the Spenglerian mindset, refuted him in his rallying cry to his country man, William Elliot:

I am not of opinion that the race of men, and the commonwealths they create, like the bodies of individuals, grow effete and languid and bloodless, and ossify by the necessities of their own conformation, and the fatal operation of longevity and time. These analogies between bodies natural and politick, though they may some times illustrate arguments, furnish no argument of themselves. They are but too often used under the colour of a specious philosophy, to find apologies for the despair of laziness, pusillanimity, and to excuse the want of all manly efforts, when the exigencies of our country call for them the more loudly.

Bravo! Such words, written by such a man, stand in stark contrast to the words and spirit of defeat that we hear and feel everywhere in the anti-European world of Liberaldom. “The Europeans must diversity.” “The Europeans must repudiate their racist past.” “The Europeans must give way…” etc. etc. There will always be someone who will pick up Burke’s mantle, the mantle of Christian Europe, and cry havoc in the very bowels of the liberal leviathan. Let the cowardly conservatives and the new anti-Christian, anti-European Christian theorists ride their “specious philosophy” of despair to the liberal hell that they so covet, the European hero will stay true to his people and his blood, and in doing so, he will become the missing protagonist in the drama of the European people.

The modern world has institutionalized biological determinism, which is the complete antithesis of the antique European’s vision of existence. The outward pageantry of nature can overwhelm a man if he sees only nature in nature. If the natural world is the world, and not a symbol of the spiritual world behind nature, animated by the living God, then religion becomes psychiatry, love becomes sex, and honor, chivalry, courage and charity become outmoded relics of the unscientific period of the Europeans’ history. The ethos of Rousseau which leads to the worship of the noble black savage replaces the religion of Jesus Christ:

Your rulers were well aware of this; and in their system of changing your manners to accommodate them to their politics, they found nothing so convenient as Rousseau. Through him they teach men to love after the fashion of philosophers; that is, they teach to men, to Frenchmen, a love without gallantry; a love without any thing of that fine flower of youthfulness and gentility, which places it, if not among the virtues, among the ornaments of life. Instead of this passion, naturally allied to grace and manners, they infuse into their youth an unfashioned, indelicate, sour, gloomy, ferocious medley of pedantry and lewdness; of metaphysical speculations, blended with the coarsest sensuality. Such is the general morality of the passions to be found in their famous philosopher, in his famous work of philosophic gallantry, the Nouvelle Eloise.

Carl Sandburg, the poet laureate of capitalism, wanted to be a rivet in a skyscraper. Such a desire is typical of the European without faith in the God of the European people. Such a man seeks oblivion in the forces of dumb nature. In Sandburg’s case it was the skyscraper, in the case of his modern descendants it is the great colored horde that the liberals and their conservative cousins desire to be one with, so that their souls, which they despise because they are white, can be obliterated in the dark colored hordes of Babylon. Opposed to this liberalism, this monumental malignant hatred of the Christian European, is the protagonist of the European drama, the Christian hero. One Tell, one Alfred, has always been enough to defeat the multitudinous hordes of heathendom, just as He was more than enough to defeat Satan and all his legions. +

Satanic Diversity – We Shall Not Bend Our Knees to Satan

But if education takes in vice as any part of its system, there is no doubt but that it will operate with abundant energy, and to an extent indefinite. The magistrate, who in favour of freedom thinks himself obliged to suffer all sorts of publications, is under a stricter duty than any other… He ought, above all, to be cautious in recommending any writer who has carried marks of a deranged understanding; for where there is no sound reason, there can be no real virtue; and madness is ever vitious and malignant. – Edmund Burke

I saw a lunatic Jewish woman on YouTube the other day. It was not a pleasant sight. The shrew was talking about an institute she had established in Sweden for “Jewish learning,” whose stated purpose was to tell the Swedish and the rest of the European people that they must become more diverse. Diversity, which means white genocide, is the goal of all liberals, but seeing the satanic forces of diversity personified in that malignant Jewess made me feel the fire and smell the sulfur of hell. If that woman had come off the screen and entered my home, I would have killed her, just as I would kill a rattlesnake or any other predator that entered my home. Of course the liberal Jewess is much worse than a rattlesnake, because her venom can kill the soul as well as the body. And I don’t think Sweden or any other European country needs to be taught ‘diversity.’ They are already diversifying themselves into extinction.

It’s not difficult to foresee the result of the institutionalization of diversity among the European people. If the shadows of diversity are not altered the European people will disappear from the face of the earth.

Burke said that if any part of a state’s educational system took in vice that country was at the mercy of an ever ‘vitious’ and malignant power. Our modern European nations have made vice, in all its manifestations, the totality of their educational systems. It is virtually impossible for a young person living in any of the European nations to grow up without a thorough immersion in all the vices of liberalism, which include: the toleration of every sexual deviation known to man; racial diversity; and a sneering, cynical atheism. If you view the educational systems in the Western countries without wanting to have the liberals’ blood for what they have wrought, you are either a liberal or a grazer, but you are most certainly not a European.

We often hear the ‘swing back’ theory from grazers who are slightly uneasy about some of the uglier manifestations of liberalism, such as gay marriage and legalized abortion. But how will things swing back, independent of any human endeavor, if our state educational system, of which the press and the church are adjuncts, teaches cradle to grave vice? Things won’t “swing back” until the ruling elite that has institutionalized diversity and vice ceases to rule. Merely uttering Emersonian platitudes and invoking democracy will only help to solidify the liberals’ power because liberalism strives on democratic platitudes. A non-democratic, non-diverse force from outside of Liberaldom must be brought to bear on the forces of diversity and vice. Then, and only then, will we see the destruction of the liberals’ satanic dystopia.

Christendom was built by Europeans who responded to God’s grace. I always see the hand of God reaching out to the hand of man, as depicted by Michelangelo, when I think of the divine-human link between God and the European. The denial of that divine-human link by the liberals and the Christian theorists has been the cornerstone of Liberaldom, which was built by Europeans reaching out to Satan.

The Christian theorist is a subtle atheist. He doesn’t deny the Christian God outright; instead he creates a theory about the Christian God that is antithetical to the Christian faith. Loving and treasuring his theory more than God the theorist attacks the bred-in-the-bone Christian. Thus the Roman Catholic and the Protestant theorist make light of the Christ-bearing people and see Christ only in the minds of people who adhere to their theory of God. The only type of Christian culture the theorist believes in is the time frame of European history in which his theory thrived.

The secular liberal attacks Christian Europe from a slightly different angle than the Christian theorist. The liberal does not say that Christian Europe did not exist. Quite the contrary: he believes that Christianity was bred-in-the-bone of the antique European: “But, mate, my heart is sore for Christian diet.” (1) And because the liberal believes Christianity was bred-in-the-bone of the antique European, the liberal believes the European people should be exterminated for propagating a belief in a false messiah. With malignant hatred, the liberals demonize the white European while deifying his opposite, the sacred colored tribesman. The malignant liberal is a great danger to the Christian for the obvious reason that he wants to destroy the Christian people. But the Christian theorist is the greater danger because he attacks the Christian European under the guise of Christianity. We must strip off the Christian theorist’s mask and see his true face. It is the face of a man who has rejected the living God in order to worship his own mind forged image of a God that is subordinate to the Christian theorist’s intellect. In the theoretical world, distinctions between religions and races become problematic, so they are eliminated. The Assisi Summit meetings in the Roman Catholic Church were celebrations of airy, theoretical nothingness, just as the Protestant Zionists’ espousal of the unrepentant Jew is the result of an adherence to a theoretical Christianity which has no room for a God with a local habitation and name: He lived in the hearts of the European people and His name was Jesus Christ. The Jews are still looking for a Messiah, and so are the Christian theorists: both have rejected the Savior of the antique Europeans.

Much more impressive than the magnificent architecture, sculpture, and paintings of the antique Europeans — and those art works are impressive — is the moral beauty of a people who demonstrated, in the entirety of their history as a people, a deep, heartfelt faith in Christ. It’s impossible, once a man comes to know old Europe from within, not to be conscious that Christian Europe was of God and modern diverse Europe is of Satan. The ancient Europeans, “loved so much that [they] could see His blood upon the rose.” In contrast, the modern liberals hate Him so much that they want to diversify His people out of existence. Just as the antique Europeans touched the hand of God, the liberals – by making the negro their incarnate god, reach out and touch the hand of Satan.

If by some miracle of grace, you have come out of the liberal educational system and seen that other world, the world of Christian Europe, then you are one who is “born to set things right.” When the liberals rally round their Jewish leaders, who tell us, “You must become diverse,” you must go to the European Ninevites and tell them, in the name God, “You must not become diverse. You must cling to His Europe and His people against all the forces of hell.” Will the Ninevites listen? It’s not up to thee or me to count the cost. Our people are not irredeemable, but they must be shown a different Europe than the vice-infested, Christ-hating Europe of the liberals. Every day millions of children are placed on the road to hell when they begin their journey through the educational system of the liberals. It’s as if we are standing by, watching an avalanche fall on a gathering of helpless children. “In so much as you have done unto the least of these my brethren, you have done it unto me.” One voice in the wilderness that cries, “Stop, this shall not go on,” is just one voice, but one voice in the wilderness that cries, “Stop, in the name of Christ,” is a voice that can stop avalanches of liberal filth.

It’s not enough to just cry, “Jew” and think the work of defending Europe is done. What is the essence of Judaism? The Jews were set apart from other peoples so they could bring forth and bear witness to the living God. Instead they chose to remain heathens and attack the light of the world. The European took up the rejected cornerstone and championed Him against all the world. At the heart of the modern Europeans’ capitulation to the forces of diversity is a sickening world weariness. The Europeans no longer want to be the Christ-bearers, a people apart from the colored, heathen world. They want to blend into oblivion with the forces of darkness. Only a faith in the non-diverse Christ can stop the European from blending into nothingness. Which brings us back to the Christian theorists. The greatest enemy of the Christian European is not the Jew, it is the Christian theorist, because the Christian theorist stops the European kinist from fighting in Christ’s name. “If the church men equate Christianity and diversity, how can I, a mere lay man, profess to fight diversity in the name of Christ?” Keep it simple. A venomous snake is still a venomous snake no matter that it wraps itself around the altar. The church men have become Jews; they will command you to diversify your people and your faith until you are one with nothingness. That is the end result of diversity.

It is through the non-diverse familial and racial channels of grace that we come to know God. Diversity destroys those channels of grace. I recently read through Burke’s Reflections on the French Revolution with some of my children. When we came to the section of the Reflections in which Burke tells of the Jacobins’ abuse of the Queen, my youngest daughter wept.

It is now sixteen or seventeen years since I saw the queen of France, then the dauphiness, at Versailles; and surely never lighted on this orb, which she hardly seemed to touch, a more delightful vision. I saw her just above the horizon, decorating and cheering the elevated sphere she just began to move in,–glittering like the morning-star, full of life, and splendor, and joy. Oh! What a revolution! And what a heart must I have to contemplate without emotion that elevation and that fall! Little did I dream when she added titles of veneration to those of enthusiastic, distant, respectful love, that she should ever be obliged to carry the sharp antidote against disgrace concealed in that bosom; little did I dream that I should have lived to see such disasters fallen upon her in a nation of gallant men, in a nation of men of honour, and of cavaliers. I thought ten thousand swords must have leaped from their scabbards to revenge even a look that threatened her with insult. But the age of chivalry is gone. That of sophisters, economists, and calculators, has succeeded; and the glory of Europe is extinguished for ever… The unbought grace of life, the cheap defence of nations, the nurse of manly sentiment, and heroic enterprise, is gone!

Do you know what it means to a father who has poured his heart and soul into his children’s education to see that the flesh of his flesh, the bone of his bone shares his own heartfelt love for Europe and Europe’s God? It means everything. And such must have been our Lord’s feeling when He poured out His love to His children, and they, the Europeans, responded to His love. We can’t turn away from that love for the satanic world of diversity. “Europe must become diverse,” was the command of the satanic Jewess. “We shall not become diverse,” is the reply of the European who loves his God and his people. +

________________________________

(1) Ben Gunn doesn’t say that he is hungry for food cooked in Europe. He doesn’t have to, because he has said the same thing when he said his heart was sore for Christian diet. Europe and Christianity were one and the same.

Not of Their World

If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you. –John 15: 18

During the trial scene in Act Four of Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice, Bassanio points out that Shylock has been offered thrice the amount of the original bond, yet he has refused it because he still wants his pound of flesh. In Bassanio’s eyes Shylock’s refusal of thrice the money constitutes malice, and he urges that the case should be thrown out. It’s not that easy, but eventually Shylock does lose his case. And his malice aforethought is punished:

Tarry, Jew:
The law hath  yet another hold on you.
It is enacted in the laws of Venice,
If it be proved against an alien
That by direct or indirect attempts
He seek the life of any citizen,
The party ‘gainst the which he doth contrive
Shall seize one half his goods; the other half
Comes to the privy coffer of the state;
And the offender’s life lies in the mercy
Of the duke only, ‘gainst all other voice.
In which predicament, I say, thou stand’st;
For it appears, by manifest proceeding,
That indirectly and directly too
Thou hast contrived against the very life
Of the defendant; and thou hast incurr’d
The danger formerly by me rehearsed.
Down therefore and beg mercy of the duke.

Of course Shakespeare is no utopian. He knows that more often than not malice does bear down truth. But The Merchant of Venice is a comedy, not a tragedy, so we get to see God’s will prevail. And really that is the whole point of The Merchant of Venice. It is God’s will that the law should encompass justice, mercy, and faith. The law should not be used as an instrument of malice. Shylock, with malice in his heart, wants to use the letter of the law to violate the spirit of the law. He is thwarted, and justice, true justice, triumphs.

It is not a little thing that, however imperfectly realized, Portia’s Christian exposition of the law was the ancient European peoples’ vision of what the law should be. Even when the vision is honored more in the breach than in the observance it is something to have the proper vision.

What is the liberals’ vision of the law? Their vision of the law is the Shylockian vision of the law. They have no faith in Christ, so they have no mercy. They seek justice. But justice without faith and mercy becomes malice. And that is what liberal justice consists of: malice and only malice. Shylock did not fear justice because he, like the liberals, saw himself as devoid of sin. If his trial was held today he would be awarded his pound of flesh.

The legal systems in all the European countries are Shylockian legal systems. They exist to extract their pound of flesh from the white Europeans. It is useless to try to obtain justice in the liberal courts because, like Shylock, the liberals have hardened their hearts. They hate the light:

I pray you, think you question with the Jew.
You may as well go stand upon the beach
And bid the main flood bate his usual height;
You may as well use question with the wolf
Why he hath made the ewe bleat for the lamb;
You may as well forbid the mountain pines
To wag their high tops and to make no noise,
When they are fretten with the gusts of heaven;
You may as well do anything most hard,
As seek to soften that–than which what’s harder?–
His Jewish heart:

It’s a great tragedy that the post World War II conservatives did not see the shifting sands under their feet. They quoted old tomes from Europe’s Christian era when the law was justice, mercy, and faith while ignoring the truth staring them in the face: the law had become a ravenous wolf out to devour the European people. The liberals’ malice aforethought was obvious to all those who were not too blind to see. Every liberal lie was brought to light. Let’s start with the lie of the poor, disenfranchised black man. The liberals claimed they sought only to help the downtrodden black, not to destroy the white. But in Africa when the whites were disenfranchised and black rule made life unbearable for blacks as well as whites, did the liberals say, “We were mistaken, we must re-establish white rule so that black and white can be better off?” Of course they didn’t. They remained obdurate in their hatred of the white. “Better that all black men should live in squalor and misery so long as we can destroy the white man.” In no country is the malice of the Shylockian liberals more manifest than in South Africa. Do you remember when the liberals claimed to be opposed to apartheid? Well, there still is apartheid in South Africa. The whites have been herded into all-white ghettoes without running water, proper shelter, or food.(1) “Serves them right,” the European conservatives say. “It couldn’t happen to us, we’ve been good to our black brothers.” It will happen to you, Mr. Conservative, just as soon as the black barbarians no longer need white votes to elect an all-black government. But mere self-interest, “it could happen to me,” should not be the primary reason that the white European should be concerned about the white South African. He should be concerned, passionately concerned, because the white South African is of the same blood as the white European. Fluellen tells Henry V that, “all the water in Wye cannot wash your Majesty’s Welsh plood out of your pody, I can tell you that.” So it is with the European. Wherever he goes he takes his nation with him, it is in his blood.

Once the racial lie, which proclaims white men to be evil and racist, has been established as dogma, all other liberal lies can be institutionalized as well. Sexual permissiveness is advanced as a therapeutic improvement on “Victorian repression,” and savage matriarchies are presented as “enlightened governments which respect women’s rights.” The lies are unchallenged because the Christian European males who were born to oppose such lies have been discredited by virtue of their ‘racism’: “It’s not surprising that the white male is sexist because he is also a racist. We must eradicate the white male.” So say the feminists who were spawned by the “Civil Rights” movement, which was in reality a movement to establish the negro as the supreme deity in the Kingdom of Babylon.

Malice has borne down truth because the white European conservatives are not conservatives. Their vision is a bureaucratic one. They see, in their mind’s eye, a democratic, egalitarian world of all races and all sexes, united in the common pursuit of riches dispensed by the most intelligent of the bureaucrats, which they believe themselves to be. The conservatives do not see the satanic malice of the liberals because they have lost their vision. They no longer see life feelingly. The bureaucratic mind can only organize the things of this world, it cannot see past the things of this world to His sacred fairy tale world of Arden, of Narnia, of The Wind in the Willows. Once the vision of Christ’s Europe is lost the liberals have won because conservatives in church and state will only make mild policy protests, they will not oppose the satanic liberal malice which permeates the modern liberal states of Europe.

Currently the ongoing debate between conservatives and liberals is over who can best manage the affairs of Liberaldom. The absolute necessity of Liberaldom’s destruction is never mentioned by the conservatives and certainly not by the liberals. The liberals are the demonically possessed swine heading for the abyss. The conservatives are Shropshire sheep grazing in a nearby pasture. As the swine rush by, the conservative sheep go over the abyss with the swine, because they don’t want to appear prejudiced against swine by refusing to join them in their mad rush to destruction. What a wonderful bunch of go-along type of guys those Shropshire sheep are! But why should the conservative grazers capitulate to evil? They cave in because they have no sustaining vision of their place in God’s grand scheme of things. They see themselves as Satan wants them to see themselves: as a subordinate race of people who can only live their lives second-hand through the good offices of the negro. If they can come up with a better way to serve the negro than the liberals, then they can sit in the seats of the liberals and play Atticus Finch. Of course the liberal will never relinquish his seat to the conservative, but that is the pathetic hope of the conservative. If we have hope in that type of ‘conservatism’ only are we not of all men most to be pitied?

Shylock’s hatred of the light was not just a Jewish thing even in Shakespeare’s time. There were a few liberal gentiles in old Europe. But now the few have become the dominant many, and Shylock’s hatred of all European Christians has become institutionalized in church and state. If we look at the history of some of the liberal hate organizations, we can see the great Judaizing movement unfold. For instance, at its inception the American Civil Liberties Union was approximately 90% Jewish. In recent years the organization has built up a majority membership of Catholics and Protestants. This synthesis was inevitable. The Jews are an organized body opposed to the light of the world and the Christian churches have become organized bodies opposed to the light of the world. And if you tell me that the churches have not become hostile to the light of the world, that they have simply removed the European cultural accoutrements from the churches, I will tell you that the Europeans’ vision of Christ was not an ‘accoutrement’, it was the faith. Syncretistic negro worship is not Christianity, it is a religion of malice, without faith, hope, or charity. Walk into any Christian church, and you will feel an overwhelming sense of malice. Malice directed at me and thee, the white Europeans.

There is an old Greek legend – I first read it in a Thomas Mann novel – that describes the timid and cowering European’s stance vis-à-vis the world and the liberals. A Greek servant is in the market place buying food for his master’s dinner when he sees Death. Death makes what appears to the servant to be a threatening glance at him. The servant then runs back to his master’s house and starts packing his belongings in preparation for a trip.

“Where are you going?” his master asks.

“I’m going to Crete.”

“Why, what has happened?”

“I saw Death in the market place and he gave me a threatening glance. So I must go to Crete without delay. Good-by.”

The master then runs to the market place looking for Death. When he finds him, he confronts him. “Why did you make a threatening glance at my servant?”

“That was not a threatening glance, it was a look of surprise. You see, I didn’t expect to see him here in Athens, because I have an appointment with him in Crete.”

The postwar conservatives who were afraid to defend their race lest they be linked to Hitler, the Southern segregationists who caved in to integration lest they be branded ‘racist,’ and the white South Africans who ended blessed apartheid in an endeavor to avoid the hatred of the liberal world, all caved into heathen liberalism to avoid the hatred of the liberals. But they are still hated! No European can avoid his destiny. He is the Christ-bearer. If he refuses to champion the Christ he will be hated for his ancestors’ sake, who did bear the Christ child across the river. But why not embrace our destiny? Why court the friendship of the wicked? If we look past Liberaldom to Christian Europe, we will not be left without comfort. We will have a sustaining vision: “If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.” The heathen will rage against us and the Shylockian liberals will hate us. Is that such a fearsome thing? It is nothing compared to the loving approbation of our honored dead and the risen Lord. +

________________________________

(1) All of my adult life — and for most of my childhood for that matter – I have heard sermons preached about the poor, starving black Africans, and I’ve seen thousands of widescreen, horrific images of the poor starving black Africans. No one ever says that the black Africans are poor and starving because black Africans have no concept of charity. Instead the plight of the black Africans is always blamed on the white man, despite the fact that the blacks in white-controlled sections of Africa were not poor and starving, because the white man does have charity.

Now the formerly white sections of Africa are controlled by the black man and the South African white people are poor and starving. Why don’t I hear sermons preached about the poor and starving whites of South Africa? And why don’t I see poor and starving white children on my television screen with heart-rending appeals for mercy. “Just five dollars a month can feed a hungry white child.” Yes, I am being disingenuous. I know why I don’t hear sermons on the plight of poor starving whites in South Africa, and I know why I don’t see pictures of and appeals for aid to the poor and starving whites of South Africa. I do not hear and see such appeals for white people, because the liberals — Jew and gentile — hate the white European with all their heart, mind, and soul. We can only deal with such inhuman wretches at sword point: nothing else will avail.

Our Race is Our Home

The true lawgiver ought to have a heart full of sensibility. He ought to love and respect his own kind, and to fear himself. –Edmund Burke

While viewing the “Boston Strong” celebrations after the capture of the second Moslem terrorist, I thought of Johann Wolfgang Goethe. This might seem like an odd juxtaposition, but it was not a forced association: the link between Goethe and the white grazers of Boston seemed quite natural to me. Goethe was a great genius and a son of Christian Europe. In his masterpiece Faust he reveals a great understanding of the nature of evil and of the divine mercy of God. But in his work as a whole Goethe shows us a man divided into three parts. He is part Christian, part pagan, and partly the man of the future, uttering hopelessly banal trivialities about the profundity of the Hypsistarians (a religious sect that venerated what was the “most perfect that came to their knowledge”). The Christian poet Scott praised the Christian insights in Goethe’s Faust, and the militant atheist Shaw praised Goethe for stepping outside of Christianity and looking forward to a new cosmic, nonChristian religion. Neither Scott nor Shaw was incorrect. Goethe was a confused and divided man without a spiritual core.

The modern European grazers, represented by the white grazers of Boston, are like the confused and disordered Goethe. Their hearts are Christian enough to weep for the victims of the Boston massacre, but they are not Christian enough to give up their liberal sponsored sporting events long enough to challenge the liberal oligarchy that permits the massacre of their own people, in the name of diversity. And make no mistake about it – this most recent “terrible tragedy” was a manmade tragedy. It was not an unpreventable tragedy like a flood or a hurricane. This tragedy was ideologically driven.

Let me go back a number of years to my college days. I was asked to be the student representative at a religious department sponsored, intercollegiate, intercommunity roundtable discussion of Islam and the West. Besides myself, the panel consisted of several ministers turned professors and several ex-priests, also turned professors. There was one secularized Jewish rabbi on the panel and one Moslem professor. Only the Moslem professed to believe in the tenets of his faith. The “Christians” and the rabbi no longer believed in their faiths.

When the panel discussion got round to the question: “Should Moslems be permitted to live and work in the non-Moslem countries of Europe and the United States?”, all the former clergymen and the rabbi said, “Of course, they should be allowed to live and work in the European nations.” I disagreed, stating that it would be more humane to our own people and to the Moslems themselves (there was some kind of Gulf War going on at the time) if we kept all Moslems out of the Western countries and then ceased bombing them in their countries. Surprisingly enough, or maybe not so surprising, the Westerners were horrified at my suggestion while the Moslem agreed with me. It was pointed out to him that if my suggestion was to become a policy of the Western countries, he, as a visiting professor of Islamic studies, would not be permitted in the United States. His response was quite revealing: “You are fools to let me in your country, because I want to destroy you!” No doubt the sponsors of the religious roundtable were quite disappointed. They couldn’t get all smarmy over such an unecumenical outcome from what was intended as a celebration of humane diversity.

The Muslim and I did not shake hands and become friends after the conference. I knew he hated Christians, and he knew I hated Moslems. But we had achieved the clarity that can only come when two people actually have beliefs. If you believe in nothing, as the former clergymen did, you can come together in a hazy ecumenical unity of nothingness. I would prefer to believe in something besides polite ecumenical nothingness, but then I’m full of the prejudices of a by-gone era, brought on, no doubt by an excessive exposure to old books written by white European males.

I haven’t forgotten the point. We were talking about the Boston Massacre and the white people who see nothing wrong with a government which bombs innocent Moslems over there, but then thinks it is somehow necessary and beneficial to let Moslems live, work, study, and worship over here. What evil lurks in the hearts of a governing body of people that think their own people, such as that eight-year-old boy blown to bits at the finish line of the Boston Marathon, should be sacrificed to preserve their satanic ideology of diversity? The shadow knows and so do we. It is better that one man should die so that we, the pagan Jews, can live, was Caiaphas’s belief. The liberals think it is better that Moslems, blacks, Mexicans, Asians, and every other anti-European religion and race should have free reign to murder, rape, and terrorize whites so that they won’t have to give up their faith in a multi-racial world, minus the white man, which is consecrated to Satan, through his conduit, the noble black savage.

The white grazers will claim that their government officials love them dearly because they killed one Moslem terrorist and wounded another. That’s all well and good — I wish they had killed both of them – but the grazers must be told that the government responded to the Boston massacre because the bombers terrorized people at a state-sponsored celebration of diversity. Attacks upon the liberal state will be punished. But the on-going rapes and murders of white women by Pakistani and Afghan Moslems in this nation and throughout the European nations will be ignored. No one in the liberal oligarchies will seek to punish those Moslem murderers and rapists. Nor will the liberal rulers seek to put an end to the ongoing black reign of terror throughout the major cities of the United States and many of the European cities. Quite the contrary, they will continue to aid and abet the black race in their war efforts by continually attacking white people in print, in pulpit, and on television.

There is more than just a small remnant of grace left in my people, the white grazers. But all their noble sentiments, exemplified by the “Boston Strong” hockey fans, have been turned against them. They’ll cry for the victims of a bombing at a liberal-sponsored sporting event and sing inoffensive generic songs without realizing that they are a captive people without a country. A nation consists of a people with one common faith and one common race. The land mass where they settle is incidental to their nationhood. A white Christian New Zealander, no matter if he never lives one day in Britain, is British, while a naturalized British citizen of Jamaican descent is an African no matter that he is called a British citizen. Race and faith make a nation, so it always has been and so it always shall be.

There are no European nations in existence anywhere in the world today for the obvious reason that there are no incorporate unions of European people committed to a nation of one faith and one race: the Christian faith and the white race. “Nationalist” sentiment demonstrated by the ecumenical, “please don’t call me racist, anti-semitic, or a Moslem-hater” English Defence League in response to the black hooligans of London, or by generic, interracial, non-denominational “Boston Strong” demonstrations, is not the type of nationalism that will help the European people. It will only help to fuel liberalism and bury the European people.

The European people are currently being pulled in every direction just as Goethe was. What could have made Goethe an integral man could also make the European people a people again. Goethe needed to believe that God entered human history in the person of Jesus Christ. Such a belief keeps a man anchored to reality, a reality that can only be comprehended through humanity. If God is in us and we are of Him, we can only know Him to the extent that we honor our ties to our kith and kin. We cannot go cosmic or ecumenical and still maintain our faith in the living God. Christ is not the God of religions or the cosmos: He is the God of human hearts who have been warmed at their own, not strangers’ hearth fires. Burke said that a cold relation made a bad citizen. And extending that thought we can say that a poor relation cannot comprehend Christianity, because the God who saved mankind from death because of His divine charity can only be known through charity, a charity that begins at home and perishes without a home. Our race is our home: it is Ratty’s river where all good things dwell –

“By it and with it and on it and in it,” said the Rat. “It’s brother and sister to me, and aunts and company, and food and drink, and (naturally) washing. It’s my world, and I don’t want any other.”

When the European people once again feel connected to Christian Europe as Ratty felt connected to his river, they will not permit Moslems, Jews, or colored barbarians to set foot on their sacred homelands. Provincialism is not racist, it is Christian.

It doesn’t’ hurt the colored barbarians and the heathens when they mix with the white Europeans, because they can’t become any worse than they are: they are barbarians and heathens. But when the white European mixes with the colored barbarians and the heathens he becomes the most odious human on the face of the earth. He becomes a traitor to the light and a man without a country. Such a soul dead individual must become a second-hand colored barbarian and second-hand heathen in order to convince himself that still he lives. This type of individual is called a liberal and there are far too many of them in the formerly European lands. The great battle that is being waged right now is for the souls of the white grazers who are neither fish nor fowl: they still have hearts, so they cannot be called doctrinaire liberals, but they have lost contact with their racial home, so they cannot be called Europeans.

The first Europeans embraced Christianity because they felt that in Christ they had found their true King and kinsman. They didn’t bend their knees to power and might, hoping, like the colored tribesmen, to appease an angry God who demanded sacrifice. They bent their knees to Christ’s divine humanity. They saw Christ as the true hero, a loyal kinsman, and the living God. They saw and believed because Christ’s humanity spoke to their humanity. The colored tribes never adopted Christianity because they never were stirred by Christ’s divine humanity.

The liberals have set up a government that demands that the white man mix with and worship the coloreds because they hope that faith in Christ, as the one true God, will be turned into a lukewarm admiration for a great civil rights worker whose mission on earth was to facilitate the worship of the negro gods. It seems that liberals are going to reign in triumph for many years, but that is what Satan wants the Christian European to think because he wants the European to despair and die.

It shall never happen. We’ve been in the belly of the whale, we few, we Europeans, and now it’s time to speak, from the heart, to the people of Nineveh, our own people, and they shall respond, because they have sacred memories of a provincial European hearth fire, presided over by Christ, the one true God. Satan tells the confused and troubled European Ninevites, through his liberal proxies, that Christian Europe was all a dream, an illusion. It is the task of the European who still sees Christian Europe to tell the grazing Ninevites that Christian Europe was not a dream. It was real just as He was — and is —  real.

The old European nationalist battle hymns still resonate with us today because they take us back to a day when Europeans believed that so long as they stood firm for their people and their God they would never ultimately be defeated. Let it never be said to the European remnant that for the battle we were not ready. “Stand and never yield.” +

The People of Mercy

But mercy is above this sceptred sway;
It is enthroned in the hearts of kings,
It is an attribute to God himself;
And earthly power doth then show likest God’s
When mercy seasons justice. Therefore, Jew,
Though justice be thy plea, consider this,
That, in the course of justice, none of us
Should see salvation: we do pray for mercy;
And that same prayer doth teach us all to render
The deeds of mercy.
-The Gentle Bard

But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.
-Romans 2: 29

The Jackie Robinson ceremonies in this country were just another chance for liberals to express their love and faith in the negro gods while they hurled anathemas at all racist Europeans past and present. This liberal hatred of the white race is so great that we must conclude that it is fueled by the same satanic being who fueled Shylock’s hatred of Antonio. “I hate him for he is a Christian.” The liberal gentile is one with the Jew in his hatred of Christ and his people. One is struck, when reading about the infamous atrocities of the Jacobins, how much they resemble, in their maniacal hatred of all things Christian, the obdurate Jews who also have hardened their hearts against the light. In fact the ranks of the liberals have so expanded since Shakespeare wrote The Merchant of Venice that even were every Jew to disappear, the liberal gentiles would still outnumber the Christian Europeans. And now, when the liberals demand their pound of white Christian flesh, they get it, by the ton.

We need go no further than the Grand Inquisitor scene in Dostoevsky’s novel The Brothers’ Karamazov to see how Christians become spiritual Jews. The Grand Inquisitor has set up a system of rules and regulations that he says come from God. But in reality they are man-made rules based on the assumption that mankind will be happier if they have no contact with the living God. God is truth, and the truth is painful, because a man, if he is to worship God in sprit and in truth, must see past the external rites of sacrifice and practice the internal rites of mercy. There must be, as St. Paul tells us, a circumcision of the heart, before we can know and love God. The Christian churchmen and their adherents have become Jews because they have used their enlightened minds to set up an external system of salvation that does not require an internal circumcision of the heart. This is why the modern churchmen are so maniacally opposed to any manifestation of the bred-in-the-bone Christianity of the ancient Europeans. Such a faith, stemming from the European’s love of his God in and through his people, would destroy the external façade of the modern churchmen’s Christian Judaism. There are none so blind as those who will not see, and it is a deliberate hardening of the heart that causes moral blindness. It is in vain that we refer the Christian Jews to the scriptural passages in which God promised salvation to the Jews if they repented. The Christian Jews are still determined to support the unrepentant Israelites. It is also in vain that one calls attention to the atrocities committed by the Israelites. Still they must be supported. For what reason? For the same reason Caiaphas wanted Christ to be crucified. Contact with the living God is too painful: better to cling to manmade external rites and let truth be crucified on a cross between two thieves.

The desire to keep the living God at bay is behind the Christian Zionists’ refusal to look past the outward Judaic forms of Christianity to the Christian God within, who has a local habitation and a name. In the Christian Zionists’ eyes the outward forms of religion are religion itself. Thus an Israelite who has the external appearance of a Jew is the chosen of God no matter what he believes about Jesus Christ. And a white European is just a man with white skin; his outer whiteness is not the sign and symbol of a white soul, a soul that is called upon to champion the living God. I once watched a production of Oscar Wilde’s story called “The Selfish Giant” with a cousin who was and is a Christian Zionist. The story is a beautiful one that brings us close to our Lord through a sympathetic connection to His sacred humanity. It brought tears to my eyes, but it only made my cousin laugh in scorn and derision. I was deeply troubled by my cousin’s reaction to the “Selfish Giant” story. Was it just a question of taste? I don’t think so. I think it was a case of two different faiths colliding. I see, in the antique Europeans, the true Hebrews, the people who believed that Christ was the Son of God, just as the Hebrew prophets foretold. I do not believe that the external Jews, living in a democratic egalitarian oligarchy, committed to international terrorism, are the people of God. In fact, I think it is blasphemous to assume our Lord was not serious when He said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.”

The Christian Zionists are like the Pharisees: they profess to believe in God, but their God is a cruel God, a figment of their own distorted vision of a God who can be embodied in a materialistic culture where the people are manically hostile to Jesus Christ. The Christian Zionists are not as numerous as their liberal brethren, who are religious atheists like the Sadducees, but they make up the bulk of the conservative Christian churches, which gives Satan a firm foothold in the institutions which used to house the followers of Christ.

If we look at the various anti-Christian tributaries – Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, liberalism, Christian Zionism – we can see that they all flow into one river, the river of biological determinism. If the outward, material substance of a man is the man himself, and not the sign and symbol of a spiritual substance within the man, then our destiny is the biological dung heap where there is no Jew, no Christian, no black or white: there is just rot. With all the blending in the satanic era of the Europeans’ history –  Christianity with Judaism, Christianity with Paganism, Christianity with Mohammedism, black with white, etc. – we have lost sight of just how profoundly different and distinct the culture of the antique Europeans was. They and they alone said, through their culture, that man’s destiny was not the biological dung heap. He was born to a higher destiny. Created by a loving God, man was destined to live for all eternity, in spirit and in truth, with that loving God:

Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me.  In my Father’s house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.  And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also. John 14: 1-3

The antique Europeans were pilgrims of the spirit. They went into the deep woods, where the colored barbarians refused to go, and saw the face of the living God. Once having seen the true God, they replaced the craven images of the gods of nature with the sign of the cross. But now that the Europeans have torn down the sign of the cross and returned the craven images, under slightly different guises, to their old places of prominence, we can begin to see what hell will be like. It’s a world devoid of God’s grace, the grace that permeated the world of the hated Europeans of the Christian era.

The devil, as Walter Scott observed, is a strict formalist: he adheres to the outward forms of all things on earth because he hates the living God who animates all things on earth from within. If Satan can keep men away from the depths within, he can keep them away from God. This is why the negro and the other colored tribesmen are worshipped and exalted in our modern society. So long as men stay on the superficial outer layer of life, where the colored pagans live, they will never come in contact with the God that dwells in the depths of the human heart.

When the Europeans were strong in their faith they tried to take Christ to the colored heathens. Now that they are weak in their faith, the colored heathens have replaced Christ in the hearts and minds of the European people. And it’s so much more natural now that the white man has abandoned Christ, the liberals tell us. But can white men ever be satisfied with unadulterated paganism?  They are trying very hard to convince themselves that they can, but the suicide rate among young whites and the drug-crazed pornographic frenzy of the white adults indicate that they must either return to the faith of their fathers or perish. No doubt the liberals, like the swine in the Gospel, will go over the cliff, but that is no reason the rest of the white race has to go with them. The liberals seem strong now, but they have no spiritual foundation: their faith in the negro is not a sustaining faith. When they fall because of spiritual atrophy, it is the white Europeans who have not worshipped at the altars of the negro gods or turned their backs on the living God in order to become as one with the unrepentant Jews, who will lead the European people out of bondage.

The modern European’s bondage, like that of the ancient Hebrews, is a self-willed bondage. He has returned to the cruel gods of nature. The Hebrews worshipped Baal and the modern Europeans worship the negro, but it amounts to the same thing. If a man rejects the living God he will be condemned to live and die with a false nature god. And to protect his nature god he must strike out at his god’s rival. The liberals will never compromise with the Christian Europeans because their gods are at enmity with each other. The only reason the Christian churches are tolerated by the liberal is because they have blended their Christian faith with negro worship and Judaism. The negro takes precedence with the secular liberals and the liberal churchmen while the Jew takes precedence with the “religious” conservatives, but so long as you hate the Christian European you can be part of Liberaldom. The liberal and his Jewish brethren are fond of hurling charges of “hate-mongering” and “racism” at the Christian European. But the defense of one’s people and one’s God is not hate-mongering or racism. Neither the liberal, the Christian Zionist, or the Jew has to reject God’s grace. They choose to do so. We are not obligated to stand by while they defile our God by attempting to destroy the people who consecrated their lives to Him. In fact, quite the contrary is the case. We are obliged to defend our people and our faith, loving and hating with all our hearts. +

Nearer to Thee

“We are the friend of popular government, but only so long as conservatism is the interest of the governing class.” – George Fitzhugh

H. C. McNeile, the author of the Bulldog Drummond adventure novels which were published in the 1920s and early 1930s, always made fun of his own intellectual prowess and of his hero’s. But McNeile’s Drummond had wise blood. He was always battling a seemingly divergent coalition of rich financiers and radical leftists. Each group had slightly different reasons for wanting to destroy Britain, but they were united in their desire to destroy old Britain.

McNeile was on to something. The financier does not want the restrictions that come with a traditional Christian society: he wants the “freedom” to pursue unlimited wealth, while the left-wing destroyers want freedom from anything that inhibits their pursuit of Babylon.

Writers, especially when they act in a body, and with one direction, have great influence on the public mind; the alliance, therefore, of these writers with the monied interest had no small effect in removing the popular odium and envy which attended that species of wealth. These writers, like the propagators of all novelties, pretended to a great zeal for the poor, and the lower orders, whilst in their satires they rendered hateful, by every exaggeration, the faults of courts, of nobility, and of priesthood. They became a sort of demagogues. They served as a link to unite, in favour of one object, obnoxious wealth to restless and desperate poverty.  – Burke

Against the evil coalition of capitalists and radicals was Bulldog Drummond. He came from that “happy breed” of men who believed in God, Crown, and race. He and his followers proved more than a match for the destroyers. And lest we doubt for one moment that McNeile’s Drummond was anchored in reality, we have only to refer to Jay Henry Mowbray’s account of the Sinking of the Titanic. What a breed of men! We shall never see their like again.

When the last boatload of priceless human life swung away from the davits of the Titanic, it left behind on the decks of the doomed ship hundreds of men who knew that the vessel’s mortal wound spelt Death for them also. But no cravens these men who went to their nameless graves, nor scourged as the galley slave to his dungeon.

Called suddenly from the ordinary pleasure of ship life and fancied security, they were in the moment confronted with the direct peril of the sea, and the absolute certainly that, while some could go to safety, many must remain.

It was the supreme test, for if a man lose his life he loses all. But, had the grim alternative thought to mock the cowardice of the breed, it was doomed to disappointment.

Silently these men stood aside. “Women first,” the inexorable law of the sea, which one disobeys only to court everlasting ignominy, undoubtedly had no place in their minds. “Women first,” the common law of humanity, born of chivalry and the nobler spirit of self-sacrifice, prevailed.

They simply stood aside.

The first blush of poignant grief will pass from those who survive and were bereft. But always will they sense in its fullest meaning this greatest of all sacrifice. Ever must it remain as a reassuring knowledge of the love, and faithfulness, and courage, of the Man, and of his care for the weak.

“Greater love hath no man than this that a man lay down his life for his friend.”  – Sinking of the Titanic

When faced with the supernatural courage and charity that can only come from a kith-and-kin, bred-in-the-bone Christianity, exhibited by the men and women on the Titanic, we can do one of two things. We can acknowledge that we are as nothing compared to those heroes of faith and ask God to give us the grace to follow, however falteringly, in their train, or we can sneer at that happy breed of Christians and worship the graceless gods of color represented by the Orientals on the Titanic who rushed to get on the lifeboats with the women and children.

I was just preparing for sleep when the crash came, and throwing on some clothes, I rushed on deck with my husband. In a short time we were told that the women would be sent in the boats. I did not want to leave my husband, but he laughed and told me that the boating was only temporary. There was very little confusion when we put off and the men in the first and second cabins were absolutely calm. Mr. Stengel kissed me and told me not to worry, that he would come in a later boat, unless it was decided to bring us back on the ship.

For some reason no attention was paid to the men who were put in our boat. One of them was an undersized Chinaman and the other was an Oriental of some kind. When the lifeboat struck the water they crawled up in the bottom and began to moan and cry. They refused to take their places at the oars and first class women passengers had to man many of the rowlocks. Still none of us thought that the great Titanic would sink. We rowed two hundred yards away, as they had told us, watching the great ship. Then the lights began to go out and then came a terrible crash like dynamite.

I heard a woman in the bow scream and then came three more terrific explosions. The boat gave a sudden lurch and then we saw the men jumping from the decks. Some of us prayed and I heard women curse, but the most terrible things was the conduct of the Chinaman and the Oriental. They threw themselves about the boat in absolute fits and almost upset the boat. They were a menace during the whole night and in the morning when the light began to come in the east and when the women were exhausted from trying to man the oars, the two of them found some cigarettes and lay in the bottom of the boat and smoked while we tried to work the oars. 

The fact that the liberals have chosen to build an anti-civilization on the ethos of the later group of individuals sickens me beyond words.

MacNeile’s Drummond was a heroic English, European type who has now faded from the world’s stage. He was a conservative defender of the status quo, as all good men and true should be when their government is conservative. But when the radical leftists and the liberal capitalists coalesce, take control of the government, and use colored barbarians to destroy the religious and racial core of your nation, a conservative must cease to conserve: he must be a counter-revolutionary determined to destroy the existing government.

There are no conservative governments, governments that are committed to an all-white Christian nation, anywhere in the European world, which is fast becoming the non-European world. In fact quite the contrary is the case. Every single European government is now committed to the extermination of the white race and the destruction of the Christian faith. Words such as democracy and equality are used to cloak what should be obvious: the white race is being destroyed by the liberals and the colored tribes. The liberals’ so-called democracy has nothing to do with the democracy of the antique Europeans. The democratic element was only present in the British system, for instance, as part of a threefold power structure that included the monarch, the nobility, and a select number of white males. Democracy, when used correctly, does not entail equality, because all men are inherently unequal. No self-respecting European would ever consider giving voting privileges to the colored stranger anymore than he would give voting privileges to the criminal or the lunatic. Such a flagrant sacrilege would lead to the destruction of the European people. But of course such a sacrilege has been institutionalized throughout the European nations, and it has led to the destruction of the European people.

The effects are not seen immediately, but the moment a European nation becomes an egalitarian democratic nation it ceases to be a white Christian nation and becomes a revolutionary Jacobin nation that must be destroyed. One looks in vain for any post-World War II conservatives who ever raised their voices, let alone their clenched fists, in defense of the European people as a separate, distinct people whose survival was all in all. Burke wanted to go to war with a foreign nation that had instituted egalitarian democracy. What would he have done had it polluted his own nation? What would any European who was still a European have done? They wouldn’t have bowed down to the gods of color: they would have fought for God and country.

It is now considered racist, immoral, and unChristian for a white man to love his own people and fight for their survival as a people. Yet it is not considered racist, immoral, and unChristian if the colored races want to love their own people and fight for their survival. It is only the white race that is supposed to commit suicide in order to appease the colored gods whom they have offended terribly. How have they offended them? They tried to take them out of their Babylonian night into the light of Europe’s day. Is that such a terrible thing? Now that French San Domingo is no more, has the great black voodoo republic of Haiti served as a beacon light of civilization? Now that white South Africa, that white pearl surrounded by ugly black soot, is no more, have the blood-soaked negro barbarians, who serve satanic Mandela, ushered in – as we were told they would once the whites ceased to govern them – a new Eden? None of this matters to the liberal, because he is not the least bit interested in truth. The worship of the black gods massages his ego and the hatred of the white man allows him to strike back at God for not running the universe according to liberal principles.

Once the European accepts the principles of democratic egalitarianism, which entails racial integration and the elimination of national boundaries, the European has accepted the liquidation of the white race. Numbers are insignificant when a few determined Europeans face the colored barbarians in battle: the spirited few will always prevail because they have that within which the colored barbarians do not have. But in the democratic egalitarian arena of the voting booth where the spiritual values count for nothing and sheer numbers count for everything the white race will be voted out of existence. White “conservatives” who accept the colored influx, legal and illegal, into their nations, hoping to “win them over” to the conservative side, are not conservatives, they are liberals. If we simply differ about the rate at which the white race should be liquidated are our differences that great?

So long as there are no counter-revolutionary white leaders, men who want to bury democratic egalitarianism and restore non-egalitarian, white Europe, the white race, the only race that ever created a genuine spiritually based civilization, will disappear from the face of the earth. But we shall not disappear from the earth if we break our democratic egalitarian shackles and become Europeans once again. The refreshing thing about Bulldog Drummond is that he has no regard for democracy or the laws that stem from democracy. He cares about the survival of that happy breed of men, his people. And that is what we should care about as well. These days conservatives talk about the survival of democracy and the survival of capitalism while ignoring that which is essential, the survival of the white race.

If we go down into the boiler room of the devil’s flag ship, the luxury cruise ship called Liberal Lily, we can see that Satan has won the liberals over to his cause and confused and divided the white grazers by blending science and democratic egalitarianism. When the laws of the physical universe are applied to man, when he is regarded as a mere biological specimen with no animating spirit within, he becomes subject to the laws of nature, and in nature we are all equal, subject to the same laws of birth, maturity, decay and death.

We need only look at the work of the degenerate anthropologist Franz Boas (is there any other kind of anthropologist?) to see how the scientific gambit is used to push democratic egalitarianism, which translates to racial diversity, which translates to the reign of the colored barbarians. Boas, who was the mentor of the sexual integrationist Margaret Mead, thought that the entire human race should blend with the black race so that all races would be equal. To further this end he became the foremost advocate of forced busing in America. This democratic solution to the race problem was pushed forward under the guise of science. Just as we progress in our accumulated knowledge of nature we advance morally, and the moral complement of a scientifically advanced people is democratic egalitarianism. Such is the liberal mantra, which is subject to the usual egalitarian caveat, “All are equal but some are more equal than others.” In the liberals’ pantheon the more-than-equal are the colored, who are closer to nature, which science tells us is the be-all and end-all of existence.

So long as the white people remain shackled to the scientific-democratic egalitarian heresy, they will be wanderers in the desert of modernity estranged from their past and their God. It is not just a matter of repudiating Darwinian evolution. Many who reject Darwin still accept democratic egalitarian evolution – democratic egalitarian race-mixing is seen as a moral evolution by the religious right. A man must repudiate the whole liberal ideology before he can become like unto and part of that happy breed of men who worship the living God in spirit and in truth.

The Drummond stories and The Wind and the Willows type stories represent a last look back at the “racist” Europeans, the last great breed of men. They were conservative in the true sense of the word. What they wanted to conserve was their people, and through their people, their faith in Christ, the one true God. My personal belief, which I have no scientific evidence to support, is that the European people will slowly emerge from their dark night of science and democracy and become Europeans again. God will not forsake His people. That same charity of honor that inspired those men on the Titanic to give up their lives for their kith and kin, will once again inspire seemingly ordinary Europeans to take arms against and defeat the numerically superior coalition of liberals and colored barbarians. Out of the depths we will cry to Him and He will answer our prayer. Even in their fallen state, in their modernity-induced stupor, I can see remnants of grace in the European grazers. Our people are not irredeemable. They are the Christ-bearers. If we light enough counter-revolutionary fires, our people will see the light and call on Him by name. +

So, by my woes I’ll be
Nearer, My God, to Thee,
Nearer to Thee.

Why Do the Heathen Rage

Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. – Psalm 2: 3

It is not remarkable that black savages went on a rampage in the Miracle Mile district of downtown Chicago on Easter eve. Nor was it remarkable that the usual assortment of college professors and members of the press excused the rampage, while spewing their venom on any white man who dared criticize the black savages. Neither event, the rampage and the liberals’ defense of the rampage, was remarkable, because bloody mayhem is the normal activity of blacks, just as the defense of bloody mayhem by blacks is the normal everyday activity of liberals. What would have been remarkable, astonishingly so, would have been a white counterattack against the black savages. If whites had demanded that the black savages who participated in the rampage be jailed and all other black savages sent back to Africa, then we would truly have seen and heard something remarkable.

Of course such a sane, Christian response to black crime will not be forthcoming, because white people have contracted a brain fever that has spread to their blood. They no longer believe in the Gospel of Christ, they believe in the gospel of the negro. Instinctively after years of brainwashing the white man always assumes that whatever the black man does is good – or at least an excusable evil brought on by whites – and whatever the white man does is evil. White people always denigrate the white and deify the black without questioning why they do so. The liberals’ creed – black is good, white is evil – has been internalized by the white grazer so that in every instance he will take the side of the black against his own people. And whenever a conservative — at least one who is more conservative than his liberal cousin – wants to have an impact on his culture he tries to invoke the black gods of the liberals. “Abortion is bad because it harms black people.” “We should condemn welfare because it hurts the black family structure.” Everything is good or evil depending on how it affects blacks and the other colored races. And as a corollary everything is good if it hurts white people. Amnesty must be extended to illegal Aztecs because that will change the racial composition of the United States from white to colored. That is good. Why is it good that savage Aztecs should replace white people? It is self-evidently good, just as it was good and holy when black savages became the rulers of white South Africa. Did anyone from the West ask why it was good? Of course not: one does not question something as basic as the turning of the earth.

This new religion, which is an extension of Jacobinism, in which the negroes become “the people,” will not be voted away or altered by any type of democratic stratagem. Negro worship is a hard, bloodthirsty, heathen faith, and it is the blood of the white man that the liberals offer as sacrifice to their bloody negro gods.

The horrendous atrocities that were committed in the “religious” wars between various Christian sects were always committed by those men and women who were more committed to their abstract notion of God than to the living God. But there was always a counterbalance to the abstracted Christian atheists, because the European people worshipped a non-abstract, personal God named Jesus Christ. A Christian leaven kept the abstracted fanatics from turning Christendom into Satandom. What happens then when the spirit of abstraction predominates in a people who have lost or wavered in their faith in Christ? The satanic, abstracted minds of atheists rule the roost with all the zeal of the older Christian sectarian zealots, but without the counterbalance of a Christian people:

Thus is this character rounded off like that of the theologian who would become an inquisitor. Extraordinary contrasts meet in its formation—a lunatic that is logical, and a monster that pretends to have a conscience. Under the pressure of his faith and egotism, he has developed two deformities, one of the head and the other of the heart; his common sense is gone, and his moral sense is utterly perverted. In fixing his mind on abstract formulas, he is no longer able to see men as they are; through self-admiration he finally comes to viewing his adversaries, and even his rivals, as miscreants deserving of death. On this downhill road nothing stops him, for, in qualifying things inversely to their true meaning, he has violated within himself the precious conceptions which bring us back to truth and justice. No light reaches eyes which regard blindness as clear-sightedness; no remorse affects a soul which erects barbarism into patriotism, and which sanctions murder with duty. – The French Revolution

In my copy of Taine that last sentence is underlined. Our negro-worshipping liberals are a people whom no light reaches, whose hearts are never touched with remorse at destroying the white race, and they equate patriotism with the murder of white Christians. Are such a people fit to govern? Again, we must quote Banquo: “Fit to govern! No, not to live.”

Robespierre was not deposed because the French Assembly repudiated Jacobinism, any more than Khrushchev was deposed because the Russian government repudiated communism. Robespierre’s Jacobinism simply came into conflict with a more Catholic and cavalier Jacobinism (kill all opposition to the people, but at a slower rate). But at heart the French Republic remained Jacobin, just as Europe became Jacobin. Burke was repudiated by his own party for his fierce opposition to the French Revolution, while every nation of Europe succumbed to its own version of the French Revolution. Liberty, equality, and fraternity for the people, and death to the aristocrats. But who are the people? They are the colored tribesmen. And who are the aristocrats? The Christ-bearing people, the whites.

In countries such as Haiti and South Africa, the whites have been and are being killed outright, and their deaths are presented to the whites in other countries as the result of racism. If you are not racist, you have nothing to worry about: “By flattering us, that we are not subject to the same vices and follies, it induces a confidence, that we shall not suffer the same evils by a contact with the infamous gang of robbers who have thus robbed and butchered our neighbors before our faces.” The white Eugene Terreblanches of South Africa are our neighbors. If we do not love them and hate their murderers we are as bad as the black fiends who have murdered them.

In nations such as the United States, Britain, France, etc., nations which still have a sizeable white population, the colored minions of the liberals kill by miscegenation and one man, one vote. Miscegenation is worse than abortion — and abortion is a sin that cries out to heaven for vengeance — because it results in the abortion of a whole line of white children while giving birth to a whole line of satanic offspring. And that great sin is maintained by one man, one vote. Why should the vote of a colored man, who hates and despises Christian Europe, count the same as the vote of a white man who loves and reveres Christian Europe? And why should a liberal who has announced, by his devotion to the negro, that he hates everything Christian and European, be allowed to have any say in the governance of a people who consecrated themselves to Christ? It is blasphemy. And the fact that it is democratic blasphemy does not make it any less loathsome and foul than communist blasphemy.

I call a commonwealth Regicide, which lays it down as a fixed law of nature, and a fundamental right of man, that all government, not being a democracy, is an usurpation; that all Kings, as such, are usurpers; and for being Kings, may and ought to be put to death, with their wives, families, and adherents. The commonwealth which acts uniformly upon those principles, and which after abolishing every festival of religion, chooses the most flagrant act of a murderous Regicide treason for a feast of eternal commemoration, and which forces all her people to observe it.—This I call Regicide by establishment. – Letters on a Regicide Peace

Is this not exactly the system we have instituted? The royal race, the Christ-bearing race, are being exterminated, and every day we have our Earth Days, our Jackie Robinson days, and our Assisi I, II, and III, to commemorate godless heathenism and rejoice in the extermination of Christian Europeans and the demonization of their past. I call these abominations “Regicide by establishment.”

When I was young I had only heard the story of the Solomon who asked God for wisdom rather than riches, and who solved the dispute between the two women, both claiming to be the mother of the one baby. It wasn’t until I was older that I read about the later years of this hideous blasphemer called Solomon. He did not use his God-given wisdom to serve the Lord, because he did not love the Lord in his heart. He loved the “strange” women of the pagans.

But King Solomon loved many strange women, together with the daughter of Pharaoh, women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Zidonians, and Hittites: Of the nations concerning which the Lord said unto the children of Israel, Ye shall not go in to them, neither shall they come in unto you: for surely they will turn away your heart after their gods: Solomon clave unto these in love. – I Kings 11: 1-2

The Scriptures go on to contrast Solomon with his father, David: “And his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God, as was the heart of David his father.” Of David? His sins were scarlet, but he did not call his sins virtues and institutionalize them. He sought God’s forgiveness and continued to love God in his heart. Is not the crucial difference between Solomon and David the crucial difference between the modern liberal Europeans and the antique Europeans? The former have abandoned the true God, Jesus Christ, and replaced Him with the heathen gods of color. The latter group of Europeans were sinners, but they did not institutionalize sin. And they loved God in their hearts. All Europeans who still have hearts to love will cleave to ancient Europe, which was consecrated to Christ, and reject modern Europe, which is dedicated to the heathen gods of color whose rites are celebrated in the European churches and homes once consecrated to Christ.

The heathens rage in the streets of Chicago, London, Paris, and in streets throughout the European world, because the European people have forsaken the faith of their fathers. The European people were, like David, the third dumb brothers found in the European fairy tales. Alone against a multitude of colored heathens they ventured forth and prevailed because they had that “charity of honor” which is bred in the bone of a people who love the Man of Sorrows with all their heart.

Our “conservative” leaders in church and state think we can convert the heathen by blending with them. That is the lie that men who refuse to fight for their God tell people in order to cloak their apostasy. Solomon never formally renounced the worship of the true God; he simply blended the worship of the God of Israel with the worship of the heathen gods. All the great evils that threaten – nay, seem to be permanent evils that Europeans must capitulate to, evils such as miscegenation, legalized abortion, Godless socialism and its cousin, Robber Baron capitalism – can and will be conquered when the Europeans become the third dumb brothers of Europe again. It is not our pygmy minds that God has need of, it is our hearts. We must follow David, St. Paul, Alfred, and Tell, not Solomon, Judas, Robespierre, and Mandela. In our blood are sacred memories of our people and our God. When those memories take hold of our soul there is no army on earth, no matter how large its numbers, that can stand against us. This has been proven time and time again in the history of the European people. The primary battle is an internal one. When the European stays with the European people and their God, refusing to blend with the heathen, he becomes the defender of Christendom, the scourge of Satandom, and the soul of honor. It is still possible: it is necessary. The heathens rage in European cities because Europeans no longer believe in one Lord, Jesus Christ. When they turn from their colored gods and call on Him by name, they will regain that charity of honor and they will reclaim their nations for Christ the King. +