The Return

William_Tell_and_sonThou know’st the marksman—I, and I alone.
Now are our homesteads free, and innocence
From thee is safe: thou’lt be our curse no more.

-Schiller

___________________________

Whenever the liberals rejoice, we know something horrendous is taking place, because liberals only rejoice when Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth is advanced. So let us take a look at the most recent cause of the liberals’ rejoicing. Behold, it is a 13-year-old girl, pitching successfully for a championship Little League team. Now there really is nothing unusual about a girl pitching well against boys. My sister’s girls’ softball team had a girl on their team who could have done quite well pitching against a boys’ team. As we know – or used to know before the age of ideological stupidity –girls develop sooner than boys and can, before boys hit puberty, often perform on the same or higher athletic level than boys. And even after boys become men, the female of the species can perform equally as well or better than the male at sports where physical strength is not important. But our ancestors, the ones who believed the Battle of Waterloo was won on the playing fields of Eton, knew that boys, if they were to become manly, Christian men, needed to compete against other boys and other boys only so they could learn to be stout-hearted and chivalrous. But that is precisely the point.  The liberals do not want young men to grow up and become virtuous, strong, Christian males; they want them to become weak, feminized, liberal, unisex creatures devoid of all masculinity. Nowadays if a male shows any masculine traits, he is evil: only women are supposed to be masculine, and men must be feminine. This is why the liberals rejoice when a young girl excels at a young boys’ game. (And you thought the liberals had suddenly taken an interest in Little League baseball.) Of course, as in all utopias – and our modern feminist utopia of masculine women and emasculated men is not an exception – some are more equal than others. Boys are still generally better at sports than girls, even prepubescent boys, so boys are not allowed to play on girls’ softball teams, but girls are allowed to play on boys’ Little League teams. Isn’t it wonderful the way equality works?

If you think this is just a little, cute, feel-good story about an exceptional little girl athlete you couldn’t be more wrong. This story is about women in combat, legalized abortion, and the destruction of the Christian patriarchal family, which is the primary channel, along with the racial channel, of God’s grace. Liberals use whatever they can to further their satanic agendas. The 13-year-old girl’s success in Little League furthers the liberals’ myth of equality – there is no male or female, no black or white. But of course there is such a thing as a male when it is necessary to demonize masculinity, just as there is such a thing as a white man when it becomes necessary to demonize whiteness.

The entire liberal agenda is based on redefining what is natural. A Christian European would use the term ‘natural’ to describe the ties between a mother and her child, the protectiveness a man feels toward the woman he loves, and the ties between brothers and people of the same race. However, all those natural ties are called unnatural by the liberals. What is ‘natural’ is whatever reduces men and women to mere biological entities. There can be no spiritual significance to masculinity or femininity because there is no such thing as a spiritual realm of existence. This Little League debacle is simply another propaganda campaign of the liberals to convince themselves and the world there is no God over and above nature who has infused His divine spirit into His creation.

The feminists and the feminized liberal males seem to run into a contradiction when they confront the black male. On the one hand, masculinity is supposed to be evil, but on the other hand the black male is supposed to be divine. How do we reconcile the two? This is what the liberals have done: they condemn all masculine behavior exhibited by white males, whether it be the spiritualized masculinity of the Christian Europeans, the Havelocks and Walter Scotts of Europe, or the more pagan variety exhibited by modern white athletes. Either is white masculinity; therefore, both are evil. But black masculinity, better described as bestiality, is never condemned (the feminists were silent during the O.J. Simpson trial) and is usually lauded because it is anti-white. So everything evil always comes back to whiteness. There can be no white males in the world, because they are the Christ-bearers. And if there are no white males in the world, there will soon be no white females as well, because they will breed with the colored races and produce demon children. Such is the liberal agenda, but it is not written: white men can forsake liberalism and forge a different, non-liberal world. In fact, they must do so, because this modern world of Liberaldom is the synthesis of all things blasphemous, cruel, unnatural, and inhuman.

What was called the “civil rights” movement was in reality the negro-worshipping movement. And from that movement came the “sexual revolution” which spawned feminism and “gay rights.” And the most sickening aspect of the Europeans’ return to Babylon was the churches’ non-resistance to – and often their support of – the new Babylonian world of the liberals. The shocking non-resistance to evil came because church men were peddling formulaic, philosophical Christianity for so long they had lost the European people. If Christianity is whatever the church men say it is, and the church men are devoid of a blood faith, then Christianity is nothing at all. The European people became a coalition of liberals and grazers with the liberals at the top giving edicts and mandates to the docile grazers.

The white male lives in a state of constant fear and trembling lest he offend one of the gods of Liberaldom, whether it be Isis or the great black god who presides over all the other gods of Liberaldom. The recent police shooting in St. Louis is an example of the craven state to which the white male has been reduced in the European nations. Instead of awarding a medal to the white police officer who took a stand against black barbarism, the white liberals and the white grazers are rushing to denounce the white police officer and appease the black barbarians by allowing them to riot in the streets of St. Louis. By some twisted logic of self-hatred, the whites accept the fact that all black atrocities against whites, which are as infinite as the sands of the desert, must be countenanced because “after all, blacks are only responding to years of oppression… blah, blah, blah,” and all resistance to black barbarism must be treated as “racism.” But if whites are not permitted to respond to black barbarism in kind there will soon be no white people. It’s now time to give blacks their own state where they can prey on each other like monsters of the deep and leave white people alone.

Of course I know that the liberals will never consent to a separation from their black gods, which is why Christian Europeans should be at war with liberals. Didn’t our Lord say something about the evil of serving two masters? When will the craven-souled modern European walk away from his negro-worshipping liberal masters and become a European again?

The celebration of a female Little League pitcher and the negro riots in St. Louis are interrelated, because in order for the negro to reign supreme the white male must be feminized. He must never resist black barbarism in any form, because the negro is the god of the new natural world of the liberals. The Christian Europeans felt it was unnatural for Christian men to allow colored barbarians to murder, rape, and pillage their own people, while the liberals rejoice at such acts of barbarism and hurl anathemas at any whites who protest. There can be no “coming together,” no compromise between two such divergent peoples as the Christian Europeans and the liberals. The liberals know this, which is why they fight a war of extermination against the white race. The ‘neither fish nor fowl’ European grazers do not know there is war going on, which is why they are being exterminated.

The old hymn asks, “Who with me my burden shares? None but Thee, dear Lord, none but Thee.” And Burke asked why there were no Frenchmen left to defend their Christian Queen. In this age of the feminized male, we know the answer to both questions. There is no one but the Man of Sorrows who can give men the grace to fight Satan and his minions, and without that grace the modern European is like the cravens of France who would not fight to defend their Queen. Eschew the intellectuals of church, state, and academy and cling to your racial hearth fire, where the grace of God will come to you, and you will be a European again. Is moral cowardice a sin? Yes, it is. There is no greater rejoicing in heaven than when a sinner returns to the fold. Let us put an end to the liberals’ rejoicing over the ongoing ‘evolution’ toward Babylon and make them lament the return of the Christian male. +

Posted in defense of the white race, Muscular Christianity | Tagged

It Begins at Home

O'Connor_Moonlit_landscape_with_figures_on_a_pathIt is surely not wise for the Church to pander to this idolatry. Even if Christianity were to be the religion only of a select few, it would be none the worse for that. Has it ever been anything else but the religion of a select few, and can it ever be anything else? Christianity is the religion of the White and not the non-White peoples, who debase it even when they accept it. They might pay lip-service to it where the white man is strong and his institutions accordingly respected, or where it has obtained a form of superstitious hold over them. But they can no more accept and comprehend essential Christianity than the white man can accept Shamanism. This, above all, makes it all the more reprehensible that the Church, instead of recognizing this, should swing round viciously upon the white man and hold him to blame for it – that white man upon whose unadulterated identity Christianity exclusively depends.   -Anthony Jacob


The print media, which is dwindling fast, and the electronic media throw the word ‘conservative’ around a lot, but they never bother telling their audiences, perhaps because they are completely ahistorical creatures of the present, that the modern ‘conservatives’ are not conservative. A true conservative is in the Burkean tradition: he does not look on his government as a means of eradicating evil from the face of the earth and ushering in a new golden age. The Burkean looks on government as a means to an end, the preservation of a particular people and their particular culture. The government that works for one people might not work for another. And whether a European government works or doesn’t work is determined by how well it protects the people’s Christian faith. A government that works against God’s channels of grace – the familial and racial hearth fires – is not a government for a conservative, Christian people. That it was self-evident the Jacobin government was hostile to the Christian traditions and to the Christian people of France was the central argument in Burke’s case against the Jacobins. It was then and it is now impossible to reconcile a belief in Jacobin democracy, which includes its Russian communist and liberal American offshoots, with traditional, Burkean conservatism. Some modern conservatives will quote Burke while supporting American Jacobinism, but such conservatives are like the man who claimed he loved his wife’s cooking but then threw his food in the trash bin when she wasn’t looking.

Modern conservatives, because they are not Burkean conservatives, generally only argue with their liberal cousins over procedural issues within the confines of liberalism; they do not disagree about the sacredness of democracy. For instance, a small minority of conservatives will protest the government’s refusal to do anything to stop the flow of illegal immigrants, but they will not protest against the legal colorization of a white nation. This is because they believe in a democratic theory of government, and doing illegal things goes against that theory, rather than a conservative government constituted to protect its own people, a people of one race and one faith.

Since the modern conservative is loyal to a theory of democratic government rather than his kith and kin, he seldom does anything that attacks liberalism at its negro-worshipping center. When a modern conservative ventures over the line separating modern liberal conservatism from genuine conservatism, it always causes an uproar among the liberals and the liberal-conservatives. A case in point: the modern conservative columnist Ann Coulter recently wrote a column in which she criticized the evangelical missionary Dr. Kent Brantly for rushing over to Africa to “save” all of the Africans suffering from the hideous Ebola disease, which is almost always fatal. The doctor quickly contracted the disease and had to be transported out of Africa to a hospital in Atlanta. Coulter placed a toe over the line that separates the liberal conservative from the Burkean conservative when she criticized the doctor for going on a self-indulgent ego trip to Africa, while ignoring the work he could have been doing at home. Are there not souls to be saved in the United States? While avoiding the issue of negro worship, Coulter did take a step over the modern conservative line by criticizing the egotism of Dr. Brantly and his failure to practice the type of charity that begins at home. But then an egotist is incapable of loving anyone close to him and can only love abstractions of people who are far away: on such people the egotistic liberals can project their fantasies. They imagine admiring hordes of adoring negroes playing Tom Robinson to their Atticus Finch.

The Atlanta hospital where Dr. Brantly is receiving treatment has assured the public that the doctor’s presence in the hospital’s isolation unit will not endanger the lives of other people in the hospital and surrounding area. I hope that is true, but the hospital’s reassurances remind me of the reassurances of my supervisors on the police force. They told me that I didn’t have to worry about getting AIDs from incidental contact with prisoners who had AIDs. Yet I noticed that they themselves never went near the AIDs-infected prisoners.

Coulter’s mild criticisms of Dr. Brantly were roundly condemned by the liberals, who would have condemned him themselves if he had been an actual Christian missionary condemning abortion or homosexual marriage. And most of the conservative liberals, who share the mad-dog liberals’ love of the noble black savage, condemned Coulter’s criticism of Dr. Brantly as well. Which is what we would expect because it is the religion of the liberal-conservative coalition that is at stake here. Brantly went to Africa as a Muslim goes to Mecca and a Catholic goes to Rome: he went there to worship. If you criticize Brantly, you criticize the faith of the liberals and the modern conservatives. It is a faith that must be challenged and defeated before white people can rise from the ash heap of diversity and become a people with a local habitation and a name. I long for the day that a man can say “the European people,” and everyone that hears those words will visualize white people and white people only, preserving their own people and their cultures in every country throughout Europe.

My desire that European nations and their European colonies should be white and only white is now considered a heresy. Tony Blair’s opinion that Britain “must become multi-cultural,” has become the law throughout the European nations. But it is not a multi-cultural state that Tony Blair liberals are striving for. They are striving for a one-culture state, a Babylonian state devoid of white people. And in order to have that state, white people must be tortured, murdered, and raped out of existence. Is this the vaunted brave new world that liberals have promised us for the last 200 years? Yes, it is.

“Missionaries” like Dr. Brantly must be seen for what they are: they are heretics who have abandoned the Christian God to go whoring after the great negro gods of Liberaldom. Brantly had a ‘people,’ a people who needed to be reminded of who they were and who they still must be: the Christ bearers. Instead, Brantly, like so many other white, negro-worshipping Roman Catholics, Protestant evangelicals, and liberals, betrayed his own people to fulfill his dream of becoming a world-renowned Atticus Finch. Is he simply a little misguided? No, a man who sides with the torturers and murderers of his own people cannot act with good intentions toward any race of people; he can only act according to the dictates of his own exalted egotism.

In the late ‘60s a play called Little Murders was written, and in the 70s it became a movie. The play-movie was a kind of absurdist dark comedy which highlighted the escalating violence in American cities. The play was considered to be “brutally honest,” but it was not brutally honest, because violent crime was depicted as something that had just grown out of control for no understandable reason. It just happened. The rhinoceros in the bedroom, which the author of Little Murders ignored, was the black man. Violent crime did not become out of control in American and European cities until negroes were allowed to roam free in white cities. In seeking to build a utopia where violent crime was non-existent, the liberals turned our cities into places where murder, rape, and mayhem against whites became the norm, and what was considered normal, everyday life became an aberration. Is the negrophile world of the liberal and the modern conservative a paradise that we should work with might and main to perpetuate, or is it a monstrous empire of cruelty that we should destroy? I think we should pursue the later course of action. Can men with any humanity left choose any other option?

No white man wants Dr. Brantly or anyone else to contract Ebola, but who is being helped by whites abandoning whites in order to serve the negro? Ostensibly the negro is being served. If that is true, then why is Africa ready to sink into the abyss now that whites have become multi-cultural? Marauding blacks in the American and European cities prey not only on whites but also on themselves like monsters from the deep since whites have become “tolerant” of multi-culturalism. And whites? The new multi-culturalism has destroyed them; they have lost their faith in the Christian God and His people. So no one is being helped by the liberals’ egotistic march to the tom toms of multi-culturalism.

The liberals have spent centuries indoctrinating the white man. He now believes that a universal love of the colored stranger is the purest, finest love on earth. To love one’s own is mere selfishness, a selfishness that marked the European in the bad old days of Christian Europe. A man can only believe such satanic filth when he has no heart. Ah, there’s the rub. Appeal to a man’s pride of intellect and he will abandon his people and his God. Balzac saw the blood red tide upon the horizon: “In Paris to tell a man he has a good heart is the same as telling him he’s stupid as a rhinoceros.” And who wants to be as stupid as a rhinoceros? I do. I want to stay with the third dumb brothers of Christian Europe who slew dragons and defied Satan and his minions, because they loved their own people in imitation of their Lord, who was and is the embodiment of that charity of honor, the mark of the true European.

The new post-Christian morality is manifested in every aspect of the Europeans’ lives. We don’t protect our borders because the stranger is purer and better than our own people. And since the colored alien is better than the white citizens, he is allowed to murder, rape, and steal when he enters his new country. In my own anti-nation called the United States of America (it should be called the United States of Satan) elderly white people, I meet them all the time, cannot afford to pay for their health care unless they increase their incomes by applying for the welfare benefits that the colored aliens receive. But the older whites won’t apply for welfare because they don’t want to be a drain on their nation’s resources. The liberal Jacobins depend on the innate honor of the white people that they have sworn to exterminate. There is no reasoning with such monsters of the deep, who hate their own with the passionate hatred of their satanic master. From out of the depths, the depths of a European heart, we respond to the liberals’ satanic universalism of hate with a love of our own people, the people of our racial hearth fire. And surely that love will teach us to hate where we ought to hate and fight without ceasing against the liberals who hate their own in the name of a universalist theology forged in hell. Our short mortal lives will count for nothing if we don’t practice the charity that begins at home. +

Posted in churches as halfway houses, Conservatism, Negro worship | Tagged

Rights of Memory

(c) Scottish Court Service; Supplied by The Public Catalogue FoundationA fairy tale-esque appreciation of the Christian faith as expounded by our Lord in the Gospels and by St. Paul in his epistles, a charity of honor that comes from that faith, a provincialism that nurtures that faith, and a love for the hero who embodies and champions that faith, are all woven into one exquisitely beautiful tapestry (and I speak of the highest form of beauty, moral beauty) by my European kinsman and hero, Sir Walter Scott. Just as words cannot do justice to Scott’s vision of Christ’s people, the Europeans, there are also no words that can adequately describe the moral separation between our modern Europe and Scott’s Europe. To hate the former and love the latter is essential if we are ever to be worthy of the people and the God championed by Walter Scott. – CWNY

Pirandello once wrote a play called Six Characters in Search of an Author. Such is the plight of the European people. They passed from pagan to Christian and then from Christian to… That is the question: what have the Europeans passed to now that they no longer see the Christian God as the author of their being?

It’s obvious that the mad-dog liberal segment of the European people, the ruling elite, have latched on to the negro as their new Christ figure, and they have used the old rites and the old documents of the Christian churches to buttress up their new religion. The liberals’ new faith is not something that can be refuted by reason: their need to worship the negro transcends reason. They view dumb nature as their author, and who but the negro, the most natural creation of dumb nature, should sit upon the throne of nature? The liberals must blot out whiteness so that mankind can return to a state of nature, which translates to a kingdom of the negro and for the negro.

But let us return to the hoi polloi, the grazers, who are neither fish nor fowl. They lack the mad-dog liberals’ intense love of the negro, but they are all enslaved by some aspect of liberalism, be it science, blood sport, democracy, the sexual revolution, or some other adjunct of the liberals’ new paradisiacal state. The grazers lack an author, a god, so they are at the mercy of the liberals who do have a god. They are like the Hebrew people during their captivity in Egypt, because they are enslaved by a powerful elite who worship heathen gods; but they are also unlike the captive Hebrews, because they are unaware they are enslaved by a powerful elite that worships heathen gods just as they are unaware of the existence of the true God. Hence the European people remain in a kind of spiritual limbo like Pirandello’s six characters in search of an author.

The satanic essence of liberalism is that it enslaves men and women without their knowing they are enslaved, and it erases the memory of the true God from their hearts, so that they must either wander aimlessly over the desert of modernity searching for God or else embrace the liberals’ god. Resistance to liberalism is almost non-existent, because of the Yeats’ factor: the mad-dog liberals, who are the worst, can do what they like with the best, the wanderers in search of an author, because the wandering grazers have no God.

There are illnesses we get that make us think, if we are young, “this feels like death, but hopefully I’m young and vital enough to survive it.” And when we are older we think, “I hope I can survive this one.” But young or old, when the fever breaks, when we feel health returning, it is a magnificent feeling. Even though we are still much weaker than we were before becoming ill, we feel better than when we were in complete health, because the fever has broken and a body that was beginning to take sickness as its norm now feels that health is its normal state. This is the way a man feels deep down in his soul when he purges the liberal fever from his blood. He is in health again! He is weak from the battle, but his spirit is now functioning. He knows the author of his being, and he knows who his enemy is: the ancient foe and his liberal minions.

Of course there are those long sicknesses when a man’s body forgets there ever was something called health. This is the present state of the European’s soul. Deep in his soul he feels that sickness is normal. He thinks to live amidst negroes, who are worshipped by the very people they kill and rape with impunity, to live amongst creatures called feminists, who slaughter their children in the womb and have female bodies but no femininity, and to look on existence as a closed, predetermined biological endgame is normal living. “This is the life for a man,” is the European’s response to modernity.

Something called the grace of God is needed, but who shall be the conduit for that grace? There are no appeals to God, because God has been found wanting. The utopians have rejected God and gone on to a new life of eternal spiritual sickness that a vast network of demonically inspired sycophants are desperately trying to peddle as health. Our world has been narrowed down to academia: the academic mentality rules the European people. And academia is an exact replica of hell. In those unhallowed halls the abstracted intellects of men and women, filled with satanic hatred for all things connected to the Son of God and His people, preach the glory of the noble black savage, the wonder and magnificence of feminism, and the triumph of all things bestial, inhumane, and blasphemous. When the citadels of academia come tumbling down, the end of liberalism is nigh; but until that day the European people will suffer that sickness unto death, which can only be cured by the forgotten God of the European mists.

August 15th will mark Walter Scott’s birthday. The European world will take no notice of it. Why should we take notice of a dead white man when we have the martyred Martin Luther King Jr. and the sainted Nelson Mandela to honor? We should honor Walter Scott’s birthday because he represented all that was good and pure and noble in the European people. Scott was the poet laureate of spiritual chivalry, the type of chivalry that beareth all things and hopeth all things because it is grounded in charity, that indefinable essence of life that can only be found in the people of the mists, the Europeans who honored and revered the God who took flesh and dwelt by the racial hearth fires of the European people. The villains in Scott’s novels are the Louis XIs of France and the Lord Dalgarnos of Britain, men who intellectualized their souls and made themselves the servants of Satan, the archangel of intellectual pride. Those villains are the minority in Scott’s Europe, and their existence in high places was seen as a tragedy by Scott and his readers. Not so today, the men with the intellectualized souls rule with the assent of an intellectualized peasantry. This has been the great triumph of Satan: there is no spiritual chivalry left in the European people. They have absorbed the intellectualized spirit of the satanic men of intellect who mock and scorn the Man of Sorrows in the derisive spirit of the Roman soldiers of ancient times. Draw the sword and throw the sheath away, because the men with the intellectualized souls are legion and they will not rest until every last vestige of Scott’s Europe, which is His Europe, is blotted from the face of the earth.

Do we have any rights of memory in the European lands? Yes, we Europeans that remain faithful to Scott’s Europe are the only Europeans who have the right to rule in Europe. In fact we must rule, because the men of the intellectualized souls have turned Europe into a third world whorehouse where spiritual syphilis is seen as health and a passionate faith in the European Christ is seen as a fatal illness.

All totalitarian regimes institute universal education, so it should be no surprise to us that the liberals have universalized education beyond the dreams of the totalitarian oligarchies of the past. “Education” has engulfed every aspect of the Europeans’ lives. There is now pre-pre-kindergarten classes so that white children can learn to hate themselves and their past at the earliest age possible. And every aspect of the grazers’ lives, particularly sports, is educational. All the sporting rituals are accompanied by educational lectures against anti-social behavior, which translates to prejudice, which translates to a refusal to worship the colored and hate the white. There are never any violations of the liberals’ code of conduct, because white people have been very carefully educated.

The white man who wishes to remain a white man is an outcast man. What the outcast white man must become is an outlaw. The outcast is a passive creature waiting for the slaughter, while the outlaw strikes back at the world he hates. William Tell and Robin Hood are my favorite of the European outlaws, but the modern white man has no Swiss mountains and no Sherwood Forest from which to launch a counterattack against the liberals. The modern counter-revolutionary is more in the position of Zorro or the Scarecrow of Romney Marsh. He must go amongst the liberals disguised as an educated, non-prejudiced white man, content to passively submit to his own extermination. But inside he is a blazing inferno, a man who hates and loves with all his heart. He will do everything he can to undermine the liberals’ kingdom of hell on earth.

Baptista tells Petrucchio that gaining Katherina’s love is “all in all.” That the white man should love his people enough to hate Liberaldom with all his heart, mind, and soul is also all in all. On the surface the monstrosity we call Liberaldom seems like an invincible super structure with its vast network of communications, monolithic educational system, and powerful military. But that entire super structure of Liberaldom was built brick by brick by individual souls filled with hatred for Christ and His people. Shouldn’t it then be possible for individuals who love Him and His people to tear down Liberaldom? The European counter-revolution is not manifest at present, but it has begun and it will continue, because there are always a few who see Christ in His people and respond to His divine charity with hearts of fire. At the last trump, in the twinkling of an eye, we shall see the liberals’ kingdom of hell on earth toppled and His eternal Europe restored. +

Posted in Christian counter-attack, counterrevolution, restoration of European civilization | Tagged

As the Systems Fail, the Light of Europe Remains

Dore_The-Conversion-of-St-PaulAbide with me! Fast falls the Eventide;
The darkness thickens, Lord with me abide
When other helpers fail, and comforts flee,
Help of the helpless, O abide with me!

-Henry Francis Lyte

________________________________

An old friend of many years standing called me recently to lament the decline of virtually everything decent. My friend is some fifteen years older than I, so she has some memories of a time when common decency still existed on the face of the earth. Some people might say my “friend” is not a friend, since there are several topics that I cannot speak to her about. Perhaps those people are right, but I am fond of Mrs._____, and I admire her for not going with the times and making her peace with debauchery and vileness.

There are two topics I cannot bring up with my friend. One is the Roman Catholic Church’s complicity with the indecency of the times – she must look on the church as the one institution that a person can trust. And the second topic is the negro – she hates what they do, but she would never denounce the ethos of To Kill a Mockingbird. She believes blacks are “basically good, it’s only a few bad ones…”

The other day I discovered a third topic that I could not bring up with the woman who I claim is a friend. She was horrified when I mentioned, with no intent to shock her, that I had no use for the Moslems of Hamas or the Jews of Israel. “But Israel is a democracy,” was her reply. “The wholesale slaughter of civilians is still the wholesale slaughter of civilians no matter if it comes from a so-called democracy or a terrorist organization,” was my reply.

I should have known not to bring up the subject of Israel and democracy, because the same people who weep for Tom Robinson in To Kill a Mockingbird and attend their local Christian fusionist churches are usually Gung ho Israel and Gung ho democracy. Why is this? How did church attendance, negro worship, the support of Israel, and the support of democracy become synonymous with Christianity? It starts with the pagan concept of ‘support your local clergy’ because they are the Illuminati; they and they alone possess the secret wisdom. Over and against the pagan priest-craft system is Chaucer’s humble village priest and Dickens’ real life hero, the Rev. Stephen Roose Hughes, who preached Christ crucified, Christ risen and loved God through their kith and kin.

The negro worshipping heresy, the Christian Jewish heresy, and the democratic heresy all stem from the clerical, speculative heresy that says Christ is the end product of a philosophical system passed on from God through a long chain of great minds; He is not the Man of Sorrows who enters human hearts. Men and women who have been trained to look for their salvation in systems, even if those systems include Christ, will naturally gravitate toward a system about God rather than a faith in the living God. Hence, the blending of negro worship and Christianity, Israel and Christianity, and democracy and Christianity.

There are nuanced differences between the speculative Christian sects. The Roman Catholic favors Israel because Israel is a democracy, while the Evangelical Protestant favors Israel because of his distorted view of what he calls the “Rapture.” Against the Bible he reportedly believes in, and against the traditional faith of the European people, the modern Evangelical religiously holds onto his faith in the unrepentant Jew as mankind’s only hope in an unbelieving world. And both the Roman Catholic and the Evangelical Protestant blend their esoteric systems with the liberals’ worship of the negro. The Roman Catholic fusionist, the Evangelical Protestant fusionist, and the liberal: between the three of them they have destroyed the “unbought grace of life.”

What binds the liberal, the Roman Catholic, and the Evangelical Protestant together (the latter two in a subordinate position to the liberal) is contempt for the Christian faith of the antique Europeans. The liberals say the antique Europeans were racist and sexist, and the fusionist sects agree with them because they do not feel the need to know God through their people. They know God through their theories, so what do they need with ‘a people’? The ongoing slaughter of the Christ-bearing people continues unabated because white people impede the liberals’ negrophile paradise, the Roman Catholics’ multi-racial, multi-religious world, and the rapture of the Evangelical Protestants.

Let’s go back to the days of the Ayatollah Khomeini, when those wild, fun-loving, mad-cap Iranian “students” took the Americans in the embassy hostage. Do you recall the hostages who were released before Reagan negotiated the final release? I certainly do. The Iranians released the black hostages, stating that they had the deepest respect for black people, unlike white European people, who did not respect black people. Of course the Iranians did not have any respect for black people or any other race of people for that matter, but what they correctly surmised from their observations of the West was that liberals were the powers that be in the Western world and liberals worshipped black people. The best way, they reasoned, to gain liberal support was to play on their sympathy for blacks. Unlike those Iranians of yesterday, the Roman Catholic fusionists and the Evangelical Protestant fusionists do share the liberals’ love of the sacred black. But they also, like the Iranian students, make an ostentatious display of their negro worship in the hopes that the liberals will allow them the freedom – in the case of the Roman Pontiffs – to kiss the Koran and visit foreign nations and campaign for the abolition “of all boundaries between peoples,” and – in the case of the Evangelical Protestant – to campaign for the continual bombing of all Israel’s enemies in the name of “The Rapture.” What is missing in the various European ideologies is a sense of original sin and a corresponding charity and humility that makes a man feel that, “there are events and circumstances beyond my ken, but in the midst of the battle against principalities and powers, I can muddle through so long as I stay connected to His reign of charity, which exists on earth at my familial and racial hearth fire.” Such quaint notions, if followed, would keep a man close to his racial hearth fire, worshipping God in spirit and in truth while avoiding dreams of rapturous, Christian Zionism, a multi-religious, multi-racial utopia, and a negro-ruled Kingdom of Babylon.

The French Jacobins took what they received in the Catholic Church, a system which explained God instead of a Gospel that showed us God’s face, and spread the new gospel throughout France and the European world. Man as a social being, united to a common social core of kith, kin, and God, disappeared. A new man emerged, who was an abstract entity without a core. He became whatever abstract theory he latched onto. The negro discovered that he had become the white man’s savage god, while the white fusionist Christians tried to live their lives secondhand through the negro, through the Jews, through the Moslems, etc. The Christian blood that once flowed through the European’s heart has congealed. He needs a fairytale revival before he can become, like Pinocchio, a real human being.

Even though many learned theologians have told us there is no such thing as a Christian culture, we know that such a culture once existed. Thousands upon thousands of silken threads reached from the European’s hearth fire to His heavenly throne. It was not the work of a day to cut those threads; it was the work of centuries. Now that all the threads leading us to His kingdom have been severed, what is our hope? Is it the negro? The Jew? Or do we place our hope in democracy? Despair and die is written on all those modern medicines. If those severed threads of the past could be reconnected – and they can be reconnected by hearts of flesh – then the Europe of charity, honor, and faith will be a living reality again, instead of a dead ember.

If you believe as Spengler and the scientific historians believed, that civilizations are biological entities that are born, mature, decay, and die according to the inexorable laws of nature, then you will not have any hope in a European revival. I believe such thinking is called a self-fulfilling prophecy. Believing existence is only determined by biology, the moderns have become mesmerized by the material façade of existence, and they passively submit to what the liberals tell them is inevitable. “White nations must become multi-racial and multi-cultural, whites must give way to the colored hordes, men must give women ‘choice,’ and we must all worship the noble savage.” Why must we do these things? Because we are progressing; somehow we are supposed to believe that perversion and blasphemy are part of the ongoing, biologically predetermined movement toward the light. What light? Light is a Christian word, a word connected to a spiritual realm that the liberals and the fusionist Christians deny. They only believe in what they see with the material eye, which is why they revere the negro man-god and look on the modern Jews as God’s chosen people.

The “conservatives” of the 20th century tried to compete with the modernism of science, psychiatry, democracy, feminism, and negro worship by claiming there was no ultimate conflict between conservative values and modernist values; they claimed the differences were simply over the means to achieve female equality, an integrated society, and a mentally healthy populace. But from a Christian European perspective it is more than a difference about the means to achieve the same ends. All the modern –isms are satanic. Christian Europeans do not deal with Satan. We look to Tell, to Roland, to Arthur, and to Alfred. There is no progression beyond the European hero. He is our exemplar now and always, because he fights and dies for the people of his house and his race in the sight of, and connected to, the Christ, the Son of the Living God. Sweet vale of Christian Europe, so long as we stay with thee, we shall dwell in the House of the Lord forever. +

Posted in antique Christianity, Christ the Hero, democracy | Tagged

To Begin Again

Gilbert_King_Cymbeline_giving_blessing‘Tis still a dream or else such stuff as madmen
Tongue and brain not; either both or nothing;
Or senseless speaking, or a speaking such
As sense cannot untie. Be what it is,
The action of my life is like it, which
I’ll keep, if but for sympathy.

-Cymbeline

Every once in awhile, about once a month, I check out the television news stations to see what they’re lying about now. What I witnessed on this occasion was a group of conservative-liberals, the Fox News variety, debating a group of Obama-loving liberals. The debaters were focused on the Malaysian airliner tragedy and the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas. There wasn’t any real disagreement among the two liberal groups. Both wanted to blame Russia for the bombing and Hamas for the war. What the liberal debaters differed on was whether The Obama had “done enough.”

It struck me while listening to the liberal blather that the lack of any European Christian presence in the major institutions (church, government, press, academy) of the European nations not only has had a disastrous effect on the European democracies, but also has had a disastrous effect on the non-European nations, because in the absence of a Christian-European ethos the modern world consists of a myriad of competing factions – the Jewish faction, the Muslim faction, the neo-pagan faction, the Christian-fusionist faction, etc. – none of whose members have within them that which makes them act according to His dictates of charity and mercy. When they proceed to make political decisions upon which the fate of nations depends, they make their decisions in a moral vacuum.

Now the liberal and Christian utopians are the first to tell us loudly and clearly that European people once made decisions that stemmed from their Christian faith: “And what was the result? They couldn’t agree on anything, and they fought wars, beat their wives, and enslaved and exploited the colored nations of the world.” But what has been the result of a Europe, of a world, without any Christian European influence? We have seen the big wars, the wars without any charitable license. In fact, we have seen no end to war because daily life in every European nation has become like life in the colored nations, an unremitting war against the light in which “humanity must perforce prey on itself, like monsters from the deep.” We haven’t progressed to utopia since we left Christian Europe, we have descended into hell. “We have no compass to govern us; nor can we know distinctly to what port we steer.”

The Father of all heresy is the abstracted intellect of man, inspired by Satan’s promise, “You shall be as gods.” The French Jacobins added the Son, which was ‘the people,’ and the Holy Ghost, which was science. Karl Marx was not an original; he simply followed the Jacobins’ model that was based on an inversion of the Christian faith. The modern, democracy-crazed European liberals have streamlined the Jacobins’ model. Now the people of color and only the people of color can be the Sons of God.

There has not been any Christian European opposition to the ongoing implementation of what the liberals call a ‘benevolent evolution toward utopia.’ And there has not been any opposition because the European people lost their blood faith in Jesus Christ. The same blood-draining disease that made French Catholics too spiritually anemic to defend their Christian King and Queen also overtook the other European peoples, through their clergymen, and made them incapable of defending their nations against the new religion of the negro man-gods.

Burnet says, that when he was in France, in the year 1683, “the method which carried over the men of the finest parts to Popery was this—they brought themselves to doubt of the whole Christian religion. When that was once done, it seemed a more indifferent thing of what side or form they continued outwardly.” If this was then the ecclesiastical policy of France, it is what they have since but too much reason to repent of. They preferred atheism to a form of religion not agreeable to their ideas. They succeeded in destroying that form; and atheism has succeeded in destroying them. I can readily give credit to Burnet’s story; because I have observed too much of a similar spirit (for a little of it is “much too much”) amongst ourselves.

This clerical shortcut, in which faith consists of a belief in the intellectual acumen of a few religious experts rather than in the passionate blood faith of a people for their God, rechanneled the Christian faith back into pagan streams and tributaries. Long John Silver found it hard to accept that it was Ben Gunn who did him in: “Ben, Ben… to think as you’ve that done me!” Well might the European everyman say to the hooded men of God, “To think that it was you that robbed me of my Christian faith.”

If the faith is an intellectual system that can be passed on from generation to generation on computer printouts, then the clergy of the various denominations have not “done us wrong”; but if the Christian faith is meant to be passed from hearts of flesh to other hearts of flesh, then the clergymen have done us wrong. If the first way to God, the way of the computer printout, is correct, then there is no need for the European people. Indeed, there is no need for any people at all. We can all exist as one big blob of anti-humanity that lives only to read the printouts given to us by the godded men.

But what if the second way to God is the true pathway to the living God? What if European Christianity, in which the European people responded to Christ’s heart of flesh with the passion of their hearts, is the only accurate vision of the Christian faith that the world possesses? The message of the Bible, the message of the church documents, can only be made clear by those who took the message to heart, because the divine love must have human hearts to dwell in.

The true image of Christ appeared in the antique European culture. Defame and demean that culture with might and main, as the liberals certainly will do and have done, and still that culture will nourish those of us who refuse to let the liberals keep us from our European past. We don’t know any Christ other than the European Christ. He is the Christ that the apostles saw on the way to Emmaus and the Christ who appeared to St. Paul on the road to Damascus. This idea that there can be another Christ hiding somewhere in the civil rights movement, or in Asia, or in the Jewish nation is what is keeping Europeans in line, begging for living space in the satanic kingdom of Babylon.

In Scott’s The Lay of the Last Minstrel, an evil dwarf assumes the outward appearance of a child of Scottish royalty. In that guise the dwarf manages to wreck havoc within the Scottish royal family. Isn’t that what the churchmen have done? They have assumed the outward garments of Christ in order to cloak their anti-Christian hearts. The dwarf is finally recognized because his evil behavior is radically different from the young prince’s behavior. So it is with the Christian clergy: their “loving forgiveness” of black torture-murderers, their love for radical Islam and the unrepentant Jew, and their deep and abiding love of the negro and hatred of the white man all indicate that they are white Christians on the outside, but black-hearted Satanists on the inside.

If we ask why the European people abandoned European Christianity we need look no further than the Grand Inquisitor scene in Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov. The Inquisitor gave Europeans the means to live and he gave them certain easy-to-follow rules to live by. In return for those gifts the Inquisitor demanded that the European people give up the white moments of existence, those moments of life when a man has the vision, when he sees the living God with a heart that has been enflamed by the divine love which passeth the understanding of the intellect. The living God does not give us utopia, He sends us pain and suffering, but in that ever moaning spiritual battle in the mists our Lord sends us vision, He sends us white moments of the soul. Christianity without white moments is a dry, untenable religion. Its adherents must graft their desiccated Christianity onto other faiths in order for it to survive. But even then they walk as men walk among the dead because pagan faiths cannot sustain men and women who once had dreams and saw visions. The true Faith, the faith that creates white moments, could revive the Europeans, but the modern death-in-life fusionist Christianity will crush the European people under an unbearable weight of superficiality and meaninglessness.

It’s difficult to believe, now that liberalism, a synthesis of all the pagan ‘isms’ under the mantle of an inverted Christianity, has conquered the European world, that Christianity was once triumphant over paganism. The mystery cults fulfilled man’s need for a personal God, but they did not fulfill his need for a personal God of mercy and love. That need, a desire for a personal God whose love passeth the understanding of the Greek rationalists and the devotees of the ecstatic sects, was what drew the Europeans to Jesus Christ. But if Christ is not the European Christ, the God of charity and mercy who rose again from the dead on the third day, who or what does He become? He becomes a second-rate god who cannot provide the comforts of the pagan gods. The new European goes to the various gods of liberalism for his daily sustenance. The evangelical goes to the Jews and the negroes; the Roman Catholic goes to the Jews, Muslims, and the negro; while the completely secularized European holds onto his negro gods and maintains their divinity against all those who oppose them, which is unfortunately very few people. No one seeks the European Christ, the Christ of white moments, because He has been buried beneath a mountain of Babylonian filth along with the antique Europeans. If some spiritual excavationist could uncover that civilization, the civilization of Christ and His people, there might just be a few Europeans who would leave the darkness of Babylon to pursue the white moments of Christian Europe. And then it will begin all over again, the story that is so ancient and so new. +

Posted in antique Christianity, Europe as the Christ-bearer | Tagged

The Cross

Gilbert_Edgar_and_GloucesterMen must endure
Their going hence even as their coming hither;
Ripeness is all. Come on.

-from King Lear

While in the midst of untold bloodshed and slaughter, perpetuated by blacks against whites, the white people of the European nations are intensifying their worship of blacks. Why? We go against God and every human instinct in the human heart when we worship the negroes, yet white people continue to worship them. Certainly negro worship represents a return to Baal, but it is also something much worse than mere paganism. White negro-worship is a blending, the type of blending that is condemned in The Revelation of St. John, of Christianity and paganism.

A Christ-less Christianity provides a religious energy to negro worship that mere paganism could never equal. For example, I recently saw a four-year old film clip of a young white woman weeping when she learned the news that a particular negro basketball player was leaving her city to play for another city. She wept at the foot of the cross for her savior who was dead. The clip was run in conjunction with recent film of fans welcoming this same negro basketball player’s return to their city. “The King has returned”: he rose from the dead, and came home, where he will sit on the right hand of god the father almighty, to judge the living and the dead for their sins of racism. One news commentator said it outright: “If this story does not stir your heart, you are a racist.” But aren’t all white people racist; haven’t we all sinned against the negro gods? Even white people who don’t think they are racist are really racist, the liberals now tell us, because in fact, “the most dangerous racist is a white who doesn’t even know he is racist”. In lieu of that terrible new finding of the liberal experts, it’s best, when worshipping at the feet of the negro gods, to say that one is truly sorry not only for every overt racist thought and action, but also for the unknown sins of racism. “For these racist sins and the racist sins of my entire life, I am heartily sorry. Please forgive me my sins.” That perverse, blasphemous prayer is the prayer of the new and improved white man.

There are two basic white responses to the atrocities committed by negroes. The mad-dog liberal simply goes on the attack against anyone who opposes the atrocities, because the mad-dog liberal desires the extermination of white people: anything that hurts them is good. And the second response comes in the form of “loving forgiveness” and “they’re not all like that.” Both responses, even though the second one usually comes from someone connected to a Christian church, stink of negro worship, which is blasphemy.

Of course if Christ is not who He said He was, the white man needs a new god, so why shouldn’t it be the negro? “It should and must be the negro,” the liberal tells us, “because he alone is natural, he alone is untainted by the filth of Christian Europe.” There are no “evening lingerings” in the negro’s soul; there is only a merciless thirst for the white man’s blood, which has intensified over the years because of the liberals’ and their “loving-forgiveness” cousins’ constant litany of abuse against the white man. There is no one even remotely connected to any of the traditional powers that be – church, press, state, and academy – in the European nations who will defend the white man’s right to exist in the here and now or defend and champion the white man’s cultural heritage. The white man has been found guilty in the great tribunal of liberalism, and he must, so the liberals tell us, be destroyed.

There is no way back to white Christian Europe through the fusionist Christian churches. If you reject God’s channels of grace, our blood ties to our kith and kin, you will become as sounding brass or a tinkling cymbal. You will perform the biological functions of a human being, but you will have no spiritual life of your own. You will only come alive to serve and worship the negro gods. This is the reason the secular and Church-going liberals cling so tenaciously to the negro. Without him they do not feel alive. They have placed God’s channel of grace, the European’s racial hearth fire, in the realm of “prejudice,” and such a realm is to be avoided in deference to the realm of “enlightenment,” which is the realm of the negro, who is a conduit to Satan.

You can’t hand a negro-worshipper a Bible or a great work of literature from Europe’s Christian era and expect he will turn into a European again. Even if he chose to read the Bible or the great work of literature, he would derive nothing from either, because his heart is closed; he has given it to his satanic abstracted world of Babylon regained.

The liberal and the fusionist Christian don’t react to things of the spirit, because they have moral blinders on. They see only prejudice in European Christianity, and they see only beauty and grace in the worship of the negro. Can such people be converted? We don’t know, but we don’t have to – in fact we must not – worship at their shrine. If every white man bows his knee to the negro gods, there will be no sign of contradiction to Satan’s kingdom of hell on earth. Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego speak for the remnant band of Europeans: “… be it known unto thee, O King, that we will not serve thy gods…”

In a world based on statistics and numbers, one man’s refusal or a half dozen men’s refusal to worship the negro gods of the liberals and the fusionist Christians might seem like nothing, but our refusal has eternal significance. He enters this world through charity: if there is no charity of honor, the type of charity that can only be known and fanned into a roaring fire at our racial hearth fire, then He cannot enter this world. So our refusal to worship the negro gods by remaining true to our racial hearth fire, allows the dear Christ to enter into this world by the only pathway He has ever chosen to take – the pathway through the human heart.

Christ told Thomas, “Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed; blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.” Christ was thinking of us when he spoke to Thomas. We would never be blessed to see Him on this earth as the apostles did, but still He came to us. We don’t actually hold His hands and touch His side nor do we lay our head upon His Sacred Heart, as John the beloved did at the Last Supper, but we do see and touch Him through the heart of His people. He abides with us in our European home, the dwelling of our Fathers who rest in the arms of the Lord. The modern Europeans must worship the negroes of Babylon because they have fled from their racial homes to wander in the multi-racial, soulless world created by the demon who prowls the world seeking the ruin of souls. He is their new master, and they hope to remain secure and protected in his care.

I once, because I didn’t want to go to work anesthetized, had a dentist pull my tooth without any anesthetic. It was very stupid of me to go without an anesthetic, because I suffered a great deal of pain for no particular reason; I could have been late for work or taken a day off with no consequences. But there is another type of pain, a necessary pain, that the European flees from which has resulted in the loss of his soul. This is the pain of having deep, heartfelt attachments to our kith and kin. The pangs of dispriz’d love, the pain of watching your loved ones suffer and die, the parent’s sorrow over an ungrateful child, the child’s sorrow at an abusive parent, all this and more is the pain of a mortal man who lives his life within the confines of the racial and familial home that our Lord has provided for us. All the Jacobins’ blather about liberty, fraternity, and equality, the Marxists’ raptures about a workers’ paradise, and the modern liberals’ paean to the sacred negro all amount to one common desire: “I hate existence in this world, so whatever takes me away from reality and furthers my utopian fantasies is good, and whatever brings me close to reality is bad.” Our Lord was crucified because He asked the Jewish leaders to accept the reality of a loving incarnate God rather than an abstract dream of a cruel Jewish state presided over by a malevolent god who would reward them and punish all their enemies. And so it has always been, since Christ left this earth. The liberal, be he Jew or judaized Christian, hates the truth and will punish home when someone defends Christian Europe, because the truth became incarnate in that civilization. Edmund Burke was not hated by the English liberals because he told lies about the French Jacobins, he was hated because he spoke the truth. If the liberals had accepted Burke’s truth, they would have had to give up their utopian fantasies. Likewise the negro-worshipping liberals of our day, secular and churched: Anthony Jacob is not hated because what he says is false, he is hated because what he says is true. If negroes really are not sacred creatures, devoid of original sin, then we must consider that the racist Europeans were essentially right about existence – “This world is a vale of tears, but Christ is Risen. He has redeemed our suffering and conquered the world. Let us take up our cross and follow Him.” What is so terrible about the European vision? Why this vast network of subterfuge, lies, and violence to suppress the vision? It is the cross of Christ: the liberals want no part of it. The sign of our salvation, our common hope, has no place in utopia. But it has the central place in the hearts and homes of the antique, racist Europeans. Never the twain shall meet. We will always be at odds with the liberals who have forsaken the cross of Christ for the negro gods, whom they believe will provide them with a pain-free life of pleasure in the new Babylon.

Right now the utopian faith of the liberals has conquered the European world. But can the worship of the negro, which is the cornerstone of the liberals’ malevolent utopia, be maintained forever? The rigid, draconian measures used to enforce negro worship seem to suggest that even the liberals fear their faith does not rest on solid ground. The counter-revolution begins with the refusal to worship the negro gods. What is essential is that we refuse to bend our knees to Satan and his minions: “… be it known unto thee, O King, that we will not serve thy gods.” +

Posted in antique Christianity, counterrevolution, Negro worship | Tagged

Two Separate Worlds

Dore_Isaiahs_Vision_of_Destruction_of_BabylonIn the liberals’ bible there is a Satan just like there is in the Christians’ Bible, but the liberals have a different version of the Genesis story. The liberals claim that the earth was once a wonderful paradise, a self-sustaining paradise, where the rule of nature was the rule of the earth. Everyone in paradise was natural, loving, giving, and non-white. The black man ruled a multi-colored people of red, yellow, black, and brown. Then one day an evil white man appeared in the garden. He cunningly subverted the good and noble black rulers and gained control of paradise. He then brought other white people, who had been hiding in Bogeyland, into paradise and set up a new and unnatural kingdom over the ruins of the black man’s paradisiacal kingdom of nature. No longer could the loving, caring, sharing people of color continue their natural practices of murder, rape, cannibalism, and free unbridled sex. The white bogeyman curtailed those natural practices and introduced an unnatural, heinous religion. The white bogeyman told the wonderful, natural people of color that there was a God above nature who looked on their natural practices as abominations. They were, the white bogeyman insisted, in a state of sin. We know the rest of the story. Despite the fact that the white bogeyman told the people of color that there was a savior who would save them from their sins and the death which was a consequence of sin, the colored people fled from the white bogeyman’s world and created their own purer, more natural worlds where rape, murder, cannibalism, and unbridled sexual license were the norm.

So two separate cultures existed, that of the white bogeymen and that of the natural men and women of color. Then the wonderful thing happened. In the cruel oppressive land of the white bogeymen, a magnificent new type of man emerged, a sport of nature, a mutant. The new man was called The Liberal… – CWNY


In America we have twice elected a negro president of the United States. And every January we have a national holiday to celebrate the life of an infamously immoral and degenerate negro named Martin Luther King Jr. In France, that great land of liberty, equality, and fraternity, the former president, Nicolas Sarkozy, speaking in 2009, said with pride that France was a regicide nation. And in Britain, formerly the mother of the free, now the mother of radical Islam and the Mau Mau, the government pays reparations to the satanic followers of Mau Mau who raped, tortured, and murdered British citizens. All the aforementioned events, which occurred without a whimper of protest from white Europeans, signify just how deeply utopian liberalism has sunk into the soul of the European people.

If the European people were a Christian people, then death would be the price for those who supported negro worship, regicide, and Mau Mau. But since the European people are not a Christian people, there is nothing to prevent negro worship, regicide, and Mau Mau from being supported and lauded. We have supped full of horrors, the most dire deeds of blood perpetrated against white people go unavenged by white Europeans whose ancestors once went into battle to protect His reign of charity. The new cowardly faith came to fruition at the time of the French Revolution:

It is now sixteen or seventeen years since I saw the queen of France, then the dauphiness, at Versailles; and surely never lighted on this orb, which she hardly seemed to touch, a more delightful vision. I saw her just above the horizon, decorating and cheering the elevated sphere she just began to move in,–glittering like the morning-star, full of life, and splendor, and joy. Oh! What a revolution! And what a heart must I have to contemplate without emotion that elevation and that fall! Little did I dream when she added titles of veneration to those of enthusiastic, distant, respectful love, that she could ever be obliged to carry the sharp antidote against disgrace concealed in that bosom; little did I dream that I should have lived to see such disasters fallen upon her in a nation of gallant men, in a nation of men of honour, and of cavaliers. I thought ten thousand swords must have leaped from their scabbards to avenge even a look that threatened her with insult. But the age of chivalry is gone. – Burke

The age of chivalry is gone indeed, but how could it be otherwise? When the Christian faith is drained from the blood of the Europeans so are the virtues that go with that faith: courage, honor, and charity. We have only Christian utopians left in the ranks of those who adhere to organized Christianity. They are false Christians who ape the utopianism of the secular liberals like a junior executive apes the big boss in a large corporate network by going around saying, “Yes, J.B.,” to everything Mr. Big says. “Yes, the Europeans were racist; Yes, we must integrate; Yes, we must encourage miscegenation; And Yes, Yes, Yes, we must all love the negro with our whole heart, mind, and soul, and hate the white man and all his works.” Such is the never-ending new and improved “Hallelujah Chorus” of the utopian Christians, whom we can “see everywhere, any time of the day,” unlike the “everyday housewife,” who seems to have gone the way of chivalry and charity, into the dustbin of history.

The French Revolution, the Haitian revolution, and rebellions such as the Mau Mau rebellion of the 1950s all stem from Satan, and they all follow the same predictable pattern:

(1)  Liberals from a distance all support the revolution – Price, Kingsley, Shelley, Keats, Byron, etc.

(2)  Some liberals, who see the bloodshed first hand, condemn the bloodshed and claim people such as Robespierre, Jean Francois, and Kenyatta have perverted the revolution, but those same liberals never abandon their precious revolutionary ideals. When the Kenyattas and Robespierres pass from the scene, they support the ongoing revolutionary movement toward the light.

(3)  The vast majority of whites in France, in Haiti, and in Kenya are not in favor of their own extermination, but their natures are “so far from doing harm that they suspect none,” which makes them believe the liberals’ lies that say democracy and diversity do not mean the extermination of white people.

(4)  Over time, the bloodbaths are forgotten, and the revolutions, especially the black revolutions, are sanctified and accepted as the model for the whole world. Butchery and savagery are accepted if they are attached to high sounding words such as civil rights, national independence, racial equality, or democracy.

(5)  All opposition to the new world order can be squashed because the new world order is based on the new religion of mankind. Heretics must be crushed in the name of the common good.

“All means are justifiable and meritorious with traitors; now that the Jacobin has made his slaughtering canonical, he slays through philanthropy.” Taine is precisely correct when he attaches the word ‘canonical’ to the utopians. The French Jacobins and their spiritual descendants, the negro-worshipping Europeans of the modern era, are bloody in their designs and more fervent in the execution of their designs than the worst of the Grand Inquisitors and the worst of the Puritan witch hunters. Christian orthodoxy is heresy and satanic negro worship is orthodoxy in modern utopian Europe. Opposition to liberal orthodoxy is not tolerated, but because of the success of the liberal organs of propaganda the liberals seldom have to deal with opposition. When enough Europeans cease to swallow the liberals’ party line and stop voluntarily offering themselves up for sacrifice, the liberals will have to become more overtly bloody and violent. This will be a step up, because it will be a sign that the silent slaughter has become a battle. God cannot defend the right if the right refuse to fight.

Most men, when pushed to a wall, will fight. But the modern European man does not feel that he has been pushed to the wall. He sees that other whites have been pushed to the wall and crushed, but he thinks that will never happen to him because he is not racist; he is a firm believer in democracy, which (he believes) stands for freedom, equality, and diversity. And since he is a rational man, he does not listen to the naysayers, the underground men who tell him that freedom, equality, and diversity mean only one thing – the death of everything white and Christian.

A man living on the mathematical surface of life cannot see the heights or the depths. But the Europeans must start to look to the heights and see what their honored dead saw in their lifetimes, or else they will be pulled down to the hellish world of the liberals where the absence of light will make them forget there ever was an overworld of light. It’s not a case of “we must act now or it will be too late.” It’s already too late if we judge success by elections and eleventh hour political movements. Such movements are only on the mathematical surface of life. In the spiritual realm, it is never too late. The liberals were and are committed to building utopia over the dead bodies and dead culture of the white Europeans. When the Europeans break away from the mathematical endgame of utopianism and start to love and hate with all their heart, they will finally begin to fight back, and such a fight, the fight for God, race, and hearth, is what we were born for.

In a movie called The Music Man (1962), there is a wonderful scene near the beginning of the film in which a con man tries to create a need in a small turn-of-the-century Iowa town for a boys’ band. Of course the con man plans to sell the band instruments and uniforms to the townspeople. In order to sell the townspeople on the band, he has to convince them the town is in “trouble.” He is told, “River City doesn’t have any trouble.” But that doesn’t deter the con man; he very cleverly creates trouble, by informing the townspeople of the dangers of a pool table in their town, which is so evil that there is only one surefire remedy: a boys’ band.

What Professor Harold Hill does is what all advertising men do: they create a need where there was no need before in order to sell what they want to sell in order to enrich themselves. The liberals first destroyed the Christian God with philosophical speculation, thus creating a need for a new god. Then they supplied the new god: first it was the “working class people,” and then “the people” became the colored people of the world with the negro at the top of the heap, and the working class whites were cast into outer darkness with the middle and upper class whites. In fact, the working class whites usually are the first to suffer the effects of the worldwide Mau Mau revolution as they cannot afford to retreat to non-occupied territories; they must stand and die where they live. Bereft of their racial hearth fire, they live and die without ever knowing what it means to be connected to the living God through one’s people.

It didn’t happen overnight, this liberal distilling process, but gradually, over time, the white man has been drained of his heart’s blood. Liberal theorists tell him that he doesn’t need his heart’s blood; his mind will serve him just fine. But will it? Has it? No, it hasn’t. The white man became hopelessly lost in a maze of philosophical speculation. Having abandoned his own people for an abstract people, he now can only experience life second-hand through the negro. So long as white men worship negroes they will be mere shadows with no real existence.

A friend who detested French cooking once described it to me as a process whereby the French drain all flavor out of their food in order to put their own flavored sauces into the food. I’ve never really tasted French cuisine, so I can’t speak to the truth of my friend’s assertion, but I can attest to that alleged process of French cooking as it pertains to white Christians. The liberals drained all the Christian blood from them in order to leave them with only the ideals the liberals forced into their pygmy brains. Chivalry, faith, honor, charity, the love of kith and kin, and the love of God are virtues that come from the heart and the blood of a man. When there is no heart and blood, there are no Christian virtues, only liberal ‘virtues.’ And what are the ‘virtues’ of the liberals? Pride of intellect, and a loving, worshipful adulation of the negro as the one true man-god.

The fight against the liberal ‘virtues’ and the fight for the virtues of the heart and the blood, the virtues of our honored dead, constitutes the only true happiness in this world. The romance of Christian Europe is not over. Since life, at least the white man’s life, is ultimately of the spirit, the eternal romance of Christian Europe will continue to inspire men of blood who will conquer the desolate, barren wastes of the liberals’ mind-forged utopia. +

Posted in Negro worship, Utopianism | Tagged ,