A Tale of Two Towers

two_towers

Of all the men who have ever taken pen in hand to put on paper what their heart felt, Shakespeare stands above them all. But he, even he, felt completely unequal to the task. In many of his sonnets he expresses frustration over his inability to adequately express his heart’s deepest sentiments. I think all the other truly great artists of the West, men such as Michelangelo and Handel, must have felt as Shakespeare felt – that what they wrote, painted, or composed was a mere stammering compared to the vision that was in their hearts. How could it be otherwise for fallen man? His heart sees the eternal light for one blessed moment, and then the things of this world darken that light and he sees through a glass darkly. And we lesser men, who are not Shakespeare, Michelangelo, or Handel, still have a vision of the light, and we still, like the great artists, try to stammer out our heart’s vision. Every human personality has a vision in his heart that is inspired by his God. Our vision as a people is contained within our race, because our race makes us a people with a local habitation and a name rather than an airy nothing or a formless universal that can be abstracted out of existence. The European people responded to Christ’s charity, and as a result His divinely human heart humanized their hearts. From the moment He came to their hearth fires, the European people’s stammerings reflected, collectively, the image of God. If we approach the European people in the spirit of a doctor who is just looking for disease, we will find nothing but disease in the European people. But if we look at their culture “feelingly” and not with the spirit of a dissector, we will see the face of God in the collective stammerings of their hearts.

We cannot reach out to His divinely human heart if we don’t have human hearts. “Out of the depths have I cried unto thee, O Lord.” If we don’t plumb the depths, if we forsake the tragedy of life for a Thomistic-Buddhistic escape into the land of the abstracted intellect, we will never transcend the tragedy of existence by fighting through the ever-moaning battle in the mist, as our Lord did. Instead we will forever seek to escape existence rather than conquer it through His Holy Cross. Having forsaken the Cross, we will never know the glory of the Resurrection.

The shadow of death hung over the European people until they saw “a great light.” Those people, those hearts who saw Christ through a glass darkly, were and are the Church of Christ. The false Aslans are the men of religion who have sought to make a church out of their man-made, mind-forged systems. At this point in the European peoples’ history the light seems all but extinguished and the shadows of death loom large. What else can we call the European nations that have become havens for the heathen faiths and the dark-skinned devils, other than the charnel houses of death? The liberals worship darkness and not the light. For this reason they have systematically attacked the people who saw a great light and infused that vision into their culture.

Will we ever again see the animation in the eyes of a European that stems from the light of a Christ-centered heart? Yes, we will, but first we will suffer as Job and King Lear suffered. Is that tragic? Yes, it is. But at least at the end of that tragic drama, the drama of the Europeans’ struggle against liberalism, there is light instead of darkness.

What vision of God do we see in the collective face of the people of color? We see the face of Satan. Yet the liberals want to blend with and worship those people. It’s no coincidence that the first atheist government within the heart of Christendom, the French Jacobin government, countenanced the massacre of whites in Haiti. The liberals’ utopia will always be built on blood, the blood of the white man. And the Christian utopians, the men who have forsaken the God of their ascending race for the great, gnostic god of the universal mind, often exceed their secular liberal brethren in their zealous hatred of the white race. In fact the hatred of the white Christ-bearing race has now become the secular liberals’ and the churchmen’s sign of election.

This fear of being racist (see The Fear of Racism) has paralyzed the European people. And it is not just the Western European people. I have heard the ‘We are not racist’ affirmation from stalwart eastern Europeans who courageously oppose Islam, but then quake before the racist label. I place the blame for this outrage on the unChristian Christian clergy. The better Europeans will oppose their liberal governments, albeit they will only oppose them democratically, but they will not oppose their church. They need to look past the church organizations who collectively represent the false Aslan, to the true church — the antique Europeans of provincial, racist Europe, whose stammerings from the heart bear witness to the living God.

Many years ago I saw the Scott Monument in Edinburgh. I suppose there are many monuments and sculptures more aesthetically pleasing to the eye, but the monument was a piece of moral beauty such as I had never seen before. It was such a moving tribute to one of Christian Europe’s greatest poets. Each carved niche of the monument contained one of the characters in Scott’s works or one of Scotland’s poets. It seemed to me then, and even more so now, that the monument captured the spirit of Scott. By placing the characters from his novels and other beloved Scottish poets in the niches of the monument, the man who made the monument was paying tribute to the stammerings of Scott’s great heart. The inner man, the vision that is in a man’s heart, is all in all. For me Walter Scott and the other great European poets such as Shakespeare pull back that veil, just for a moment, which separates this world from the next. And they bring us to that other world by way of the human heart. They reject intellectual systems and cosmic-mysticism for the one sure mysticism that St. Paul enjoins us to practice – the charity connected to His divine charity. I have no doubt that the Brits will soon tear down the Scott Monument, but haven’t the British people already done something worse than tear down a monument? They, like all the people of modern Europe, have forsaken the antique Europeans’ vision of the heart, as articulated and exemplified by Sir Walter Scott.

I frequently hear liberals and liberal conservatives saying that the Europeans must be diverse because the essence of a democratic society is diversity. Everyone, regardless of race, color, or creed must be welcome in nations that respect their democratic institutions and traditions. But we should not respect our democratic institutions and traditions, because they are not of Europe, they are not part of the European peoples’ heart. If you have a cancer in your body, you don’t strive to keep the cancer alive in your body because it is now part of your body’s history. You acknowledge that it’s there, but you strive to purge it from your body. The Moslems and the colored hordes are now part of the European people’s history, but that does not mean they must be preserved and protected (let alone worshipped) as if they are our people. They should be purged from the European nations because they are a cancerous non-Christian disease that will kill every last vestige of the light that shineth in darkness.

Let us not get lost in the theories of the secular and Christian utopians. Despite all the liberals’ raptures about the wonders of a world purged of white people and dominated by colored people, we see nothing but death, decay, and debauchery in the brave new world of techno-barbarian liberals and their colored barbarian gods. Is this the promised end? The antique Europeans saw beauty on a cross. Where is the moral beauty in the liberals’ brave new world?

George Meikle Kemp, the architect of the Scott Monument, was born in Midlothian, the scene of one of Scott’s greatest novels, and in his early years he was a shepherd on his father’s farm:

I gaze on thee, and one sweet memory tells
Of that strange lad who, all a summer’s day,
Herded his sheep upon the Pentland fells,
And read the mighty minstrel’s border lay:
And who, to echoes of the city bells
Blending with clash of arms and fierce foray,
Beheld thee there upon the hillside lone–
Brandished his crook and froze thee into stone!

-Ebenezer Charlton Black

Black’s ode to the architect who poured out his heart’s stammerings to the Scottish bard he loved captures the essence of Christian Europe. We are the provincial people who love a provincial God born in a manger. So long as we remain faithful to our provincial God, by loving Him in and through our kith and kin, we triumph over death and decay. But if we continue to aid the liberals in their attempt to rebuild the Tower of Babel, we will perish in darkness.

Two monuments, the one built by a loving heart in honor of a provincial poet who speaks to us all because he stayed with the provincial hearth-fire virtues, and the other tower built by blasphemers who sought to destroy the provincial virtues in order to satisfy their desire to become as gods. We shall not follow in their train. We shall place our hearts and our swords at the service of Scott’s provincial Europe. +

Posted in Charity, Christian Europe, democracy | Tagged

The Non-Diverse European

Barton__Sailing-Boats on the Serpentine But let us consider these factors carefully. Racial segregation does not imply racial oppression or genocide or anything Communist like that, but means purely what it says. It means that the white race and the black race, the one advanced and the other primitive and polygamous, instead of mixing retain their widely disparate customs and identities. Basically it means only this: That the white race is determined to stay white. This, aside from the sheer impossibility of two such widely disparate races living on mixed and equal terms, is absolutely all that racial segregation means.

– Anthony Jacob


If I were a liberal, which by the grace of God I am not, I would be slightly worried about a few recent developments within Liberaldom. They are only minor problems, but if I were a liberal who wanted to see the complete triumph of liberalism I would not even want minor problems. The first problem is being caused by the black athletes who are refusing to stand for the national anthem. Don’t they realize – I am speaking for worried liberals – that we keep the white grazers in negro-worshipping trim by wrapping all our sporting events in the American flag? It’s all right to hate whites – in fact we encourage you to hate whites – but do you have to mar our negro-worshipping sporting events by baring your fangs at the services? We will cover up for you with accusations of racism against anyone who objects to your posturing, and then follow up the racism accusations with, “You must understand their rage,” but still you have made it difficult for us to fool all of the grazers all of the time. A few might slip away. What does that matter? It probably doesn’t matter, but having once been a white man I know that they can and will fight if they are stirred to the core of their being. So why push it when we are winning? Let sleeping dogs lie.

The second problem (still speaking as a liberal) is that loud-mouthed Hillary. The woman is constantly putting her foot in her mouth. Didn’t we have anybody else to run for President? That statement about the basket of deplorables is going to haunt us right up to election.

Still (no longer speaking as a liberal), the problem of stupid colored minions who don’t know when to leave well enough alone and the problem of running a woman for president who is too overt in her demonism is not going to put a major dent in the liberal machine. And such glitches will not put a major dent in the liberal machine, because when such glitches occur they only irritate a small number of white grazers, and those white grazers who are irritated are not moved to repudiate liberalism, they are simply moved to seek redemption from the devil. They will complain to the liberal hierarchy and ask them to correct what they feel is an aberration from liberalism. The grazers do not understand that what they see as an aberration is the essence of liberalism – the hatred of the white, Christ-bearing race. And how can the grazers understand the satanic nature of liberalism when they have been educated in liberal schools, they worship in liberal churches, and they live in a society dominated by liberalism? They can’t, because they have been seduced by liberalism just as Merlin was seduced by Vivien:

Then, in one moment, she put forth the charm
Of woven paces and of waving hands,
And in the hollow oak he lay as dead
And lost to life and use and name and fame.

Then crying, “I have made his glory mine,”
And shrieking out, “O fool!” the harlot leapt
Adown the forest, and the thicket closed
Behind her, and the forest echo’d “Fool.”

The white grazer lies prostrate before the liberals as one who is “lost to life and use and name and fame.” Of what use is the white man? He lives to serve the colored barbarians. What is his name? His name is evil. There are no evil men of color, all evil resides in the white male. And what is his fame? He has no fame, he only lives in infamy, soon to be exterminated.

The Moslem attacks in Europe and this country are not similar in the body counts, but they are similar to the anthem protests and the ‘deplorables in the basket’ remark of Hillary in this regard: They make the liberals nervous because they are so blatant. Will the white Merlin ever be stirred up enough to return from the dead? No, not in his former state. He was an intellectual Christian; for him Christianity was magic. And he who lives by magic can be seduced by magic. Vivien was not particularly smart, but she was backed by the devil who knew that Vivien had charms that could overwhelm an intellectual faith devoid of passion. Vivien offered Merlin the passion that his faith lacked. It is only Arthur’s faith, which is anchored in the love of his Lord, in and through his people, that sustains him in the day of battle against the flesh and the devil. Merlin can only be saved from without. His kinsmen must break his enchantment with the sword of Christ’s divine mercy. Then Merlin, having rejected the magic of intellectual Christianity, will embrace the miracle of the true faith – our Lord’s divine condescension, the charity and passion of His death on the cross, which has redeemed the world, and His resurrection from the dead, which gives us the sure and certain hope of our resurrection from the dead.

The white grazer is very far from the European people who believed that the Christ story was true. If some statement by a Hillary or an Angela Merkel, or some blatant act of ingratitude from the pampered and privileged black athletes, or yet another Moslem attack on the European people, were to trigger something in the white grazer’s soul that would make him take the first step back to his Christian, European hearth fire, that would truly be an event worth celebrating. But it hasn’t happened. The liberals circle the wagons around their colored and Moslem minions whenever they become too blatant in their barbarism, and they regroup and rephrase when one of their public officials misspeak.

In Matthew 5:3 Christ says, “Blessed are the poor in spirit,” and in Luke 6:20, He says, “Blessed be ye poor.” It seems that our Lord, in Matthew 5:3 means to suggest that a man does not have to be in abject poverty to be humble in spirit and realize he is completely dependent on God. Nor does the fact of poverty necessarily make a man humble in spirit and receptive to God’s grace. But in Luke 6:20, He does make the point that it is often only those who have been humbled by the loss of the things of this world who can come to know God. The modern European people have only a passing intellectual acquaintance with the God whom their ancestors knew in spirit and in truth. What will happen when the liberals’ fantasy world comes tumbling down, when they no longer can provide the sporting events, the health care, and the other basic human services? The prophetic voice of Anthony Jacob speaks to the modern European, but the modern European is not listening:

Kenya, we must understand, is a microcosm of the entire West. Therefore let us ask ourselves, What would have been our general White position today if the world had consisted only of Kenya, with no other place for us to go to and no other form of government for us to live under? What then? We, the White race, would already have been obliterated or reduced to everlasting serfdom, would we not? Yet however fanciful it might still seem to the white peoples of the northern American states and occupied Europe, the world today does in the most vital sense consist only of Kenya, for we cannot keep on being racially overruled and uprooted and moved on. Wherever we are now we are in effect in Kenya; for certainly the operations of the anti-White conspiracies, the techniques of the Communists, Liberals, and One-Worlders, remain significantly identical whether they be applied in Kenya or Alabama.

Africa is the world, particularly South Africa and Kenya. The blacks will not be practical and keep the useful whites alive. Most will perish and the ones left alive will live in squalor. Will that poverty ennoble the white? Will they turn to the European Christ? Some will. But poverty is not a magic formula for spiritual renewal; it often simply crushes the spirit. What Christ wants is our heartfelt love. He doesn’t require us to live in hovels in order to know His love. The people of Nineveh were supposed to be unconvertible, but when Jonah listened to God instead of the voice of this world only – the voice of practical, utilitarian logic – he went to Nineveh, and the people of Nineveh were converted. “O Lear, O Lear, Lear! Beat at this gate, that let thy folly in, And thy dear judgement out!” It is the heart that illuminates reason. If our hearts are right, our reason will serve the good. If our hearts seek a treasure other than Him, our reason will serve the devil. No plea for reason to prevail has ever stopped a war or arrested the headlong flight of a demon-possessed people from hurtling over the cliff.  Only a passion, grounded in His passion, that is passed from one heart to another can arrest the seemingly unstoppable fall of the European people into the deepest pit of hell – a Babylonian hell on earth.

The European fairy tales in which the third dumb brother wins the fair princess and becomes king because he has that charity of honor were stories that illustrated the Pauline Christianity, which tells us that “the foolishness of God” is “wiser than men,” had entered the blood of the European people. From that “foolishness” the European people derived their strength. Merlin and the white grazers have placed their hopes in intellectual systems, whether they are called magic or science; it is all one. Such systems will ultimately betray their adherents and leave them in a hollow oak bereft of their name and identity.

Why do young whites look for their identity in artificial recreations of what they think is the old Viking culture? I suppose it is because they feel it gives them an identity and a people to whom they can belong to. But the path of neo-paganism is the path to the dung hill. The Vikings and the other pagan warrior tribes bent their knees to Christ. If a European forsakes the European Christ, he forsakes his people. Oscar Wilde was wrong. Each man does not kill the thing he loves. The liberal seeks to kill the thing he hates – the Son of God and the Christ-bearing race. Likewise the neo-pagan, because he hates the Son of God, hates the Christ-bearing Europeans and seeks to forge a new Europe grafted on to the old pagan Europeans.

It is only the European with the heart of flesh, the European who loves much, who will endure to the end. The ‘isms’ (liberalism and Neopaganism) are aberrations, they are not of Europe. And it is only eternal Europe that will survive, all the ‘isms’ will turn to ashes. The indoctrination didn’t work. We reject their world of democracy, science, multiculturalism, and negro worship. We prefer the foolishness of St. Paul and the antique Europeans. +

Posted in Grazers, liberals are the true haters, White genocide | Tagged ,

By What Right Do Liberals Rule?

Dore_St_Paul_at_EphesusThere is no safety for honest men, but by believing all possible evil of evil men, and by acting with promptitude, decision, and steadiness on that belief. I well remember, at every epocha of this wonderful history, in every scene of this tragic business, that when your sophistic usurpers were laying down mischievous principles, and even applying them in direct resolutions, it was the fashion to say, that they never intended to execute those declarations in their rigour. This made men cautious in their opposition, and remiss in early precaution. By holding out this fallacious hope, the impostors deluded sometimes one description of men, and sometimes another, so that no means of resistance were provided against them, when they came to execute in cruelty what they had planned in fraud.

– Burke in A Letter to a Member of the National Assembly


 When Richard II unlawfully seized the lands of Bolingbroke, thus setting off the War of the Roses, which would finally end with the death of Richard III at Bosworth Field, his uncle York warns him that he is only king by “fair sequence and succession.” If he violates fair sequence and succession to seize his cousin’s lands, does he not invalidate his right to be king? But Richard ignores his uncle’s advice, and he does indeed lose his crown and his life as a result:

DUKE OF YORK. O my liege,
Pardon me, if you please; if not, I, pleased
Not to be pardon’d, am content withal.
Seek you to seize and gripe into your hands
The royalties and rights of banish’d Hereford?
Is not Gaunt dead, and doth not Hereford live?
Was not Gaunt just, and is not Harry true?
Did not the one deserve to have an heir?
Is not his heir a well-deserving son?
Take Hereford’s rights away, and take from Time
His charters and his customary rights;
Let not to-morrow then ensue to-day;
Be not thyself; for how art thou a king
But by fair sequence and succession?
Now, afore God–God forbid I say true!–
If you do wrongfully seize Hereford’s rights,
Call in the letters patent that he hath
By his attorneys-general to sue
His livery, and deny his offer’d homage,
You pluck a thousand dangers on your head,
You lose a thousand well-disposed hearts
And prick my tender patience, to those thoughts
Which honour and allegiance cannot think.

KING RICHARD II. Think what you will, we seize into our hands
His plate, his goods, his money and his lands.

DUKE OF YORK. I’ll not be by the while: my liege, farewell:
What will ensue hereof, there’s none can tell;
But by bad courses may be understood
That their events can never fall out good.

Richard the Second

With the same arrogance of Richard, but without his Shakespearean poetic, the satanic Prime Minister of Canada recently announced that Canada was not a nation. If it isn’t, then by what right is Justin Trudeau the Prime Minister of Canada? By right of liberalism, the Canadian Prime Minister tells us. Canada is simply a group of people who believe in humanity. But what is humanity in the abstract? The liberals have told us the answer to that question through their deeds: ‘For where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.’ The liberals treasure the colored races and the heathen faiths. So humanity consists of the colored races and the heathen faiths in the aggregate. That is what Justin Trudeau fancies himself the leader of – an aggregate herd called humanity. But his title of Prime Minister is only valid because of an older rule of fair sequence and succession instituted by white Christian Europeans. If he violates that rule, he is a tyrant masquerading as a legitimate ruler.

The white Canadians, like the American Midwesterners, are more open about their liberal agenda, but they are no different than the liberals in all the other white nations. Liberals do not look on themselves as leaders elected to defend and protect the white citizens of their nations. They look on themselves as an elect group of men and women with the right and duty to exterminate the white people within their realms in order to advance the interests of the colored barbarians. And whites who petition and plead with the liberal elect for rights within liberalism will find, like Sisyphus, that they can never quite get the ‘white people have rights too’ rock up the democratic, multi-cultural hill of the liberals.

Bolingbroke knew that if he allowed Richard to divest him of his lands and title, he would lose his name and his identity, and his heirs would lose their names and identity. And he also knew that if he let Richard seize his lands and titles, Richard would feel free to take his life, so he fought back. But the modern Europeans, who have been robbed of their identity as a people by liberals who seek their lives as well, seem to have no desire to fight back. Why?

The first reason is that the modern Europeans have ceded a divine right of kings to those officials who are democratically elected. James I of England, Scotland, and Wales tried to foist such a right on the British people, but he, and his Stuart successors, failed to establish that right, because the European people had a bred-in-the-bone faith that put Christian limits on their sovereigns. ‘I serve the King, and the King serves Christ,’ was their rough-hewn code. And when a King didn’t respect the Christian faith and the Christian rights of his subjects, he was deposed.

Thomas Hughes, author of Tom Brown’s Schooldays, was of the opinion that if the new age of democracy failed to recognize that Christ, not the democratic process, was the ruler of Europe, then Europe would descend into the dark night of Babylon. And of course that is what has happened. The European laws that were grounded in our Christian faith were sacred, but laws grounded in liberalism are far from sacred. They are, in fact, satanic. Until Europeans rid themselves of the notion that any law decreed by men elected democratically must be followed as holy writ, you can keep digging those mass graves for the Europeans who refuse to fight.

The second reason that the modern Europeans won’t fight back against the techno-barbarians and the colored barbarians is that they no longer have an identity to fight for. What were the European people? They were the Christ-bearers. What are they now? The church men tell them that they are not the Christ-bearers; their ancestors worshipped a false Euro-centric Messiah that never was. The liberals tell them something similar – they tell them that their God was a racist, sexist, homophobic God as were the people who worshipped Him. ‘So who am I?’ the wandering European asks. ‘Where did I come from and wither am I going?’ The liberal’s answer – ‘You are an accident of nature, a loathsome boil on the body of humanity that must be lanced and then removed.’ And the white man accepts that piece of liberal doctrine, because he can’t defy nature. The old Christian Europeans could defy biological nature because they believed in a God above nature, but the modern European cannot defy nature because his God cannot transcend nature; he is bound, like Prometheus, upon that hard rock with the liberal and colored barbarian vultures attacking his entrails.

The Christian era of the European people was, according to the liberals, the age of superstition and unscientific thinking. But what could be more superstitious than the modern enlightened Europeans’ belief in science and democracy? What has been the end result of their belief system? The modern Europeans meekly submit to their own extermination as they chant the democratic-scientific litany: ‘We love the colored barbarians because they are natural and organic people, and we believe in the infallibility of the democratic process – onward and upward with democracy, science, and the noble savages of color.’

A Trump victory will not be a victory for white people. It will be a rearguard action that will give the white Europeans a little breathing time before their inevitable defeat. And their defeat is inevitable if they don’t reconnect with their past and learn to see existence feelingly. There is a passion gap between the modern Europeans and their ancestors. The antique Europeans had hearts of flesh that responded to any attack on His reign of charity. When innocence was attacked, when their people were attacked, they responded with the hatred that stems from love. You can’t sustain a long war – and a very long war is necessary to defeat the liberals – with a war cry of ‘We want our share of the Jacobin pie!’ The European people can only fight as they should fight, when they fight Jacobinism in defense of innocence – the aborted babies and the white victims of colored atrocities. No white candidate who does not make the abortion issue and the white genocide issue his main issues is truly a white candidate. And there never will be a white candidate, because Jacobin democracy is anti-white and anti-Christian. Break your democratic chains, ye men of Europe, and fight in response to your heart’s promptings. Surely it is better to be an antique European who loves and hates with all his heart than a modern intellectual something-or-other who has nothing to feel passionate about?

Burke, and later Richard Weaver, echoing Burke, tells us that our prejudices are our heartfelt intuitions about the nature of existence. If we purge our ‘prejudices,’ we have no touchstones of reality; we are reeds for every wind that blows. We can see the reeds blowing in the winds when we look at the new intellectual Christians who have divested themselves of the superstitions and prejudices of the antique Europeans. The new, unprejudiced, intellectual Christians worship negroes and all the non-white races regardless of what they do or believe. The new intellectual Christians believe in the sanctity of the Jews despite that fact that the Jews don’t believe in Jesus Christ. And the new intellectual Christians always side with the liberals, the great haters of Christ and His people, against those who believe in Jesus Christ and try to defend His people against the colored barbarians and the heathen faiths. What will it take for the European people to once again become prejudiced, ‘To hate the devil and all his works’?

What makes a man turn his back on liberal Babylon and seek that other world – His Kingdom come, on earth as it is in heaven? He must be touched, at the deepest level of his soul, by the love that passeth the understanding of the intellect. There is only one way to the Father, whose love passeth all understanding: It is through the Son of God. And there is only one way to the Son: It is through human hearts that love Him. There is no other Christ than the Euro-centric Christ. That Christ is not time-bound. He was and is at the center of the only truly human culture that ever existed on the face of the earth. Without a connection to the people who created that culture, in response to His divine love, there can be no faith, no hope, no charity, and consequently no resistance to liberal Babylon. “Seek ye first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things shall be added unto you.” Wasn’t the miracle of Europe a direct result of Europeans who did indeed seek, first and foremost, the kingdom of heaven described to us by the Son of God? The European people will never throw off the yoke of liberal techno-barbarism and colored barbarism by a utilitarian affirmation of intellectual Christianity. They must love the Euro-centric Christ who enters human hearts. Within those European hearts is the death warrant of liberal Babylon. The love that is rooted in His passion can never be defeated. Wither does the European wander? Christ is his King by fair sequence and succession. When he loves enough to fight for his king, he will reclaim his European name and identity – the Christ-Bearer – and he will be triumphant over the satanic liberals and their colored minions. +

Posted in antique Christianity, democracy, Jacobinism | Tagged ,

But of Thee, O Lord

von_carolsfeld_risen_christ_appears_to_his_disciples Viewing things in this light, I have frequently sunk into a degree of despondency and dejection hardly to be described: yet out of the profoundest depths of this despair, an impulse which I have in vain endeavoured to resist has urged me to raise one feeble cry against this unfortunate coalition which is formed at home, in order to make a coalition with France, subversive of the whole ancient order of the world.

Letters on a Regicide Peace


Let me pause and honor Phyllis Schlafly, who passed away a few days ago. I am not a ‘Founding Fathers,’ free market, democracy-loving Americanist; that aspect of Mrs. Schlafly’s agenda never held any appeal for me. Nor did Mrs. Schlafly take a stand against negro worship, which is one of the two great issues of our times. But on that other issue, the issue of “Unsex me here,” Phyllis Schlafly took her stand and held it, never yielding unto death. She opposed cop chicks, soldier chicks, infanticide, and the demonization of the Christian patriarchal family. For that I honor her and say, “God bless you, Phyllis Schlafly,” as I’m sure He will.

Speaking of death (“I didn’t know we were,” you reply), my body played a rather cruel trick on me this past August. After seven years without so much as a sniffle, I was plagued with an illness that I thought, at one point, was going to take me to that country from whose bourn no traveler returns. You can accuse me of hypocrisy if you want – “How can a professed Christian be so unwilling to die and be with his Lord?” – but I prayed the “Please, not yet” prayer. I remember making a similar prayer some thirty years ago when I received a head injury while working as a police officer. But there was a crucial difference between the two events. During the first, I didn’t want to die because I wanted to be there for my family, and because I still wanted to enjoy those thousand and one earthly things that our Lord has put on this terrestrial ball for our enjoyment. During the second, the recent illness, I did not want to die because I still wanted to be there for my family, but the desire to enjoy life had vanished and been replaced by a certain longing for death. That longing was nowhere near as strong as my desire to still be a stay and support for my family, but that new longing had definitely replaced the zest-for-life longing of thirty years ago. Because I’m a reflective, “melancholy Dane” type, upon my recovery I thought about what had changed inside me over the past thirty years to destroy those “joys of this earth” yearnings. And I concluded that it has to do with what Blake wrote: “Where man is not nature is barren.” The liberals have done such a thorough job of destroying Christian Europe that there is no living human remnants to be found. When our European culture was Christian, there were “sweet vale of Avoca” moments when God, man, and nature seemed one. Now, when Satanic Babylon has replaced Christian Europe, man, nature, and the devil are one. A world peopled by Cornwalls, Gonerils, Regans, and Calibans is not a world of infinite delight, it is hell.

The dying Laerte says,

The foul practice
Hath turn’d itself on me.
Lo, here I lie,
Never to rise again. Thy mother’s poison’d.
I can no more: –the King
The King’s to blame.

Yes, the King was to blame, but he never was the true king. Hamlet was the legitimate heir of his father, King Hamlet. And the intellectual Christians are not the true church, they are false prophets who preach a false Christianity envenomed with the poison of liberalism.  Christ left His church in the hearts of His people, and Satan’s allies have attacked that church by creating an anti-church alongside it, with all the outer accoutrements of Christianity but with a spiritual core that consists of a death’s head. Intellectual Christianity is Pope John reacting to the torture-murder of his own people at the hands of black barbarians with “loving forgiveness” for, and reverend worship of, the murderous black savages. Intellectual Christianity is Pope Francis placing Christ on the same level as Mohammed and below Allah. Intellectual Christianity is the betrayal of all things white and Christian by Christian democratic leaders such as Angela Merkel. Intellectual Christianity is the persecution of the white race under the banner of ‘fighting racism,’ while in reality it is Satan who has organized the attack. Never accept the anti-European lie. The European people are under attack because Christian Europe was a sign of contradiction to Satan. Our modern, inhumane, Christ-hating Europe is a sign of contradiction to the Man of Sorrows who once ruled Europe through the hearts of His people. While the intellectual Christians tried to make their man-made, mind-forged theologies the universal law, the true church was held together by the European people who loved the Savior in and through their kith and kin:

The writers on public law have often called this aggregate of nations a Commonwealth. They had reason. It is virtually one great state having the same basis of general law; with some diversity of provincial customs and local establishments. The nations of Europe have had the very same Christian religion, agreeing in the fundamental parts, varying a little in the ceremonies and in the subordinate doctrines. The whole of the polity and economy of every country in Europe has been derived from the same sources. – Edmund Burke

Yes, from the same sources, from the same wellspring – the blood of the Lamb who taketh away the sins of the world. Every European man and woman knew that their nation was a nation because His divine charity ruled over their racial hearth fires. A breach of custom or a breach of law was immoral because their customs and laws came from Christ. But when the laws and customs of the European nations come from Jacobinism, spawned by intellectual Christianity, the European people must oppose such laws and customs lest they become the subhuman servants of the liberals, just as the Eloi became the prey of the Morlocks in H. G. Wells’ novel The Time Machine.

Burke took great pains to show the people of Europe that the French Revolution was not a mere change in government, not the exchange of one ruling family for another. Nor was it the change of a Royal King for a Lord Protector. It was a change from a Christian commonwealth to a satanic commonwealth. For liberals, it was the dawning of a new day throughout Europe; for Burke, who saw with blinding sight, it was the beginning of the end. The “unbought grace of life” would disappear from Europe if Europeans allowed the Jacobin serpent to enter therein.

The history of Europe since the French Revolution has confirmed Burke’s prophetic warnings. All the European wars since the French Revolution, except the American Civil War, which was a war of Southern European loyalists against Northern Jacobins, have been wars between competing factions of Jacobins. The history of Europe under Jacobinism has been like the tale of The Shepherd of the Giant Mountains without a Christian hero to kill the griffin. Now, every European battle, political and military, spawns new, young griffins just as Jacobin and venomous as their ‘different in degree but not in kind’ enemy. The old right was not conservative in that they wanted to return to Christian Europe and side with the King against the Jacobins. All the old right wanted was a larger piece of the Jacobin pie. And the new alternative right is a very old alternative right. They are young griffins who want their share of Jacobin Europe. But whether it is the old right, which was never from the Right, or whether it is the new alternative right, which differs from the liberals and the old right in nothing except possibly the extent of their sneer against all things Christian and European, matters little.

Ah, the sneer. That seems to be the link between all the modern movements. The ‘smart ones’ sneer at the antique Europeans because they were noble whereas the modern sneerers are ignoble; the ‘smart ones’ sneer at the antique Europeans because they were dumb (why else would they worship a gloomy Gus who died between two thieves?). And on it goes – all that made life worth living, the romance that accompanied male and female relationships was deemed sentimental slop (maybe some of it was, but it certainly was superior to the ‘let’s do it in the road’ philosophy of the moderns); the faith that lessened and finally transcended the sting of death (Death, where is thy victory?) was replaced with macho existentialism and the ‘absorbed into the elements’ faith of the nature-loving liberals. And worst of all the charity of honor disappeared from the face of the earth because it disappeared from the hearts of the European people. No European political movement or organized insurrection can have any validity or worth unless it stems from that charity of honor bred into the bones of our European ancestors at their racial hearth fire.

“In the midst of life we be in death:” But what is death? Our Lord tells us that death is the beginning of life eternal. Why does that belief play no part in the grandiose schemes of the liberals, the conservative liberals, and the alternative right? Why must they kill old Europe? Our Lord said that the pure in heart would see the living God. Is that why the people who saw Christ and made Him the light of their culture must have no rights of memory in this distracted globe? They must not be remembered, because they remind us that “in the midst of life we be in death.” We can’t face that truth without faith; it is too horrible. Just as the man who knows only Lady Macbeths, the man who never had one whispering silken gown across his life, cannot bring himself to fight for a woman’s honor, so is the man who has never known the Christ of old Europe incapable of mounting a charge for his King, his people, and his God.

Some force greater than intellectual Christianity, neopaganism, or liberalism must come into the European’s heart and purify his vision. Is such a miracle possible? It is certainly possible. And it should be every European Christian’s prayer that the Europeans, who currently sneer and mock all that is good and noble in the European people of the past and those who follow in their train in the present, will be converted to the faith of their ancestors or else die on the swords of the men who love so much that they have seen His blood upon the rose. +

Posted in antique Christianity, Europeans and Christ, Jacobinism | Tagged ,

Fast Falls the Eventide

von_Carolsfeld_The_risen_Christ_appears_at_Emmaus Abide with me; fast falls the eventide;
The darkness deepens; Lord with me abide.
When other helpers fail and comforts flee,
Help of the helpless, O abide with me.

– Henry Francis Lyte

____________________

All the non-white races pose a danger to the white race, because the non-white races, in the main, have not been Christianized. Therefore their hate is always directed against the good, which is the white race. Even when the whites embrace the same devil that the people of color worship, the colored savages still hate the whites because of what whites once were. The colored barbarians never believe, because of the whites’ Christian past, that whites won’t revert to form and try to forcibly drag them away from their beloved Egyptian night.

The colored races need not worry. The liberal powers that be in the Western nations have no intention of returning to Christian Europe. The seemingly trivial, but fraught with significance, incident of the half-breed football player who refused to stand during the playing of the American national anthem, and the various white and colored reactions to his refusal indicate quite clearly the genocidal nature of the modern Europeans.

Let me begin with the obvious – It is whites who should refuse to stand for the national anthem, not colored people. (1) The United States of America, like all the nations settled by Europeans, is set up for the deification of the colored races and the liquidation of the white race. One of the most important ways that the liberal governments of the West keep their white victims anesthetized and indoctrinated is through sporting events. There are ‘inclusion’ days at sporting events which celebrate sodomy; there are negro days, oriental days, Mexican days, etc., but there are no white days at the sporting events. There is only the wringing of liberal hands when some sport is not ‘diverse’ enough. In countries such as Canada, where they cannot entice enough colored aliens into their country to completely pollute their sport teams, they celebrate the colored athletes they do have and desperately try to get more. Soon whites will be banned from all sport teams. That is called ‘diversity,’ which means the triumph of colored barbarism over white chivalry. Sport is the dramatic acting out of a people’s national ethos. When colored barbarism is sacred and white chivalry is demonized, the sporting events of white nations celebrate and extol colored barbarism.

The black and the white athletes have supported the half-breed’s self-serving egomania while the white grazers have wrapped themselves in the Masonic flag of the United States and screamed about the lack of respect for ‘our troops.’ Can anyone explain to the white grazer that white people on this continent have not had their own ‘troops’ since Nathan Forrest disbanded the original Ku Klux Klan? Just as I feel sorry for an AIDs victim who has contracted AIDs through immoral acts, I feel sorry for a soldier who is killed, maimed, or wounded fighting for the United States government. But my sympathy for the AIDs victim and the soldier is not as great as my sympathy for the white victims of colored atrocities. The latter did not meet with misfortune and/or death because of an immoral act on their part, unless you call being white immoral in and of itself, whereas the sodomite and the man who fights for the United States government becomes a victim as a result of his own immorality. Not being perfect myself, I can sympathize with such victims, but my greatest sympathy goes out to the white innocents.(2)

Before moving on from the half-breed barbarian, we should say something about the nature of half-breeds, which are becoming more and more prevalent in the European nations. In the ‘superstitious and racist’ 19th century, the Europeans were of the opinion that half-breeds were even more dangerous than unadulterated colored barbarians, because they combined the post-Christian liberal hatred of their own people with the primitive, age-old hatred that the colored races have for the white race. It’s like mixing arsenic and cyanide or rattlesnake venom with cobra venom.

Nothing is more distasteful to the modern European than comments about the dangers of race-mixing and colored barbarism, but are not Christians supposed to seek the truth? Who is right? Our ancestors, who abominated race-mixing and looked on the non-white people of the world as dangerous barbarians that had to be resisted lest they overwhelm the white nations, or the liberals, who think we should bow down and worship the colored heathen? It always comes back to the third temptation of the devil: “All this power will I give thee, and the glory of them: for that is delivered unto me; and to whomsoever I will I give it. If thou therefore wilt worship me, all shall be thine.” And our Lord replies: “Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.” Lady Macbeth gave herself up directly to Satan, but her husband, who did his wife’s bidding, also gave himself up to Satan: he served Satan through his wife. The liberals serve Satan through their worship of the colored barbarians. Even if the liberals could deliver on their promise, which they can’t, of an earthly utopia for all those who accept ‘diversity,’ should we give up our immortal souls for their utopia? Didn’t the most important Someone who ever lived once ask us, “For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?”

The “Battle Hymn of the Republic” and “America the Beautiful” are outright blasphemies. The “Star-Spangled Banner,” which extols the “free and the brave,” hardly captures the essence of a nation where whites live under the mind-forged shackles of diversity, but the colored barbarians perceive the “Star-Spangled Banner” to be a white anthem, so even that liberal-based anthem will be replaced by an anthem similar to the one the Zulus chanted before they attacked Rorke’s Drift. Will there ever come a time when whites face the foe again and respond with shot, shell, and bayonet while singing “Men of Harlech”? I doubt it. But there will come a time when the warring tribes of colored barbarians have made a wasteland of the white nations. Then a remnant band of whites, who have remained faithful, will call on their Lord and Kinsman, and their anthem will be “Abide with Me.” At that moment when all the false helps and comforts, such as democracy, science, diversity, and intellectual Christianity have failed, the remnant band who have kept His cross before their eyes will remember His words: “Fear not; I am the first and the last,” and they will rebuild Christian Europe in the midst of Babylon. Just as Babylon overwhelmed Christendom, so will the new Christendom overwhelm Babylon.

Modern Christian Europe is dead. The Moslem invasion, the deification of the colored races and the ongoing democratic, universalist blather of clerical and secular liberals are all part of the funeral rites, but if Christ is indeed risen from the dead as our European ancestors believed, then Christian Europe can also rise from the dead. The Europeans’ past and future is contained in the passages in Luke 24: 28-36:

And they drew nigh unto the village, whither they went: and he made as though he would have gone further. But they constrained him, saying, Abide with us: for it is toward evening, and the day is far spent. And he went in to tarry with them. And it came to pass, as he sat at meat with them, he took bread, and blessed it, and brake, and gave to them. And their eyes were opened, and they knew him; and he vanished out of their sight. And they said one to another, Did not our heart burn within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the scriptures? And they rose up the same hour, and returned to Jerusalem, and found the eleven gathered together, and them that were with them, Saying, The Lord is risen indeed, and hath appeared to Simon. And they told what things were done in the way, and how he was known of them in breaking of bread. And as they thus spake, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you.

“Did not our heart burn within us?” That was the difference between the European people and the non-Europeans. Because their hearts burned within them in His presence, they asked Him to abide with them. How can a people who have abandoned all the noble passions that reside in the human heart, such as the love of kith and kin, suddenly develop hearts that burn within them in His presence? They can’t. This brave new world has been created according to Satan’s plan: “Kill the Europeans’ heart and you kill Christ.” That is Satan’s decree. He cannot actually kill Christ, but he can destroy His image in man if he plunges his satanic sword of the abstracted intellect through the European’s heart. The European counterrevolution begins with the simple prayer uttered at our European hearth fire: “Fast falls the eventide; the darkness deepens; Lord, with me abide.” +

____________________________________________

(1) During the American Civil War the Southerners did not celebrate the Fourth of July, because they did not feel part of the United States. The white people of the United States and all the nations of Europe are more disenfranchised now than the Southerners were during the Civil War and Reconstruction Era. The counterrevolution will begin when whites realize they are a captive people at the mercy of a foe that has no mercy.

(2) Of course the white woman who is murdered by her black boyfriend is not an innocent victim who rates the same sympathy as the white innocent who is murdered by a marauding creature of color.

The European nations as they exist today are like a vast zoo. The whites are the animals in the zoo, and the owners of the zoo, the liberals, have given the colored barbarians free passes to go into the zoo and kill as many white animals as they wish. It’s a deadly sign of the times when animals have more rights than whites. “But let’s all join hands and support our colored sport teams” is the liberals’ comforting command. Why should we follow that command? Shouldn’t a man stand upright at least once in his life and refuse to bend his knee to Satan by refusing to pledge his allegiance to diversity?

The Implicit Oath of Allegiance that all whites take when they celebrate diversity and multiculturalism:

“I pledge allegiance to diversity and the multicultural nations in which it strives. One Babylon, under Satan, without white people, and with sexual depravity and multiculturalism for all.”

 

Posted in counterrevolution, Europeans and Christ | Tagged

The Fear of Racism

Woman_with_an_issue_of_blood And, behold, a woman, which was diseased with an issue of blood twelve years, came behind him, and touched the hem of his garment: For she said within herself, If I may but touch his garment, I shall be whole. But Jesus turned him about, and when he saw her, he said, Daughter, be of good comfort; thy faith hath made thee whole. And the woman was made whole from that hour. – Matthew 9: 20-22


The European people prior to the 20th century were like unto the woman with the issue of blood: They had faith in the divine humanity of Jesus Christ. And as a result of that faith, a power, the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, went into the European people. That power, that divine charity of our Lord, did not make the European people into gods, but it did make them unlike the non-white cultures, because they, and they alone, gave a local habitation and a name to the one true God.

The liberals have launched a very successful campaign against those antique Europeans and their culture. It has been so successful that all of organized Christianity, which has become organized Jewry, has sided with the liberals against the Christian Europeans. Why have professed Christians sided with the abortionists, the sodomites, and the race-mixers against the people of old, Christian Europe? We know why the mad-dog liberals hate the antique Europeans – they worship darkness and not the light. But again, why do professed Christians join with the liberals? There is no question that it is the issue of race which has joined the liberals and the new age Christians into an uneasy, but nevertheless clear alliance against the antique Europeans.

It doesn’t appall the new age Christians that our ancestors were against abortion and sodomy, but it does appall them – in fact it horrifies them – that our ancestors abominated race-mixing. You might think that it was only the modern Roman Catholics, who do not place the same stress on the Bible as the Protestants do, who deplore the ‘racism’ of the antique Europeans, but the modern Protestants with the Tower of Babel story right before them also abominate the ‘racism’ of the antique Europeans. So let’s be clear on this point: The modern ‘Christians’ have sold their souls to the devil, for just as sure there is a God in heaven and a devil in hell, liberalism is from the devil.

What makes a man fear the racist label so much that he will side with the devil and his minions against the faith of his ancestors? The answer lies in the Book of Revelation. Why does Jesus Christ tell us, in chapter 2, verses 6 and 15, that He hates the deeds and the doctrines of the Nicolaitanes? Is it because they are adulterers? Or is it because they think adultery and other such sins are of no account if you merely affirm an intellectual belief in Christianity as an organized system? I think it is the latter reason. But of course there is no general agreement on the identity or the sins of the Nicolaitanes. My opinion is based on the history of my people. Throughout their history, the European laity were in a constant struggle to maintain their faith in Jesus Christ as their Lord and kinsman over and against the clergy, who, in the main, preferred to champion an intellectual system, which they claimed was instituted by Christ, over and against the Europeans’ faith in Christ, the God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and St. Paul. The first type of faith requires a willingness to submit to one’s intellectual superiors, the second type of faith requires a circumcised heart. That second faith, which is, I believe, the true faith, is sanctioned by the Gospels, by St. Paul, and by the witness of the great European poets such as Shakespeare and Walter Scott, who speak to us still and tell us that the heart’s prompting is the voice of God.

But why has the other faith, the unfaith of intellectual Christianity, become mainstream Christianity while the old bred-in-the-bone faith of the antique Europeans has become a hole-and-corner faith for outlawed men hiding in the bogs and fens of what was once Christendom? It is a very old story. It is the story of the pride of intellect. God was not bound to Adam and Eve by a legalistic system, He was bound to them by love. He loved them as a father loves his children. They should have felt bound to Him by filial love, but they chose to circumvent their heart to heart relationship with God and exchange that relationship for an intellectual relationship with Satan. The modern Christians have repeated the sin of Adam and Eve. Liberalism is clearly from Satan, but if their churchmen tell them that it is only through intelligence that a man can be saved, then the new age Christians feel they must cling to intelligence. And what is the stupidest thing a man can be? It is a racist. Thus the fear of the racist label keeps the new Christian-Jews out of the camp of Christ and keeps them in Satan’s camp. It must give Satan no end of satisfaction to hear the words, “Lord, Lord” on the lips of professed Christians who condemn, with righteous indignation, the Christians of old Europe that gave Christ a place by their racial hearth fire. Where is He now that those European hearth fires have been extinguished throughout the white nations?

So long as the clerical leaders preach intellectual Christianity, which consists of the unholy trinity of the Father – abstracted intelligence – the Son – the sacred negro and the other non-white races – the Holy Ghost – science – and so long as the laity follow those leaders, whites will never fight back against the liberals and their colored minions. And racism will always be the cornerstone of the liberals’ kingdom of hell on earth, just as Christ is the cornerstone of the Kingdom of Heaven.

The liberals have placed the fire-breathing dragon called racism at the gates of Liberaldom. Is there a Christian knight who dares face that dragon who spews the fire of ‘Tthou art a racist’ at any white man who dares to equate his racial hearth fire, and the mysterious human relationships formed at that racial hearth fire, with goodness, light, and the unbought grace of life. If we denounce our racial hearth fire, we are men without a nation, and worse yet, we are men without honor. The Christian people who were “wont to conquer others have made a shameful conquest of themselves,” because of their fear of being racist and therefore unintelligent. And we all know, according to the liberals, that only the intelligent, the Illuminati, can enter the kingdom of heaven. Oh, for a man who is not afraid of the racist label, a man who will confront the dragon who spews the ‘Thou art a racist’ fire and drive a sword through the dragon’s heart.

If we look closely at intellectual Christianity we can see why the Europeans start every morning with the ‘I shall not be a racist’ prayer. Their god is the abstracted intellect who views racism as a sign of damnation. Hence the best way to prove you are of the elect is to embrace the colored heathens, who are the collective saviors of the world. If we believe in them they will lead us to the paradise of the intelligent men. Such a paradise, where the intelligent pagans sit and talk about virtue, reminds us of the first circle of hell. That is where a man ends up if he forsakes the promptings of his heart for the mind-forged utopia of the godded men, the men of intellect.

The third person of the new Christianity (which is not Christian) permeates the European culture. Science is truth, and truth is science. Science is invoked to prove that there is no such thing as a white person. Science is invoked to prove that men are monkeys. And science is invoked to kill the pain of existence that the old-fashioned racist God of the antique Europeans could not or would not do away with. The Holy Ghost of Science holds out to men the false hope that they can accept the third temptation of the devil: They can have an early paradise without facing the consequences of the devil’s bargain.

But what is the price of that third offer? We must all bow down and worship Satan. Haven’t we done just that? When we renounce the non-abstract Christ, the Christ with a local habitation in the hearts of our European ancestors, for a new triune god of intellect, colored heathenism, and science, have we not made our choice, have we not chosen Satan over Christ?

The Moslem invasion has not roused Christian Europeans. What opposition there is consists of the ‘We are not racist Christians,’ which is no opposition at all, it is the airy nothings of intellectual Christianity. Any opposition to liberalism — and Islam is part of Liberaldom — must come from men whose hearts belong to the Christ of old Europe. That Europe was built on the charity that never faileth, the charity that cured the woman with the issue of blood.

The cold, heartless intellectual Christianity of the modern church men and their followers is not a sustaining faith. St. John tells us that “perfect love casteth out fear.” The racist dragon will never be removed from the gates of Liberaldom until the European people return to their one true love, the Christ-centered Europe that was grounded in the love of the Savior who responded to His people when they reached out to touch the hem of His garment. We have an issue of blood that cannot be cured except by the Christ of our racist ancestors. Does Christianity really begin and end with the affirmation of ‘I am not a racist’? Or is Christianity about the faith, the hope, and the charity that was bequeathed to us by the racist Europeans? Why should we run and hide under the bed when the liberals and the intellectual Christians call us racists? What does it mean to be racist? It means we love our people and the Christ-centered civilization they bequeathed to us. If other peoples want to believe as the antique Europeans believed, which they steadfastly refuse to do, that is all to the good, but if they demand that we repudiate our people and eradicate every single white hearth fire on the face of the earth, which is exactly what they do demand, we should come out from under our beds, kill the racist dragon, and conquer Liberaldom in the name of our sacred ancestors and in the name of Christ the King. +

Posted in antique Christianity, Europeans and Christ, Muscular Christianity | Tagged ,

The Long War

Dore_Michael_casts_out_rebel_angels Worshipping organization in too hard and primitive a sense they threaten to transform the human world into something more like a world of ants. In many respects, therefore, it is dangerous to by-pass history, or imagine that the natural sciences—as though reigning over all—can safely be left to determine our views on human destiny. – Herbert Butterfield

______________________________

In his critique of the Vatican II theologians, The Devastated Vineyard, Dietrich von Hildebrand stated that although St. Thomas’s system was not all of the faith, as Aquinas claimed, St. Thomas did not state deliberate falsehoods about the faith as the Vatican II theologians did. I would concede that the Vatican II theologians are certainly more heretical theologians than St. Thomas, but I would qualify that concession by saying that the Vatican II theologians were merely following St. Thomas’s theology to its logical conclusion, just as the psychoanalysts who came after Freud were acting on his original thesis even though they were dissenters in degree from Freud’s tenets.

What Aquinas, Feuerbach, Darwin, Freud, and Marx had in common was the Rosencrantz and Guildenstern fixation. They wanted to simplify and dissect in order to obtain knowledge:

Hamlet. I do not understand that. Will you play upon this pipe?

Guildenstern. My lord, I cannot.

Hamlet. I pray you.

Guildenstern. Believe me, I cannot.

Hamlet. I do beseech you.

Guildenstern. I know no touch of it, my lord.

Hamlet. ‘Tis as easy as lying. Govern these ventages with your finger and thumb, give it breath with your mouth, and it will discourse most excellent music. Look you, these are the stops.

Guildenstern. But these cannot I command to any utterance of harmony. I have not the skill.

Hamlet. Why, look you now, how unworthy a thing you make of me! You would play upon me, you would seem to know my stops, you would pluck out the heart of my mystery, you would sound me from my lowest note to the top of my compass; and there is much music, excellent voice, in this little organ, yet cannot you make it speak. ‘Sblood, do you think that I am easier to be play’d on than a pipe? Call me what instrument you will, though you can fret me, you cannot play upon me.

In order to simplify man he must be made into a creature who can be summed up solely by reference to the natural, biological world. Nor can the god of mere biological man be more than the sum of the parts of the natural world. For how could mere natural man, in the biological sense, understand a God who is more than nature? He can’t, which is why all the anti-white and anti-Christian “thinkers” such as Feuerbach, Darwin, Marx, and Freud reduced God and man down to simple products of nature. God became nature and men were like bugs and insects; they could be studied and dissected, and then they could be made, by the examiners, into happy bugs and insects. Feuerbach was going to make men happy by proving that the Christian God was a product of their fertile imaginations. Darwin was going to make men happy by proving to them that they were apes. Marx was simply a caricature of Darwin and Feuerbach. And Freud, who was a second rater but vastly superior to the third raters such as Feuerbach, Darwin, and Marx, was going to make men happy by bringing out their subconscious neuroses and subjecting these neuroses to the healing powers of reason. But what if a man’s subconscious is really his soul? A soul that is not as simple to play upon as a recorder? And what if reason is not an objective arbitrator between two or three competing passions, but is a subject, not a master, of those passions? It is significant that the modern psychoanalysts no longer try, as Freud did, to “cure” people by digging deep into their subconscious. They simply give them drugs. The hubris of the early psychoanalysts was incredible, but at least they tried to heal rather than anesthetize.

What we are witnessing today is the triumph of the nature philosophies of the Jacobins, Feuerbach, Darwin, Marx, and Freud. All Europeans drink at the trough of the nature gods. The conservatives might be more like Freud, in that they still believe in the healing powers of reason, than the mad-dog liberals who follow a mish-mash of Darwin, Marx, and Feuerbach. But it all amounts to a return to Baal. The European people have returned to the fleshpots of Egypt.

In order to kill all resistance to the return to Baal, the liberals had to trivialize existence. They had to exchange the complexity of thousands of years of Christian traditions into a few platitudes such as ‘thou shalt not be racist,’ ‘thou shalt not be sexist,’ and ‘thou shalt be multicultural.’ What Karl Barth said of Feuerbach – “We have heard Feuerbach speak and we have heard something disgustingly, nauseatingly trivial” – can and should be said of our modern liberal society. Has any society anywhere in the world ever been built on more nauseatingly, disgustingly, evil trivialities as our modern liberal society?

There is no resistance to liberalism because conservatives are the Freudian branch of liberalism. By that of course I don’t mean that the conservatives are all card-carrying Freudians. I mean they are the second-rate biological determinists who are in philosophical agreement with the third-rate liberals about the necessity of a democratic, scientistic, rational world, but they differ over the furniture arrangement of that new world. But what is lost is that which cannot be lost without bringing the European people to utter ruin. We have lost our connection to our Christian past. In that past are men and women with depth of soul. They needed something more than the evil trivialities of ‘Thou shall not be a racist or sexist’ and ‘Thou shall worship diversity and democracy with all thy heart, mind, and soul.’ They needed the hero-God, the Man of Sorrows who meets the needs of a people with a tragic sense of life, people who believe in His holy cross more than the utopian nightmare of the liberals.

When science holds sway over the minds of men, they return to polytheism. Even when they still keep the name of Christian, they become polytheists. One case in point – When Karl Stern, a Roman Catholic convert and a psychoanalyst, wrote The Pillar of Fire, he made a case for the synthesis of Christianity and psychoanalysis. But such syntheses blur the image of Christ in man and tend to glorify the ape in man. And an ape needs nature gods, not the Son of God.

The first organized polytheistic state within the heart of Christian Europe was Jacobin France. The first Jacobins were atheists, but they soon shifted to organized polytheism with ridiculous corn and grain festivals accompanied by the murder of aristocrats, thus combining the same polytheistic elements that the back-sliding Israelites included in their return to Baal. Our modern sporting events, our diversity inspired church services, and our ritualistic sacrifice of infants in the abortuaries are all part of the ongoing push to return to Baal, to nature, which ultimately means the extinction of the human personality. The religion of the gypsies, a people of non-definite race and a vague nature religion, has become the faith of the modern science-minded Europeans:

“To be resolved into the elements,” said the hardened atheist, pressing his fettered arms against his bosom; “my hope, trust, and expectation is, that the mysterious frame of humanity shall melt into the general mass of nature, to be recompounded in the other forms with which she daily supplies those which daily disappear, and return under different forms,–the watery particles to streams and showers, the earthy parts to enrich their mother earth, the airy portions to wanton in the breeze, and those of fire to supply the blaze of Aldeboran and his brethren,–In this faith have I lived, and I will die in it!—Hence! Begone!—disturb me no farther!—I have spoken the last words that mortal ears shall listen to!”

Quentin Durward by Walter Scott

To be resolved into the elements, that is the faith of the liberals, those great lovers of humanity! And those churchmen who want to join with them through the Jews, the Moslems, and the heathens of color, what are they but the great betrayers of our Lord and His people?

If we boil this race war down to the main point, it is this: Liberal polytheism is Satan’s attack on Christ through Christ’s people, who were and are the European people who developed human personalities through their love of the God-Man. Let us keep that image of God reaching out to man that Michelangelo painted on the Sistine Chapel ever before our eyes. Satan wants us to blend our race into the nothingness of nature because he wants to blot out forever the image of Christ in man. And my great concern is that there is no Christian resistance to Satan’s master stroke. “I am not a racist,” is always the first thing a halfway-house Christian says when he protests any of the liberal gambits against the white, Christ-bearing race. And by abandoning that ‘racist’ connection to his people, the halfway-house Christian has made himself a spiritual eunuch without the strength to oppose the liberals who have not only spent the unbought grace of life, they have set up Jacobin states throughout the formerly white Christian nations. The liberals have institutionalized the hatred and the vilification of any white man who dares to invoke the memory of that blessed civilization whose people relied on and believed in the grace and love of our blessed Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.

Burke’s description of the calm, rational English administrators who thought it might be a good idea if the Jacobins didn’t guillotine so many people is an accurate description of the tepid and timid opposition the liberal conservatives present to the mad-dog liberals:

Whenever the adverse party has raised a cry for peace with the Regicide, the answer has been little more than this: “That the administration wished for such a peace full as much as the opposition, but that the time was not convenient for making it.” Whatever else has been said was much in the same spirit. Reasons of this kind never touched the substantial merits of the war. They were in the nature of dilatory pleas, exceptions of form, previous questions. Accordingly, all the arguments against a compliance with what was represented as the popular desire (urged on with all possible vehemence and earnestness by the Jacobins) have appeared flat and languid, feeble and evasive. They appeared to aim only at gaining time. They never entered into the peculiar and distinctive character of the war. They spoke neither to the understanding nor to the heart. Cold as ice themselves, they never could kindle in our breasts a spark of that zeal which is necessary to a conflict with an adverse zeal; much less were they made to infuse into our minds that stubborn, persevering spirit which alone is capable of bearing up against those vicissitudes of fortune which will probably occur, and those burdens which must be inevitably borne, in a long war. –Letters on a Regicide Peace by Edmund Burke

We are engaged in a long war against the enemies of Christ, who attack Him by attacking His people. A culture based on the ethos of “To be resolved into the elements,” is not a culture, it is an excrescence that should be eradicated from the face of the earth. There can be no blending, no compromise with the people who champion the polytheistic anti-culture called liberalism. +

Posted in antique Christianity, Christian Europe, Utopianism | Tagged , ,