Out of the Belly of the Leviathan

Dore_Jonah_cast_forth_by_the_whaleBut Jonah rose up to flee unto Tarshish from the presence of the Lord, and went down to Joppa; and he found a ship going to Tarshish: so he paid the fare thereof, and went down into it, to go with them unto Tarshish from the presence of the Lord.

Jonah 1: 3


The white police officers who are shot and killed by misunderstood black ‘youths’ get a little more notice than ordinary whites who are shot and killed by black ‘youths,’ but in both cases the party line of the liberals is the same. The focus is on the white race: What did the white policemen and/or the white race in general do to make the heathens rage? So long as liberals rule the Western nations, that will always be officialdom’s reaction to the murder of whites. The murders are never the blacks’ fault. And why are the murders never the blacks’ fault? Because a pure, sinless race of people can do no evil. What seems like evil is the result of white racism – some evil whites twist the facts and try to blame blacks for their just retaliation against the white race for crimes against the black race. Unfortunately that ‘criminally insane’ apologia for black barbarians is not an exaggeration; I am not stretching a point. In the liberals’ universe there are no bad blacks, there are only evil whites who provoke wayward black ‘youths’ into committing youthful indiscretions. Nothing will ever be done to stem the blood-red tide of black on white violence so long as the liberals worship the black barbarians who represent, to the liberals, the antithesis of the white Christians of old Europe.

It is seldom made explicit, but the implicit message the liberals put out every time there is black on white violence is that black violence can be prevented if whites would behave properly. ‘The French in Haiti, the whites in South Africa, the whites of the Southern United States, white policemen, and ordinary white citizens, were and are racist; that is why they are being slaughtered. You need not worry if you are a white who repudiates racism.’ This is, of course, a liberal stratagem. Blacks are not being forced to commit violence by white racism; they commit violent crimes against the white race because they are savages who know nothing except how to rape, murder, and torture. They will not spare the ‘good whites,’ because they have no respect for anything but power. They can be restrained by force, but they will never refrain from violence because they have been shown charity. In their heathen eyes, a charitable man is a weak man who deserves to be brutalized and murdered.

Some conservative-liberals who are appalled at the Moslem invasion of Europe and the United States have tried to point out to their fellow liberals how inconsistent Moslem values and liberal values are. They point out that Moslems rape women, Moslems believe in a Moslem theocracy, and Moslems are not fond of the liberals’ view of diversity. But why, if you have tolerated the rape and murder cultures of the Mexicans and the blacks, should you turn on the Moslems? It is the mad-dog liberals who are being consistent. The conservative-liberal who wants to tolerate black and Mexican savagery while banning Moslem savagery is the inconsistent liberal. What the conservative fails to confront is the moral bankruptcy of intellectual Christianity. Christianity, divorced from the heartfelt passions, both good and bad, that come from an intimate connection to one’s own race, spawns that hellish ideology called liberalism. And at the core of liberalism is a hatred for Christ. Every other difference that the liberal has with the Moslems and the colored heathens melts away before that one essential passion they share with the Moslems and the colored heathens: They hate Christ and the Christ-bearing race.

The European people are running scared like the pre-repentant Jonah. Rather than face the liberals and the colored barbarians, they have fled unto Tarshish by way of the good ship Liberalism. They would rather hide in that ship then fulfill their destiny as the Christ-bearing people. But hasn’t liberalism failed to provide the comfort the Europeans sought? All the liberals’ systems – Thomism, Communism, and Jacobin democracy – have failed to sustain the European people in the day of battle. And they have failed because they require a man to break his covenant with his people and his God before he can attain the comfort of the liberals’ systems. If a man sacrifices his kith and kin on the altars of the liberals, he can stay aboard the ship that will take him to Tarshish? But of course we never get to Tarshish; we are in the belly of the whale. For how long? Just as long as we refuse to take up our cross and face the techno-barbarian liberals and the colored heathens of Nineveh.

The sailors on the ship Jonah sailed on all worshipped heathen gods, but they were not the ones who brought down the wrath of God. It was Jonah’s apostasy that brought down the wrath of God upon the ship and crew. So it is with the European people. We cannot ignore the central event of human history – the birth, death, and resurrection from the dead of Jesus Christ – without perishing as a people. We cannot return to paganism by becoming Socratic Christians or techno-barbarian pagans. It is all or nothing. We must fulfill our prophetic destiny or perish in the belly of the whale.

Orlando, the hero of Shakespeare’s As You Like It, declares that, “I can live no longer by thinking.” He can no longer love an abstraction called Rosalind, he must be married to the real flesh and blood Rosalind. When we had a racial home we were a people. Without that home we are Undines, we are not fully human. And how can non-humans respond to the God-Man? We can’t. Once white skin was synonymous with Christian. “I have not tasted Christian food for three years,” Ben Gunn says. He didn’t have to say European food, because to be European was to be Christian. The new theology of ‘Western culture has nothing to do with race’ is not an advance, it is a return to paganism, to Greek philosophy, which regards the incarnation of Christ as foolishness. There is no European resistance to the anti-white liberals and colored heathens, because the churchmen have made a fatal separation of race and faith. If we can’t trust the faith we received from our kith and kin, in what or whom can we trust?

The Roman Catholic churchmen blend Christianity with Islam and colored heathenism while the Protestant evangelicals blend Christianity with Judaism and colored heathenism. And they do this, we are told, in the name of a universalist God who demands one thing from his adherents – They must not be racist. But what if our race is our spiritual backbone? If I’m wrong, if there is no connection between our racial hearth fire and our God, if we do not find God through those mysterious racial and familial ties, then why have the new European Christians gone whoring after heathen gods and made gods of the colored heathens? Why can’t their universalist god, free of racial prejudices, sustain them in the day of battle?

I don’t think that a Frenchman who celebrates Bastille Day, as blasphemous as that celebration is, deserves to be slaughtered by Moslems, but surely you can see the irony of that massacre? The regicides of France did not just kill a Christian king, as terrible as that act was, they destroyed the incorporate union of the European people and Christ. It was a second fall of man. Loyalty to an abstract people and an abstract god replaced loyalty to the God who abides with us at the racial and familial hearth fire. Frenchmen and whites of all the European nations are naked to their heathen enemies because the abstract ‘blessings’ of liberty, equality, and fraternity that are celebrated on Bastille Day replaced the non-abstract virtues of faith, hope, and charity that were practiced by the racist, prejudiced, antique Europeans.

The European people have had their drunken French Revolution party for quite some time now, but the party has taken on the look of a macabre dance of death. Even when Moslem Jihadists do not kill the revelers, the Europeans look like deaths’ heads. The women who prefer other women to men, the men who prefer men to women, the whites who worship negroes, and the intellectual Christians who fear the racist label so much that they are willing to forsake their God and their people to prove they are not racist, all present us with a terrible vision of a people on the brink of extinction. What then can we hope for? It seems quite trite, and even futile, to say that Christ is the only hope of the white race. After all, it is the white Christian churchmen who have presided over the prosecution of the white race. We have been charged, on the one hand with being insufficiently Christian, and on the other we have been charged with being too exclusively Christian. The trial has been rigged. The verdict was decided beforehand. No matter what the charge, the verdict will always be: ‘The white race is guilty.’

White people in Europe, the United States, and throughout the world behave like they are on trial before a world court that will treat them fairly if they just present their case in a rational manner, following the proper rules of courtroom procedure. They never seem to understand that it doesn’t matter what they say or do, they have already been tried and found guilty in the minds of the liberals. ‘We protest peacefully, we are not racist,’ the whites plead; ‘Please let us be part of Liberaldom.’ But whites will never be allowed into the liberals’ Emerald City because of their tainted past. Buried in their racial memory, a memory the liberals are trying to purge from their souls, is the image of the Man of Sorrows. Through the power of His love our loves are restored to us, “and all our sorrows end.” Why should that vision and that hope be destroyed?

The Europeans must be eradicated because their Savior is not of this world. Neither He nor His followers are like unto the Moslems, the colored heathen, the Jews, the neo-pagans, or the liberals who seek an earthly paradise with no regard for the vision of the living God who died on the cross. This (final?) battle is about ‘this world-only’ and ‘Christ’s kingdom come.’ It was our ancestors’ contention, and it is my own contention, that when we abide with the people of our own racial hearth fire we will know the one true God who bids us come to Him through those mysterious human relationships that the liberals shun. “I reject His world,” Ivan Karamazov declared. So have they all, the liberals and their colored minions, rejected His world. But the European people cannot live any longer on that ship destined for Tarshish. We will never get there. And even if we did, we would choke on the insipid, soul-killing food of that liberal, Christ-hating city. Far better to follow our racial destiny and confront the liberals and their colored allies. For charity’s sake we must fight the people who have not charity. The lay of the ancient European minstrel speaks to our hearts. He sings of men and women who loved their people, and through that love they found the Savior who redeemed the world with a love that passeth the understanding of the liberals and the colored heathens. I don’t know any other Europe apart from that Christ-centered Europe. And why should I, or any other European, seek to know any other Europe? +

Posted in democracy, Europeans and Christ | Tagged

The Invisible Empire of the European People

Dore_Jesus-falling-beneath-the-crossAbstractedly speaking, government, as well as liberty, is good; yet could I, in common sense, ten years ago, have felicitated France on her enjoyment of a government (for she then had a government) without inquiry what the nature of that government was, or how it was administered? Can I now congratulate the same nation upon its freedom? Is it because liberty in the abstract may be classed amongst the blessings of mankind, that I am seriously to felicitate a mad-man, who has escaped from the protecting restraint and wholesome darkness of his cell, on his restoration to the enjoyment of light and liberty? Am I to congratulate a highwayman and murderer, who has broke prison, upon the recovery of his natural rights? This would be to act over again the scene of the criminals condemned to the galleys, and their heroic deliverer, the metaphysic knight of the sorrowful countenance. – Edmund Burke

I have yet to read of a white policeman’s shooting of a black ‘youth’ where I thought the white police officer had murdered the black. In most cases I have heard about, the police officer killed a thug who needed killing, and in the other cases the shooting was an accident brought on by some ill-advised action of the victim. Of course I am prejudiced. But are not the liberals and the black barbarians prejudiced? I’ll stick with my prejudices, because I think they are in line with the truth.

Although I support individual police officers who have confrontations with black criminals, I am not a big supporter of the police. And I am not a big supporter of the police for the same reason I am not a big supporter of ‘our troops.’ The police and the military work for the liberals; they are far more likely to come down on white people who have committed crimes against the state, which means ‘racist’ resistance to liberal abortionists, black murderers, and Moslem jihadists, than they are likely to aggressively attack Moslem and black hooligans. America is not a city on a hill, exempt from the same problems that plague the whites in Europe. And in the European nations the police are trained to go after whites who oppose the barbarians of color and to leave the colored barbarians alone. Likewise the United States. When I worked as a police officer some twenty-five years ago, we were always being sent to ‘special training’ courses. At those training courses we were taught about the evils of white racism and the need for a sensitive new police force that would stop brutalizing blacks. I’m sure the anti-white propaganda has gotten worse in the last quarter century. And the anti-white propaganda works. When the Rodney King affair occurred, I was the only officer on the force who supported the police officers who were accused of beating the poor, helpless Rodney King while he was driving home from his nightly charity work at a hospital for the incurably ill.

The young men who become police officers come from our culture, which is liberal. They have been fed anti-white propaganda since the day of their births. What makes them different from their white counterparts who do not work as police officers? Nothing. They are marked for death just as whites are marked for death in society at large. The essence of liberalism is hatred – hatred for the white Christ-bearing race. Whites are bred for sacrifice.  They all are destined to die on the liberals’ altars, dedicated to their heathen gods. When Moslem or black violence is too blatant as in Dallas and in Orlando, there are some white rumblings, but they never amount to anything, because whites will not attack liberalism itself by squarely facing the fact that we are in a race war which only one side is fighting. Any white protest of Moslem or black violence is always preceded with the ‘we are not racist’ plea. For instance, the Britain First party, which has all those nice parades, regularly condemns racism and gushes about all the Pakistanis and blacks who support the Britain First party. ‘We support all those who respect our traditions.’ What traditions are we talking about? Fish and chips? If a man is not white and Christian how can he be a Briton? The Britain First party seems to be the ‘End of White Britain’ party, just as the American Republican party has become the ‘Stupid Party’ that plans to win by appeasing the non-white Americans who hate white America.

Most middle-of-the-road whites tend to respect the police just as they respect their clergy. But in both instances, they have failed to look past the symbols of what used to be to the reality of the present. The police and the clergy are adjuncts of Liberaldom; whites should not rely on either adjunct to support them in their ongoing war with the liberals. But of course that is the problem: the ‘decent’ whites are “so far from doing harm that they suspect none.” But the liberals do mean to do them harm. And whites must learn, as Edgar learned, to look past the outward forms and look within. Behind the smiling, liberal façade – the sporting events, the church services, the patriotic celebrations –is the cold ruthless figure of Satan, laughing, as only Satan can laugh, with contempt and with malice.

The Norman Rockwell painting of a policeman giving a lost child an ice cream cone is still the image that many white people have of the police. But the same artist’s painting of Federal marshals escorting a negro girl to school in order to desegregate the South is more in keeping with the role of the police in modern Liberaldom. They live to serve the state. If they are killed by black murderers, my heart goes out to them as it goes out to all whites who are being victimized by black barbarians, but when they defend the abortionists, the integrationists, or any part of Liberaldom, the police are my sworn enemies. To say you are just doing your job does not excuse you if your job entails the defense of liberalism.

Burke saw the Achilles’ heel of the virtuous whites when they failed to respond to the French Revolution with fire and sword: “Above all, good men do not suspect that their destruction is attempted through their virtues.” It is the same with the whites of the modern Western nations. They cling to the virtue of being non-racist while the white-hating liberals and the colored heathens use the race card to destroy them. It is time, in fact it is past time, to leave mere virtue behind and follow the way of the cross, the way of passion – a passionate self-sacrificing love for our kith and kin and a passionate hatred for the enemies of our kith and kin. Aslan is not a tame Lion, which is why the Grand Inquisitors of Liberaldom want to do away with Him. They do not want white hearts which are enflamed with a passion that they, the Grand Inquisitors, cannot control. ‘Give me the merely virtuous,’ the Grand Inquisitor says, ‘I can always keep them in check by holding the ‘racist’ label over their heads.’

The abortion of the white race starts with the abstraction. When white people allowed their racial identity, which is part of their soul, to be thrown on the junk heap of history, they lost their connection to all those heartfelt passions that connect them to each other and to their God. Why do we support the police? Because they fight for us? No, they don’t. They fight for an abstraction called ‘the people.’ And only heathens and colored barbarians can be ‘the people.’ (1) If you are lucky enough to live in an all-white neighborhood, a police officer might aid you when a white hooligan attacks, just as a psychologist who works in a satanic profession might still give some practical advice that works, but in the war against the liberals and the colored barbarians the police will become your enemy, because white people must be abstracted and then aborted.

The police and the military units that serve the liberals stem from the abstraction the liberals call Christianity. If Christ does not dwell within us, but is only out there as an abstract God, then we have no spiritual armor. We are defenseless against the wickedness and snares of the devil. He can outsmart us without working up a sweat. But if we can trust our instincts, because our instincts are grounded in a faith in Christ who dwells within our heart and at our racial hearth fire, we can fight the devil and his minions without the aid of a liberal-based system.

The ‘conservative’ Thomist, Frederick Wilhelmsen, once wrote that the West had nothing to do with race. Really? If the West has nothing to do with race, then why was the cultural entity called the West created by white people? And why have the non-whites never created a Christian culture? So let me disagree and state that the Christian West has everything to do with race. It is St. Thomas Aquinas who has nothing to do with the West. In a similar vein, the ‘conservative’ Francis Canavan, while professing an admiration for Burke, tells us that Burke was right about Jacobin democracy but wrong to condemn all democracies.

Once again I must disagree. Where is the ‘good’ democracy? It was Burke’s contention that a nation could thrive under a monarchial, aristocratic system as in pre-Jacobin France, or it could thrive under a monarchial, aristocratic, democratic system as in Great Britain. But no nation could exist as a pure democracy, because a democracy was the most tyrannical government imaginable, where a few tyrants ruled in the name of an aggregate herd called ‘the people.’ Christian utopians such as Wilhelmsen and Canavan are more dangerous than their secular counterparts, because they deceive the merely virtuous by convincing them that Christianity consists of supporting the right abstractions, such as racial equality and democratic principles.

The word ‘organic’ is generally used nowadays to distinguish real food from plastic, chemical food, but I use the word in its ancient context. We need to stop looking to organizations that were founded by the liberals – the churches, the military, the schools, and the police – and start looking to those invisible, organic ties of blood and faith that bound the antique Europeans to each other and their God. It was Robert E. Lee who first used the term “invisible empire” to describe the Ku Klux Klan. And it was Robert E. Lee who suggested that Nathan Bedford Forrest should be the man in charge of that invisible empire. We must go down to our European roots and become like unto the men who made up that invisible empire. We shouldn’t literally copy the Klansmen, but we should be like them in spirit. They were a conquered people, in the material sense, who were ruled by a cabal of liberals who had loosed the barbarians of color upon them. And yet they triumphed. They preserved their people and their civilization, because they refused to submit to liberal rule. They didn’t respect any institution that was not organically part of their culture and their heritage. The South didn’t lose the war until they became part of Liberaldom in the 1950s. My contention is that all of us, we Europeans, should be klansmen. We should stay loyal to the invisible European empire of the antique Europeans. It is not Western science nor our democratic systems that made Europe great. It is the moral vision and the greatness of heart that infused that vision into a civilization that made Europe different in kind from all other civilizations, which, in comparison to the European civilization, do not even deserve the name civilizations. Christ dwelt among us; He still does. He dwells with those Europeans who have not forsaken their white blood. I know that term ‘white blood’ appalls the modern churchmen, but the modern churchmen appall me. Is the incarnation of Christ true or is it not? If it is true, then it is also true that spiritual values can be passed on through the blood. Let us stop living a life of abstract virtue and live the life of a European who loves and hates with all his heart.

You won’t see the invisible empire of Europeans on any of the major news sites or the alternative news sites, but it represents the spirit above the dust of Babylon that will rebuild Christian Europe. “For we are saved by hope: but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for?” +


(1) The negro Dallas police chief delivered a disgustingly inappropriate eulogy for the white Dallas police officers who were murdered. He used the occasion for self-aggrandizement, and the media used the occasion for negro worship. That police chief represents the real face of our modern police force. (Watch the unedited Fox version, not the heavily edited CNN version.)

Posted in counterrevolution, defense of the white race, democracy | Tagged

Incarnational Europe Is Our Beginning and Our End

O'Connor_LondonBut now all is to be changed. All the pleasing illusions, which made power gentle and obedience liberal, which harmonized the different shades of life, and which, by a bland assimilation, incorporated into politics the sentiments which beautify and soften private society, are to be dissolved by this new conquering empire of light and reason. All the decent drapery of life is to be rudely torn off. All the superadded ideas, furnished from the wardrobe of a moral imagination, which the heart owns, and the understanding ratifies, as necessary to cover the defects of our naked, shivering nature, and to raise it to dignity in our own estimation, are to be exploded as a ridiculous, absurd, and antiquated fashion. – Edmund Burke

I don’t categorically deny that there have been individuals who received private revelations from God. But I don’t accept, as part of my faith, any private revelations other than St. Paul’s vision of Christ on the road to Damascus and St. John’s revelations on the island of Patmos. And since neither St. Paul nor St. John told us the actual identity of the anti-Christ, I can’t say with any certainty who the anti-Christ is. All that can be said about Pope Francis is that if he is not the anti-Christ then he is certainly giving a very good imitation of the anti-Christ. He is like some of those Elvis imitators who seem more like Elvis than Elvis.

Pope Francis the man is a liberal. And liberalism is from the devil. But what makes Pope Francis the most dangerous liberal in the world is the position he holds. He is like unto a master baker who bakes strychnine into the bread. He is much more dangerous than his non-baking fellow citizens because he, and he alone, has the power to dispense poison under the guise of healthy bread.  Dante posted a sign, “Abandon all hope ye who enter here,” over the portal of Hell. That should be the sign over the Roman Catholic Church of Pope Francis. He is the purveyor of liberalism under the guise of Christianity and as such he is an earthly conduit to hell.

The Pope seems to have a slight preference for Moslems over the Jews, while Protestant evangelicals have a decided preference for the Jews. But both Islam and Judaism represent a return to paganism and a rejection of Jesus Christ. Most Protestants can comprehend that Islam is a pagan faith, but they don’t see the Jews for what they are. Having rejected Christ, the Jews reverted to type and became another branch of paganism. They maintained their belief in their ‘chosen’ status while rejecting the reason for that status. If you blend Christ with Judaism, Islam, or any other pagan faith, you will lose Christ. But that blending process is the essence of liberalism.

Christ tells us, through St. John, that He is the, “Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.” The Grand Inquisitor, Pope Francis, and his evangelical brethren have rebuked Christ. They tell Him and us that He is not the beginning and the end. “In the beginning was diversity, but mankind fell from diversity and became racist. In the end will be diversity again, presided over by Satan, the good angel who suffered much in order to bring mankind that which was needful: diversity. So let it be written, so let it be.”

Never doubt that the Islamization of Europe combined with the colorization of Europe is from the devil. Let the churches be burned to the ground; they are the purveyors of satanic filth. The European people need to take their stand in the small platoons that Burke spoke of:

To be attached to the subdivision, to love the little platoon we belong to in society, is the first principle (the germ as it were) of public affections. It is the first link in the series by which we proceed towards a love to our country, and to mankind. The interest of that portion of social arrangement is a trust in the hands of all those who compose it; and as none but bad men would justify it in abuse, none but traitors would barter it away for their own personal advantage.

From such racial platoons will come the spirit to resist the forces of darkness which consist of the techno-barbaric liberals and the colored heathens.

To actually walk the streets of a great European city and enjoy the thousand and one Christian things of that city is no longer possible. The Christian things are blended with liberal and Moslem things, and such a blending is worse than the outright paganism of old Rome or pre-Christian Greece. But “while memory holds a seat in this distracted globe,” we shall not forget eternal Europe. So long as two or three are gathered together who still remember, and live by that remembrance, Europe lives.

The European people have been poisoned incrementally. They were served the finest wines with just a small dose of poison. Then the dosage was increased a little more and then still more until the final dose that killed them. I have seen this incremental poisoning take place during my lifetime. The Christian comforts were permitted so long as the enemy felt their removal might awaken the European people to the fact that they were being poisoned. Race-mixing was called civil rights until there was no white abhorrence of race-mixing. Homosexual marriages and abortion were presented as compassionate solutions to hard cases until the white Europeans accepted such things as normal. Works of literature from the Christian era of the European people were depicted in a new, negative light and then rejected out of hand. Everything that connected men to the God-Man who dwelt in the hearts of the antique Europeans has been eliminated.

When I was a young man, I read Vladimir Solovyov’s Lectures on Divine Humanity. My reaction to the book was similar to Horatio’s reaction to Hamlet’s assertion that there was something rotten in the state of Denmark: “There needs no ghost, come back from the grave to tell us this.” That God has planted His divine imprint on humanity through His Son Jesus Christ seemed too obvious; I wondered why Solovyov thought he had to say it. But I was coming from the poets, from Shakespeare, Scott, Dostoyevsky, and Dickens. Every word they wrote pointed to the incarnational aspects of our European culture. When I entered the realm of speculative philosophy and theology, I understood what a philosophical maverick Vladimir Solovyov was. He said what needed to be said – that Western philosophy and theology were heretical deviations from the cultural heart and soul of the European people – which was and ever shall be the God-Man, Jesus Christ.

We must be aware of the poison we have swallowed so that we can seek the antidote. And that poison is a mixture of paganism and Christianity, which constitutes the deadliest soul-poisoning mixture ever created by Satan. It is called liberalism. Liberalism mixes the cruelty of the pagan religions with an evangelical post-Christian zeal that places the aggregate herd above individual human beings. Institutionalized inhumanity is the mark of liberalism. That is why the church and state must be democratized, because in a democratized institution or state a small cabal of liberals, which translates to Satanists, rule in the name of an aggregate herd of inhuman heathens. No white man will ever be allowed to co-exist, in church or state, with the inhuman aggregate herd of colored heathens, because the white man has the taint of original sin on him. He championed the God-Man, Jesus Christ. Satan is paying the white man back through the liberals, whose patron saint is Julian the Apostate.

I often hear the liberal-conservatives trying to argue with the mad-dog liberals on a practical basis: “Don’t you realize that Moslems will destroy liberalism?” And, “Don’t you see that black violence will also be directed at you?” But the mad-dog liberals will not see, because the worship of the Christ-hating heathens and colored barbarians is essential to their pagan faith. The liberals firmly believe that they are the beloved ones; their man-gods love them. And in point of fact it is usually the good whites, the leaderless, groping, defenseless remnants of Christian Europe, who take the brunt of the heathens’ wrath. The de Klerkian liberals find temporary escapes. Does Angela Merkel have to live near a camp of Moslem refugees? Does Pope Francis have to share an apartment with the black Moslems whom he worships in a public, satanic church service? The liberals will be the last to go, and they will die affirming their faith in the colored heathens and the colored heathens’ god – the archangel Satan.

When Pope Francis recently equated the first apostles with the modern Moslem invaders, he was giving us a window into the mind of Satan. Christ is to be ground to bits in the giant machinery of diversity. And that machinery is devoid of individual human beings. Hamlet’s refusal to be played upon like a recorder and the underground man’s refusal to be a piano key are the defiant resistance movements of the Europeans who stand in the face of the satanic whirlwind and announce that “a personality stands here.” A personality, we should add, that knows that “Christ is in me, and I am in Christ.” St. Paul is not an aberration; his faith is one with Christ and the first Christian Europeans who saw Christ as the hero of heroes who would fight by their side against the powers of darkness. All that matters is the one essential thing – we must reclaim our European manhood, which differs in kind from pagan manhood. Instead of sitting back and watching colored heathens and liberal pagans slaughter whites, we should fight as the first European Christians fought – for hearth, for race, and for charity’s sake. How can a man with a European heart watch the liberals’ orgies of blood without responding with fire and sword? Formal Europe, the Europe of quaint shops, splendid architecture, and streets filled with white people, is dead. But eternal Europe still lives wherever there are two or three gathered together in His name to form their European platoon. A platoon wedded to European soil and European soil alone, a platoon wedded to Christ and to Christ alone. Christ is the beginning and the end, the first and the last, and Christian Europe is our first and last home, no matter the numbers the devil sends against us. Never, never, never shall the Satanism of Pope Francis and his liberal allies be allowed to masquerade as the true faith. Thus is our faith tested, and we shall respond with that charity of honor which did not fail St. Paul. And it shall not fail us. +

Posted in Christ the Hero, churches as halfway houses, Europeans and Christ | Tagged ,

True to Our God and Our Blood

Nathaniel_Bedford_Forrest_statueBut down these mean streets a man must go who is not himself mean, who is neither tarnished nor afraid. The detective in this kind of story must be such a man. He is the hero, he is everything. He must be a complete man and a common man and yet an unusual man. He must be, to use a rather weathered phrase, a man of honor, by instinct, by inevitability, without thought of it, and certainly without saying it. – Raymond Chandler


The hero saves not only by his prowess, he saves by the divinity within himself. Indeed his prowess depends upon this divinity. The hero’s ‘most perfect image is, of course, Christ the man-god. There is no hero unless the odds are overwhelmingly against the thing he stands for, or the rescue which takes him upon his quest. They are the powers of darkness; they show him the brutal weight of matter, the seemingly irresistible forces of mass. Since fear and desire make all of us tremble, the first quest of the hero is triumph over himself; and afterwards he follows the quest, a selfless and devoted individual on the way of becoming an archetype. Indeed because he is devoted, he is fearless. – Andrew Lytle

The Brexit vote and Trump’s nomination are very small wins in minor skirmishes. The big battles are still being won by the liberals – the Moslems remain in Britain, more Moslems are pouring into America, and Trump is already back-pedaling on his ‘no more Moslems’ pledge. So what has been gained by these ‘wins’? Noting of any lasting significance. But the Brexit vote and Trump’s primary wins do reveal to us that there is still some life left in the European Everyman. Granted, a vote against the EU and against the neocons in the Republican Party does not mean that whites are ready to rise and ride in defense of their God, their King, and their people. But it is significant that a large number of whites did not listen to the liberal elite who told them that they must, lest they be labeled simple-minded, vote for the EU and the neocons. The fact that they didn’t vote as the liberals wanted shows there is some genuine pietas left in the European people; but without leadership, without a Tell, or an Alfred stepping forth, that subterranean current of white pietas will remain untapped. Why can’t the people rise up without leaders? Because the people must see their own aspirations, their own souls, embodied in the passion and heroic strife of one man. I refer you to the incarnation of our Lord. Ask yourself why He became incarnate, and you will understand why the mass of men need a leader. “We must have leaders. If none will undertake to lead us right, we shall find guides who will contrive to conduct us to shame and ruin.” (Burke)

Any leader who bids us place all our hopes as a people in the democratic process will conduct us to shame and ruin. That has been the case in the European nations for the past one hundred years. The age of democracy has ushered in the age of white genocide. What did Woodrow Wilson say as he plunged his country into the senseless war that destroyed the European people? “The world must be made safe for democracy.” We now know what that code word meant: “White Genocide.”

A hero fights for what his people hold most dear. Thus the pagan hero, such as Achilles, fights for the pride of his people and the wealth to be gained by conquest. So it is with all the non-white cultures. A hero might act alone, but he takes the hopes and aspirations of his people into battle with him. The Christian European hero differs in kind from the pagan and non-white hero. The European hero fights for what Burke called “that charity of honor,” because that is what his people regard as the vital link between them and their God. There were very few European heroes in the 20th century (Anthony Jacob was an exception), and none, that we know of, in the 21st century, because the Europeans do not regard themselves as a people. How can a hero arise from a people who have denounced themselves? It is difficult, but not impossible. The 21st century European hero must rise up from eternal Europe, from the dead who rest in the arms of the Lord, and act according to their Christ-centered European ethos. Ignoring the spiritual wasteland of the 21st and 20th century, he must take his stand with the men and women of eternal Europe. And like Roland, he must not yield even unto death.

I know this sounds too poetical, too fantastical, to the results-oriented, pragmatic minds of 21st century men. But the Christian hero never made the pragmatic result his main goal. Certainly men such as Alfred and Robert E. Lee wanted to succeed in the practical realm, but they didn’t fight for that reason. They fought because in the deepest recesses of their souls that charity of honor compelled them to fight, no matter what the practical men told them about their chances for success in the here and now. Hamlet’s defiance of pagan augury has always been the mark of the Christian, European hero:

Horatio. If your mind dislike anything, obey it. I will forestall their repair hither, and say you are not fit.

Hamlet. Not a whit; we defy augury. There’s a special providence in the fall of a sparrow. If it be now, ‘tis not to come; if it be not to come, it will be now; if it be not now, yet it will come; the readiness is all. Since no man has aught of what he leaves, what is’t to leave betimes? Let be.

Yes, let be. The Christian hero cares about one thing: That he fights with all his heart, mind, and soul for his people, because it is through his people that he touches the heart of God. The European hero knows, in his blood, what the mystery of Christ’s incarnation means, and he acts upon that knowledge. If Christ is incarnate in His people then to defend Christ the European must defend his people.

Modern Europe has no heroes, because modern Europeans have accepted the liberals’ perverse universalism – only the non-white races can be a people. If whites try to band together as a people, they become racists, and racism is the unpardonable sin. But only whites can be guilty of the unpardonable sin. So we have non-white heroes who know nothing of charity; they are heroes of carnage and barbarism. The blacks, the Moslems, the Mexicans, the Orientals, and any other non-white race you can name have become the liberals’ people. Pope Francis, the penultimate of liberalism, worships Moslems of color, because they are his people; they are anti-white and anti-Christian. The descent into white oblivion will continue so long as white people follow the lead of the Angela Merkels and Pope Francises of Liberaldom.

It’s important to distinguish between the brave man and the hero. A case in point – In the American Civil War there were brave men on both sides, but only the South produced heroes, because once all the qualifications are made the essential fact of that war is crystal clear. The Southern people fought for the cause of Christian Europe and the people of the North fought for Jacobin democracy. This is not to suggest that the rank and file of the North thought they were fighting for Jacobin democracy. But their leaders knew what they were fighting for, and they led their people down that slippery slope where brave men fight for a satanic cause. I believe that I once mentioned that my grandfather used to tell me stories about my great, great grandfather who fought on the northern side in the Civil War. My grandfather said that his grandfather, who lived into his nineties, used to say that he regretted fighting for the Union, because he felt that he had been lied to: “I was told I was fighting for my country. If I had known I was fighting for the negroes, I wouldn’t have fought.” Without placing a halo on every single Southern soldier, the fact remains that those Southern soldiers who fought honorably were heroes. Like the King of heroes, they fought, bled, and sacrificed for their people, who were fighting for leaders committed to Christian Europe. And they were fighting for the misled Union soldiers as well, for were they not Europeans too, and are not all Europeans, in their heart of hearts, connected to the God-Man?

The words, “You have betrayed us,” should be writ large on the walls of church and state. The intelligentsia have denounced their people and gone whoring after false messiahs and a new people. The leaders in the Evangelical churches have made the Jews their people. Everything Jewish is now supposed to be Christian. Blasphemy! And the Roman Catholic churchmen have made every dark colored heathen their god and every Christ-hating Moslem their brother in irreligion. Where your people dwell, so dwells your faith. If you won’t return to the Europe where He resides at the hearth fires of the white faithful then you will be at the mercy of the colored heathens and the techno-barbarian liberals.

Nothing is hopeless if the European people return to their racial hearth fires. But they must make that return. In his book I Saw Two Englands (1943), H. V. Morton talks about the importance of belonging to a people committed to the defense of the Christian things – of home, hearth, and race.

Nothing I have known in English life has approached the eagerness with which ordinary men have run to arms in order to defend their homes. My own point of view, and, indeed, it is that of all the farmers, the farm labourers and the cowmen who compose our Home Guard, is that should the rest of England fall, our own parish would hold out to the last man. The responsibility of defending our own village has given to that village a gigantic significance in our eyes. To us it seems the main objective of any invader. When I look at the map, I am sometimes amazed to see how small and unimportant it must appear to any one not in our Platoon. But if all villages throughout England think as we do, what a hedge of opposition they present to any one who dares to set an invader’s foot upon this island…

When the social historian reviews modern England, I should not be surprised if he came to the conclusion that, so far as movement and social life go, we do-day are in a more secluded backwater than our ancestors of the Napoleonic period. Reading the histories and memoirs of that time, I had the impression that life in those days of professional armies went on much as usual; prize-fighting continued; the coaches were running; London was not made into a shabby area of self-defence and, if Martello Towers ringed the coast, and Militia and Yeomanry numbered nearly half a million, English life was not interrupted by Napoleon as it has been interrupted by Hitler. But Hitler has struck the same fine sparks from England: for this we owe him gratitude. He may have led us along the primrose path to bankruptcy, but in the process we have touched old simplicities and have known again the feeling that we belong to our country and our country to us. (1)

That was then. Was that the last gasp of the white race or can whites still become a people again if a Lee, a Forrest, or an Alfred steps out of the European mists and leads them into battle? I have no doubt that such a hero will have followers, because we are the Christ-bearing race, are we not?

The Moslem menace has awakened some Europeans, but the menace is not being opposed in the name of white Christian Germany, in the name of white Christian Britain, and so on. We cannot fight the colored heathen and the techno-barbarian liberals in the name of the universalism of the liberals. We must fight in the name of our people, and in the name of our God. If we are not white and Christian, what are we? We are nothing. But if we are true to our blood, what might we be? We will be Europeans, and that is all in all. +


(1) I do not subscribe to the liberals’ demonization of Germany in World War II. But Hitler was not a hero. Claus von Stauffenberg and Rommel were the true German heroes. They fought for eternal, Christian Germany just as Morton’s home guard fought for eternal, Christian Britain.

Posted in Christ the Hero, Muscular Christianity | Tagged , , ,

Our Fight for the Land of ‘Evening Lingerings’

Shepard_Return_of_UlyssesThe Europeans who are resisting the Moslem invasion of the European nations are making the same mistakes the prolifers made. They say they know what liberals are, but if they truly knew what they are, satanically possessed swine, would they try to appeal to their humanity? “Please stop abortion; it kills a young child.” And, “Please stop allowing Moslems into our nation; they are destroying our culture and killing our people.” Would you ask a wolf to spare the sheep in your pasture or would you kill the wolf? The liberals hate everything that is humane and Christian, so why would you expect them to stop killing babies and white people simply because you point out to them that legalized abortion and legalized white genocide are inhumane? The liberals know what they are doing in both cases. They want to kill babies and they want to destroy the white race. White Christians can either kill the wolves – the liberals and the colored heathen – or they can sit back and watch the slaughter while they keep appealing to the wolves’ humanity. – CWNY


Well might the terrified weasels dive under the tables and spring madly up at the windows! Well might the ferrets rush wildly for the fireplace and get hopelessly jammed in the chimney! Well might tables and chairs be upset, and glass and china be sent crashing on the floor, in the panic of that terrible moment when the four Heroes strode wrathfully into the room! The mighty Badger, his whiskers bristling, his great cudgel whistling through the air; Mole, black and grim, brandishing his stick and shouting his awful war-cry, ‘A Mole! A Mole!’ Rat; desperate and determined, his belt bulging with weapons of every age and every variety; Toad, frenzied with excitement and injured pride, swollen to twice his ordinary size, leaping into the air and emitting Toad-whoops that chilled them to the marrow! ‘Toad he went a-pleasuring!’ he yelled. ‘I’LL pleasure ’em!’ and he went straight for the Chief Weasel. They were but four in all, but to the panic-stricken weasels the hall seemed full of monstrous animals, grey, black, brown and yellow, whooping and flourishing enormous cudgels; and they broke and fled with squeals of terror and dismay, this way and that, through the windows, up the chimney, anywhere to get out of reach of those terrible sticks. – Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows

I understand the liberals: they are satanically possessed swine. However, I don’t understand the right-wing nationalists who claim to be against white genocide yet always condemn any violence directed against the liberals who are responsible for white genocide. I bring this subject up once again because of the recent execution of a white-genocide advocate in the Labour Party of Britain. The mental health of the executioner has been called into question, and he has been roundly condemned by white nationalists and the Britain First party. To say I differ with those so-called white nationalists who condemned the white avenger would be putting it too mildly. I vehemently oppose their condemnations. Quite probably the man is mentally unstable, but the act itself was moral and justifiable.(1)

It is wrong to place bombs in crowded bars in order to kill men and women in Northern Ireland, as the Communist IRA does. It is wrong to bomb thousands of innocent men and women in Arab countries, as the neocons do, because their leaders don’t want to open their nations to democratic capitalism. It is wrong to bomb a federal building and kill innocent civilians, as Timothy McVeigh did. It is wrong to shoot blacks just because you want to shoot black people, as Dylann Roof did. And it is wrong to shoot the children of liberals at a summer camp in Norway as Anders Breivik did. But is it wrong to shoot and kill a Labour Party Minister who advocates, and backs up her advocacy with deeds, the extermination of white people? No, it is not. One down and about a million to go, or whatever is the number of liberals in power throughout the liberal West, should be our battle cry.

The problem with the non-violent white nationalists is that they love the democratic process more than their people. The democratic process allows them to form think tanks, write witty, sarcastic things about their more liberal brethren, and to make themselves leaders of an abstract people, fighting for an abstract cause. This is why actual fighting scares the white nationalists. If white people were to abandon the democratic process and actually start fighting for their people, what would become of the white nationalists who worship the democratic process?

This constant harping on non-violence by the white nationalists – “We don’t want to upset the liberals” – is depressingly similar to that of the prolifers who loved the democratic process more than the babies who were being murdered. “Don’t burn down the clinics,” and “Don’t shoot the abortion doctors,” we were told. And what happened? Legalized abortion became part of the fabric of our nation, just as white genocide has become part of the fabric of the white nations. The white nationalist liberal who worships the democratic process will always lose out to the mad-dog liberal who sees the democratic process as a means to an end – the destruction of the white, Christ-bearing people. The mad-dog liberals never remain non-violent when they lose ground through the democratic process. They go outside the democratic process and use whatever tactic, including murder, that achieves their ends. Should we imitate the mad-dog liberals then? No, we should not. But we should realize that the mark of a man is not that he never kills, nor is the mark of a man that he lives to kill. The mark of a man is what he kills for. And if he will not kill in defense of his kith and kin, what kind of man is he?

Because they worship the democratic process the white nationalists often find themselves in bed with strange bedfellows. In a democracy you cannot venture forth, as David did, with the belief that God will aid you against the seemingly invincible foe. You must have numbers rather than God on your side. Thus you latch on to the homosexuals, the feminists, or any other group, no matter how Godless it is, that gives you the numbers to outvote your liberal cousins. But even if you could win an electoral victory by making such unholy alliances, what kind of victory would you achieve?

Ever since the 1950’s when the white genocide movement, which was called the ‘Civil Rights Movement,’ became institutionalized, this nation and the other nations of Europe have been about the business of liquidating the white race under the guise of democratizing the world. And throughout the liquidation process there has always been the democracy-loving white nationalists telling us that we are about to turn the corner and win an election. How is that possible when whites are one of the smallest racial groups in the world? If you democratize the world, guess what racial group will be voted out of existence? The whites did not take a vote when they built Christendom and defended it from the attacks of the heathens. If they had taken a vote, neither you nor I would be here today. This democratic abortion of the white race is like unto the abortion of the unborn babies. Must we stand by and watch the slaughter because the slaughter is taking place democratically?

The modern white nationalist’s passion for a democratic system that will save his people is rooted in the false-Aslan side of the European people’s history. The true faith, the faith of the Gospels, the faith of St. Paul, was centered on the God-Man, Jesus Christ.

But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother’s womb, and called me by his grace, To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood: Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus. Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days. Galatians 1: 15-18

St. Paul tells us this lest we look to a system about God rather than God Himself. The first European Christians were Christ-centered Christians who saw Christ as the true Hero-God, their Lord and kinsman. As long as the European people held onto that faith, they were a match for heathendom. But when the Ganelons in the church started to present their systems about God as God Himself, they started a secularization process that turned Christian Europe into a land covered with the evil, democratic mills of Satan. There is no hope for white people who enter the democratic mills. But there is hope for the white people who refuse to enter therein. The journey back to our European home begins with a refusal to bend the knee to the Jacobins’ god – the aggregate herd of heathen humanity, which is devoid of all humanity.

In a keynote speech at the Democratic convention that nominated Bill Clinton, the arch-liberal Bill Bradley gave a remarkably candid speech. He said that Americans were not willing to accept a tragic view of existence. They believed that existence on this earth could be so expertly arranged that tragedy could be eliminated. Bradley was not just articulating the underlying belief of American liberals, he was articulating the belief of all European liberals. That promise of utopia is what keeps the liberals in power. The antique European tells us that our lives here on earth are inherently tragic, because we are mortal men who must suffer much and then die, but we do not suffer in vain, because He has redeemed our suffering. But if you don’t believe that Christ is who He said He was, then you should throw in your lot with the utopians. And that is the tragedy of the white nationalists. They do not want a return to Christian Europe, because they don’t believe what the antique Europeans believed. Instead, they want white people to be included in the new world order. But that shall never happen. No matter that the white nationalists deny Him, they are eternally bound, in the eyes of the liberals and the colored heathens, to Him. The white nationalists won’t return home and they won’t be allowed to enter the new Jacobin paradise of the liberals.(2) So the white nationalist will live and die with his faith in the democratic process. As the colored barbarians descend upon his house, he will be on his phone to his congressman trying to drum up support for an anti-immigration candidate. And with his dying breath he will exclaim, “We are just about to turn the corner.”

Democracy is a code word for white genocide. If the whole world is democratized, then the whole world will be like South Africa, Haiti, and Arabia – one monolith of colored and heathen barbarism. Whites must stake out a homeland and defend it against the heathens of color and the white Ganelons who have sided with the colored heathens. The notion that we can somehow defeat the liberals through democracy is like unto the notion that the sheep can dialog with the wolves. Killing is not a magic panacea; it does not solve all problems. But killing is part of war, and we are in a war with the liberals, are we not? Surely you don’t believe that you can dialog with those who have told you openly that they mean to exterminate you and your people?

No one knows whether the heathen liberals will ever fight their colored allies when their colored allies turn against them. Nor do we know whether the Moslems will eradicate the Jews and/or the Asians, or whether the Asians and/or the Jews will prevail over the Moslems. All that doesn’t matter. What does matter is that we, the European people, cling to our one true love. Christ is in us and we are in Christ. We must stay white and European if we intend to stay with Him. “He who endures to the end shall be saved.”+


(1) It takes a type of divine madness to attack the leviathan alone. But what if the whites who still claim to be white would fight, in the fullest sense of the world? Then the mad prophets would become integral men leading other men in a holy cause.

(2) I noted back in the days of the Ayatollah Khomeini that he kept hurling anathemas at the Christian West. It was obvious to Christians that the West had ceased to be Christian, but in the eyes of the Ayatollah the West was still Christian. Try as you might, Mr. White Nationalist and Mr. Mad-Dog Liberal, you cannot escape your destiny any more than Jonah could escape his. Your enemies, who are wedded to Satan, know that you are the Christ-bearing people, even if you try to deny Him.

Posted in Christian counter-attack, counterrevolution, White genocide | Tagged ,

We All Shall Come Home

Constable_A-Mill-at-Gillingham-in-DorsetThe indulgence of a sort of undefined hope, an obscure confidence, that some lurking remains of virtue, some degree of shame, might exist in the breasts of the oppressors of France, has been among the causes which have helped to bring on the common ruin of king and people. There is no safety for honest men, but by believing all possible evil of evil men, and by acting with promptitude, decision, and steadiness on that belief. I well remember, at every epoch of this wonderful history, in every scene of this tragic business, that when your sophistic usurpers were laying down mischievous principles, and even applying them in direct resolutions, it was the fashion to say, that they never intended to execute those declarations in their rigour. This made men cautious in their opposition, and remiss in early precaution. By holding out this fallacious hope, the impostors deluded sometimes one description of men, and sometimes another, so that no means of resistance were provided against them, when they came to execute in cruelty what they had planned in fraud. – A letter from Mr. Burke, to a member of the National Assembly: in answer to some objections to his book on French affairs.


Keepsake Mill

Over the borders, a sin without pardon,
Breaking the branches and crawling below,
Out through the breach in the wall of the garden,
Down by the banks of the river, we go.

Here is the mill with the humming of thunder,
Here is the weir with the wonder of foam,
Here is the sluice with the race running under—
Marvellous places, though handy to home!

Sounds of the village grow stiller and stiller,
Stiller the note of the birds on the hill;
Dusty and dim are the eyes of the miller,
Deaf are his ears with the moil of the mill.

Years may go by, and the wheel in the river
Wheel as it wheels for us, children, to-day,
Wheel and keep roaring and foaming for ever
Long after all of the boys are away.

Home from the Indies and home from the ocean,
Heroes and soldiers we all shall come home;
Still we shall find the old mill wheel in motion,
Turning and churning that river to foam.

You with the bean that I gave when we quarrelled,
I with your marble of Saturday last,
Honoured and old and all gaily apparelled,
Here we shall meet and remember the past.

–Robert Louis Stevenson

I haven’t seen a mainstream news channel for over two months, but when my son told me that there had been a record-breaking mass murder, I bit the bullet and turned on the news. That was a mistake. The CNN crowd was droning on about gun control while the Fox News liberals had a terrorism “expert” on their show exhorting Americans to bomb ISIS. Puck was right: “Lord, what fools these mortals be.” It should be obvious to all who have eyes to see, which excludes the liberals, that we need less gun control. When terrorists strike, an armed citizenry should strike back at them. And it should be equally obvious that bombing ISIS over there will not stop home-grown Moslems over here from going on killing sprees in the name of Islam. America’s terrorist problem, like Europe’s terrorist problem, is insolvable so long as the European people remain under the thralldom of a utopian universalism, which is opposed to all things Christian and all things European. Indeed, the two – Christianity and Europe – cannot be separated. There is no Christianity other than European Christianity, and the European people have no identity if they separate themselves from their Christian past. But of course that is what the liberals of all stamps have done. They have divorced Christ and married Satan. And because of their new marriage with Satan, the European people are incapable of defending themselves as a people. They can and will defend Jacobin democracy in Church and state, an ideology which was created to destroy the image of God in man by destroying the Christ-bearing race, but they will not defend the European people. This is why the obvious solutions to such problems as Islamic terrorism, obvious to simple-minded peasants such as myself, are not obvious to the liberals. The European peasant says that the way to stop Islamic terrorism is to evict all Moslems from the Western countries. But the new European finds such solutions simple-minded and racist. Thus he suggests that we make war on guns or against ‘bad’ Moslems, but he never confronts the fact that liberalism is an ideology that renders its adherents incapable of fighting evil, because liberalism is a Satanic ideology designed to destroy the good and perpetuate evil.

It would not be necessary, if the European people believed in a Europe that was white and Christian, to look for the bad Moslems. A white Christian people would not grant rights of citizenship to any one of the Moslem faith, a faith opposed to the faith of the European people. Nor would a white Christian people permit Mexicans, blacks, or any other non-white race within their borders. But until the European people reclaim their past and become Europeans again, they will be as the people of Israel who followed the Pharisees: “And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.”

If you have ever had a relative or a family friend with Alzheimer’s disease you know how sad that disease is. Those who have the illness often seem as the ones who, “did not die, but nothing of life remained.” But when there is a flash of memory, it seems as if the loved one has returned, for a moment, from the dead. The European people are suffering from a spiritual Alzheimer’s. They have flashes of humanity when they remember who they were, but the memory is soon absorbed by the ever-present, ever-vigilant, liberal, medical staff. It is their special mission to keep the European people in a permanent state of spiritual Alzheimer’s. There must be no memories of old Europe, because such a memory, if it is sustained and acted on by the European people, would destroy Liberaldom. Dickens stands, along with Scott and Dostoevsky, as a giant among the European novelists, because he stayed close to the human heart. And by doing so, he gave us a glimpse of the divine Heart. In his novel, Nicholas Nickleby, Dickens connects our memory, the memory of our childhood, with the divine:

As the door of the vehicle was roughly closed, a comb fell from Kate’s hair, close at her uncle’s feet; and as he picked it up, and returned it into her hand, the light from a neighbouring lamp shone upon her face. The lock of hair that had escaped and curled loosely over her brow, the traces of tears yet scarcely dry, the flushed cheek, the look of sorrow, all fired some dormant train of recollection in the old man’s breast; and the face of his dead brother seemed present before him, with the very look it bore on some occasion of boyish grief, of which every minutest circumstance flashed upon his mind, with the distinctness of a scene of yesterday.

Ralph Nickleby, who was proof against all appeals of blood and kindred—who was steeled against every tale of sorrow and distress—staggered while he looked, and went back into his house, as a man who had seen a spirit from some world beyond the grave. 

Of course Ralph Nickleby, who was a forerunner of Ebenezer Scrooge, does not sustain that memory. If he had, he would have died in the arms of the Lord and seen the real Europe, Christ’s Europe, which waits for us beyond the grave. It is Jesus Christ and all “love’s loving parts” – our kith and kin – that join with us when we keep the memory of our European childhood before our eyes. If we never let go of that vision, we will never suffer Christian Europe to be eclipsed by the blended culture of the archangel Satan.

Classical liberals such as Jared Taylor and Geert Wilders keep pointing out that Islam is incompatible with liberalism. But is it incompatible with liberalism’s central tenet? No, it is not. That is why the liberals will never oppose Islam. At Islam’s core is the hatred of Jesus Christ and the Christ-bearing people. And that is what is at the core of liberalism. The classical liberals who oppose Islam in the name of liberalism are like the free love advocates who get angry when their children practice what they, the parents, preached. You can’t be a democracy-loving liberal and then condemn your liberal brethren for living up to the credo of Jacobin democracy: The white, Christ-bearing race must die. Nothing but degenerate filth has come from the Age of Democracy. Why not step out of the filth and live in the rarefied air of the antique Europeans?

The Europeans’ failure to act against the Moslem menace is emblematic of their refusal to give up the dream of an earthly paradise where all evils can be overcome by science and diversity. But evil exists now just as it has always existed. What has changed to make Islam or any other evil something other than evil?

The Turks, encouraged with the flight of the Christians, presently advanced their ensigns upon the top of the uttermost wall, crying Victory; and by the breach entered as if it had been a great flood, which, having once found a breach in the bank, overfloweth, and beareth down all before it; so the Turks, when they had won the utter wall, entered the city by the same gate that was opened for Justinianus and by a breach which they had before made with their great artillery, and without mercy cutting in pieces all that came in their way, without further resistance became lords of that famous and imperial city… In this fury of the barbarians perished many thousands of men, women, and children, without respect of age, sex, or condition. Many, for safeguard of their lives, fled into the temple of Sophia, where they were all without pity slain, except some few reserved by the barbarous victors to purposes more grievous than death itself. The rich and beautiful ornaments and jewels of that most sumptuous and magnificent church—the stately building of Justinianus the emperor—were, in the turning of a hand, plucked down and carried away by the Turks; and the church itself, built for God to be honoured in, for the present converted into a stable for their horses, or a place for the execution of their abominable and unspeakable filthiness: the image of the crucifix was also by them taken down, and a Turk’s cap put upon the head thereof, and so set up and shot at with their arrows, and afterwards, in great derision, carried about in their camp, as it had been in procession, with drums playing before it, railing and spitting at it, and calling it the God of the Christians, which I note not so much done in contempt of the image, as in despite of Christ and the Christian religion. –

Richard Knolles (1603) History of the Turks

That there is a devil who works his will through liberals and colored heathens is the same now as it always has been. What has changed is the number of liberals. Their numbers have grown from a few vermin to a legion of ravenous wolves. For centuries Europe was the light in darkness; now it is the land of scientism and heathenism where occasional flickers of light appear for a moment, only to disappear into the dark night of Babylon. It has been the liberals’ sacred – sacred to them – task to kill the European light whenever and wherever it appears. They have been quite successful, because they have the passionate intensity of satanic hatred that Yeats warned us of, while the everyday Europeans who want to be liberal, while preserving the fruits of non-liberal Europe, lack the conviction to attack the liberals at their satanic core, which is their support for a racially and religiously blended utopian world. When a female journalist deplores the feminism that makes white males indifferent to the rape of the women of Cologne, but then quickly adds that she does not want to see a return to the patriarchal values of old Europe, she is demonstrating the moral schizophrenia that keeps the European people enslaved to the liberals and the colored heathens. There must be a spiritual return to old Europe or else the blood red tide of liberalism will triumph. This does not mean we must imitate the outer shell of old Europe, but it does mean that we must be like unto the antique Europeans in our inmost soul. We must respond to the lay of the ancient European minstrel and ignore the sirens of modernity.

When Edward the I was engaged in a war with the Welsh, he ordered, with Machiavellian cunning, the execution of any Welsh bard his soldiers came upon. Why would he do this? He did it because he knew that if you destroy a peoples’ connection to their past, their bardic past, where the heroes of their race reside, you kill the people’s will to resist. The liberals first attacked the European’s past by heaping the monkey-vomit of ‘racism,’ ‘sexism,’ and ‘simple-mindedness’ on it. Who would want to approach such a foul-smelling substance? Now they are using the iron fist and smashing anyone who hearkens back to bardic Europe. The revolution is complete when there is no one left that even remembers Christian Europe. In Church and State, bardic Europe, which was the Europe of heroes who opposed liberalism with fire and sword, is dead. But the organized Jacobin democracies of Europe are not the European people, and the organized churches are not Christ’s church. Bardic Europe is buried somewhere in the racial memory of the European people. It is the task, the sacred task, of the European hero who still remembers and loves the European childhood of his people to live by the bardic code in defiance of the liberal forces arrayed against him. He will match and overman the liberals’ passionate intensity with a passionate intensity of greater depth and feeling, because his passionate intensity is grounded in the love of Him whose love passeth the understanding of the liberals and the colored heathens. Just as Christ draws us to Him, so will the European who abides with old Europe draw his people back to their European hearth fire, where they can hear the lay of the European minstrel.

If we believe that our Savior does not ‘evolve,’ that He does not ‘diversify’ and change from the Christ who enters human hearts into an ecumenical combination of Nelson Mandela, Muhammad, and Buddha, then we must respond to the call of bardic Europe and to bardic Europe alone. All around us is the filth of rotting-corpse liberalism. In the midst of the decay and filth, we must cling to Him who does not change, who does not decay. We triumph still when we remember and live in His Europe. Once that divine-human connection is made, we will kneel only in prayer to Him; we will not kneel to the devil and his diversified minions. To be Europeans once again is all in all. +

Posted in antique Christianity, democracy, Europeans and Christ | Tagged , , ,

The Trumpet Shall Sound and the Europeans Shall Rise


“If you were born to honor, show it now;” – Shakespeare, Pericles


I recently saw an Italian nationalist, a Christian, explaining to a hostile newsman the reason why he wanted the Moslems to be sent back to their own lands. Everything the Italian patriot said made perfect sense. He stated what every European should say about their own nations. He said the Italians’ culture was Christian and that culture could not be blended with the Islamic culture. He went on to suggest that wealthy Italians could assist the repatriated Moslems in their own county, but all the Moslems should be expelled from Italy. That would be a humane, Christian way to handle the “immigration crisis.” But of course such a humane, Christian policy will not be implemented. It will not be implemented because European Christians, such as that Italian patriot, have failed to come to terms with liberalism. Burke came to terms with liberalism:

Nothing can be conceived more hard than the heart of a thoroughbred metaphysician. It comes nearer to the cold malignity of a wicked spirit than to the frailty and passion of a man. It is like that of the principle of evil himself, incorporeal, pure, unmixed, dephlegmated, defecated evil. It is no easy operation to eradicate humanity from the human breast. What Shakespeare calls “the compunctious visitings of nature” will sometimes knock at their hearts, and protest against their murderous speculations. But they have a means of compounding with their nature. Their humanity is not dissolved. They only give it a long prorogation. They are ready to declare, that they do not think two thousand years too long a period for the good that they pursue. It is remarkable, that they never see any way to their projected good but by the road of some evil. Their imagination is not fatigued with the contemplation of human suffering through the wild waste of centuries added to centuries of misery and desolation. Their humanity is at their horizon−and, like the horizon, it always flies before them. The geometricians, and the chemists, bring, the one from the dry bones of their diagrams, and the other from the soot of their furnaces, dispositions that make them worse than indifferent about those feelings and habitudes, which are the support of the moral world. –A Letter to a Noble Lord

Scott came to terms with liberalism:

In this point of view, Goethe’s conception of the character and reasoning of Mephistopheles, the tempting spirit in the singular play of “Faust,” appears to me more happy than that which has been formed by Byron, and even than the Satan of Milton. These last great authors have given to the Evil Principle something which elevates and dignifies his wickedness; a sustained and unconquerable resistance against Omnipotence itself—a lofty scorn of suffering compared with submission, and all those points of attraction in the Author of Evil, which have induced Burns and others to consider him as the Hero of the “Paradise Lost.” The great German poet has, on the contrary, rendered his seducing spirit a being who, otherwise totally unimpassioned, seems only to have existed for the purpose of increasing, by his persuasions and temptations, the mass of moral evil, and who calls forth by his seductions those slumbering passions which otherwise might have allowed the human being who was the object of the Evil Spirit’s operations to pass the tenor of his life in tranquility. For this purpose Mephistopheles is, like Louis XI., endowed with an acute and depreciating spirit of caustic wit, which is employed incessantly in undervaluing and vilifying all actions, the consequences of which do not lead certainly and directly to self-gratification. – Introduction to Quentin Durward

And Dostoyevsky came to terms with liberalism:

She had never seen such men of letters before; they were incredibly but quite openly vain, as though in being so vain they were performing some sort of function. Some, though by no means all, arrived drunk and then behaved as if there were something beautiful in drunkenness that they had discovered only yesterday. Indeed, they all seemed proud of something. Their faces proclaimed that they had just this minute discovered some terribly important secret. They swore at one another and admired themselves for doing so. It was difficult to find out what they had actually written, but they described themselves as critics, novelists, satirists, playwrights, and debunkers. –The Possessed

But the betwixt-and-between European Everyman still has not learned that you cannot compromise with liberals. It is all or nothing – Christ or the devil.

The European Christians who are resisting the Moslem invasion of the European nations are making the same mistakes the prolifers made. They say they know what liberals are, but if they truly knew what they are, satanically possessed swine, would they try to appeal to their humanity? “Please stop abortion; it kills a young child,” and, “Please stop allowing Moslems into our nation; they are destroying our culture and killing our people.” Would you ask a wolf to spare the sheep in your pasture or would you kill the wolf? The liberals hate everything that is humane and Christian, so why would you expect them to stop killing babies and white people simply because you point out to them that legalized abortion and legalized white genocide are inhumane? The liberals know what they are doing in both cases. They want to kill babies and they want to destroy the white race. White Christians can either kill the wolves – the liberals and the colored heathen –or they can sit back and watch the slaughter while they keep appealing to the wolves’ humanity.

The integral Christian instinctively knows and loves the good and instinctively knows and hates evil. But what happens when Christian men rebuild the Tower of Babel in the belief that Christians do not have to worry about the sin of pride? A false dichotomy is set up between the heart and the head. The hierarchy of the various churches push a satanic agenda that is grounded in the mind of Satan, while the laity are torn between the Savior who enters human hearts and the mind-forged Churchianity espoused by Satanists in clerical attire. The prolife Christian and the anti-Moslem Christian will always stop short of a call to arms against the enemies of his people, because the leaders of his church are wedded to a satanic universalism that condemns all things white and Christian. Hence the white Christian with a remnant of the true faith in his heart will make a timid protest against the Islamic invasion, but he will refrain from taking the necessary measures to stop the invasion, because he dare not call liberals evil when the leaders of his own church are liberals who are in favor of the Islamic invasion. And he dare not touch the issue of the black infestation of his nation, which is just as dangerous and often combined with the Islamic invasion, because that goes against the satanic universalism of the anti-Christian churches. The day of reckoning for the liberals and the colored heathens will come when the European people give up intellectual Christianity and return to the faith of their fathers, who believed in the Christ who enters human hearts, not the satanic archangel who enters human minds.

The decadent poet, Andre Gidé, opined that he didn’t believe in the devil but that is what the devil wanted: The devil wanted Gidé to be ‘too smart’ to believe in the devil so that he could work his will upon him. As long as European Christians are conflicted between the heart of Christ and the minds of their satanic leaders they will be at the mercy of Satan, who rules through his minions, the liberals.

When a man leaves his Christian home and goes out into the world, does he go out into the world as the third dumb brother goes out into the world, armed with that charity of honor that was instilled into him at his racial hearth fire, or does he go out into the world as his two older, clever brothers went out into the world – to ignore that charity of honor and serve Satan? The European who abandons the mystical body of the church, which consists of all those who have taken Christ into their hearts and welcomed Him at their racial hearth fire, for organized Jewry, which consists of all the organized branches of the heart-hardened, Christ-less Christian churches, will always be torn between European Christianity which is now condemned as racist, and the universalist, satanic faith of the church men. The European people are not as cowardly as they appear. From a purely pagan perspective, they appear to be cowards who will not fight for their people. But they are conflicted. They must go against the faith they have been taught, which is intellectual Christianity, in order to fight the devil and his minions in the name of an older and now condemned racist faith. Thus intellectual Christianity makes cowards of all its adherents. One longs for the return of the Goth, the Christian European who fears nothing, fights for his own, and loves and hates with all his heart. In short, one longs for an integral European who will not bow down and worship at the liberals’ shrines in church and state, and who will not respond to the murder and rape of his people with letters to the editor or protest marches, but will respond with fire and sword. The Christ-hating liberal, Adolf Hitler, asked, “Is Paris burning?” It was not. We, the Christ-bearing Europeans, need to ask, “Are the heathens’ altars burning?” And if they are not burning, then why are they not burning?

Anthony Jacob, the spiritual heir of Edmund Burke, pointed out that the colored hordes of the Moslem and negroid tribes were not conquering the West because of their military might. They were conquering the West because the liberals were allowing them to conquer the West. Why are the liberals inviting the colored heathens into Europe? The obvious answer is the correct one: Because they worship darkness and not the light. But why do they worship darkness? That is a mystery that has to do with God’s grace and human free will. All we know is that the liberals hate all things Christian. And since it was the European people who formed an incorporate union with Christ, the liberals hate the European people. They will not cease from mental strife until the white race no longer exists. When Tony Blair says Britain must be multi-cultural, and when Nicholas Sarkozy says that the French people must be multi-racial, they are both expressing the liberals’ mandate – all whites must perish so a liberal utopia can be established. And the spiritual fount of secular, liberal utopianism is intellectual Christianity. The French clergy at the time of the French Revolution were more worried about adherents to their system going over to the Protestant faith than they were worried about whether or not their people believed in the Son of God. The organized Christian-Jewry that Dostoyevsky saw as the aid and support of the Communists was the Christ-less Christianity of the Grand Inquisitor, who gave the people an earthly utopia as a replacement for the Son of God. That earthly utopia has turned into a very rancid and foul-tasting pot of lentils, has it not? Apparently it still gives sustenance and hope to enough white Europeans so that it prevents them from detaching themselves form liberalism. They are still trying to find a place within the confines of a utopian system that is designed to kill every last white and to destroy every cultural remnant of the white Europeans’ Christian culture.

I’ve heard many on the right say that the liberals have overplayed their hands by becoming so blatant with their liberalism – their outright advocacy of the Moslem invasion, their aggressive pro-active stance on homosexual marriage and transgender rights, and their complete capitulation to black murderers and rapists. Have the liberals overplayed their hands? It’s certainly possible; they are not infallible. But I don’t see any signs that white people understand what liberals are, the aforementioned demon-swine, and thus I see no signs that white people are determined to fight the liberals. It is my hope that the grace of God is working in the unseen recesses of a handful of Europeans’ hearts, and that indwelling spirit of God will soon bear good fruits. That is my hope and that is my faith, for what is faith if it is seen? Will Satan have the last sneer? Will all of old Europe perish while the sneering liberals and the triumphant heathens of color dance on her grave? My mind says, yes, that is precisely what shall happen. But my heart tells me that such shadows will be altered at the last trump, at the twinkling of an eye, by men and women of European blood who still love Him in and through their people. +

Posted in Christian Europe, Europe as the Christ-bearer, Third Dumb Brother, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , ,