Like to a Tenement or a Pelting Farm

Staunton_John_of_Gaunt's_deathbedThis blessed plot, this earth,
this realm, this England,
This nurse, this teeming womb of royal kings,
Fear’d by their breed and famous by their birth,
Renowned for their deeds as far from home,
For Christian service and true chivalry,
As is the sepulchre in stubborn Jewry,
Of the world’s ransom, blessed Mary’s Son,
This land of such dear souls, this dear dear land,
Dear for her reputation through the world,
Is now leased out, I die pronouncing it,
Like to a tenement or pelting farm:
England, bound in with the triumphant sea
Whose rocky shore beats back the envious siege
Of wat’ry Neptune, is now bound in with shame,
With inky blots and rotten parchment bonds:
That England, that was wont to conquer others,
Hath made a shameful conquest of itself.
Ah, would the scandal vanish with my life,
How happy then were my ensuing death!

All of the modern European nations fit John of Gaunt’s description of a debased England. They have been leas’d out to Muslims, colored savages, and stubborn Jewry. What is happening in the small town in which I live is a perfect example in miniature of what is happening in the European nations on a larger scale. The town used to be an all-white town. Older people of the town, whose hearts indignant break over the changes they have seen in the town over the last 70-plus years they have lived here, tell of a bygone time when no negroes, mulattoes, Mexicans, or Muslims lived here. But that has all changed. Every block of the town has a few genuine white homes which are surrounded by rental units with the usual assortment of negroes, mulattoes, Mexicans, and Muslims. Diversity is everywhere, even in small town America. Who rents to the third world invaders? Slum landlords, who have moved out to the country, not to farm – heavens, no – they have moved out to avoid the colored hordes that they rent to, because the government guarantees their rent. Like the revelers in Poe’s short story “The Masque of the Red Death,” the slumlords hope to stave off the colored plague by moving further away from it, while it consumes the poorer whites who cannot flee to the country. Serves them right anyway, their very poverty proves that they are unfit to live in the gated communities and country houses of the white elect – the liberals and the liberal conservatives who hate the whites, their own people, while loving and worshipping, from a safe distance, the colored strangers. Of course, in Poe’s tale the revelers in the gated-community house do not escape the red death. Nor will our modern white revelers escape the Muslims and the colored savages. The people who know only sacrifice, not mercy, will not stop at the gates of the white liberals. They will invade the gated-community homes and the country estates as well, because a people without a racial home will not have the spiritual backbone to defend their geographical homeland.

The great liberal death wish that Muggeridge wrote about in 1979 exists, but it does not exist in quite the way Muggeridge described it. The liberals do not wish to die themselves. They fear death as Poe’s revelers feared the plague. That is why they have a death wish; they wish for the death of the white race so that they will be spared. You see, their death wish has a liberal caveat: “If we sacrifice our people, we shall be saved.” The Muslim and colored hordes did not consent to the liberals’ caveat, but the liberal believes in that caveat. This is why the liberal, and the grazers whom the liberal commands, does not bat an eye when South African whites are butchered and murdered by their colored overlords. “Those are the bad whites. They must be sacrificed so the colored gods will be appeased and let the good whites live.” But since the colored barbarians are not gods of mercy, they will not let the white-hating liberals and the stupefied grazers live, but the liberal and the grazer do not believe that. ‘Though he slay thee, yet will I love and serve my savage god,’ is the creed of the liberal and his grazers.

When a town or a nation is leased out to strangers, people who have no knowledge of or interest in the traditions, manners, and customs of the people who used to reside there, the older traditions, manners, and customs die out. And that is what has happened in the European towns and nations. The Muslims and the colored savages have imposed their traditions, manners, and customs on the European people.

The liberals rejoice in the death of everything European, but they reserve the right to enjoy the pleasurable fruits of European culture. For a little while they can indulge their hypocritical lifestyles, but for how long? I recently saw a few minutes (which was all I could take) of a PBS special on Mary of Peter, Paul, and Mary fame. The matronly, liberal, earth goddess lived on a beautiful country estate, still singing radical folk songs, and still enjoying an opulent, white lifestyle that had been acquired by singing folk songs about evil white people. Had the liberal Mary taken that jet plane, along with Peter and Paul, to blackest Africa and stayed there, she would still be a disgusting liberal, but at least she would be a consistent liberal.

Many white people in town and nation bitterly regret the death of a way of life that they loved, and they look back wistfully at the days gone by. But bitterness and a nostalgic regret are not sufficient. There must be righteous anger at the loss of our European culture. Why is that essential link in the chain, righteous anger at what has been taken away from us, missing in the European people? I place the blame squarely on organized Christianity, which has become a greater anti-European, anti-Christian force than organized Jewry. The first indication that organized Christianity was a breeding ground for the religious indifference that makes a man incapable of defending his culture and his people was the French Revolution. The reason ten thousand swords did not leap from the scabbards of French cavaliers when their King and Queen were threatened was because the French clergy were advocates for their intellectual system of Christianity over and against the Pauline Christianity of the heart. They were indifferent to what was in the hearts of their people so long as their people rejected all other Christian systems and gave outward assent to the system of the French clergymen:

I have no doubt that some miserable bigots will be found here, as well as elsewhere, who hate sects and parties different from their own more than they love the substance of religion, and who are more angry with those who differ from them in their particular plans and systems than displeased with those who attack the foundation of our common hope. These men will write and speak on the subject in the manner that is to be expected from their temper and character. Burnet says that when he was in France, in the year 1683, “the method which carried over the men of the finest parts to Popery was this — they brought themselves to doubt of the whole Christian religion. When that was once done, it seemed a more indifferent thing of what side or form they continued outwardly.” If this was then the ecclesiastical policy of France, it is what they have since but too much reason to repent of. They preferred atheism to a form of religion not agreeable to their ideas. They succeeded in destroying that form; and atheism has succeeded in destroying them. I can readily give credit to Burnet’s story, because I have observed too much of a similar spirit (for a little of it is “much too much”) amongst ourselves. – Edmund Burke

A Christian system, with its own philosophy and its special catechism, is not enough to sustain a man’s faith in Jesus Christ, because there is no room in such a system for human beings, human beings with hearts that yearn for a communion with His sacred heart. There was no French opposition to the French Revolution for the same reason there is currently no opposition to the Muslim and colored invasion of Europe. The clergy refuse to support the European Christ, who can only be known in and through His people. Such a Christ is an anathema to clerical bureaucrats who must abstract God so they can dissect Him in a science lab of their own construction. Once they have put God in their science lab, they can claim exclusive rights to Him. Only they, the men in the white lab coats, can dispense God to their followers. But such a God cannot stir human hearts. God is not dead, He still lives, but He has been replaced by a false, bloodless, academic God.

The vast majority of whites do not attend church, so why do I claim that it is organized Christianity that is the main obstacle to the Christian European counter-revolution? I make such a claim, because men are motivated by their religion. Men and women without religious faith are mere sheep that are acted upon; they are not actors in the pageant of human events.(1) The Jews, the Muslims, and the colored savages are all acting according to their pagan faiths. They differ in degree, but they are united in their pagan opposition to the one true religion, which transcends paganism. It is of no small consequence then that the leaders of the Christian churches have returned to paganism by way of the Academy. They have made Christianity into a pagan philosophy. But philosophy does not have the power to combat Islam, Jewry, or black voodoo. Philosophy lacks a human heart. The great haters of European Christianity are engaged with all their heart, mind, and soul in their war against the European people. But the European people, deprived of a heartfelt religious faith, can only latch onto one of the anti-European pagan faiths, be it Islam, negro worship, or Evangelical Zionism, in order to satisfy the longing in their empty hearts.

Is all this too fantastical? I don’t think so. Why do the people who once conquered the world now lease out their nations to heathens and colored savages? Falstaff withered and died because the “King hath killed his heart.” Christ was the heart of Europe. When our people were united to His heart, we did not make a shameful conquest of ourselves, but instead we conquered other nations in His name. The defense of Europe will not come from the academy in church or state. The defense will come from Europeans who break with Churchianity and return to the God who enters human hearts. I don’t know that such a return will come about, but I do know that there will be no defense of our people and sacred Europe unless that Pauline struggle against principalities and powers, which takes place in the human heart, replaces the mind-forged liberalism of the modern, Christ-less Christian churches. If we go back to those first Christian Europeans, the men who left Woden for Christ, we do not see universalists. Those men, our brothers in the faith, did not think that they had to betray the people of their own hearth fire in order to follow Christ. Their love of Christ intensified their love for their own people. That intense love for one’s own, in and through the Savior, marked off the European Christian from the pagans who loved their generic tribe outside of the personal love of the living God. Now the antique European must ask the modern Europeans, “You all did love Him once, not without cause, for what cause have you now abandoned Him?” Of course, the answer comes back to us on a silver plate which would total 30 pieces of silver if melted down. “We have left Him, because we value the fleshpots of Babylon in this world more than eternal kinship with Him in this world and His hypothetical world to come.” So be it then, but as for me and my house, we will serve the Lord. +


(1) We know, and it is our pride to know, that man is by his constitution a religious animal; that atheism is against, not only our reason, but our instincts; and that it cannot prevail long. But if, in the moment of riot, and in a drunken delirium from the hot spirit drawn out of the alembic of hell, which in France is now so furiously boiling, we should uncover our nakedness, by throwing off that Christian religion which has hitherto been our boast and comfort, and one great source of civilization amongst us, and amongst many other nations, we are apprehensive (being well aware that the mind will not endure a void) that some uncouth, pernicious, and degrading superstition might take place of it. –Burke

Posted in counterrevolution, Europeans and Christ | Tagged ,

Europe and the Daughter of Jairus

Dore_Jesus_raising_up_the_daughter_of_JairusWhile he yet spake, there cometh one from the ruler of the synagogue’s house, saying to him, Thy daughter is dead; trouble not the Master. But when Jesus heard it, he answered him, saying, Fear not: believe only, and she shall be made whole. And when he came into the house, he suffered no man to go in, save Peter, and James, and John, and the father and the mother of the maiden. And all wept, and bewailed her: but he said, Weep not; she is not dead, but sleepeth. And they laughed him to scorn, knowing that she was dead. And he put them all out, and took her by the hand, and called, saying, Maid, arise. And her spirit came again, and she arose straightway: and he commanded to give her meat. And her parents were astonished: but he charged them that they should tell no man what was done. – Luke 8: 49-56

I’m not very computer savvy, so I don’t view the internet that often. Perhaps that’s just as well, because when I do look at the samizdat publications on the internet there seems to be virtually no opposition to white genocide in the ranks of white Christians. All I see on the white nationalist front is neopagan opposition to Jews and white Christians, whom they lump together in one package marked for disposal in the dustbin of history. The neopagans are a rather hideous group of infidels; they love the white race as the feminists love women, that is, they love an impersonal conglomeration of white chromosomes while hating the white men of the past and present who have white souls. Just as Lady Macbeth screamed, “Unsex me here,” so the neopagans scream, “Unsoul me here.” It’s more than depressing, it’s the stuff of Shakespearean tragedy, to see white men who hate white people while loving white chromosomes.

The neopagan infidels are part of Liberaldom; they, like the Jews they claim to hate so much, hate Christian Europe and look to a new world dominated by their superior intelligence. They have chosen a different colored swine than the liberals, but they have chosen, like the liberals, to enter the cliff-bound swine rather than submit to Christ the Lord.

These are bitter times, unquestionably the worst of times for European Christians. The nations of Europe have raised the Islamic Crescent over Europe, and the United States has made the Negroid race, which is very compatible with Islam, the supreme ruling race of the nation. And the only opposition to the deification of the negro and the Islamization of Europe has come from white neopagans who hate all white Christian Europeans. But let’s make one thing crystal clear: The whites are being exterminated because they once were Christian. And they have no will to resist their own extermination because they are no longer Christian. You can’t become a believing Christian for practical, utilitarian reasons, but the naked truth is part of our racial history – whites did not worship negroes nor permit Muslims to invade Europe when they believed in Jesus Christ, true God and true man. When they ceased to believe in the European Christ and shifted their allegiance to the Jewish Christ, the negro-worshipping, social worker Christ, the ecumenical Christ, etc., they lost their will to defend their racial hearth fire. “If our God condemns our racial hearth fire, why should we fight for it,” became the firm belief of the new and enlightened Europeans. The demon Pope first visited the atheist Fidel Castro before coming to the United States to condemn all white European Christians, all white men and women who still love the Savior in and through their people. This new anti-Christian narrative coming out of the Christian churches is a tale told by a moral idiot, signifying the death knell of Christian Europe.

That Christian Europe should die is the will of Satan. And he certainly has marshaled a large array of troops to do his bidding – the neopagans, the Jews, the Muslims, the barbarians of color, and the liberals are all arrayed against the last remnant of Europeans. But Satan has never understood the divine love. Christ cares about His people. In this, their greatest trial, He will not leave them defenseless. Driven to extremities they will finally let go of their ‘systems’ and find God. The great satanic error of the modern church men has been their belief that they can create a system that makes a deep, heartfelt faith unnecessary. Their belief in a religious system has made, in the church men’s eyes, individual people with hearts of flesh unnecessary. All that concerns the powers that be in organized Christianity, which has become organized Jewry, is human beings in the aggregate. “If white people no longer support our system, then we’ll cater to the Mexicans, the blacks, the Orientals, or even the Moslems. What is important is that the system survives.” But the true God is not concerned with numbers and systems. He cares about what is in the human heart. What He wants is hearts that respond to His heart. So we are back to the antique Europeans again. If we respond to their vision of Christ, which is the vision of the true God, we will be united to His sacred heart. That doesn’t guarantee we will triumph in this world. When has Christ ever promised that kind of triumph? But it does mean that we will fight for those we love, because He is in our people as we are in Him: “And there reigns love and all love’s loving parts…”

The incredible hatred for the Christ-bearing people that motivates the liberal, the neopagan, and the anti-Christian church men stems from the Caiaphas principle. Caiaphas knew there was something special about Christ; quite possibly he knew He was the Son of God. But if the true King, the Messiah, had really come into the world, what would happen to Caiaphas? Would the true King smash Caiaphas’s enemies and make his position of high priest even greater? Or would Christ do nothing against Caiaphas’s enemies other than tell them that they too could inherit eternal life? Caiaphas’s anger reached a satanic white heat when he realized that Christ had not come to set up a kingdom on earth for Caiaphas and his friends, He had come to provide eternal life, something a Sadducee had no need of, because he didn’t believe in any world but this world. Thus moral pariahs, with their visions of power in this world only, always have no place for the Son of God. Christ can only appeal to those who have reached the Shakespearean depths of life. Hamlet, Lear, and Cordelia all knew what it means to have a God whose “bosom is endeared with all hearts.” The colored savages, the Jews, the Jewish-minded neopagans, the power-mad, grasping, fawning church men, and the liberals do not.

‘Tis strange indeed that our King would come to us in mean apparel and consent to be crucified between two thieves, but He did just that, because it was the only way to reach our hearts. If you ever get a chance, take a look at the movie called Strange Cargo. It is an allegorical tale of the Christ. He comes to earth in the form of a convict, and He brings a group of hardened convicts to faith and redemption through contact with His sacred heart. All save one are saved. And the one who resists the divine love? He is the intellectual. Therein is the tragedy of Western man writ large. He is too smart to let Christ come into his heart. If we look at the Europeans’ journey from faith to darkness, we can see that the Europeans lost their way sometime after World War I. No doubt that war was a manifestation of the Europeans’ new faith in systems and science over Christ. From that time on, the ‘conservatives’ ceased to write about preserving their people; instead they wrote about preserving democracy and capitalism. Great Christian works from the 19th century, such as Beside the Bonnie Brier Bush and Tom Brown’s School Days, were regarded as sentimental slop from an unscientific age, and great 20th century Christian works, such as C. S. Lewis’s Chronicles of Narnia, were seen only as children’s books. But I am not impressed with the deluge of filth that the liberals call ‘modern literature,’ nor am I impressed with the scientific thinking of the neopagans. I am impressed – I am moved to tears – by the moral vision of the antique Europeans who saw beauty on the Cross and judged all things by His honor code, which was (and is) “that charity of honor.”

Like Theseus, we must face the Minotaur, only this time we enter the maze of existence as Christian warriors. Whether it is the colored barbarians, the Moslems, or the fifth columnists in the ranks of the Jews, the neopagans, or the church men, we cannot allow His people to perish from the earth without a fight. Right now the Europeans are dead men. Their leaders have already started the funeral rites. But who, when he walked this earth, brought the dead to life? There is life in the European people still if we do not give up on the European fairy tale, which tells us of a third dumb brother who became King of all the realm, because he had a heart on fire with charity.

Faith needs a local habitation. It is essential, now that Europeans have lost their geographical home, that they stay with their racial home. In that home is their past, their present, and their future. They belong with Alfred and Tell and the hearth fire Christians of old Europe. And they can stand with those men and women now, when they have no spot of ground to call their own. And the future? They have eternal Europe, which has the room their Savior has prepared for them.

We do not love white chromosomes without an animating spirit. We love our racial hearth fire, because He dwells there amongst His people. We shall always have a home so long as we see His divine love and our people as one incorporate union. We know that the white-hating, Christ-hating minions of Satan will not abate their fury. They will continue until the end of time. They will not be defeated on this earth until Christ returns. But they should not be permitted a free hand. Wherever European hearts stay connected to His sacred Heart, the Kingdom of God is present. It is within our power to make that connection, in and through our people. Nothing is written except this: “Lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.” +

Posted in Christ the Hero, resurrection | Tagged

Blessed Provincialism

Thomson_Old_BenjyAnd let us not be hard on him, if at that moment his soul is fuller of the tomb and him who lies there than of the altar and Him of whom it speaks. Such stages have to be gone through, I believe, by all young and brave souls, who must win their way through hero-worship, to the worship of Him who is the King and Lord of heroes. For it is only through our mysterious human relationships, through the love and tenderness and purity of mothers, and sisters, and wives, through the strength and courage and wisdom of fathers, and brothers, and teachers, that we can come to the knowledge of Him, in whom alone the love, and the tenderness, and the purity, and the strength, and the courage, and the wisdom of all these dwell for ever and ever in perfect fullness. – Thomas Hughes

Several months ago there were massive protest marches by native-born, white Germans against the Islamization of Germany. If a minority group with 1/100th of that number had marched with a grievance against the German government, that grievance would have been taken care of in favor of the foreign-born minorities. Not so with the native-born. Despite the fact that large numbers of white Germans are against the Islamization of Germany, the German government has announced they will take 1,000,000 Syrian Moslems into their country. Most European countries, Hungary and Denmark excepted, have announced similar suicidal ‘sanctuary’ policies, differing only in the number of refugee-invaders that will be allowed in. (1)

There is no need to go over old ground. This new ‘Islamization of Europe’ movement is part of the ongoing anti-European movement that Burke warned us would take place if we did not fight the Jacobins’ movement to destroy the image of God in man, which leads to the destruction of traditional governments and the traditional Christian faith of the European people. The negro, the Moslem, the yellow, and the brown, are all welcome in Europe, but the white man? He is an anathema.

I have maintained in one samizdat article after another that European men and women who love His Europe and hate Liberaldom with all their heart, mind, and soul can turn the blood-red tide of the multitudinous hordes of color and heathens away from Europe’s shores. But what evidence is there of such a groundswell of European opposition? There is no evidence, in fact, the anti-European invaders seem stronger and larger in numbers than ever before. Maybe we are destined to perish to the last man, but if the old Europe is His Europe, why would you want to try to survive by making a place for yourself in Liberaldom? That is the devil’s trap. He wants you to sell your soul in order to live in Liberaldom. It won’t work. The devil will take your soul and kill your body as well. No whites will be allowed to live in Liberaldom.

The white grazer has failed to grasp the fact that white people are a conquered race. No white man should support his local school, his local church, or “the troops.” The power structures of the Western world are at war with the white race. If whites could grasp that fact, they might at least make it a little more difficult for the Moslems and the colored savages to push them off the face of the earth. Let me use my own passive people here in America as prime examples of the foolish grazers. Every time I take one of my sons to a gun range, I see a whole host of heavily armed men testing their rifles and shotguns for deer season. These men are excellent shots and can’t wait for the big hunt. All quite masculine, isn’t it? No, it is not. Not one of these men ever shows the slightest interest in the fact that negroes, Mexicans, and Moslems have invaded their nation. I have nothing against hunting per se, but are deer a greater threat than the blood-red tide of colored tribesmen and Moslems? Of course the key is the powers that be. Our liberal government has not called the colored and Moslem invasion an invasion. If the liberals call an invasion ‘sanctuary,’ the grazers will not challenge their government. They will fly the flag, hunt, and watch football – God bless America, aren’t we glad we are so free? Free to do what? To swill beer, watch football, and shoot deer under the watchful eye of Uncle Sam? But what are we not free to do? We are not free to defend our birthright, a white Christian European nation wrested from the heathens in the days when Europeans were Christian. Football, hunting, and beer are not worth our souls.

The white grazers do not lack physical courage. If their government told them that the Moslems and colored hordes were invaders and called upon them to fight, the grazers would leave hunting and football behind to fight. What the white grazers lack is moral courage and moral vision. They won’t fight without government sanction, because they have lost the blood faith of their ancestors. What is true, what is good, is handed to them on a computer printout from the rulers in church and state, and the computer printout always tells them that the white Christian must give way to the colored strangers and the heathen faiths.

The ‘computer printout’ philosophy of existence stems from the great scholastic’s heretical view that reason was free of original sin. Henceforth it was better to be smart in the head than wise in the heart. St. Paul’s moral vision of the circumcised heart was replaced by the reasoning men who had computer printouts of God. Great poets have a way of encapsulating an intellectual state of mind with a few words. Balzac put his finger on the source of Western man’s decadence when he wrote that in Paris to say a man has a good heart is to say he is stupid as a rhinoceros. If the human heart is not connected to God, then how are we to know God? The answer the church men gave us was that we could know God by being as smart as the Greek philosophers and as detached from the incarnate God and our own people as Buddha was from all of existence. St. Paul enjoins us to rely on the charity that never faileth while our church men advise us to rely on the universal mind, which they, the proud pontificators – the scientists, the educators, the philosophers, and the theologians – insist is greater than charity. With blinding sight Burke spelled out for us the brave new world that was unfolding before our eyes in Jacobin France:

But the age of chivalry is gone; that of sophisters, economists, and calculators has succeeded, and the glory of Europe is extinguished forever. Never, never more, shall we behold that generous loyalty to rank and sex, that proud submission, that dignified obedience, that subordination of the heart, which kept alive, even in servitude itself, the spirit of an exalted freedom! The unbought grace of life, the cheap defense of nations, the nurse of manly sentiment and heroic enterprise is gone. It is gone, that sensibility of principle, that charity of honor, which felt a stain like a wound, which inspired courage whilst it mitigated ferocity, which ennobled whatever it touched, and under which vice itself lost half its evil, by losing all its grossness. – Burke

There are religious sects, such as the Mormons, who fly in the face of the traditional Christian belief that the age of prophesy ended with the coming of Christ. We must reject such ‘religious’ sects, because they devalue the importance of the Lord of History, Jesus Christ. However, there is another sort of prophet that the Christian people have always honored – the man who judges his times and warns us what will happen “if these shadows are not altered.” Burke contrasted the ‘charity of honor’ culture of old Europe with the new Jacobin culture of utopian Babylon and enjoined Western man to stand with that ‘charity of honor’ culture against the forces of Babylon. Babylon won out, because the men of Europe wanted to be smart. And having that charity of honor is the equivalent of being as stupid as a rhinoceros in the eyes of the world. In the popular movie of the 1950s, The Day the Earth Stood Still, it is scientists on earth and the aliens from another planet, who are both connected to the spirit of the great universal mind, who will save the earth from utter destruction. And in the popular movie Star Wars, it is The Force, not Jesus Christ, who will save us. It is always supposed to be the smarter, and therefore more religious, thing to do, to be faithful to smart scientists and theologians who invoke the great universal mind, instead of being faithful to a personal God who comes to us in and through the people of our racial hearth fire. The provincial, heartfelt, blood faith of the European has now gone underground, and that is the reason that the Moslem and colored hordes have invaded Europe. When European men once again view Christ as the God who enters human hearts, they will reclaim Europe for Him. For how can a man fight for the great god of the universal mind? He can’t, but he can and will fight for his Lord and kinsman, Jesus Christ.

When love of kith and kin is interwoven with love of God, a man defends his nation, because everything he holds dear is contained in his nation. If the love of kith and kin, the love which was sanctioned by our incarnate Lord, is demonized, and the love of a universalist, abstract people and an abstract god is seen as the highest and purest religion, then utter destruction will fall upon those who believe in such a demonic faith. Is not the hatred of the incarnation of our Lord the ultimate mark of Satan? The demon pope is coming to the United States, where he will condemn, in the name of his purer, higher religion, all the provincial, traditional ties that bind the European to his hearth fire, his nation, and his God. A man needs to have a faith inside his heart so that he can resist the demon forces from outside his heart, which threaten his racial heart fire.

In that simple masterpiece titled Tom Brown’s Schooldays – simple because Thomas Hughes saw Christ in his kith and kin – Hughes rejects the universal mind for Jesus of Nazareth. Arnold of Rugby could not convert his son – therein lies the mystery of divine grace – but he did show the light to one student who loved him and loved Christ through Arnold of Rugby.

What was it that moved and held us, the rest of the three hundred reckless, childish boys, who feared the Doctor with all our hearts, and very little besides in heaven or earth; who thought more of our sets in the School than of the Church of Christ, and put the traditions of Rugby and the public opinion of boys in our daily life above the laws of God? We couldn’t enter into half that we heard; we hadn’t the knowledge of our own hearts or the knowledge of one another, and little enough of the faith, hope, and love needed to that end. But we listened… It was not the cold, clear voice of one giving advice and warning from serene heights to those who were struggling and sinning below, but the warm, living voice of one who was fighting for us and by our sides, and calling on us to help him and ourselves and one another. And so, wearily and little by little, but surely and steadily on the whole, was brought home to the young boy, for the first time, the meaning of his life—that it was no fool’s or sluggard’s paradise into which he had wandered by chance, but a battlefield ordained from of old, where there are no spectators, but the youngest must take his side, and the stakes are life and death. And he who roused this consciousness in them showed them at the same time, by every word he spoke in the pulpit, and by his whole daily life, how that battle was to be fought, and stood there before them their fellow-soldier and the captain of their band—the true sort of captain, too, for a boy’s army—one who had no misgivings, and gave no uncertain word of command, and, let who would yield or make truce, would fight the fight out (so every boy felt) to the last gasp and the last drop of blood. Other sides of his character might take hold of and influence boys here and there; but it was this thoroughness and undaunted courage which, more than anything else, won his way to the hearts of the great mass of those on whom he left his mark, and made them believe first in him and then in his Master. – Tom Brown’s Schooldays

Tom Brown’s Schooldays went from being considered a classic to being considered a mere “child’s tale,” and then was dispatched to oblivion. Its journey has been the journey of the European people. They had the faith, in all its fullness, then they relegated the faith to the stuff of fables, and finally they consigned the simple faith in Christ the Lord to oblivion and replaced it with a faith in science and Babylon. Whatever is provincial and European is evil, and whatever is universal and anti-European is good. But Christ resides in that provincial, European hearth fire. Without His leadership, the world becomes Babylon. For charity’s sake we must fight for the European hearth fire even though the experts in church and state tell us we are evil for doing so. Charity endureth forever, and Babylon consumes itself and all those who champion its cause. +

(1) I heard a news commentator say that Hungary had disgraced Europe by refusing to take in Syrian Moslems. Whom does that commentator speak for? He doesn’t speak for me, nor does he speak for the white people of Hungary. He speaks for the inhuman liberals who hate their own people with a despicable, satanic hatred that marks them off from the rest of mankind and makes them unfit to live, let alone govern.

Posted in Europe as the Christ-bearer | Tagged ,

Ganelon’s Treachery Returns

RolandAnd when he went forth to land, there met him out of the city a certain man, which had devils long time, and ware no clothes, neither abode in any house, but in the tombs. When he saw Jesus, he cried out, and fell down before him, and with a loud voice said, What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of God most high? I beseech thee, torment me not. (For he had commanded the unclean spirit to come out of the man. For oftentimes it had caught him: and he was kept bound with chains and in fetters; and he brake the bands, and was driven of the devil into the wilderness.)

And Jesus asked him, saying, What is thy name? And he said, Legion: because many devils were entered into him. And they besought him that he would not command them to go out into the deep. And there was there a herd of many swine feeding on the mountain: and they besought him that he would suffer them to enter into them. And he suffered them. Then went the devils out of the man, and entered into the swine: and the herd ran violently down a steep place into the lake, and were choked. – Luke 8: 27-33

My mother’s father gave her a set of storybooks when she was little, and she in turn gave them to me. The stories in the various books are stories of the European people. They tell the story of The Bruce, of William Tell, of the Red Cross Knight, and many, many more tales about the great heroes of the white race. Among those many more is the story of Roland, the bravest of Charlemagne’s knights. He was betrayed by his father-in-law Ganelon to the Muslims and died, fighting nobly with a few companions against hordes of Muslims:

Scarcely had Roland breathed his last when Charlemagne arrived to find of all his twenty thousand no one left. Mournfully he called his peers by name. Not one there was to answer – not a single one. And on the height, his face toward Spain, they found the hero Roland. Great was the grief of all. Great was the grief of Charlemagne. His host pursued the Saracens, and by the river E’bro the Moors paid to the full the penalty of their treachery. Then bearing the bodies of Roland and Oliver, Charlemagne returned to France. Laden with chains and tied to a stake like a wild beast Ganelon was led before his judges for trial. By his dark deed lay twenty thousand dead. He was condemned and suffered a shameful death. But in the hearts of Charlemagne and all the people of France remained undying love for Roland, for he took his stand, and held it, never yielding unto death.

In Dante’s Inferno only the Devil himself is placed lower in hell than Ganelon. But now Europe is governed by a whole host of Ganelons. In the name of compassion we are told by church and state that the European people in America and Europe proper must take in thousands upon thousands of Syrian Muslims. Sanctuary? It is not sanctuary, it is an invasion. And the Ganelons of modern Europe should be tied to a stake like their infamous predecessor and tried for their crimes. Instead they luxuriate in fits of self-righteous indignation when any nation, as Hungary tried to do, makes an effort to protect her people from the Muslim hordes. The European Ganelons always pick out some fresh-faced Muslim woman with a cute infant in her arms – “How can you deny them access to your nation?” It should be easy. We should deny all such invaders access to our nation, because we love our own sweet-faced women and children. We don’t hate yours, but you have a nation to go to – go there!

The liberals’ incredible double-dealing is obvious. On the one hand we are told that we must abort all babies born in the European nations, because there are too many babies being born. And then on the other hand we are told we must allow an unlimited amount of Muslims into European nations. Why must we do this? Because we are commanded to go over the cliff with the swinish liberals who are possessed by the devil.

The liberals’ hatred of their own and their love of the stranger can only be understood in the context of demonic possession. Why else would they welcome people into their nation with values diametrically opposed to their own values? Islam is certainly opposed to Christianity, but it is also opposed to liberalism, and yet, only a few liberals, such as Geert Wilders and Jared Taylor, have pointed out the incompatibility of liberalism and Islam. There will be no gay marriages in a Muslim Europe, there will be no feminism, there will be no negro worship, and there will be no toleration of Jews. Why then would the liberals welcome them into their nations? It goes back to the demons in that Gospel story in St. Luke. The liberals have one fear that overrides all other fears: the fear of the God of Mercy, Jesus Christ. And even though the European people have ceased, as a collective body, to be Christian, the liberals fear and hate them, because they were once Christian. It’s the same way with the Muslims. When the Ayatollah Khomeini was performing Muslim hijinks in Iran, he referred to the West as the Christian West, his ancient enemy. The liberals of the West tried to tell him that the West was not Christian, but to no avail. For him the West was Richard, Raymond, and Godfrey. Would that it were true! The enemies of Christ, be they liberal or Muslim, will always hate the white race, because of what the white race once was, the Christ-bearing race. Muslims are not exclusively anti-white, they also hate Christians of other races — witness their execution of the Coptic Christians – but white people will always be the primary enemy of Muslims, because of their past devotion, as an entire race, to the God of mercy.

Some neopagans and right-wing Christians have expressed a preferment for Muslims over the liberals. “Let them come, at least they are not liberals,” is their sentiment. But should a Christian let Muslims determine who should live and who should die? A Muslim state would be just as evil as a liberal state. The important thing is to fight both liberalism and Islam. The Christian European doesn’t oppose Islam because its tenets run contrary to the liberal tenets of the Western democracies, he opposes Islam because its tenets are diametrically opposed to European Christianity, the faith of our ascending race. There is no room for Muslims or liberals in Europe, but since the latter are homegrown we must deal with them on a case by case basis and gradually purge them from our ranks. But the Muslims are foreign invaders; there is no reason why we have to suffer one single Muslim on European soil. Let them practice what they feel is the true faith in the Islamic countries and let Christian Europe alone. But of course the Muslims will not let Europe alone. The liberal Ganelons have let them in. Only European Christians can stop the Muslims at the gates of Vienna. Are there any left? There are certainly none in the organized churches, but the true faith runs through human hearts. Will there be enough European hearts of flesh to stop the blood-red tide? I don’t know; I only know that I love my people and I hate Muslim invaders. Are there no other European people left who love and hate with all their heart?

I once had a student who asked me why I was so hostile to Islam since the Muslims were against the liberals. I answered him with the “pushing an old lady” example. A man could be pushing an old lady into traffic or out of traffic. The two acts of pushing the old lady are the same physical acts, but spiritually they are quite different. The one act saves the old lady, while the other kills her. A Christian opposes feminism, because feminism destroys femininity, which is a source of grace. The Christian does not, as the Muslim does, despise femininity itself. So it goes with all the issues that a more conservative Christian might seem, on the surface, to be of a like mind with the Muslims. But there is absolutely no agreement between a nature religion that is a fusion of Judaism and paganism and a religion of spirit and truth forged from a relationship between the incarnate God of charity and mercy and His people who have circumcised their hearts in order to receive Him still. I find it hard to believe, as Burke found it hard to believe that the French courtiers would not defend their Queen, that any non-liberal European could accept the existence of Islam in Europe. But we know of the grazers; they are wedded to their local atheist clergy and a false idea of universalism, but it is only universalism for the white race; they must love the stranger and hate themselves while the Muslim stranger and the colored stranger need only take care of their own while they destroy the infidel, who is always the white man and those who accept the white man’s religion.

The liberal, the Jew, and the Muslim are at odds on so many issues, but they are one at the core of their hatred: They hate the incarnate God. Can there be a unity based only on hatred? I don’t think so. The Christian European will always be opposed by liberals, Jews, and Muslims, but beyond that they will always be at war with each other. It’s not our mission to side with one over the other, or to try and blend them all into one big ecumenical stew. It’s our mission to hold onto the vision of the incarnate Lord bequeathed to us at our racial hearth fire by our European ancestors.

The whites’ surrender to the Muslims, the liberals, the blacks, and the Jews stems from their lack of faith in Christ as the Lord of History. Christian atheists have tried to justify their betrayal of the European people by claiming that they are just being more Christian; they are perfecting their Christian faith by jettisoning the antique Europeans and their culture. But that is precisely the point. If you deny what even the antique Europeans’ Muslim enemies conceded – that the Europeans’ culture was Christian in all its essentials — then you deny the incarnation of our Lord. If He was not incarnate in Christian Europe then how is He to be known? Is He to be known in the future, as the Jews believe; is He only a minor prophet, as the Muslims believe; is He a social worker, as the liberals believe; or is He a weak and ineffectual pagan deity, as the blacks believe?

Ganelon was tried and killed, because the Europeans of that era believed Christ was incarnate in the European people. To betray them was to betray Him. The modern liberals also believe that Christ was incarnate in the antique European people. That is why they want the West to replace their heirs with Muslims. They want to show there is no going back. Once white people are no more, the Son of Man will have no place to lay His head. It is one of the great ironies of history, but an irony that makes sense from a Christian perspective, that when white people thought they were weaklings who needed Christ the Lord, they conquered the world with their creativity and their unconquerable spirit. Now that they think they are strong and independent, without any need for the incarnate Lord, they are jabbering idiots too weak to resist an invasion of ants, let alone an invasion of warlike heathens. When a mine caved in in Wales and a minder was trapped below, the miner’s friends would say “Who is for Edmund Gwynn?” — or whoever was trapped below. And the man’s friends would say, “I am for Edmund Gwynn,” and they would go down into the mine to see if they could rescue their friend. “Who is for the antique Europeans and the Incarnate Lord?” If we bring them out of the mine that the liberals have exploded on top of them, they will rescue us.+

Posted in Christian Europe, counterrevolution | Tagged ,

On Bended Knee

FDore_Crucifixion_Plate216or heathen heart that puts her trust
In reeking tube and iron shard,
All valiant dust that builds on dust,
And guarding, calls not thee to guard,
For frantic boast and foolish word
Thy mercy on thy people, Lord!

-Rudyard Kipling


America is governed by a revolutionary tribunal government with a slight twist on the Jacobin and Russian models. In our nation the twin-evil system is used. There are two parties, both sworn enemies of the other, who beg Americans to choose their party come election time lest the country face economic and moral ruin. But this is part of Satan’s plan. Both parties are committed to Jacobinism, the democracy of ‘some are more equal than others.’ Our elections, like our court proceedings, are merely for show; the results will be the same whether a Republican or a Democrat is elected. Negro worship will remain the national religion, Christian Europeans will remain a persecuted race, and everything vile and loathsome, such as Lady Macbeth-feminism, sodomy, and miscegenation will be exalted while everything decent and good that stems from the older, white culture will be vilified and denigrated.

The revolutionary nature of the American experiment in democracy becomes crystal clear when we see how all the various branches of the revolutionary tribunal respond to black atrocities. It is that response which highlights the first principle of the revolution – ‘Some are more equal than others,’ namely, the black savages, because they are completely untainted by anything that stinks of the sins of the antique Europeans.

In the extremely rare instance when a white man kills blacks, as in the case of the North Carolina church shootings, it is always (as it should be) the shooter’s fault and it is also (as it should not be) the fault of the entire white race. Groups are formed (‘Black lives matter’), marches take place, and whites go into a frenzy of mourning and ‘what can be done?’ self-flagellation. What happens when the all too frequent torture murders of whites and the simple, regular murders of whites by blacks take place? When the atrocities cannot be ignored, which in most cases they are, the black atrocities are blamed on whites. Very learned whites gather together to try and discover what whites have done and are still doing to make blacks do such horrendous things. No academic ever blames blacks for their murderous deeds; it is always the white man’s fault. Why is it never, in the opinion of the white academic, the black man’s fault? Because there is no sin in the black man; only the white European is invested and infected with original sin. ’Keep looking,’ the academician says, ‘eventually you’ll find the reason for the hideously inhuman and savage behavior of the black man. It will be white racism.’ You see the liberal has already made an a priori assumption about the evil of the white man and the goodness of the black man. No historical reality can alter his a priori assumption.

At this writing the city of Baltimore is in ruins while negroes are running amok. This is because whites are acting under the assumption that they can stop black violence by not responding to black violence. ‘Just let them riot, murder, and rape so that they will see that we are not racist. And once they see that we are not racist they will cease to riot, murder, and rape.’ That is perfectly logical if – and it is a big if – the black race really is free from original sin.

Blacks of course are not free from original sin, which is part of the human condition. But they are free from original sin and every other type of sin in the eyes of the liberals. And this belief of the liberals is destroying the white race. To build your society on the belief that the most savage and anti-Christian element of your society are special deities to be petted, pampered, and adored as the sacred cows are petted, pampered, and adored by the Hindu is to commit racial suicide.

There is a species of bird called the cowbird that lay their eggs in the nests of other birds when the nests are unattended, to be hatched by the nest owner. If their eggs are rejected by the nest owner, then they return and destroy the others’ eggs in retaliation. The ‘enlightened’ liberals of the revolutionary tribunal have gone one better: they have invited the cowbird-negro into the racial hearth of the European people in order to destroy the European people. The liberals are allowed to do this now, because they are powerful. To oppose them means the loss of livelihood and often the loss of life. They were allowed to do this in the past, because they presented themselves as the intelligent and enlightened purveyors of the new utopian age. If a man wants to share in the fruits of utopia he has to go along with the new ethos of utopia that highlights miscegenation, feminism, legalized abortion, and the mandatory acceptance of sodomy. Do we really get so much from our revolutionary tribunal government that we should support them as they destroy everything our people once held to be sacred?

The revolutionary tribunal government in America does not differ greatly from the revolutionary tribunal governments in Europe. The European nations permit multiple political parties, but whenever a third or fourth party – let’s say, an anti-immigration party – starts to become successful, the major liberal parties unite to defeat that party. The important thing is that the revolutionary tribunal government must stay in power. Third party platforms are only adopted by revolutionary governments when their platforms support the revolution.

All nations, even anti-nations such as the modern revolutionary tribunal nations, have a moral essence. The moral essence of the old European nations was European Christianity – one race, one faith. The moral essence of the new European nations is a utopian moral essence. Whatever is anti-Christian and anti-white is part of the moral essence of the new Europe. This is why you will never get anywhere by protesting black crime, abortion, or gay rights. Such things are part of the moral essence of the liberals’ utopia, and they will defend them to the death – your death. If, however, you wish to protest the lack of women in your local fire department or the small number of black doctors, your protests will be heard, and the powers that be will try to redress the ‘injustice.’

Shakespeare tells us, through Banquo, that ‘tis strange’:

And oftentimes, to win us to our harm,
The instruments of darkness tell us truths,
Win us with honest trifles, to betray’s
In deepest consequence.

When they are out of power, the revolutionaries often tell us honest trifles about the Ancien Régime: ‘The King picks his nose’ or ‘The Queen has too many hair dressers,’ etc., in order to lead us into a betrayal of the Ancien Régime, which shall ultimately hurt us in deepest consequence. None of the Ancien Régimes can stand up to the scrutiny of utopian liberals. They will all be found wanting. But why, once the Ancien Régimes are toppled, are not the revolutionary tribunal governments held to the same standards to which the Ancien Régimes were held? The answer is quite simple – the new revolutionary regimes are moving toward utopia; therefore, everything they do, which usually includes shedding the blood of millions of innocent men, women, and children, must be forgiven.

In contrast to the revolutionary regimes, the more traditional Ancien Régimes such as Czarist Russia and monarchist France did not need to shed the blood of the innocents to maintain their regimes. Perhaps this was because the Ancien Régimes were not utopian regimes. Perfection demands bloodshed. The revolutionary tribunal governments have no qualms about shedding blood, because their hearts are pure; they are building the new Babylon.

The white blood being shed in the utopian states of Europe and America will not be lamented by the revolutionary tribunals. In fact the murder of whites is the proof of the revolutionary governments’ sincerity. Utopia cannot become a reality until the non-utopian whites, the original sinners, are eliminated. That is the new catechism – all atrocities are permitted so long as blacks commit the atrocities; there is no valid criticism that can be leveled at the revolutionary governments, because their hearts are pure, and there is no evil that cannot be countenanced so long as it moves mankind, minus white mankind, toward a future state of utopian bliss.

A government can stand without the enthusiastic support of the bulk of its citizens; it needs only the enthusiastic support of a tiny minority and the passive acceptance of the rest of its citizens. It is clear who makes up the ranks of the enthusiastic supporters of the revolutionary tribunal governments of the European nations. The mad-dog liberals, fueled by satanic hatred for the people and culture of old Europe, make up the ranks of ruling elite of the new, anti-white European nations. But why do the grazers acquiesce? Why do they permit the liberals to rule? I’ve had many years to think about that question, and though there are many different reasons why the grazers do not oppose the liberals’ revolutionary government – fear of economic deprivation, the need for the approval of society, the need to participate in and watch state-sponsored sporting events – all these are reasons why the grazers stay with the revolutionary tribunal governments, but they are not the reason. The European people, even in their decadent grazing state of existence, ultimately are motivated by their religion. The Christian churches, after World War I, started preaching a blended Christianity. Out and out enemies of Christianity were able to win the church-going Christians over to their side on many issues, such as miscegenation, because the churches started to lend their support to such perversions. Gradually the churches lost their independent voices and became very tiny adjuncts of the revolutionary tribunal governments. The European people, the most religious people on the face of the earth, will not break from the revolutionary tribunal governments, because they will not break faith with what they perceive to be their religion, a blended religion that combines Christianity, democracy, negro worship, Judaism, and paganism.

Kipling and Thomas Nelson Page got it right. When the white man loves and hates with all his heart miracles occur. When we shake the superflux (1) of blended Christianity off and go back to that hovel with King Lear, we will discover that a European hovel becomes a manger where “love and all love’s loving parts” reigns. The onward and upward march of the utopians leads to hell. The bended knee at the foot of the cross, the symbol and substance of the true Europeans, leads to His kingdom come, on earth as it is in heaven. +
(1) Expose thyself to feel what wretches feel,
That thou mayst shake the superflux to them
And show the heavens more just.

Posted in counterrevolution, democracy, Uncategorized, Utopianism | Tagged

We Labor and Weep

Gilbert_Lear_with_CordeliaYou find it perfectly ridiculous, and unfit for me in particular, to take these things as my ingredients of commiseration. Pray why is it absurd in me to think, that the chivalrous spirit which dictated a veneration for women of condition and of beauty, without any consideration whatever of enjoying them, was the great source of those manners which have been the pride and ornament of Europe for so many ages? And am I not to lament that I have lived to see those manners extinguished in so shocking a manner, by means of speculations of finance, and the false science of a sordid and degenerate philosophy?

-Edmund Burke

As if the United States wasn’t bad enough already, now we must suffer through a visit from an atheist pope whose ‘religious vision’ is a combination of Marxism and Al Gore’s ‘global warming of the earth’ philosophy. For me the Pope’s visit highlights the huge gulf that exists between organized Christianity and Christ. Perhaps the European people were more necessary to the faith than the organizational men thought. But of course I’m being disingenuous when I say “perhaps.” It is crystal clear that the only true church was – and is – the European people that believe in the historical Jesus who dwelt by their racial hearth fire. And it is also crystal clear that the Pope and all the forces of Liberaldom, which are the forces of hell, are totally against the Christian folk of Europe. As Bassanio says of Shylock, we can also say of liberals such as Pope Francis:

“Yes, here I tender it for him in the court; Yea, twice the sum. If that will not suffice, I will be bound to pay it ten times o’er, on forfeit of my hands, my head, my heart. If this will not suffice, it must appear That malice bears down truth.”

Yes, malice has borne down truth. What is our truth, the European folk, and what is their truth, the liberals from hell? Our truth is that the Christ-bearing people brought the negroes from darkness to light and did all that was humanly possible to do for savages who resisted the light with all their heart, mind, and soul. The liberals’ truth is that the white man destroyed the civilizations of noble savages and imprisoned great saints such as Nelson Mandela and Martin Luther King Jr. Our truth is that there is no mercy, no charity in Islam and the Christian faith must be fought for in the name of the God of charity and mercy. The liberals’ truth is that the good Muslims must be welcomed to the West, because Islam is a nobler and purer faith than Christianity. Our truth is that all the modern ills – feminism, institutionalized sodomy, negro worship, and Western democracy – stem from the fact that Europeans have rejected the historical Jesus, the God of our ascending race, for the blended Christ, for the science lab, and for the negro. Their truth is that all the modern ills stem from European Christianity and that feminism, negro worship, science, and institutionalized sodomy will cure the cancer of European Christianity. There can be no compromise between two such divergent views of existence. One people must be wrong and one people must be right. I find it hard to believe (but I must believe it because it happened) that a European cannot see that it is impossible to blend the Christian folk of the old, provincial, racist, Christian Europe with the liberals of the new, multiracial, universalist, atheist Europe. One people must triumph and the other must die. At present it is old Europe that has died. If we spend what remains of our lives reversing that defeat we will not be rejected when we stand before our Maker at the last judgment.

I certainly do not have an inkling as to the day and the hour of that final reckoning when the true King will return, but it does seem like this, our modern Satania, engenders a feeling of Armageddon. Because of the great institutionalized evils of feminism, negro worship, sodomy, democracy, and science, we feel that all the forces of hell have been arrayed against us. The fumes of Hell are in the very air we breathe. “It must be time to rise and ride,” is the unspoken yearning of every European who remains a European.

Satan took over Europe through the home-grown horde of sophisters, economists, and calculators that Burke opposed so mightily. Through the press and the academy those calculators, sophisters, and economists could deluge the nations with lies that became true-lies to the people, because the truth was never heard; it was buried in the propaganda of anti-Christian liberalism, whose greatest proponent was Rousseau:

Through him they teach men to love after the fashion of philosophers; that is, they teach to men, to Frenchmen, a love without gallantry; a love without any thing of that fine flower of youthfulness and gentility, which places it, if not among the virtues, among the ornaments of life. Instead of their passion, naturally allied to grace and manners, they infuse into their youth an unfashioned, indelicate, sour, gloomy, ferocious medley of pedantry and lewdness of metaphysical speculations, blended with the coarsest sensuality.  – Burke

The new religion of utopian lies was very powerful in Burke’s day, but prophets like Burke could still have an influence. Burke could not stop the ongoing march to oblivion that continued after Robespierre’s death. But he did, almost singlehandedly, turn the British people against the French Revolution. It gives me great satisfaction to know that his English neighbors burned down Priestley’s house; it’s a pity Priestley escaped the fire. Oh to be in London when Priestley’s house went up in flames. ‘Tis a consummation devoutly to be hoped for and fought for – to see the whole liberal house of cards go up in flames.

In the early 1900s William Graham Sumner wrote a book called Folkways in which he delineated what Burke had said almost 120 years earlier. Sumner called the antique Europeans who lived by prejudices rooted in tradition, ‘the folk.’ And he called the managerial overlords – the economists, calculators, and sophists – the stentors (named after Stentor, the Greek Warrior, “whose voice was as powerful as fifty voices of other men”). But as Weyl and Marina point out in their book American Statesmen on Slavery and the Negro, neither Stentor nor Graham or any other statesman of the pagan or Christian era of Europe could have foreseen just how powerful the stentor class would become in the mass media era, the era when science, the liberals’ Holy Ghost, could enable the ruling stentor class, the liberals, to spread lying propaganda throughout the entire globe in seconds. Without technology the liberals would have to do the slow pamphleteering of the bad old days of the French Revolution. “They were grand days, but it took too long to get out the message.” Solzhenitsyn remarked on this phenomenon when he first came out of the Gulag. He said that in America you could speak the truth but it was drowned out by the plethora of lies put out by the stentorian rulers of Liberaldom.

Solzhenitsyn made his statement about the truth being drowned out in the early 1970s. It is still drowned out, but because of the success of the stentorian campaign of lies, truth has gone further underground. You really must support the lies or you will not be allowed to speak. In Britain the late John Tyndall was sent to jail for a private, off-the-cuff remark about the Islamic invasion of Britain. Every European nation inflicts different penalties, but every European nation, led by liberal stentors, punishes the truth tellers and supports the great lie that the new Babylonian Europe, the Europe of technological barbarians united to colored barbarians and sustained by science, is the true Europe, and the folk Europe, the Europe of charity, mercy, and Christian romance, is the false Europe.
Can one man or a handful of men who live, with all their heart, mind, and soul, in old Europe, overcome all the forces of technological hell, which have been institutionalized in modern Liberaldom? The answer is ‘no, they cannot,’ if you look at their task from a material standpoint. To defeat the invincible forces of Satanism with material weapons is as impossible as moving mountains with a shovel. But what of the Christian romance? What of St. Paul, Alfred, and Gottschalk? If we see what they saw and invoke their God, can we defeat Satan and his minions? Yes, it is quite possible, if, as in all the European fairy tales, we fight in His name for that charity of honor.

My favorite of Walt Disney’s animated films was one of his last animated films. The critics didn’t like it, because it ‘didn’t break new ground,’ and it ‘just told an old fairy tale,’ but I loved it as a child and I love it still. The film is Sleeping Beauty. The finale pits young Prince Philip against Maleficent, the evil sorceress. After she has thrown obstacle after obstacle in Prince Philip’s path, who is trying to awaken Sleeping Beauty with ‘love’s first kiss,’ and has failed to stop Prince Philip with any of her fiendish obstacles, Maleficent is forced to reveal her true self. Right before she turns into an enormous, fire-spewing dragon, she says, “Now deal with me and all the forces of hell!” The Prince is undeterred. Armed with the shield of virtue and the sword of truth, he hurls the sword into the dragon’s heart. The dragon falls to the ground and all that remains is the sword of truth standing upright in the ground. “The sign of the cross, the spirit above the dust.” Not up to Walt Disney’s usual standards? Hogwash, it is the crowning achievement of his magnificent career as the Hans Christian Andersen of the 20th century.

It’s quite significant that the modern Disney studio, which, like our modern churches, keeps the old symbols of a Christian people while supporting Satanism, has released a new version of Sleeping Beauty in which Maleficent is the heroine. That is as it should be; a society dedicated to Satan should celebrate his triumph over the Christian folk of old Europe.

To say I admire Edmund Burke would be a huge understatement. I love him. He loved Christian Europe, and he sacrificed friendship, prestige, and money to defend Christ’s Europe against the legions of Satan, the economists, calculators, and sophists. To stand alone as Burke did is impossible for a man who does not see Christ in the civilization and the people whom he is defending. It is with me as it was with Burke: “It is impossible that a greater difference can exist on earth, than, unfortunately for me, there is on those subjects, between your sentiments and mine.” There is no possibility of coexisting with the haters of Christian Europe. To think and feel as they do would destroy our souls. Christ’s words come back to us when we think of assuaging our loneliness with just a little bit of liberalism: “For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world and lose his own soul.” This incredible loneliness is like a sword thrust in the heart. But the fact that we can’t give up the romance, even if the loneliness kills us, tells us where we belong. We belong with Him, sword in hand, fighting the forces of darkness so long as we can draw a breath in this world. And afterwards? The fairy tale is true and Liberaldom is false. We shall see our Lord face to face. +

Posted in antique Christianity | Tagged

Who Will Defend Christian Europe?

Nathaniel_Bedford_Forrest_statue“It may be tempting for the historian to arraign great men, prosecute them and convict them. It panders to his prejudices, inflates his ego and is invariably successful, since they are not present to defend themselves.” – Weyl and Marina


Let’s pretend I’m a talk show host. On my second show I have a panel of experts discussing the negro. All the experts take it as a given that integration has been a failure. In light of that fact, the experts are discussing whether it would be better to send all the blacks back to Africa or to relocate them to a few states in the United States.

The third show is dedicated to feminism. The demonic nature of feminism is taken as a given. That abortion will once again become illegal and abortion doctors will receive the death penalty is agreed upon with virtually no discussion at all. What the panel of experts is divided on is how strict the measures should be in order to insure that the laws of a Christian patriarchy are adhered to. The consensus of the panel is that the laws must be very strict at first, because so much damage has been done by matriarchal rule. But once patriarchy is reestablished, there can be a certain relaxing, but no abeyance, of some of the stricter laws.

The fourth show is about the homosexual menace that so recently threatened to destroy the last vestiges of Western civilization. Again, the sinfulness of sodomy is taken as a given by the panel. What is necessary is to determine the punishment for the public advocacy of homosexuality. Eschewing the medieval practice of punishing the private, hidden homosexuality, the panel agrees on the necessity of punishing any public advocacy of homosexual rights or any public display of homosexuality.

The fifth show is on the subject of the democratic heresy, not just as regards the American experiment in democracy, but also as regards the various European democracies. Democracy as a religion is condemned out of hand. What the panel discusses is the nature of the monarchy that is to be adopted. Shall it be an absolute monarchy, or a constitutional monarchy with a republican and popular element? But at no point in the discussions is there any talk of reviving the American and modern European satanic experiments in ‘some-are-more-equal-than-others’ democracy.

The first show is the show that determined the subject matter for all the subsequent shows. In that first show the necessity of preserving and defending the European peoples’ Christian faith was discussed. The panel agreed that freedom of religion only applied to freedom within the Christian faith. The freedom to advocate another religion other than Christianity, the freedom to build a heathen church and the freedom to oppose the laws stemming from a Christian government, such as the laws prohibiting abortion and miscegenation, would be strictly forbidden.

Of course my talk show would never be allowed. The liberals would never allow such public ‘blasphemy.’ They would never permit the public condemnation of legalized abortion, democracy, and sodomy, and the advocacy of segregation and favored religion status for Christianity. And of course the reason the liberals would not permit a television show challenging the sacred cows of Liberaldom is because the liberals fought long and hard to establish their power. Why should they give it up by allowing any type of challenge to their power? That would be rather foolish, wouldn’t it? But the liberals were not always in power in the West; there was a time when they needed – and were granted – free speech in order to advance their agenda. When they were partly inside and partly outside of the government, the liberals used the Phil-Donahue-talk-show method of coercion: “Let’s discuss sodomy,” “What really is wrong with gay marriage?,” “Why not permit race-mixing?,” “Why not permit abortion?” Once that which is sacred and must be preserved is no longer taken as a given, but is instead open for ‘discussion’, then that which is sacred will not be preserved. I remember, many years ago, cancelling my subscription to National Review when they ran an article on abortion titled, “Abortion: A Spirited Debate.” No magazine claiming to be conservative can treat abortion as a debatable issue. Conservatives are called upon to defend the Christian West, not to debate the relative merits of Christian morality and liberal morality.

And that is the big difference between the conservatives and the liberals. People will always act according to their religion. The liberals, now that they have total power, use the iron fist; they do not debate. They believe in an anti-Christian, anti-white utopia with the sacred negro at the center. They will not debate the moral rectitude of their religion; their duty is to defend it against the enemy – white Christians – by any means possible. Why, when they were in power, did not the conservatives defend their faith with the same zeal that the liberals now defend their faith? The conservatives of the early 20th century and the mid-20th century did defend their faith. The problem was that they did not believe in European Christianity. They believed in a fusion of democracy and Christianity. And such a fusion is a false religion. In the name of democracy the liberals penetrated and then consumed conservatism. What does modern conservatism consist of? Nothing. Conservatives are just an adjunct of liberalism, begging liberals to allow them to be part of Liberaldom by showing them that they too love the negro.

The case of the anti-sodomite, Christian baker of Colorado is an example of how the new ‘iron fist’ of liberalism operates. The sodomite branch of the liberal machine waited until they had complete power and then bared their fangs. Two pig-gutted sodomites had traveled from another state to the Christian Colorado bakery, and asked the owner, a professed Christian, to make them a sodomite wedding cake in 2012. You know the rest – the man refused to countenance sin by baking a “gay” cake. The sodomites went to court, and the baker lost. He appealed and the appeals court upheld the lower court’s decision. Facing the prospect of stiff fines, the baker has chosen to no longer make wedding cakes, thus losing 40% of his business. Another mom-and-pop bakery in Oregon was fined $135,000 by a state bureaucrat on July 4th for refusing to make a wedding cake for a lesbian couple three years ago. Both cases prove what we should have known when the gay rights movement started – liberalism has nothing to do with compassion for sinners, it is about the celebration of sin and the punishment of the Christian opponents of that celebration. “Don’t impede the onward march to utopia or we will trample you to death!” is the liberals’ firm resolve.

It was significant that the sodomites’ feminist lawyer had argued that the baker’s religiously based refusal to bake the cake was not valid, for the reason that white people once cited their religion in order to ban inter-racial marriage. This ‘brilliant’ argument evidently convinced the judge, who upheld the lower court’s ruling. There are two points to be made in response to the feminist lawyer and the liberal judges. First, just because the Christian religion was once cited to justify a ban on inter-racial marriage does not invalidate the Christian baker’s claim that he should not be forced to bake a cake for sodomites or lose his livelihood. Secondly, Christians should also be against inter-racial marriage, because it leads to the legalization of abortion and sodomy by defacing the image of God in man, but the Mom and Pop bakers were not guilty of such sentiments nor was the Colorado baker. Would that they were. I think the old adage, ‘in for a penny, in for a pound,’ applies here. The liberals will not let you be half-liberal, so why not go all the way and become a white Christian European who loves his own racial hearth fire above all others?

Some military man, perhaps it was MacArthur or perhaps Robert E. Lee, once said that the words which describe all failed military campaigns are “too late.” The white people of the United States have discovered too late that civil rights meant negro dominance and the extermination of white people, equal rights for women meant legalized abortion, and gay rights meant the mandated acceptance of sodomite marriages. So long as evil was put in virtuous terms, white grazers did not see evil for what it was. First, they were weakened by the Phil-Donahue-type discussion, then they were completely overwhelmed by the virtuous façade of the demon movements. “Who would be so base that they are against civil rights? Who would be so vile that they are against equal rights for women? Who would be so devoid of humanity that he would not forgive homosexuals? And who would be so tyrannical that he would be undemocratic? If any, speak – for him have I offended. None? Then none have I offended, keep on grazing in the fields of oblivion.”

Even before the feminist revolution, which preceded and led to the homosexual revolution, the liberals’ sinister purposes were crystal clear during the civil rights movement, which was really the miscegenation movement. If racial harmony was really the liberals’ goal and not the extermination of whites, the suggestions in such books as American Statesmen on Slavery and the Negro, written in 1971 by Nathaniel Weyl and William Marina, would have been followed. In that book the two authors pointed out that virtually every prominent America statesman, including Abraham Lincoln, suggested some sort of separation of the races for the sake of the white race and the black race. Weyl and Marina proposed that if the right of private association, the right to segregate in schools, housing, and civic organizations, was upheld, then a non-utopian harmony could be achieved between the races. But such moderate, well-thought out proposals were vehemently rejected by the liberals. Why? Hasn’t it become obvious? The liberals do not want racial harmony, they want the extermination of the white race, just as they want to deify Lady Macbeth and destroy Christian marriage. What will it take for white grazers to turn away in disgust and horror from the liberals’ trough?

The whole liberal agenda is bad because it harms white, Christian Europeans. That should be our primary reason for opposing liberalism. But we must also point out that the “civil rights” movement has been a disaster for blacks; they now have no one to check their savagery, which they practice on each other as well as on whites. Nor has liberalism been beneficial for women. They now have the right to be bimbo newscasters and garage mechanics, but so many have lost that uniquely feminine spirituality that is necessary to be truly female. And the homosexuals? Is it really compassionate to tell them that the sin of sodomy is something they should celebrate?

The liberals claim to be humane, compassionate human beings. In fact, the liberals would have us believe that they and they alone are humane and compassionate. We must get past “we too are humane and compassionate, we don’t hate blacks, we don’t hate women, we are not homophobic” etc. That is not true. It is not a case of “we too are humane and compassionate,” it is a case of the liberals being devoid of all humanity. They use words like compassion to push a cruel, merciless agenda down the throats of white grazers who stand befuddled and amazed before the liberal juggernaut of scientists, educators, and New Age theologians. It is only the white, prejudiced, Christian European who is humane and compassionate. I object to using the term “humanist” to describe liberals. They are not liberal humanists – there is nothing human about them – they are inhumane monstrosities. Do Christian Europeans hate? Of course we do — we hate because we love much. We don’t hate Uncle Remus, but we do hate militant black savages who prey on white people. We don’t hate Florence Nightingale, but we do hate Lady Macbeth and all those feminist harpies that have followed in her train. And we don’t hate homosexuals, we feel sorry for them, that is, until they become militant, and then we do indeed hate them. When I was growing up, I didn’t even know what a homosexual was until my late teens. And when I heard about their existence, I felt sorry for them. They would never know the feeling a man gets when that one special silken gown enters his life. Of course feminism has killed the silken-gown femininity, so maybe modern heterosexual men will never know that feeling either. But the point is I didn’t hate homosexuals. But I do hate them now, when they militantly attack the silken-gown ethos of the Christian knight and the Christian hearth fire. I feel the same about the feminists as I do about the barbarians of color and the homosexuals. Pity dies, and a fighting hatred takes over when they threaten the European hearth fire. This seems so obvious that I shouldn’t have to write it down, but it isn’t obvious to the vast majority of white people, or else they would not go so gently into the Babylonian night of liberalism. They would rage against the dying of the light of Christian Europe, and then the light will not die. +

Posted in Charity, liberals are the true haters | Tagged