The Moral Vision

When men once turn to brutes, the trifle of men’s wit that remains in them adds tenfold to their brutality. –

Tanglewood Tales by Nathaniel Hawthorne

The mad-dog liberals have given themselves over to Satan. They are the academics, the Antifaers, the members of the Democratic Party, the Labour Party, and the various leftist-Marxist parties throughout Europe. They represent a large minority of white people, but they still do not, in my judgment, make up the majority of white people. The majority of white people throughout the world are what I call grazers. They graze in the mad-dog liberals’ pastures and dutifully follow the mad-dog liberals’ orders, but they do not share the mad-dog liberals’ hatred for all things white and Christian. Nor do they realize that they are being fattened up for execution in the liberals’ slaughterhouse. Why do the white grazers believe that there is a place for them in Liberaldom? They believe there is a place for them in Liberaldom for the same reason the narrator in Melville’s short story “Benito Cereno” believed that blood-thirsty negro savages were kindly natives who meant the white captain on the ship no harm.

The grazers cannot see evil clearly, because they have no vision of the good. If the grazers believed in the European Christ, as distinct from the cosmic Christ of the churchmen who is all things to all people, they would not continue to graze in the pastures of Liberaldom without fighting back against the liberals. They would know that when they, the liberals, do these things and say these things they are not the friends of white people. When they institutionalize race-mixing, abortion, sodomy, and negro worship, they are evil men and women who must be opposed, just as Charles Martel opposed the Moslems. You can only deal democratically with people with whom you share a common set of values. You can’t have any peaceful dealings with people who want your heart’s blood. But of course the grazer does not believe that the liberals want his heart’s blood. “That’s so silly, why would a liberal want our blood? It doesn’t make any sense.” But the liberals’ agenda does make sense, it makes perfect sense in the spiritual realm, which is the realm that governs all of our lives whether we acknowledge its existence or not. What could be more logical, from Satan’s perspective, than the destruction of the Christ-bearing race? In a war, you destroy the breeding ground of the enemy. And Christ’s breeding ground was and is the hearts of the European people. The liberals are coldly, maniacally doing the will of Satan by destroying all things white.

When Edgar sees his blinded father poorly led and determined to fling himself over a precipice, he must think of some way to give his father a will to live. We know the stratagem he uses, and that stratagem works:

Hadst thou been aught but gossamer, feathers, air,
So many fathom down precipitating,
Thou ’dst shiver’d like an egg: but thou dost breathe;
Hast heavy substances; bleeed’st not; speak’st; art sound.
Ten masts at each make not the altitude
Which thou hast perpendicularly fell.
Thy life’s a miracle. Speak yet again.

The white people of modern Europe must believe that the civilization of old Europe was a miracle before they will take up arms against the liberals. If they make that realization, they will know the good and be prepared to fight evil, and they will survive as a people. But so long as they believe that Christian Europe was evil, and modern, multi-racial, multi-cultural, democratic Europe is good, they will continue to be a hopeless, helpless, captive people.

Recently a group of scientists got together to tell us how we could save the planet from destruction. Did the scientists recommend we fall onto our knees and invite Christ into our hearts while expelling all liberals and colored barbarians from our nations? No, they did not. They listed a whole series of problems to be addressed, none of which was the problem of Liberalism. Instead, a main problem, according to the scientists, was overpopulation. Let me translate the liberal double-speak. When scientists of the West tell ‘mankind’ that we have a population problem, they are really telling the world that we must eliminate white people, because there is no overpopulation problem in the Western nations unless you mean the Moslem and colored barbarians who are overrunning Europe and the United States. That is an overpopulation problem the West should deal with, but the learned men of science were not referring to the colored heathen, they were talking to the people of the West. They want the people of the West, the white Europeans, to self-destruct. And the white Europeans will do what they are told, unless they believe that Christian Europe was a miracle that has to be maintained and perpetuated. As it stands now, the liberals are hell-bent on destroying the white race, and the intellectual Christians think that a good Christian must hasten the end of the white race by repudiating the European Christians’ vision of Christ and supporting the enthronement of the negro as the savior of the West.

Every Sunday throughout the Western world we see the tragedy of intellectual Christianity. Churches with many of the art works and iconic images from old Europe lining their Church walls feature modern clergymen who preach about the evils of old racist Europe and the wonders of the new, multi-racial, multi-cultural Europe. What has the new church of the cosmic Christ produced? It has produced the aforementioned evils of race-mixing, abortion, sodomy and negro worship. But somehow by a strange metamorphosis, the culture that has spawned all those evils, our modern liberal culture, is supposed to be good while the culture that produced Christian men and women who opposed all of the modern evils, the culture of the antique Europeans, is now supposed to be the most evil culture that has ever existed on the face of the earth. And no one will defend that culture or the people who created that culture in response to God’s grace. Churchmen who owe their position in the church to their Christian forefathers will not say one good word for their spiritual fathers. “Faith of our Fathers, Living Still,” has become, “Let our Racist Fathers Rot in the Grave While We Look to the Negro Who is Living Now.” Is their abhorrence of the antique Europeans’ ‘racism’ really the reason the secular liberals and their kissing cousins in the churches have demonized the whites who lived during the Christian era in Europe? No, it is not. The race card is a stratagem that works. The great haters of humanity, the liberals, do not really care about the black man or any other human being. They are incapable of love, all they can do is hate. And the generic black man is a convenient weapon which they use to subdue the white Christ-bearing race. The liberals will use that weapon so long as it is effective.

It’s difficult to envision a 21st century nation of whites who do not fear the racist label. We can look to the past and see whites who were not afraid to love their own people and maintain a white, provincial culture set apart from the colored heathens, but it doesn’t seem like whites will ever again become like unto those men and women of old Europe. It will take a miracle, but we once were the people who believed in the one great Miracle that began in a manger in Bethlehem.

At the center of Satan’s kingdom on earth in every European nation are the universities. It is in Academia that we see pure evil undiluted by anything good. And if we recall to mind that the universities were originally spawned by the various churches, we see a great tragedy. How could something so evil come from something so well-intentioned? Was it really well-intentioned, or was it the second fall of man? Was it an attempt to replace God’s word with man’s will? Perhaps in the beginning there were well-intentioned men who exaggerated the capacity of the human intellect and devalued the capacity of the human heart. But once that tragic error was made, Satan was able to use man’s pride of intellect, what Chateaubriand called the pride of science, to place a barrier between God and man. That barrier must be taken down. So long as it remains, the world will be in the hands of intellectualized beasts of prey, who, in the fullness of their intellectual pride, slavishly serve Satan.

For good or evil, the white race determines the history of the world. The liberals, who are the intellectual beasts of prey, have determined that the white race must be destroyed. They will preside over the extermination process, and they, in their own minds, will be spared to preside over a colored paradise, which in reality will be a kingdom of eternal night. But the pure intellect has nothing to do with reality. The intellectual man follows a cosmic star of unreality, which begins in the heavens, just as Satan began, and ends up plunging into hell, just as Satan did.

What would happen if the Europeans once again looked to the Star of Bethlehem instead of the liberals’ cosmic star? Miracles would occur in Europe once again. Nothing is impossible if the European people renew their covenant with God. I am frequently told that things are not as bad as I paint them. “Democracy works, and there are still good Christians in the churches.” My response is that democracy has never worked, and, as regards the ‘good Christians’ in the churches – I’m sure there are good Christians in the rank and file of some of the break-away fringe churches. But they are good Christians in spite of, not because of, the church system that they belong to. The spirit cannot be scientized; when the church of God becomes a man-made system rather than a covenant between the living God and His people, the people with hearts of flesh, the church becomes part of Liberaldom.

The Lord God gave us hearts of flesh so we could know Him in this world and love Him in the next world. The miracle of Europe was a reflection of God’s labor of love which was embodied in the person of Jesus Christ. The further we slide away from incarnate Europe, the harder it gets to believe in God’s labor of love. And then the ethos of the bestial intellects of prey becomes our reality; we no longer see the light. So much now rests on so few. Our European lives are indeed a miracle, but only those who still see the European miracle clearly will endure to the end. +

Posted in Europe as the Christ-bearer, Grazers, restoration of European civilization, Uncategorized | Tagged , ,

In the Heart Dwelleth the Soul

And my ending is despair,
Unless I be reliev’d by prayer…

-Prospero in The Tempest

St. John tells us that, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God,” and later he tells us that, “the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us…” It has been my contention — and it remains my contention — that the Word of God, which is the Gospel of Christ crucified, Christ risen, sank deep into the hearts of the European people, so deeply that it became part of their blood. They could only be divested of that faith by a long, painful process that drains the lifeblood from a man. That process is called liberalism. It starts with an intellectual premise that the real man, the advanced man, is pure intellect. From that premise the deblooding process begins.

The first deblooder was the devil. He appealed to Adam and Eve’s intellects to convince them that their filial relationship with God the Father was unnecessary. Smart people do not need a filial relationship with God, they only need a vague intellectual attachment to God. That has always been the story of man’s rebellion against God – “We are too smart to submit to God.” It has been the task of the Europeans, the men of blood, to tell the great intellects, who want to return to paganism through intellectual Christianity or through one or more of the pagan philosophies, that they are not that smart. For once a man ceases to think with his heart he becomes a tool of Satan.

Throughout the Christian centuries there were always the deblooders in church and society at large who wanted to make all of existence an intellectual proposition. But it was not until the American Revolution that the deblooding process became institutionalized. America was a propositional nation from its inception. The French Revolution took the implication of the U.S. Revolution to its logical conclusion – Man is God. The same deblooding process that animated Jefferson, Madison, and Franklin also animated the French revolutionists. The evils of the American experiment in democracy are often overlooked because the Americans, unlike the French, did not expressly denounce God when they framed the U. S. Constitution. But they did make God an intellectual construct, which is back-door atheism, which incidentally is what the French Jacobins ultimately adopted as well. They found out that men needed some kind of God. So both the French and the Americans focused on an intellectual concept of the noble black savage.

The deblooding process became institutionalized throughout the European nations in the 20th century, and it has been held over, like a long-running theatrical success, for the 21st century. But why has the new-old Gnostic faith replaced Christianity? What makes it so appealing to the modern Europeans? Its success has to do with the cumulative nature of scientific knowledge. With each passing century the European scientists gained in knowledge of the natural world. That gave them, and the men and women who partook of that knowledge, a feeling of power. Was the Holy Ghost of the Christian Trinity really necessary when there was more power and knowledge to be gleaned from science than from a mystical entity that could not be seen? The problem a Christian faces when he stands before the almighty holy ghost of science is that his knowledge is not cumulative, he must start at the beginning, in his infancy of faith, and try to counter the magnificence of science with his puny faith. Unless, and this ‘unless’ is everything, he unites with his honored dead in spirit, blood, and faith. Then he is not starting anew nor is he alone. He stands with his people, a long line of heroes, against the new Gnostics with their unholy trinity. But he must stand with his honored dead or he will succumb to the abstracted intellect, the negro, and science. For this reason the liberal plays the race card over and over again. If racism is blasphemy then the antique Europeans were evil. The modern Europeans are cut off from their past, because they fear the racist label. If they want to be Christians, they must be intellectual Christians who have made their peace with the negro, who is the liberals’ savior, and they must make their peace with the liberals’ holy ghost, which is science. And the European people have made their peace with the liberals’ trinity, because once they cut their ties to their ‘racist’ ancestors they were alone against an implacable foe. They were like Lilliputians fighting giants. If they leave the slime pits of negro worship and stand with their European ancestors, they will not be alone in the day of battle against the liberals and the colored barbarians. As it stands now the Europeans are defenseless, because they are afraid of the racist label attached to their ancestors, just as if the racist label is a plague that they dare not catch. But you will not only be without all human aid if you run from your Christian past, you will also be without divine aid, because the living God does not reside in the abstracted minds of the wizards of modernity. He lives with His people, the men and women with hearts of flesh. They were called Europeans.

In the aftermath of the Texas shooting, there was the usual nonsense about gun control. But there were two other things that do not bode well for white people. The liberals were glad that it was white people who were killed, and they also mocked the victims, because they were praying, and they mocked those who said they would pray for the victims and their families. The liberals’ lack of concern for the death of white people should not shock us. They want all white people to perish. Nor should we be shocked by the liberals’ blasphemy – is not the essence of liberalism blasphemy? But it is significant that the liberals no longer feel the need to hide their hatred of whites nor their hatred of the Christian God.

The unanswered prayer does pose a problem for the professed Christian. It’s quite similar to the ‘why is there suffering?’ problem. But throughout all the Christian centuries of Europe, the European people were able to pray to their Lord and Savior with all sincerity even though there were many prayers that were not answered. What has changed? That filial relationship with God has changed. Adam and Eve did not trust their father, so they turned to pure intelligence as a refuge. When the European people went over to scientism, they ceased to know God through their hearts, hearts which told them that their prayers mattered, even when it seemed they were of no effect. In the absence of a belief that a loving God does respond to our prayers, what is left? There is the trinity of the liberals.

But can the abstracted intellect serve as a substitute for God the father? Can the negro be our messiah? And can science replace the Holy Ghost? It seems to me that all three divisions of the liberals’ trinity show us honest trifles only to betray us in deepest consequence. When facing our own deaths, our loved ones’ death, or the death of our civilization, we cannot find any consolation or hope in the liberals’ trinity. So why do we cling to that trinity and reject the Christian Trinity of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost?

Christ tells us that it will not be forgiven us if we blaspheme against the Holy Ghost. Is not that what the liberals enjoin us to do? They bid us look to the new holy ghost, the scientific holy ghost who proceeds from the abstracted intellect and the sacred negro, and with the abstracted intellect of man and the sacred negro, science is worshipped and glorified. Look at academia, look at organized Christian Jewry – are they not citadels of blasphemy? You can’t reach God through prayer in those citadels, because they reject the Holy Ghost who leads us to our Savior. We won’t come out of the liberals’ maze until we reconnect with our past, and we can’t reconnect with our past if we continue to reject the Holy Ghost who resides in hearts that love much.

It is now taken as a given by the mad-dog liberals that the white race must be exterminated for the sin of racism. The conservatives, who are the classical liberals, agree with the mad-dog liberals about white racism: it is the unforgiveable sin. But the conservatives think their sin can be expunged by their repudiation of the antique Europeans and their willingness to worship the negro. “It’s not enough,” the liberals declare, “You must face the executioners’ block.” And even in death the white man will not be cleansed, because the triune god of the liberals has no merciful savior, and the white man’s sin consists of his whiteness — that is a sin that can never be expunged.

Throughout the Old Testament as we follow the people of God, we are struck by all the backsliding and apostasy from the one true God that takes place. Time and time again the people whom God spoke to through His prophets ignore the prophets and return to Baal or its equivalent. That backsliding and apostasy became codified law when the bulk of the Jewish people rejected the Messiah, who was the fulfillment of the prophecies. And now the wheel has come full circle. The European people who believed in the prophecies and in Him who was the fulfillment of the prophecies have returned to Baal. “We shall bring you hell,” the liberals tell us. Yes, they have brought us hell. The same God who rose from the dead on the third day can raise us up from this hell on earth. But we can’t conjure up the living God by the brilliance of our intellects or the magic of our systems. We can learn to love Him in and through the European people from the racist era of European history. That was an era, like every era of European history, of wars, adulteries, lust, and every other evil under the sun. But there were hearts of faith in that era of European history – there were people struggling to the light, in contrast to the liberals of our modern era who have banished the light in order to worship darkness.

It’s not possible to live in the darkness of Liberaldom without faith in His Europe. If the antique Europeans were incorrect, if their vision of Christ was false, then to whom can we turn for the words of eternal life? The liberals tell us that we can turn to their triune god. The intellectual Christians tell us that we can place our hope in a new fusionist Christianity free from the racism of time-bound European Christianity. But the new Christianity is simply another form of atheism. Without a local habitation the antique Europeans’ hearth-fire Christ becomes a lesser god in a pantheon of nature gods who are subordinate to the negro. Is this the final apostasy of the Europeans people? Will they all perish from the face of the earth without any record that they ever existed at all? That certainly seems likely, seeing that all the European schools and universities are divesting themselves of all things white – no white male authors, no white male musicians or artists – everything white must perish. But there is the rub, which gives the liberal nightmares. You can eradicate the culture of the people who believed in the God-Man. And you can eradicate the people who still profess a belief in the European Christ. But, if Christ is indeed the son of God, how can you eradicate God? Why, if we believe that Christ is the Son of God, should we ever cave in to the liberals? Despite what seems, it is the liberals, not those who stand with the Christ of old Europe, who are playing a losing hand. They are playing a losing hand because our Redeemer liveth. Christ rose from the dead on the third day, and that shall always be the source of our faith and the reason we shall stay with eternal Europe against all the world. +

Posted in antique Christianity, black faith, blood faith | Tagged

The Institutionalized Tragedy of Liberalism

Lear. And my poor fool is hang’d! No, no, no life!
Why should a dog, a horse, a rat, have life,
And thou no breath at all? Thou’lt come no more,
Never, never, never, never, never!
Pray you, undo this button. Thank you sir.
Do you see this? Look on her, look, her lips,
Look there, look there!

-King Lear

Thou art the grave where buried love doth live…

– Wm. Shakespeare


The fool, who is no fool, in King Lear bravely tries to keep Lear in good spirits despite the fact that misfortune has fallen upon Lear. But there is a limit. After Lear is cast out by his two daughters and left bereft of everything, including his wits, the fool has nothing left to say.

Lear. Make no noise, make no noise; draw the curtains; so, so, so. We’ll go to supper i’ th’ morning.

Fool. And I’ll go to bed at noon.

Those are the last words of Lear’s fool. And he, like Cordelia, is eventually executed.

If we segue to Tennyson’s Idylls of the King we meet another fool. Remember the last tournament? Arthur watches his Christian knights defeat the heathen knights, but in defeating them they break every rule of chivalry. Arthur returns to his chamber:

So all the ways were safe from shore to shore,
But in the heart of Arthur pain was lord.

And when Arthur returns to his chamber, he hears a voice at his feet:

A voice clung sobbing till he question’d it,
‘What art thou?’ and the voice about his feet
Sent up an answer, sobbing, ‘I am thy fool,
And I shall never make thee smile again.’

It was the fool’s purpose in the royal courts of olden times to help the king to keep his perspective. When the king was sad, the fool tried to make him merry, and when the king was too enthusiastically happy when he should have been more tempered, it was the fool’s function to dampen, with humor, the king’s enthusiasm. It was no easy job as Viola, the heroine of Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night, observes:

This fellow is wise enough to play the fool,
And to do that well craves a kind of wit.
He must observe their mood on whom he jests,
The quality of persons, and the time,
And, like the haggard, check at every feather
That comes before his eye. This is a practice
As full of labour as a wise man’s art;
For folly that he wisely shows is fit.
But wise men, folly-fall’n, quite taint their wit.

Feste, the fool in Twelfth Night, continues to play the fool throughout the length of the play. He is even given the last word. That is because Twelfth Night is a comedy, and in comedy, the proper order of existence often teeters on the brink of destruction, but things are set right by the end. In such societies the fool’s place is secure. But when the proper order of things has been overthrown, when “all is cheerless, dark and deadly,” the fool cannot function. In Lear’s kingdom and Arthur’s kingdom the evil one’s presence is too pervasive to permit the type of restorative humor that a good court jester can provide. The type of court jesters who bid us laugh at our foibles and put things in perspective depend on a society that has the proper perspective. In a society that has institutionalized Satanism there can be only jeering mockery of all things decent and honorable – and when all things decent and honorable are mocked, tragedy becomes institutionalized. Public ceremonies are tragic because they celebrate Satanism, and all of the daily activities of life plunge a man into the maelstrom of a society pulling him toward hell. The high comedy of court jesters such as Wodehouse and Feste comes to an end, and foul, loathsome, sneering, mocking ‘comedians’ such as the Monty Python group comes to the forefront.

Every regime, even a satanic regime, has its jesters. But a satanic regime uses jesters to ensure that there is no high humor, humor that elevates the soul. There must only be mocking, jeering humor that is supportive of the almighty satanic state. One must either face the fact that one lives in a kingdom of tragedy where “humanity must perforce prey on itself like monsters from the deep,” or else a man must take the opiates of modernity and proclaim that he loves the modern negroid states of Europe and is a very happy man. If we face the reality of modernity, we will not be dancing in the streets, we will have no kindly fools to ease the pain of existence, because institutionalized liberalism is institutionalized tragedy that kills the good fools, but we will still have souls. If we take the path of spiritual anesthesia, we might be superficially happier than the non-anesthetized, but we will lose our souls.

I don’t meet many non-anesthetized whites. Most of the grazers are on some type of opiate – whether it is ‘American Legion’ patriotism, sports, or clerical-sponsored intellectual Christianity. The reason for the high preponderance of anesthetized whites is simple. In order to survive economically in our society, a man must adjust to the customs, manners, and rhythms of our society. You will suffer economically and may be in peril of your life if you don’t adjust to society. But should we try to adjust to Satandom? “Of course we shouldn’t,” is the grazer’s reply, “but we do not live in Satandom.” Then the grazer tells you why we do not live in Satandom. His answer usually centers on the fact that we live in a democracy and/or we have a lot of churches. But why is the reign of Satan a good thing so long as he reigns in the name of the democratic process in church and state?

There has never been a more successful totalitarian society than the United Negro States of America. And the various European states are not far behind the United States. It appears that countries like Britain, France, and Germany are heading to oblivion at a faster rate than the United States, but that is because the United States’ geographical mass has slowed down the process of destruction. But it will come, because the United States is the ideological leader of the new Satandom.

If the liberals were not religious zealots they would see that they have won the war. They have institutionalized all the dystopian dreams of their liberal Jacobin forefathers. The noble savage is worshipped, the slaughter of the innocents is a sacred right, and sodomy has been normalized. All those perversions and more have become part of the fabric of our culture. But still the liberal heathens rage. They act as if they are a disenfranchised minority fighting against some omnipotent fascist enemy. The Antifa forces declared this Saturday, November 4th, as their day of reckoning.  Who are they challenging? Their values are the state’s values. Who is resisting them?

The liberals will never be satisfied because Satan is never satisfied, and they are driven by the same hatred that drives Satan. Burke identified the liberals’ one overriding passion in his Letters on a Regicide Peace:

The rebels to God perfectly abhor the Author of their being. They hate him * with all their heart, with all their mind, with all their soul, and with all their strength.’ He never presents himself to their thoughts but to menace and alarm them. They cannot strike the Sun out of Heaven, but they are able to raise a smouldering smoke that obscures him from their own eyes. Not being able to revenge themselves on God, they have a delight in vicariously defacing, degrading, torturing, and tearing in pieces his image in man.

The liberals can never cease their fight so long as white people exist, because it was white people who created an ‘image of God’ culture. A grazer who supports the liberals’ wars, who supports the liberals’ police force, and pays proper homage to the sacred negro might survive for a little longer than a white who does not pay homage to the liberal state, but in the end, the white grazer will be taken from his pasture and executed in the great liberal slaughter house. All of white humanity must perish because all of white humanity was once connected to eternal Europe, which, through a glass darkly, reflected the divine image of Christ the Lord.

Let us look at Shakespeare’s complete works as a chronicle of existence as seen through the eyes of a Christian European. The comedies give us an image of our Lord’s house of many mansions, the tragedies bid us face the reality of suffering, and the romances turn us toward Him who is “the grave where buried love doth live.” The liberals, because they hate the risen Lord, have created a world without comedy, without the catharsis of Christian tragedies, and without the sure and certain hope in the resurrection of the dead. We have nothing to hang onto if we accept the reign of the liberals. Must we submit? It might seem like the practical thing to do. But if there is a spiritual realm above this vale of tears, then we cannot order our lives as if we are mere by-products of nature. Just as the sheer moral ugliness of the liberals and the colored heathen must have a supernaturally demonic source, so must the moral beauty of the antique Europeans have a divine source. Our ancestors believed that the divine source was Christ. His kingdom-come is not compatible with liberalism, so we have no choice. We must acknowledge that we are a captive people and refuse to accept that captivity as permanent. Everything we do should be done with the intention of undermining Liberaldom and rebuilding His reign of charity. There is only one season in Liberaldom, it is always a time to kill; to kill God by killing His people. For the love of Him who died on the cross and for the love of our kith and kin, we must be like unto Thomas Nelson Page’s Goth. We must love and hate with European hearts of flesh. Then, in the darkness of Satandom, there will still be light, there will still be hope. +

Posted in counterrevolution, Europe as the Christ-bearer, White genocide | Tagged

This Will Ever Be the European Story

A brilliant morning shines on the old city. Its antiquities and ruins are surpassingly beautiful, with the lusty ivy gleaming in the sun, and the rich trees waving in the balmy air. Changes of glorious light from moving boughs, songs of birds, scents from gardens, woods, and fields—or, rather, from the one great garden of the whole cultivated island in its yielding time—penetrate into the Cathedral, subdue its earthy odour, and preach the Resurrection and the Life. The cold stone tombs of centuries ago grow warm; and flecks of brightness dart into the sternest marble corners of the building, fluttering there like wings.

The Mystery of Edwin Drood by Charles Dickens

A friend once asked me upon what five books, if I were limited to five, would I build my library. When he gave me permission to list complete works as one book, I gave him my answer:

  1. King James Version of the Bible
  2. Shakespeare – the complete works
  3. Sir Walter Scott – the complete works
  4. Dickens – the complete works
  5. The Brothers Grimm – the complete works

Of course there is no reason to confine yourself to just five books unless you have a friend who likes to play the ‘five books game’. Actually my friend was generous – it’s usually just two books that you’re allowed on the desert island.

It is to the fifth book that I want to turn right now, because there is a story in Grimm’s Fairy Tales about a Young Drummer who climbs a glass mountain, a glass mountain that is supposed to be impossible to climb, in order to rescue a fair maiden. I have not talked to the Young Drummer for eight years, giving rise to a rumor that the Young Drummer has left us. He has not; I have just been negligent. Perhaps I have let the spiritual rot of modernity beat me down, rendering me incapable of speaking with a truly integral man from the heart of sacred, fairy tale Europe. Let me try to rectify my negligence.


CWNY: It’s been a few years since I’ve spoken to you.

Young Drummer: It’s been more than a few.

CWNY: I apologize.

YD: There’s no need to apologize. Friends don’t always have to speak to each other. We are eternally bound to each other through our love for eternal Europe, and through that bond we are eternally bound to Him.

CWNY: The liberals don’t want us to be connected to His Europe.

YD: No, they don’t. Once a man, a European man, feels connected to the antique Europeans in spirit, blood, and faith, he will become the most feared and hated man in Liberaldom; he will become an integral man, a Christian European.

CWNY: But it hasn’t happened. The European people have cut themselves off from their Christian ancestors.

YD: Yes, they have. We are in the end times — there is no use lying to ourselves about that.

CWNY: Although we know neither the day nor the hour.

YD: Of course not. The end times could last hundreds of years, but we must judge our times by the Scriptures. When all the heresies, blasphemies, and perversions that have ever plagued the human race are synthesized into one organized system, and when the powers that be in church and state support that system, then we can say unequivocally that we are in the end times.

CWNY: Let’s be clear about the ‘system.’

YD: All right, the system is called liberalism. No one ever defies that system as a system. There are people who criticize certain aspects of liberalism, but there are no Europeans who criticize the whole liberal system. Europeans have become addicted to the dialectic approach to existence, which has left them doomed to wallow in the superficialities of life without ever reaching the rhetorical center of existence.

CWNY: By the rhetorical center, you mean the human heart?

YD: Yes. In the beginning was the Word. If Christ’s words do not take flesh in the human heart, they become grist for the ‘smart ones’ – the philosophers, theologians, sociologists, psychiatrists, and scientists. What they do with the words of our Lord cries out to heaven for vengeance. Their blasphemies make a man want to rise and ride against Liberaldom.

CWNY: Yes, they do. But at the risk of appearing like a prisoner of the dialectic I must say something about the romance of going into battle against the liberal leviathans. You are a kind of Melchizedek figure — “Without father, without mother, without beginning of days, nor end of life.” Can a mere mortal like myself really rise and ride against the liberals?

YD: Yes, you can and you must. Taking up arms against the liberals and their minions does not exclude the military option, but it also consists of something more. You might never get the opportunity to meet the enemy on the battlefield, but you should see yourself as permanently at war with the liberals and their colored gods. Even if the whole world worships at the altars of the liberals’ heathen gods you must not do so. The refusal to worship the liberals’ gods is the white Christian’s first duty. From that refusal everything else of consequence follows. You will protect your children from the liberals’ ideology, and you will attack the liberals through whatever means are at your disposal. There is an unremitting war going on with Satan, the liberals, and the colored heathens on one side, and the white Europeans on the other side. It is only the white Christian Europeans who are fighting, but Satan is attacking the entire white race. He doesn’t spare the white grazers, because he is always afraid that something might arouse them. It’s better to simply kill them off to make sure.

CWNY: There is a certain logic to that strategy, a satanic logic without a doubt, but it is logical, if you hate humanity, to exterminate the one race that became fully human through their faith in the divine humanity of Jesus Christ.

YD: Yes, and there is only one way to know the Savior – through the charity that begins at home, where the mysterious human relationships we develop with the people of our racial hearth fire come to fruition, unless stamped out by the liberals in church and state. Kill that flesh and blood conduit to God and you have isolated man from God.

CWNY: Yes, and that is what has happened to the European people. They have left their racial hearth fire to go whoring after the liberals’ heathen gods.

I like Kipling, but I must disagree with the third and fourth lines of the last stanza of the poem “If”:

If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you,
If all men count with you, but none too much:

If we followed that advice we wouldn’t have hearts of flesh. Of course my loving friends can hurt me. The only way to avoid such hurt is to form no deep attachments as the Buddhists and the Thomists recommend. And of course some men do count with me more than mere rationalism deems acceptable.

YD: Kipling’s “If” does not represent the pinnacle of his work.

CWNY: No, it doesn’t. His magnificent story, “The Gardener,” captures the heart of the man.

YD: Yes. Kipling was a man of heart. When taken for all and all he was one of us, he belongs to eternal Europe, because he championed the little things, such as the love of kith and kin, that lead us to God.

Very few people ask my advice any more, but if they did I would advise them to eschew the big theories of life and stay with the little things that come from a devotion to the European hearth fire.

CWNY: Like Ratty and his River?

YD: Yes, that’s it. The great destroyers, the intellectual Christians and their secular counterparts, all act like they have discovered a very great secret that is so completely and utterly magnificent and profound that it will make all mankind happy beyond measure if they would just follow the liberals. But when we look closely at the liberals’ great secret we see that the emperor has no clothes. This utterly new and magnificent secret is a very old thing, it is paganism. The worship of the noble black savage is not new, it is just another variation of the worship of Baal. Christ asks: “When the Son of Man returns, will He find faith on earth?” He will not find faith on earth if the Europeans do not reject liberalism in its entirety. You can’t have just a little bit of liberalism. At the heart and center of liberalism is negro worship. If you kill that heart, all the tentacles that are strangling the European people will cease to strangle them. But if you fail to strike at the heart of the liberal leviathan, everything you do will be useless. Unless the blood of our ancestors — for I too am a European — once again becomes part of the Europeans’ soul, their sickness will be a sickness unto death. It must be all or nothing. Either the fairy tale of our Lord and Savior is true or it is not. If it is not true, then we are of all men most to be pitied and scorned. But I say it is true, so why should any man, a European man, stand on the wrong side of the Christian-liberal divide? I’ve said enough.


The mad-dog liberals hate the antique Europeans. They will not cease from mental fight until they have eradicated every last vestige of their glorious culture and killed every white European who is even remotely connected to those people from long ago. The conservatives tell us not to bother about the antique Europeans; they bid us look to their brains and their systems. ‘After all,’ they tell us, in imitation of Claudius’s reproach of Hamlet, ‘it is wrong to obsess on the dead.’ But ‘the dead’ are not dead to me. They represent all that is truly alive. When I go through the works of Shakespeare, Scott, or Dickens, I feel that I know those authors intimately, and I am drawn to their Europe peopled with men and women who live in the shadow of the cross. Some reject the blessed Savior, and some turn to Him, but they all know who founded Europe. Isn’t that more than Gibbon or any of the other classical liberal ‘thinkers,’ living or dead, ever comprehended? We are not born of pagan Greece or pagan Rome, we are born of Christian Europe. It’s not possible for a European to abandon His Europe and still retain his humanity. A European who decides to reside, body and soul, in Liberaldom becomes an Unman who has sold his eternal jewel for the false paradise promised him by the weird sisters of Liberaldom.

The modern European man stood upon the heath and accepted the devil’s bargain. We few, the least and the last of the European faithful, have returned to that tempest-tossed heath in order to hurl our defiance at the weird sisters: “We refuse to be part of Liberaldom. Return to hell and tell your master that the people of our house shall serve the Savior, who is Christ the Lord. This shall ever be our story – we are characters in the great European fairy tale that concludes with the resurrection of the dead and the life everlasting. There is no other story like the Europeans’ story. Why should we look for another story or another author?” +

Posted in Europeans and Christ, White genocide, Young Drummer | Tagged , ,

The Day Is Far Spent

And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, he took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and gave to them. And their eyes were opened, and they knew him; and he vanished out of their sight. And they said one to another, Did not our heart burn within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the scriptures?

Luke 24: 30-32

If white Americans were taking a knee in defiance of the United Negro States of America, I would be all for it. But since taking a knee has become a protest against ‘racism’ I am against those who take a knee – although I do hope they keep it up because it has actually stirred up some life in a small minority of white grazers. What about the German sport team (10 out of 11 were white) who took a knee in solidarity with the American blacks? If I had a ‘hard-guy’ blog I would insult the Germans’ manhood, but not having a hard-guy blog, I will simply make a confession. Like Wilson Micawber who was “hourly” expecting something to “turn up” I have always held out hope that the Germans, the most maligned of the much maligned race of Europeans, would be the first white nation to fight back against liberalism. And when I say ‘fight back’ I mean real fighting — I do not refer to voting. I based my hope on the Germans’ past history. They defied Roman universalism twice. In both instances they opposed the synthesis of Christianity and paganism in the name of Christ, who is not a God that can be synthesized with any other gods. But in their third defiance, the Third Reich, they did not defy the world in the name of Christ. There was no noble declaration of “Here I stand, God help me.” There was only the ignoble machinations of a cabal of techno-barbarians led by a pathetic neo-pagan vastly inferior to the real Roman pagans. Maybe that is why the German people cannot oppose liberalism now. In their recent past they have only Hitler to inspire them, and he is very uninspiring, which brings us to the central point: If Christ is not the lodestar of Europe, who or what shall be the lodestar? The German people are in the same sinking boat as the rest of the European people. It was foolish of me to expect them to be the ones to take up arms against liberalism.

In Eugene O’Neill’s play Hughie he depicts a night clerk who simply waits. Waits for what? He doesn’t know. Becket picks up the same theme in Waiting for Godot. Has the expectation of Christ’s imminent return that we see in the early Christian church become a bitter, desperate, existential cry of despair in modern Europe? Certainly it has. We now have life without hope and without charity, because we have lost faith in Christ. It seems to us that He broke his word; He did not return to set things right. Despair can spread like wildfire. We, the European people, have fled to nature and nature’s god, the noble savage, to ease our pain. We are sick unto death from waiting for Christ’s return.

Every Christian who has come to believe in the risen Lord must feel as the apostles felt who encountered Christ on the road to Emmaus: “Abide with us: for it is toward evening, and the day is far spent.” He does stay with them at the inn, but eventually He must leave them, but not before He opens up their hearts to the truth. He set their hearts on fire. Is not that our comfort in this world? Where does the Holy Ghost, our comforter, reside if not in the human heart? Our European ancestors did not turn from Christ in despair and embrace science as the new Holy Ghost, because they had hearts of flesh. Once the cord binding the human heart to His divinely human heart is severed there can be no faith. We are forced back upon our intellects, which are reeds for every ill wind that blows.

The Nicolaitanes that Christ condemns in the Book of Revelations were professed Christians. But they thought that their adherence to an intellectual system absolved them from sin. When only the intellect is involved in our relationship with Christ we lose the intimacy that St. Paul spoke of – “Christ in man and man in Christ.” Men and women striving for such an intimacy do not, because they are mortal, achieve perfection, but they do create societies that sustain faith, hope, and charity, in contrast to the Nicolaitane societies in which men and women follow the logic of ‘man’s intellect is God’ pushed to its logical conclusion.

The classical liberals do not believe that the mad-dog liberals will actually act upon their belief in the goodness and purity of the sacred negro. “Rational people will not destroy every last remnant of European culture and kill every last white person — that simply defies belief.” But it is happening. Picture a large forest of trees that you think no rational man would want to destroy. When a group of people come along and tell you that for hate’s sake they are going to destroy the forest, you refuse to believe them. But then one tree after another is cut down, and still you refuse to believe in the evil intentions of the Jacobin tree cutters. The destruction of the first set of trees is easily explained. “Those trees were rotten (racist) – they had to be cut down,” is the classical liberal’s reaction. And when more trees are cut down? Again, the classical liberal finds a reason to excuse the great destroyers of the forest. “Those trees also were rotten – we were better off without them.” Eventually the entire forest will be destroyed as the classical liberals blather on into the night about the goodness of the destroyers and the evil of the European forest.

What will be left of Europe if the liberals are allowed to follow the logic of their faith in nature and nature’s god? Nothing will be left. No art work from old Europe will survive. No language stemming from old Europe will survive – the inhabitants of the new Europe will speak Arabic, Swahili, and Pig Latin or some other primitive mumbo jumbo, but they will not speak any of the European languages. Why should they? Why should the pure and innocent children of nature speak the language of the evil ones? The final solution is coming: Why should the evil ones exist at all?

All that is anti-European — be it Islam, feminism, or communism – comes to us through the worship of the negro. The negro is the savior in the Satanic religion of the Nicolaitanes of Liberaldom. Their holy father is their own intellect, and they bid us reject the comforter who dwells in the human heart for their new comforter, which is science. We have left the road to Emmaus where the risen Lord walked with us and followed the negro back to the darkness of Babylon. Whenever a classical liberal opposes one of the –isms of modernity, he does so in the name of the negro. “I oppose the Islamic invasion of my nation, but I am not a racist, I have many friends who are black…” That type of opposition to liberalism is not an opposition. You must reject the liberals’ savior and embrace the true Savior if you are ever going to make any headway against the principalities and powers of this world only.

Miss Havisham in Dickens’ novel Great Expectations feels that she has been wronged by humanity in general and the male sex in particular. So she adopts a little girl and by controlling every aspect of her existence teaches her to hate humanity in general and the male sex in particular. The liberals, under the influence of Satan, took the part of Miss Havisham. They made Satan’s hatred of God their own and began to fashion a world based on that hatred. “Why is there suffering?” and “Why, if He is the Christ, hasn’t He returned?” All these questions and more, Satan whispered into the liberals’ ears. And they listened. “Take my hand,” says Satan, and they do. Can’t the liberals feel the reptilian coldness of that hand? No, they can’t, because they have been morally anesthetized. They believe in the kingdom they have created, a kingdom without love, faith, hope, honor, or charity. All is dark and deadly in Liberaldom; it is a kingdom of everlasting night. The conservative seeks to make a place for himself within that kingdom. Never! Nothing human can survive in a world consecrated to the devil through the negro.

How can the light shine when all the channels of God’s grace have been blocked? The liberals have not only killed their own hearts, they have also banished from their hell on earth all genuine sentiments springing from the human heart. All our “mysterious human relationships” that enable us to know the Savior are proscribed in Liberaldom. The unbought grace of life that Edmund Burke spoke of has been destroyed by the liberals. Of what did that grace consist? It was not something esoteric, it was not an intellectual thing, it was the simple humanity that came from the hearth fires of white people who took Christ into their hearts and their homes. We have lost the strength and fire that comes from charity, because we have broken the human links to God. Johanna Spyri writes about those human links in her magnificent novel Heidi:

Heidi ran out and brought back the old hymn book. Then she found one beautiful song after another, for she knew them well now, and enjoyed them herself, and it was many days since she had heard all the verses she was so fond of.

The grandmother lay with folded hands and on her face, which at first had looked so troubled, now rested a happy smile, as if a great good fortune had come to her.

Suddenly Heidi stopped.

“Grandmother, are you well again already?”

“I’m feeling much better, Heidi. What have you read to me has done me good. Finish it, will you?”

The child read the hymn to the end, and when she came to the last words,–

“When mine eyes grow dimmer, sadder,
Pour thy light into my heart,
That I may pass over gladder
Than men to their homes depart,”—

The grandmother repeated them over and over, and an expression of very joyful expectation came over her face. Heidi felt so happy to see it. All the sunny day of her journey home rose before her, and she exclaimed with delight: —

“Grandmother, I know already how it seems to be on the way home.”

The grandmother did not answer, but she had heard the words perfectly, and the expression which had pleased Heidi remained on her face.

After a while the child said;–

“It is growing dark now, grandmother; I must go back; but I am so glad that you are happy again.”

The grandmother took the child’s hand in hers and held it fast; then she said:–

“Yes, I am so happy again; if I must stay lying here, I am content. You see, nobody who has not been through it knows what it is to have to lie for days and days all alone, and not hear a word from another human being, and not be able to see—not see even a single sunbeam. Then such gloomy thoughts come to one that it often seems as if it never could be bright again and one could not bear it any longer. But when I hear the words which you have read to me, it is as if a light arose in my heart, and that makes me happy again.”

I know that Heidi is deemed a sentimental relic of a racist, sexist era by our learned liberal pundits, but there is genuine sentiment, as distinct from sentimentality, in Heidi. We are not told to cry over the alleged sins of the white man and the sufferings of the noble black savage in Heidi. Instead we are told to love our own in and through our Savior. The blind grandmother in Heidi sees more than we see. She sees, through Heidi, the living God, while we lie in the darkness of Liberaldom. The drunken, half-crazed Welshman, Dylan Thomas, got the rage right, but his rage was without hope. We also shall rage against the dying of the light, but not without the hope that is within us – Please God, in the darkness of Liberaldom, “Abide with us; for it is toward evening, and the day is far spent.” +

Posted in Christ the Hero, defense of the white race, Europe as the Christ-bearer | Tagged

The Bitter Fruits of Diversity

And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Death. — Revelations 6:8

And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last. – Revelations 22: 12-13


Dr. Seuss wrote a large number of great children’s books from the 1930’s through the 1950’s. By the 1960’s he had become radicalized and ceased to write great children’s books, but the New Age liberals hate their own just as Robespierre hated all his fellow Jacobins. “No one is pure enough except me,” is the credo of our modern Jacobins. Which is why a mural from Seuss’s book And to Think That I Saw It on Mulberry Street was recently removed from Amazing World of Dr. Seuss Museum in Springfield, Massachusetts for perpetuating racial stereotypes (there is a Chinese boy in the book running with chopsticks). The demonizing of the white race is right and proper, but the stereotyping of the colored races is evil. Thus The Song of the South is banned in the United States because it depicts a good darkie who respects his white masters. The Belgian author of the wonderful Tintin books of the 1920’s and 1930’s later repudiated his book Tintin in the Congo because he was sorry that it perpetuated the true stereotype of ignorant, superstitious, and bloodthirsty black men. His book is also banned in the United States and Europe. The list goes on and on. Nor have I mentioned all the appropriations of white culture by black barbarians. Most of Shakespeare’s plays, when they are performed in the United States (which is not very often), feature black actors and actresses. Dickens’ Christmas Carol features a black Ebenezer Scrooge, and the new musical group Black Violin celebrates the fact that there are black violinists. But wait – aren’t whites supposed to be totally evil? Why then do blacks want to appropriate their culture? I’ll tell you why. Because nothing of any value has ever come from the colored cultures and nothing of any value has ever come from our modern liberal culture. And that is why Satan is a modernist: he supports the synthesis of colored barbarism and modern liberalism, because the two entities, when joined together, constitute hell on earth.

White people should tell the blacks that if they hate us so much — and we must conclude that they do judging by their words and actions – then they should stay away from whites and have nothing to do with them. Let us live out our lives deprived of diversity. Let us have cities that are white and hospitable, parks that are safe to walk and recreate in, concerts, plays, and movies that are negro-free, and let us have it immediately. It will be a great hardship, but we will try to suffer through life without the negro.

But of course we cannot have life without the negro. And why is that? The white man was certainly better off when he lived apart from negroes, and the negro was better off when he was segregated from the white man. Then the white man could sustain his own civilization and materially and spiritually aid the black man. It’s ironic – only the so-called racist societies such as segregated South Africa and the pre-Civil War South ever aided the black man. And they aided him by maintaining their own race and civilization and making their aid to the black man conditional – he had to adhere, at least outwardly, to the ethos of white civilization.

Do the Atticus Finch liberals, who have made the black man a god, really care about the black man? Of course they don’t. They need a god, a suffering servant, that they can sacrifice for and to. And they have chosen the black, noble savage. They will cling to their savage gods with all their heart and soul, but will they die for them? They hope it will not come to that. They want the racist whites, thee and me, to die for the black gods. After all, someone besides the liberals, who have gone beyond whiteness, must die in atonement for the original sin, which is the sin of whiteness.

We have now reached a new level of white-hating. The conservatives, who are the classical liberals, were tried and convicted of racism decades ago. But now the Jacobins are preying on each other. Liberals are condemning other liberals. Isn’t that terrible? Maybe the liberals will kill each other off in one big Antifa rally. ‘Tis a consummation devoutly to be wished, but I don’t think we will be rid of the liberals that easily.

I do not follow current events that closely, because I know, like Melville’s Bartleby, where I am. I live in the kingdom of hell on earth. I live where what is good and decent is spit on and what is evil and vile is lauded and applauded. And all that is good and decent stems from the people, the antique Europeans, who are constantly being denounced, by conservatives and liberals, as the most evil people that ever walked the face of the earth. So why should I listen to them, the liberals and the conservatives, who spew their venom on my honored dead that are not alive to defend themselves? And they are never defended by anyone in public life. Conservatives will defend themselves against charges of racism by denouncing the antique Europeans. “Conservatism is about ideas, it has nothing to do with race.” Oh really? From whence comes our “idea” of God incarnate? Does it come from a particular people with hearts of flesh who gave Christ a place by their racial hearth fire, or from the airy nothingness of the cosmos where all ideas dwell in limbo without a local habitation in the human heart? The conservatives’ religion is called Gnosticism, and their liberal brethren have gotten the better of them by adding the negro to the mix in order to give their Gnosticism an earthly home.

I play a game with my cat in which we simulate the reality of the jungle. I throw a rolled up sock around the living room, and he “attacks” the sock, but he doesn’t actually catch the sock. He runs by it and gives it a wave with his paw. But he thinks he has won. In his cat’s mind he has beaten the evil sock. Of course I perpetuate his fantasy by telling him he is a good boy for conquering the bad sock. The conservatives play a similar game with the liberals. But the conservatives are not as cute as my cat nor do I have an urge to applaud them at the conclusion of the game, because the conservatives play a deadly game with the liberals, a game that leaves white people naked to the enemy.

The game goes like this – picture the generic talk show format. There is a conservative commentator and a liberal guest. The conservative very politely points out the error of the liberal’s position. Pick whatever issue you want, it doesn’t matter because the liberal’s response will always be the same: “You are a racist.” Now the debate shifts to the “conservative’s” defense. He outlines all the reasons why he is not racist – he is not against immigration, he is just against uncontrolled immigration. He totally abhors segregation in any form. He condemns the racism of the white race prior to the 1960’s, he condemns the South African whites, and on and on he goes. Like my cat, he thinks he has won the game even though he has actually achieved nothing. He has not made a dent in the liberal’s armor. The liberal just sits there with a smug look on his face while Mr. Conservative goes through his litany of why he is not a racist. At the conclusion of the litany, the liberal repeats his charge of racism. The conservative thinks he has won, but in reality the liberal has won — the charge of racism has won the day for the liberal. No white man can win a debate with a liberal when he accepts the liberals’ terms of engagement, because the liberals have already predetermined the results of every debate. The white man is racist, and white racism (not black racism) is the unpardonable sin.

Some years back I mentioned to a Roman Catholic priest of my acquaintance that I was taking a few days off to visit my parents who had retired to a little house by the sea. The priest immediately asked me if there were any blacks residing in that town by the sea. When I told him that there were not, he acted like he had won some kind of contest. I went away from the priest with the distinct impression that he thought my parents were in a state of mortal sin for choosing to retire to a town that was not – Horror of Horrors! – racially diverse. And of course I was in mortal sin as well for wanting to visit my parents in that non-diverse town by the sea.

The conservatives’ rhetoric is just empty rhetoric because the conservatives accept the liberals’ theology – white racism is evil. But what is white racism? White racism is white pietas, it is loving one’s own kith and kin in and through the God-Man, Jesus Christ. It does not consist of the hatred of individual human beings, especially one’s own kind, under the auspices of a universalist, Gnostic love of an aggregate herd of colored heathens. So long as the conservatives see existence through the eyes of the mad-dog liberals, who see the negro as the Alpha and Omega of existence, there will be no white counter-attack against the liberal leviathan.

The United States is not a city built on a hill pointing upward to heaven. It is a city built in the midst of the valley of the shadow of death. Negro worship is the worship of Satan. And from that worship stems every other evil under the sun — sexual Babylon, feminism, legalized abortion, and legalized sodomy are the result of the European people’s shift from the worship of Christ to the worship of Satan through the medium of the noble black savage. “Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed be Thy name…” has been replaced by, “Our sacred negroes, who art the gods of Liberaldom, hallowed be thy name, thy kingdom come, thy will be done in this our kingdom of mother earth.” There now is no heavenly Father, there is the negro, who presides over hell on earth. Is this civilization what we want to conserve? Does it matter one jot who gets elected in a nation consecrated to the sacred negro?

The Christ-bearing people must break the mind-forged chains of negro worship or they will be consumed by the enemy of mankind, who never gives quarter to his enemies. “Diversity, diversity!” the liberals cry – “You must become diverse!” But what is diversity? It is the blending of the white Christ-bearing race with Satan. And that blending has resulted in an equality of sorts. We have come to an equality of Satanism:

African fitness in the realms of the Gruesome and the Grisly is however very well testified. The witchcraft practiced by Lord Graham’s ancestors was nothing compared with the witchcraft practised by Savanhu’s contemporaries. Even the witches of Macbeth were literally pallid amateurs compared with average twentieth-century African witches. A casual little news item informed us, for instance, that in the Gwaai Reserve a female witchdoctor cut the body of a still-born infant in half, cooked the top half and, together with her sister, ate it. It transpired that the mother of the infant had been severely and repeatedly beaten by her husband, and had gone to the witchdoctor asking for a love potion. To obtain the ingredients for the potion, the mother, who was pregnant, was given something to cause an abortion. And the witchdoctor and her sister made a meal of what was left. –White Man, Think Again! by A. Jacob

Hasn’t the white man duplicated that African demonism with legalized abortion? We can’t live as a diverse people, because we cannot live in hell, we can only surfeit and die there. St. John warned us in the Book of Revelation of the dangers of blending Christ with the principalities and powers of this world only. That blending is called hell. Everything good and noble comes from non-diverse Europe. If we do not hold on to that essential truth and make it our all in all, we will lose our hope for heaven in the next world, and we will live in the hell of Liberaldom in this world. +

Posted in antique Christianity, black faith, Jacobinism | Tagged

Armed with Cruel Hate

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,  Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away. For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. –2 Timothy 3: 1-7

After the Antifa threat and the subsequent Antifa massacre in Las Vegas, a woman of my acquaintance, a white grazer, asked me what I thought of the Antifaers. When I told her they were possessed by the devil and were hell-bent on destroying the white Christ-bearing race, she was very disturbed. I hadn’t told her what she wanted to hear. It is very unsettling to think that one has an enemy who cannot be appeased by anything less than your heart’s blood. But what is the use of lying to ourselves? Isn’t it crystal clear now? It wasn’t crystal clear to that woman, and it isn’t crystal clear to the rest of the white grazers.

Satan had to morally anesthetize the white race before he could work his will upon them. And he has done that quite well. Whenever the colored heathens or the Jacobins, which is what the Antifaers are, commit atrocities, the white grazers instinctively (such instincts have now been bred in their bones) look for the white provocation of the violence: “We have not gotten the blacks jobs,” or, “Trump is too confrontational.” It is always something the white man has done that causes violence, because, as church, state, and academia tell us, the white man is evil. And although this makes the white grazer somewhat uncomfortable, he accepts the theology of the white man’s responsibility for the evil that men do. He accepts it, because he respects the moral authority of his leaders in church and state, and he accepts it because he would rather think that the bloodletting can be halted by appeasement than face the fact that he has an enemy that cannot be appeased, because that enemy is driven by a satanic hatred for the white race.

In the old Christian hymn, “A Mighty Fortress Is Our God,” we are told that our enemy is “armed with cruel hate.” It’s curious, now that Satan has become so visible through the works of his minions, that modern Europeans thoroughly reject the notion that Satan prowls about the world seeking the ruin of souls. But then again maybe it is not so curious. Since Christ has become less visible in the works of His people, wasn’t it inevitable that men would redefine and rehabilitate the devil? Christ has been demythologized, and so has the devil.

I doubt there is a single mad-dog liberal (they call themselves Antifa) who believes in the devil. But the devil does not want their belief. If they truly believed in his existence they might come to believe in Christ. What the devil wants is the liberals’ compliance with his will. And he has that. What is the devil’s will? To attack God by destroying His people. His great frustration is that he must work through humanity to strike at God. The great hater of mankind, the archangel who spits on the God-man and the image of God in man, must work through human beings in order to obtain his will. So must our Lord work through human beings, but the divine condescension was not abhorrent to our Lord and Savior — He took flesh and dwelt among us. Tis not so with the devil. He does not move men’s hearts with his sacrifice, he moves men’s minds with his appeals to their pride and self-will. What will the Antifaers gain by the destruction of the white Christ-bearing race? What did Satan ultimately gain by his rejection of God? He gained hell and lost heaven. And that is what the Antifaers want. They want hell on earth. And when do they want it? They want it now. The liberals are like unto Lady Macbeth — the new generation no longer tries to disguise it: “Fill me from the crown to the toe top full of direst cruelty! Make thick my blood; stop up th’ access and passage to remorse, that no compunctious visitings of nature, Shake my fell purpose, nor keep peace between th’ Effect and it!”

The devil does not necessarily want the Antifaers to be so blatant. He can inspire them, he can fill them from crown to the toe top with direst cruelty, but he cannot personally take charge of their war against whites. Did he want the German Jacobins to say we’ll bring you hell? Did he want the American Antifaers to say they were going to disrupt the nation by whatever means necessary? And did he want that Las Vegas shooter to kill all those white people? I don’t know. If the white grazers are aroused by such bloodletting then the liberals have miscalculated. But it doesn’t seem the grazers will be aroused. “It was the work of a mentally deranged person,” the Satanists tell the white grazers. If the grazers accept that, and there is every indication that they have accepted that explanation, then the Antifaers have not made a blunder and Satan will step up the bloodletting. (1)

The Las Vegas massacre represents a change in the liberals’ conduct of the war. Hitherto the liberals have been content to kill by proxy, letting the colored heathen do their killing for them. But now they have stepped forward, and we should take note of the shift in tactics, because the white techno-barbarian brings a technological mind to his killing. He can kill with a much greater efficiency than the colored heathen. But why is the liberal so impatient? After all, the extermination of the white race was proceeding at a nice steady pace. The liberal can’t wait because of his intense hatred. His hatred knows no bounds; the mere thought that there are white people still living and breathing the same air as their exalted liberal selves and the colored heathens fills the liberals with rage. They crave their bond, which is the blood of the white man.

The great advantage the Antifa liberals have over the white grazers is their passionate hatred. The grazers cannot defend themselves because they have been morally neutered; they are incapable of responding to the liberals’ hatred with a passionate hatred of their own. But isn’t it wrong to hate? No, it is not. We hate the devil and his minions, because we love Christ and His people. We must separate the hate that stems from love from the hatred that comes from vanity, envy, and pride. The man who doesn’t hate those who attack his people and blaspheme against his God is no man at all. The liberals’ hatred of the white race is grounded in their hatred of Christ. If we loved much we would hate the devil’s minions and fight them with a passionate intensity greater than the liberals’ passionate hatred. As it stands now, the white European has been enslaved by liberalism. His passivity before the enemy denotes a moral decline of epic proportions and serves as a tragic example of what happens to a man without a faith.

This New Year’s Eve will mark the second anniversary of the rape of the women of Cologne. In the aftermath of those Moslem outrages I read the commentary of a female Danish reporter who deplored the lack of manhood among the German males who stood by and did nothing to stop the outrages. She wanted to see some chivalry in the German males, but she went on to say that she did not want to return to the repressive, sexist days of yore. She just wanted to see some manhood when Moslems attacked the liberated women of the 21st century. You can’t have it both ways. Chivalry stems from a blood faith, a faith in Jesus Christ as true God and true man. It is not a faucet that can be turned off and on according to the whims of supermarket, intellectual Christians who want to pick and choose the Christian virtues that best serve their needs. That charity of honor which stems from a man’s faith in Jesus Christ was bred in the bone of our European ancestors. You cannot systematically remove that faith and replace it with a bloodless faith in a synthesis of rationalism, paganism, and Christianity and expect to see the same type of men and women who once existed in old Europe. European women no longer behave in a manner that inspires European men to be chivalrous, and European men no longer have that within which makes a man respond to the rage of the heathens with a passionate rage in defense of the innocent.

In Charles Dickens’ novel Little Dorrit, Arthur Clemens runs afoul of the Circumlocution Office when he attempts to aid Little Dorrit and her family. The Circumlocution Office is a vast bureaucratic network that tells the British people how not to do things.

Because the Circumlocution Office went on mechanically, every day, keeping this wonderful, all-sufficient wheel of statesmanship, How not to do it, in motion. Because the Circumlocution Office was down upon any ill-advised public servant who was going to do it, or who appeared to be by any surprising accident in remote danger of doing it, with a minute, and a memorandum, and a letter of instructions that extinguished him. It was this spirit of national efficiency in the Circumlocution Office that had gradually led to its having something to do with everything. Mechanicians, natural philosophers, soldiers, sailors, petitioners, memorialists, people with grievances, people who wanted to prevent grievances, people who wanted to redress grievances, jobbing people, jobbed people, people who couldn’t get rewarded for merit, and people who couldn’t get punished for demerit, were all indiscriminately tucked up under the foolscap paper of the Circumlocution Office.

Numbers of people were lost in the Circumlocution Office. Unfortunates with wrongs, or with projects for the general welfare (and they had better have had wrongs at first, than have taken that bitter English recipe for certainly getting them), who in slow lapse of time and agony had passed safely through other public departments; who, according to rule, had been bullied in this, over-reached by that, and evaded by the other; got referred at last to the Circumlocution Office, and never reappeared in the light of day. Boards sat upon them, secretaries minuted upon them, commissioners gabbled about them, clerks registered, entered, checked, and ticked them off, and they melted away. In short, all the business of the country went through the Circumlocution Office, except the business that never came out of it; and its name was Legion.

The classical liberals are one big circumlocution network set up to tell whites how not to respond to the liberals’ and colored barbarians’ hatred of the white race. They must be cautious in their rhetoric, lest they inflame the mad-dog liberal (as if a mad-dog liberal is not already inflamed), and they must never insult, accuse, or act against any barbarian of color. In short the white man must learn how not to do anything about his own destruction. He must let be.

Do pagans love their own? Yes, to a certain degree they love their own. But did the pagans love their own with the passionate intensity of the Christian Europeans? No, they did not. The mark of the European during Europe’s Christian centuries was the intensity of his love, which passed the understanding of the colored heathens. And now? The mark of the mad-dog liberal European is his hatred of his own, and the mark of the modern European everyman is his complete indifference to the rape, torture, and murder of his own people. It is intellectual Christianity that has brought Europeans to this pass. Edward Gibbon, the author of the epic historical work, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, was a convert to Roman Catholicism in his youth and then a convert to Calvinism. In both cases, his conversions were intellectual conversions. He looked at Christ with his mind’s eye, not through the eyes of his heart. And when he came to write his history of Rome, he wrote with poetical fire about the pagan faiths, but when he wrote about Christianity he sounded like an accountant reading his ledger to his employer. The Rev. H. H. Milman responded to Gibbon’s back-door assault on the Christian Europeans and their Lord and Savior:

Christianity alone receives no embellishment from the magic of Gibbon’s language; his imagination is dead to its moral dignity; it is kept down by a general tone of jealous disparagement, or neutralised by a painfully elaborate exposition of its darker and degenerate periods. There are occasions, indeed, when its manifestly beneficial influence, can compel even him, as it were, to fairness and, and kindle his unguarded eloquence to its usual fervor; but in general he soon relapses in to a frigid apathy; affects an ostentatiously severe impartiality; notes all the faults of Christians in every age with bitter and almost malignant sarcasm; reluctantly and with exception and reservation, admits their claim to admiration. This inextricable bias appears even to influence his manner of composition. While all the other assailants of the Roman empire, whether warlike or religious, the Goth, the Hun, the Arab, the Tartar, Alaric and Attila, Mohammed, and Zingis, and Tamerlane, are each introduced upon the scene almost with dramatic animation—their progress related in a full, complete, and unbroken narrative—the triumph of Christianity alone takes that form of a cold and critical disquisition. The successes of barbarous energy and brute force call forth all the consummate skill of composition, while the moral triumphs of Christian benevolence, the tranquil heroism of endurance, the blameless purity, the contempt of guilty fame and of honours destructive to the human race, which, had they assumed the proud name of philosophy, would have been blazoned in his brightest words, because they own religion as their principle, sink into narrow asceticism. The glories of Christianity, in short, touch on no chord in the heart of the writer; his imagination remains unkindled; his words, though they maintain their stately and measured march, have become cool, argumentative, and inanimate.

Is not Gibbon’s cynicism the essence of the liberals’’ attack on Christ and the Christ-bearing race? Let me extend Rev. Milman’s defense – It is Christ and Christ alone who can cure our moral blindness, the moral blindness that makes us indifferent to the suffering of our own people – “For judgement I am come into this world, that they which see not might see; and that they which see might be made blind.” What is the blindness of which Christ speaks? It is the blindness of those who do not see the moral beauty of Christ’s birth, crucifixion, and resurrection from the dead. The European hearth fires of yore honored the Christ story, not as an intellectual construct, but as a living reality which animated their hearts. Classical liberalism has no answer to those who hate the white race with a passion fueled by Satan. But St. Paul does have an answer. The European men and women who circumcise their hearts will love their people in and through the Savior. That breed of Europeans, if there are any left, and that breed alone, will be able to defeat the liberals and the colored heathen. +


(1) It matters little whether the Vegas shooter was a convert to Islam or whether he considered himself part of the Antifa movement. His inspiration was the same in either case. His heart was poisoned against the white race, because he was one of Satan’s minions. The Satanic, anti-white poison has entered the bloodstream of the anti-white liberals. Such creatures can only be conquered by white men who have hearts of flesh consecrated to our Savior, who is Christ the Lord.

Posted in Grazers, Jacobinism, post-Christian rationalism, Propositional faith, restoration of European civilization | Tagged