The Satanic Core of the Liberals’ ‘Niceness’

Wyeth_William_WallaceIt is a dreadful part of the example, that infernal malevolence has had pious apologists, who read their lectures on frailties in favour of crimes; who abandoned the weak, and court the friendship of the wicked. To root out these maxims, and the examples that support them, is a wise object of years of war. This is that war. This is that moral war. It was said by old Trivulzio, that the battle of Marignan was the battle of the Giants, that all the rest of the many he had seen were those of the Cranes and Pygmies. This is true of the objects, at least, of the contest. For the greater part of those, which we have hitherto contended for, in comparison, were the toys of children.

The October Politician is so full of charity and good nature, that he supposes, that these very robbers and murderers themselves are in a course of amelioration; on what ground I cannot conceive, except on the long practice of every crime, and by its complete success. He is an Origenist, and believes in the conversion of the Devil. All that runs in the place of blood in his veins, is nothing but the milk of human kindness. He is as soft as a curd, though, as a politician, he might be supposed to be made of sterner stuff. He supposes (to use his own expression) “that the salutary truths which he inculcates, are making their way into their bosoms.” Their bosom is a rock of granite, on which falsehood has long since built her strong hold. Poor Truth has had a hard work of it with her little pickaxe. Nothing but gunpowder will do.

Letters on a Regicide Peace

When I was growing up the use of weights in sports was discouraged. My football coach, like many coaches of that time, told me to stop lifting weights, because he thought that weightlifting would make me ‘muscle-bound.’ Some twenty years later, every pro team in the country and most of the college teams had strength coaches, and movies like Pumping Iron had made body building a major sport. Ironically, as weightlifting came out of the closet, it changed from an activity that could enhance strength and health to a narcissistic activity that destroyed a man’s health and virility.

The puffed-up, steroid-using, body builders and athletes of today are the complete opposite of the old time strong men. Without access to exercise science gurus armed with PhDs, and without the use of steroids and total gyms, the old time lifters built bodies that stood the test of time. Many of the old-time strong men maintained their strength and vitality right to the end of their lives. George Hackenschmidt was still lifting massive weights in his mid-eighties as were most of the old time lifters who practiced the now antiquated ‘three days a week, with rest in between’ program.

Nor have the modern exercise science men discovered anything new about exercise. The old timers knew about circuit training and other such ‘modern’ innovations; they just didn’t have a fancy name for the ‘new’ techniques. But that is the essence of the modern world, gimmickry without substance.

I don’t intend to start an exercise blog – there are too many of them already – but I do want to segue from the modernity of the modern body building culture to the modernism of the liberal-conservatives. I dismiss the straight-out mad-dog liberals; they are the swine going over the cliff. It is the conservatives who are not conserving, going over the cliff with the liberals, that I want to discuss.

Burke was very clear about what a European statesman was duty-bound to conserve: the institutions, customs, manners, and prejudices that helped the European people preserve their faith in our Common Hope. All changes in government must be changes to preserve the foundations of a Christian government, just as you would shore up a sacred monument with mortar and plaster, rather than tear it down and put up a new monument. Burke denounced the French Revolution with Shakespearean eloquence and passion, because he saw that the French Revolution was a radical break with the customs, manners, and prejudices of the European people who had believed, for over 1,500 years, in our Common Hope. Henceforth the battle would not only be with the pagans from without Europe, it would also be a battle against the post-Christians within Europe.

The modern conservatives are the spiritual counter parts of the modern steroid body builders. They claim to be improving and conserving while they are really helping the mad-dog liberals to tear down Western civilization by injecting a harmful poison into the European people. And what is that poison that is supposed to improve, but in reality kills? It is the poison of cosmic intellectualism as articulated by Albert Einstein in 1931:

“In primitive peoples it is, first of all, fear that awakens religious ideas—fear of hunger, of wild animals, of illness, and of death. Since the understanding of causal connections is usually limited on this level of existence, the human soul forges a being, more or less like itself, on whose will and activities depend the experiences which it fears…

“An important advance in the life of a people is the transformation of the religion of fear into the moral religion. But one must avoid the prejudice that regards the religions of primitive peoples as pure fear religions and those of the civilized races as pure moral religions. All are mixed forms, though the moral element predominates in the higher levels of social life. Common to all these types is the anthropomorphic character of the idea of God.

“Only exceptionally gifted individuals or especially noble communities rise essentially above this level; in these there is found a third level of religious experience, even if it is seldom found in a pure form. I will call it the cosmic religious sense. This is hard to make clear to those who do not experience it, since it does not involve an anthropomorphic idea of God; the individual feels the vanity of human desires and aims, and the nobility and marvelous order which are revealed in nature and in the world of thought.”

– cited in One Race, One Faith, One Shepherd

Who are the exceptionally gifted individuals that do not need “moral religion”? They are virtually all the European intelligentsia, both liberal and conservative. And the grazers, the people who should be the Christian faithful, have followed their leaders. For who wants to be ‘as stupid as a rhinoceros’ by subscribing to an intellectually inferior religion and the customs, manners, and prejudices attached to that religion? “Who is here so prejudiced, who will not support the massive influx of negroes and Aztecs into the European nations? Who is here so lacking in compassion that he will not welcome Moslems into the European nations? And who is so racist and illiberal that he wants his nation to be white and Christian while shunning all others? If any, speak, for we will purge that man from cosmic, multi-cultural Europe.”

The Christian churches followed in the train of the European intelligentsia. The liberals abandoned Christ entirely, and the conservatives betrayed Him by refusing to defend that which is essential for the survival of the Christian faith as a vital force in the life of the European people. We need to believe that we saw Christ face to face in the collective face of the antique Europeans. If they, the people who took Christ into their hearts, didn’t know Him, then how can we know Him? “We can know Him by a new, improved method, through the good offices of our intellects,” say the conservatives who have been shooting up with intellectual steroids to bulk up their highly developed brains. But is such a thing possible? What have the people on intellectual steroids produced? A world in which “mankind preys upon itself like monsters from the deep.” The barbarians of color kill whites and themselves with an increasing ferocity, the Moslems have marched right through the open gates of Liberaldom vowing that, “Your children shall be Moslems,” and not one public figure has called for the expulsion of the colored barbarians and the Moslems from the European nations. Why is this? Because the intelligentsia, the liberal elite that governs the white nations, do not believe in our Common Hope. If they did, they would not deliver up their own people to be tortured and murdered by colored barbarians. Nor would they allow the one true God to be replaced by the God of the Moslems.

The liberals and the liberal conservatives have detached themselves from humanity. They have invented a cosmic brotherhood of the intellect, which, from their point of view, makes them supernatural beings above the lot of common humanity. And they are right. They have left common humanity behind. They are like unto Satan, the archangel of intellect. Some, by the grace of God, might return to humanity and the humane God, but we can’t count on any member of Liberaldom joining the ranks of the European people. Their hardened hearts are poisoned against the light and we dare not mix with them on any terms other than martial ones, lest we be poisoned by them.

That leaves the white grazers, the men and women who have had so many false Aslans thrown at them that they can no longer see the real Aslan, the one who took flesh and dwelt among us, first in Bethlehem, Judea, and then amongst the people of Europe who took Him into their hearts. The white grazers are hovering between two worlds, the world of cosmic universalism where unspeakable cruelty and butchery dwell under the names of multiculturalism and democracy, and the world of His Kingdom come, a realm of charity forged out of a previously untamed pagan wilderness by the Knight Errant of charity and mercy. The people who loved much followed in His train and kept the flame of His divine charity alive through all the Christian centuries of their history. But now? Christ’s words come back to us with an overwhelming force: “When the Son of Man returns will He find faith on earth?”

In White Man Think Again, Anthony Jacob writes of the one fatal flaw of the white Kenyans:

It is very far from being my intention to belittle the people of Kenya and to add insult to their unspeakable injury. Their only fundamental fault, after all, was to be too trusting and innocent a people to be a party to that which was supplanting them. They trusted Britain unquestioningly and assumed the Native would prove himself grateful for what had been done for him. They trusted everybody because they are a trustworthy people themselves…

Yes, in other words the ignorance of our Western liberal intellectuals is killing us. The distortion of their university-adjusted vision is such that even when they clearly perceive every detail of a given situation, the picture in the mirror of their intellects is invariably upside down. It is a form of insanity, ethical as well as intellectual; an insanity which takes the form of a blind belief in the efficacy of so-called ‘good’ principles regardless of the circumstances in which they are applied; such as the giving of The Vote to people who cannot read or write, and the granting of ‘National Self-determination’ to tribes of stark naked cannibals. It is a ‘sideways with the people’ insanity; one of the deadliest of its manifestations being the belief that true goodness consists in depriving oneself of the power to do good. It is an insanity compelling liberal politicians to delight in bringing about the utter subjugation of their own white race.

Therein lies the fatal flaw of all white grazers. They cannot see the evil of liberalism. They are constantly asking why their government doesn’t protect them from the colored barbarians from within and the Moslem invasion from without, but then they never believe you when you give them the answer: “The liberals hate the Christ-bearing people because they worship darkness and not the light.” This is unacceptable to the white grazer. His local clergyman is a kindly fellow, he preaches niceness and universal love, and he wouldn’t sell his people down the blood red river of diversity. Nor would his conservative congressman; he has a democratic love for all mankind. Until the grazer understands that behind the façade of liberal niceness lurks the cold malignity of the devil, he will be forever bound upon the liberals’ wheel of fire, asking for the bread of charity and receiving a stone. That is the essence of liberalism: a stone, just as hard and impenetrable as the liberal’s heart.

Burke had hope that a leader would emerge who would inspire the white grazers of his day to rally and throw off the ideological Jacobinism that was taking over Europe. He died thinking that a champion of old Christian Europe had yet to emerge. But his humility kept him from seeing that a champion had emerged, a champion who saw through the outward niceness of liberalism to its satanic core. That Christian champion was Edmund Burke, who stands with Shakespeare as the great champion and poet of the white Christian race. With blinding sight he saw that it was the Europeans’ passion to love the good and hate evil that made them a race distinct from all others. Their passion linked to His passion made Christian Europe, and their descent to niceness destroyed Christian Europe. It is the task of the true European conservatives to live up to that essential truth so passionately articulated and defended by Edmund Burke, the great Knight errant of Europe: “They never will love where they ought to love, who do not hate where they ought to hate.” Forsake liberal niceness, love your people in and through Christ, and Liberaldom will come tumbling down, freeing the Europeans to do battle with and defeat the colored barbarians and the Moslem invaders.

The liberals’ little black puppet, The Obama, recently compared the new wave of Moslems invaders to the Pilgrims who came over from England many years ago. Is there any resemblance between a Moslem and a Christian? Is there any resemblance between the men who came to a geographical land mass to build a civilization and the men who now come to that same land mass to destroy a civilization? The whites will be pushed off the face of the earth if they do not forsake satanic niceness and start acting like their Christian forefathers. The false Aslan of Pope Francis and his ilk has poisoned Europe for much too long. It is time to look to the real Aslan, the Aslan of Alfred and of Havelock, the one true God, who did not suffer, die, and on the third day rise from the dead so that men could celebrate satanic cruelty while flying the flag of multicultural, Christian niceness. “He is not a tame lion.” No, He is not, He is the Christ, the God of our racial hearth fire. If we forsake that hearth fire, we forsake charity, mercy, and Him. +

Posted in Christian counter-attack, Europe as the Christ-bearer, post-Christian rationalism | Tagged , , ,

A Homeland for Whites

Dore_Apparition-of-St-George-on-the-Mount-of-OlivesThe liberals’ incredible double-dealing is obvious. On the one hand we are told that we must abort all babies born in the European nations, because there are too many babies being born. And then on the other hand we are told we must allow an unlimited amount of Moslems into European nations. Why must we do this? Because we are commanded to go over the cliff with the swinish liberals who are possessed by the devil. – CWNY

Mahomet planted in Arabia a new Religion, directly opposite to the Christian Religion; yet such as did in a good Measure express in Words, the Life of a great Part of the Christians. This Religion was first embraced by the Saracens, who revolted from the Emperor Heraclius; whose Arms quickly subdued Arabia, Syria, Palaestine, Egypt, Persia, and afterwards they invaded Africa, and came over Sea into Spain. But the Power of the Saracens was derived to others, particularly to the Turks, a very war-like People, who after many long Engagements with the Saracens, being desired to enter into a League, they easily embraced a Religion agreeable to their Manners, and transferred the Imperial Power to themselves. Having taken the Cities of Asia and Greece, and the Success of their Arms increasing, they came into the Borders of Hungary and Germany… This Religion, which was plainly calculated for Bloodshed, delights much in Ceremonies; – Hugo Grotius

When something as dramatic as the Paris massacre occurs, I briefly, ever so briefly, hope that my people will “wake up” and become white men again But then, like the man in the song called “The Green, Green Grass of Home,” I realize that “I was only dreaming.” (1) Men interpret external events according to the a priori passion that is in their hearts. I see the Paris massacre as the inevitable result of the white man’s rejection of Christian Europe for multicultural, democratic Europe. The liberal sees the massacre as a temporary setback on the way to utopia.

What is the difference between the Islamic Jihadist and the liberal? They both desire the death of white people, because of the whites’ Christian past, so why do the liberals seem outraged? The modern liberals are like the Jacobins who finally turned on Robespierre. They weren’t repudiating the ideals of liberty, equality, and fraternity, they were just repudiating Robespierre’s excessively violent way of going about the business of liberty, equality, and fraternity. If Robespierre had scaled down the blood-letting and toned down the rhetoric, he could have blended right into democratic, regicidal France. Let us never forget that former French President Nicolas Sarkozy said as recently as 2009 that France was a regicide nation. And so are they all – every single modern European nation – regicide nations. They have murdered Christian Europe and are committed to the extermination of the Christ-bearing race. So it is the excessive violence of the Jihadists that the liberals object to, not the Jihadists goal of eliminating every last remnant of Christian Europe.

The liberals’ second objection to the perpetrators of the Paris massacre has to do with the two camps’ differing views of utopia. The liberals envision a multicultural state in which everyone subscribes to liberal ideals. The Jihadists envision a utopian Moslem state in which everyone adheres to Islamic law. It is the mythical belief of the liberals that the Jihadists are not the real Moslems. In the liberals’ eyes of unreality the Jihadists are the bad Moslems who won’t settle down and enjoy the fruits of multicultural Liberaldom. (2) This is why the conservatives, who are not conservative, and their liberal allies never talk about expelling all Moslems from the European nations. That would run counter to the liberals’ faith that all religions except the Christian religion, and all races except the white race, can live in perfect peace and harmony so long as they make their utopia the complete opposite of Christian Europe.

The liberal stentors run the European nations, so the great lie, which would not have convinced a five-year-old from the 19th century, has become the constant refrain of the liberals: ‘Islam is good, those Jihadists are the small minority… etc.’ What can we expect from the people who have already told us that Mexicans and blacks are sacred?

As a result of the liberals’ ‘good and bad Moslems’ narrative the retired generals want to step up the bombing over there in order to get the bad Moslems. That would be a wonderful strategy, wouldn’t it? The American bombers destroyed Saddam Hussein’s government, which kept ISIS-like groups under control, so let us see if we can further destabilize the region with more bombing. Every solution but the obvious solution is suggested, the obvious solution being that we put an end to multiculturalism and expel all Moslems from the European nations. That is also the solution to the black and Mexican problem as well. But we will never see such a policy from European governments, because all the European governments are Jacobin governments, which cannibalize their own people in the name of democracy and multiculturalism.

If Africa, Europe, and the United States are to be reserved for the black race, if Mexico and the United States are to be reserved for the Aztec race, and if Islam is going to be the religion of the Europeans as well as the Arabs, where will white Christians dwell? It is not inhumane to send the heathens and the colored strangers back to their own lands, it is the only humane, Christian policy that a European can follow. If you don’t defend your own racial hearth fire, you are not a Christian; in point of fact you are worse than the heathens.

The white race is not being driven off the earth because of the Moslems, the Jews, or the colored barbarians. The white race is self-destructing, because liberalism has made white people defenseless in the face of the enemy. If you believe that it is sinful to love your own people, to feel a sentimental attachment to those smaller, familial, and racial units of life that Burke celebrates, you will not fight for your people. You will most probably fight against your own people. The antique Europeans had their problems with the Jews, the Moslems, and colored barbarians, but they managed to preserve their civilization despite having to battle the anti-Christian (and therefore anti-European) forces arrayed against them. And because they preserved their racial hearth fire they were able to turn a Christian Europe over to their heirs. Is our modern Babylon really better than Christian Europe? Is legalized sodomy better than heterosexual love sanctified by marriage? Is a culture that permits miscegenation better than a culture that does not sanction such a blasphemy? Should that charity of honor culture give way to the cruelty of Islam and black voodoo? It is liberalism that must be defeated before white people can reclaim their identity as a people and recapture the spirit to fight all the satanic coalitions of heathens and colored barbarians that our ancestors fought against so successfully.

Liberalism is a reenactment of the fall of man. The liberals have hardened their hearts against the Light of the world and turned to Satan for salvation from the Christian God. Adam and Eve hid from God after their fall from grace. The liberals seek to destroy all remnants of Christian Europe so they will have no nagging reminders of their fall from grace. And white people, even those whites who have completely repudiated Christian Europe, are a reminder of the pre-satanic era of European history. They must die. Such is the credo of the liberal.

Once we grasp the fact that the liberal’s heart is envenomed with a hatred for Christ and His people, we can understand why everything he does seems contrary to reality. We can understand why the liberal governments disarm their white citizens in black and Moslem urban zones of terror. We can understand why white “racism” is deemed a greater threat than colored barbarism, and we can understand why the protection of white people is considered an unholy blasphemy. In the liberal’s hardened heart, Satan is lord, and he sees everything from Satan’s perspective. Satan desires the physical destruction of the white race, but he also desires their spiritual destruction as well. This is why the liberals’ attack on white people always includes an attack on their past, their Christian past. “Despair and die,” Satan tells us through his liberal stentors. “Fight in my name and triumph,” our Lord tells us.

The violation of our race is the moral equivalent of a home invasion. If we don’t hold our racial home as inviolable then we have no soul that we can call our own. We will be mere shadows of men and women, roaming the earth hoping to find that which was lost. The conservatives who will not fight for that which was lost, our racial hearth fire, are not conservative. They are simply appendages of the liberals.

The Paris massacre is a slightly more dramatic event in the continual war against the white race, but it is not an aberration. The massacre is part of the liberals’ fantasy – a white-free world. No liberal or liberal conservative has changed one iota because of the massacre. The liberals still talk about kindness and compassion for the terrorists and the conservatives talk about bombing bad Moslems in order to make the world safe, not for white people, but for democracy. Right after the Paris massacre the Canadian Prime Minister announced his determination to go ahead with his plan to admit thousands of Syrian ‘refugees’ into Canada. Obama, Merkel, and all the church groups remain steadfast as well; they will not abandon their ‘compassion’; they will open up their hearts to their Moslem brethren. (3) And why are the Moslems the liberals’ brethren? Their lifestyle seems completely opposed to the liberals’ lifestyle. But then the blacks’ and the Aztecs’ lifestyles seem completely opposed to liberalism as well, so we are still left with the ‘why?’ Of course, we know why. The liberals have one overriding passion in their heart, one faith – there is one evil and that is whiteness. Whoever opposes the white race is good, no matter what they say or do that seems contrary to liberalism. Because the liberals believe that the Christ-bearing race must be destroyed, even if whites have ceased to carry the Christ Child, one is tempted to offer some practical advice to the white Europeans: “Since you are damned as the Christ-bearing race, why don’t you pick up that burden and actually become, once again, the Christ-bearing race?” But such advice is not really practical. Christ wants great lovers, not utilitarians. We must love Him with an overflowing heart that believeth and hopeth all things. We must become like unto the woman in the Gospels who had “an issue of blood twelve years.” She said, “If I may touch but His clothes I shall be whole.” If we could but touch His clothes, reconnecting with our white, Christian ancestors, we too will be made whole and be more than a match for the pestilence of liberalism and the savage onslaught of the Moslems and the colored barbarians. +


(1) The old home town looks the same
As I step down from the train
And there to meet me is my mama and my papa

Down the road I look and there runs Mary
Hair of gold and the lips like cherries
It’s good to touch the green, green grass of home

Yes, they’ll all come to meet me
Arms reachin’, smiling sweetly
Oh, it’s good to touch the green, green grass of home

The old house is still standing
Though the paint is cracked and dry
And there’s that old oak tree that I used to play on

Yeah, down the lane I’ll walk with my sweet Mary
Hair of gold and the lips like cherries
It’s good to touch the green, green grass of home

Yes, they’ll all come to meet me
Arms reachin’, smiling sweetly
Oh, it’s good to touch the green, green grass of home

Then I awake and look around me
At four gray walls that surround me
And I realize I was only dreamin’

There’s a guard and there’s a sad old padre
Arm and arm we’ll walk at daybreak again
I’ll touch the green, green grass of home

Yes, they’ll all come to see me
In the shade of that old tree
As I lay me in the green, green grass of home

By Burt Bacharach and Hal David

(2) What is never taken into account by liberals or conservatives is the extent to which contact with the Christian Europeans altered the behavior of the followers of the Jewish, Moslem, and Asian faiths. Their people became kinder and gentler without realizing the reason for their alterations. Now that the Europeans have repudiated the European Christianity of their ancestors the pagan faiths are resurfacing in all their naked Christ-hating fury

(3) We should not have to prove that the Syrians entering the United States and Europe are terrorists before we deny them entre, any more than we should feel compelled to let a stranger into our home simply because he has proved he is not a murderer. Our nation, like our home, should only be welcome to our kith and kin.

Posted in Christian Europe, defense of the white race | Tagged

Democracy Must Die So Our People Can Live

Schnorr_von_Carolsfeld_Michael_and_his_angels_fight_the_dragonThe men of Walter Scott’s Europe would not sit idly by talking about economic systems and universal panaceas to end discrimination, while their people were slaughtered right in front of their eyes. They would act as Christian men should act in the face of a barbaric, aggressive invader devoid of the slightest trace of humanity. This insane, horrific, murderous attack on white people will continue unabated and in fact will intensify until white men acknowledge that the bardic Europeans of the past who loved and hated with all their hearts were the true men of the right. They believed in Christ risen and they believed that the first rule of charity, the charity that never faileth, is the love of our own people. At the moment that such love, the love of our own racial hearth, became a matter for rational debate, the white man was lost. Only he who remains faithful, faithful to all the instinctive promptings of a heart that still loves, will be able to help his people survive the dark night of Liberaldom and live to see His light descend, once again, over Europe’s green and pleasant land. – Our Race is Our People

The movie Iron Curtain (1948) was based on the life of Igor Gouzenko. Gouzenko was a Russian national working in the Canadian embassy, who was a spy for the Communists. The movie depicts, in a very moving and convincing manner, Gouzenko’s gradual disenchantment with communism and his efforts to expose the communist cabal working against the Canadian government. At the film’s end, Gouzenko has successfully placed incriminating evidence into the hands of the Canadian officials, which results in the prosecution and conviction of a large number of Canadian communists. The one flaw in the movie was its ending. The narrator tells us that Gouzenko is now living secretly in Canada with the full rights of a Canadian citizen. That’s all well and good. But then the narrator goes on to tell us that Gouzenko’s greatest protection is the democratic way of life. And the movie ends on that very discordant note.

That one discordant note in the movie has become a liberal symphony of death for the white man. Gouzenko was able to defect to Canada because the Canadian people still had a remnant of Christian charity in their souls, not because of the West’s democratic way of life. The West was committed to a slower transformation from Christian Europe to Satanic Europe than the Russian communists, but the Canadian democratic system and the Russian communist system were rooted in the spirit of the French Revolution, regicide and atheism.

I recently saw a show that features the pro-abort, anti-capital punishment “conservative” Bill O’Reilly. O’Reilly was quite rightly railing against Harry Reid for refusing to allow the Senate to vote on “Kate’s Law.” Kate Steinle was the young woman who was murdered by an Aztec cannibal who had come back into the United States for the zillionth time in order to commit murder. His last crime was the murder of Kate Steinle. O’Reilly, to his credit, was incensed with Reid and the Obama administration for resisting a bill that simply called for the enforcement of our immigration laws in order to try and prevent murderous Aztec thugs from coming across the border to kill white women. O’Reilly kept asking, “Why would anyone object to this bill?” The answer is quite obvious to anyone who has not been blinded by the democracy myth. O’Reilly does not see that our “democratic way of life” is a system set up by Satan to destroy the white race. Obama and Reid are simply being true to their creed – “People of color must be protected, and the white race must be destroyed.” Until “conservatives” such as O’Reilly grasp that essential truth about our democratic system, nothing good will ever come of talk show blather from conservatives. I’m not holding my breath in anticipation of a great awakening from the conservative-liberals. The democratic way is their faith.

Reid, like all liberals, lied about his real intentions. He did not say that he opposed “Kate’s Law” because he hated whites and wanted to hasten the Aztecs’ conquest of the United States. Instead he said that the incarceration of Aztec murderers and rapists would be too expensive! I agree; that is why I think we should spare the expense of incarceration by executing the Aztec murderers right at the scene of their murders. One bullet would not be very expensive.

The belief in the democratic way that was supposed to save Gouzenko and is supposed to protect us will not save us from the wickedness and snares of the devil. Democracy is a fiery furnace that the satanically inspired liberals use to exterminate the white race. So long as the democratic way rules the West the fiery furnaces will continue to consume the white race. Every day more whites walk sheep-like into the fiery furnace.

Why are whites unable to read the signs of the times? Is it not crystal clear, particularly after the Angela Merkel declaration of war, that the democratic leaders of the West have launched their final assault on the white race? Does anyone think that the Merkels and Reids of the West will be defeated through the democratic process? War is not something a Christian European longs for. But a war in defense of home, race, and faith is certainly superior to a cowardly surrender to satanic liberals, heathens, and colored barbarians. Even if you prefer a surrender to the enemy in order to save your life, that will not be permitted. The forces of hell – the liberals, the Jews, the Moslems, the organized Christian atheists, and the colored barbarians – are all determined to kill the whites down to the last man.

The great obstacle preventing white self-defense is the white man’s lack of a sentimental attachment to his people. That was the main reason for the success of the French Revolution, and that is the main reason the white race faces extinction. The liberals in church and state, especially the liberals in the organized churches, preached a cosmic love of a generic mankind which was supposed to be superior to the love men used to have for hearth and race. “To be attached to the subdivision, to love the little platoon we belong to in society, is the first principle (the germ as it were) of public affections. It is the first link in the series by which we proceed towards a love to our country, and to mankind.” (Burke) The result of a cosmic love of mankind is a hatred of particular human beings. And what race of people has demonstrated a most particular and distinct humanity? It was the people who bound themselves to our Common Hope. What have the Europeans done to warrant the hatred of the liberal apostates and the entire non-European world? They loved much – “If the world hate you, ye know that it hated me before it hated you.”

The liberals could not live with Einstein’s cosmic faith. They needed a people, so they turned to the heathens and the colored barbarians whose collective face bears the imprint of Satan. The unspeakable, merciless cruelty of the Moslem, the colored barbarian, and the technological liberal is the result of their intense hatred of Christ whom they strike back at through His people. We can’t coexist with such an unholy coalition. They seek our blood and will always seek our blood until the end of time. Are such monsters of inhumanity to be stopped by an appeal to our democratic way? No, it is to the Hope of the hopeless that we must apply for aid. If the Europeans walk away from democracy and its attendant ecclesiastical systems they will find themselves in tremendous peril, but they will also discover that they have the spiritual force to fight the satanic forces of Islam, liberalism, and colored barbarism that once made them feel hopelessly overwhelmed.(1)

The problem with the “democratic way” as a source of salvation is that the democratic way celebrates the statistical aggregate. And a statistical aggregate has no charity. It’s easy to kill statistics, whether they are the sick, the infirm, the elderly, the babies in the womb, or the white race. The ethos of the colored hordes, to overwhelm by numbers, dovetails with the liberals’ ethos of the statistical aggregate. “Let’s count the numbers; we now have more colored barbarians and Moslems in Europe, so let’s vote for the extermination of the white race.” Will the white grazers then go willingly into the furnace? They will if they still retain their belief in the democratic way. What the white everyman always fails to grasp is the fact that liberals have left Christian Europe and its attendant ethos behind. The liberals have become metaphysicians, and there is nothing “more hard than the heart of a thoroughbred metaphysician. It comes nearer to the cold malignity of a wicked spirit than to the frailty and passion of a man. It is like that of the principle of evil himself, incorporeal, pure, unmixed, dephlegmated, defecated evil.” To place one’s hopes in the liberals and the democratic way is to seek redemption from the devil.

When our Lord left this earth He promised to send us a Comforter: “But because I have said these things unto you, sorrow hath filled your heart. Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.” Can there be any doubt, when we look at the totality of our people’s history, their Christian history, that our Lord kept His promise? He did send us a comforter. But what if we forsake that comforter, because he did not bring us a Kingdom of God on earth? What if he just enabled human hearts to know and love the Divine Heart? Isn’t that worth all the kingdoms of this world? Europeans have a great battle on their hands. If we go into that battle with the platitudes of democracy – “Have mercy on us because we are not racist, because we too are multicultural” — we will lose. If we go into the battle with the love of our people and our God, we will win. And by ‘win’ I do not mean it is written that our armies will triumph. But every battle fought in His name is a preparation for the final battle, in which Christ and those who call on Him by name will triumph. The farther we get away from the European hearth fire the farther we get away from that essential truth. Stay close to that hearth fire and all will be well. +


(1) Nothing will be done in Paris, London, or any other white European city to prevent the type of massacre that just took place in Paris. The people slain in Paris were sacrificed on the altars of multiculturalism and democracy. The blood red tide can only be halted by people committed to one race and one faith. The French President called the Paris massacre an act of war. Indeed it is. Then, Mr. President, act like you are in a war. Remove every single Moslem from France. The murderers are not bad Moslems, they are the ‘good’ Moslems; they practice their faith. I recently read of a small college that called their sport team “The Crusaders.” The President of the college decided it was time to get rid of such a violent image; it was not multi-cultural.

Enough said? If you jettison your white Christian past, the heathens will jettison you.

Posted in democracy, Europe as the Christ-bearer, White genocide | Tagged

More Precious Than Gold

Dore_The_AscensionFor where your treasure is, there will your heart be also. – Matthew 6: 21


I want to continue with John Sharp Williams’ mediation on sentiment, because it lies at the heart of the white man’s dilemma. The white grazers are divided men: They watch football games, shoot deer, and support the troops. They are not racists, yet they have a vague feeling that something is not right on the racial front. They have been told by the liberals in church and state that black violence is the result of white prejudice. “If whites were kinder, blacks wouldn’t have to be so violent,” is the liberal party line, which the grazer hears ad nauseam and does in part believe. But he only believes in part; hence there is a certain uneasiness in his soul that hinders his enjoyment of the football games.

Does a grazer ever wonder about the liberal inconsistencies? Does he ever ask himself, late at night before he passes from conscious to the unconsciousness of death’s counterfeit, why the liberals are so obsessed with date rape by white males that they now have issued legal documents that must be signed by both parties at each stage of intimacy, yet they are completely unconcerned about the violent rape of white women by Moslems and black savages?

And what about the discrepancies between ‘black lives matter’ and ‘white lives matter’? Does the grazer ever wonder why black lives, even the lives of murderous black thugs, are of vital importance, while white lives, even if the lives taken are innocent ones, do not matter? I hope the grazer is at least troubled by such things. But I really can’t be certain about the grazer, because he is so unsure of where his treasure lies. His heart is divided between liberalism and the un-liberalism of old Europe, so he grazes in the pastures of oblivion.

Ahab was able to over man the soul of Starbuck, his first mate, because Ahab had an overriding passion that ruled his heart: he wanted to kill the white whale. Starbuck, the grazer, had no overriding passion, so he was swept away by Ahab’s passion. In the end the grazers will support the liberals, because they, like Starbuck, cannot match the liberals’ passion, which is their hatred of the Christ-bearing race and their love of the savages of color.

What appears to be a death wish, the liberals’ hatred of the white and their love of the colored stranger, is really a liberal life-wish. A man cannot live by bread alone; he must have a faith. The liberals’ faith will destroy them, just as the demons’ hatred of Christ made them go over the cliff, but the liberals haven’t the moral vision to see that. All they see are colored gods who will rid them of the dreaded one, Jesus of Nazareth. The first apostles said to Christ, when He asked them if they would leave Him: “Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life.” The liberal is too smart to be fooled by that gambit. He feels that he has a place to go: he will go to the new Babylon where he can worship the colored noble savage, free of the burden of the God-Man.

I’ve seen, on alternative news sites, that there is some resistance to the Moslem invasion of Europe in England, Hungary, and Poland, and I trust there are pockets of resistance in every European country. Any resistance to any part of the liberal agenda is certainly to the good. But if the resistance is to be sustainable, it must be anti-democratic; it must take its inspiration from the chivalric ideals of the antique Europeans. Burke was right when he saw that the loss of chivalric spirit was the main reason for the success of French Revolution. And all the subsequent French Revolutions throughout Europe have succeeded, because “…the age of chivalry is gone. That of sophisters, economists, and calculators, has succeeded…”

If some stirring of the old chivalry has entered the hearts of white European males as a result of this recent Moslem invasion, that is all to the good. It will be an enduring good when white men return to their ancient faith, eschewing the anti-white, anti-Christian faith of the clergy, and fight in the name of Christian Europe. It is something we can work for and hope for.

When you voice your lack of faith in the democratic process, conservatives and right-wingers call you a ‘defeatist’ who believes there is no hope. Such people simply do not understand the older chivalric ethos of the antique European. I have absolute faith that nothing can defeat Europeans who follow the code of chivalry – the chivalry of Prince Phillip in the Cinderella story and the chivalry of the hero in Thomas Nelson Page’s short story called “The Goth”:

On the instant stood revealed, as though he had blown down the ages, a pure Goth, unchanged in any essential since his fathers had left their forests and through all obstacles, even through ranks of Roman legionaries, sword in hand had hewn their way straight to the goal of their desires. He was a Goth in all his appetites and habits, a Goth unchanged, unfettered. True to his instincts, true to his traditions, fearing nothing, loving only his own, loving and hating, with all his heart – a Goth.

It is no pagan Goth that Page celebrates; he speaks of the Christian Goth who has not become enslaved to the Caiaphases in Christian garb that believe a Christian should kill his instinct to defend his racial hearth fire and become a universalist Christian who loves all mankind with a lukewarm ‘niceness.’ There is no real devil in modern clerical Christianity; Satan is only a wayward child who can be reformed by a few visits to the shrink. And there is no Christ, the Lord; He is now merely a captain on the Love Boat. The real gods are the noble savages of color, because they are the stuff that the liberals’ dreams are made on.

Burke’s assertion, “I hate abstractions,” was the equivalent of a declaration of war against the Jacobins in church and state. The Jacobins used abstractions to kill. The murder of a Christian King and Queen was called, ‘liberty, equality, and fraternity,’ and the defacing of the image of God in man was called, ‘moving mankind onward.’ The Muslimization of the nations of Europe along with the negroization of those same nations has been thrust upon us in the name of multi-culturalism, but what does that abstraction really mean? (1) It means the rape of white women and the torture and murder of white children, white women, and white men. No matter how fancy the clerical dress-up parties are, no matter how many football games our government provides, can a European man with one tiny ounce of chivalry left in his blood do anything else but cry, “Havoc!” and descend upon the liberals and their colored allies with a determination to fight to the knife against the devilish destroyers of our racial hearth fire, where our loved ones and the one, true God reside?

If we view the pagan European hero-gods as ends in themselves, as celebrations of the greatness of white genes, we miss the point of preserving those hero-gods. They are part of the Christian story. The hero-gods were preparing a place in their people’s hearts for the one true hero God. Prometheus stole fire from the gods in order to give it to man. For his charity, he was punished by being tied to a rock while birds of prey pecked at his liver. You can look on that story as proof that the crucifixion story is just a genre story repeated over and over again in the Jungian oversoul of mankind, or you can see that story as an indication that our Lord plants the means to know Him in all valiant hearts. Christ is the real Prometheus, but He did not have to steal fire from the gods, because He was God, the God who brought the fire of His divine charity to man.

The pagan hero-gods, like the fairy tale characters in the Grimms’ fairy tales (see The Inhumanity of Utopian Europe) are dependent on the historical Jesus for their continued existence. If Christ is no longer embodied in a people as the one true God, He becomes an abstraction, a philosophical concept that can be used according to the whims of the ahistorical Christian atheists. There is no chivalry in Christian atheism, because the Christ who sets hearts aflame is not present in systems, and where there is no Christ, there is no chivalry, and Satanism in all its many guises reigns supreme.

In modern circles you label yourself an idiot if you talk about the devil as anything other than a Halloween bogeyman. But he is real, just as our Divine Savior is real. The devil wants the ‘intelligent’ men and women of the West to regard him and Christ as myths. That way he can work his will upon the intelligent ones who haven’t the spiritual wherewithal to call on Christ to aid them against the wickedness and snares of a devil they don’t believe in. But if we look at the world the liberals have built we can see Satan’s imprint on every aspect of it. In the new movie about Sleeping Beauty, put out by the anti-Disney, Disney Studios, Malificent is now the heroine (see We Labor and Weep). The satanic faiths and the anti-European people of color are welcome in Europe while the Christian Europeans are seen as pariahs to be pushed off the earth. And to add a satanic spice to the New Babylon, the sodomites have been given free rein. The liberals, while denying the reality of Satan, have built a kingdom of Satan on earth. They must put down any uprising of the real Europeans, the men and women with hearts of flesh, who are connected, through their people, to Jesus Christ. The liberals will allow organized, intellectual Christianity to stay around as part of Babylon, because the church men support liberalism, but there must be no chivalry in the ranks of the European people. That would indicate the resurgence of the true faith in the hearts of the European people, which would bring about the destruction of Liberaldom. When the real Christ enters human hearts, miracles of chivalry occur. That is the nightmare of the liberal. We should want nothing better than to be the liberals’ worst nightmare. +


(1) The negroization of a nation goes hand-in-hand with the Muslimization of a nation, because the pagan ethos of Islam appeals to the negro, whereas the poetic of Christianity does not appeal to the negro.

Posted in black faith, restoration of European civilization | Tagged

A Sentimental Attachment

Smith_Heidi_and_PeterAnd yet, my friends, there are people who say that all this sort of talk is “sentiment;” that what we want to do is to “come down to cotton and corn and pork;” buying and selling, negotiating your bank exchange; that everything else is “sentiment,” and that sentiment is “rot.” Let it be a point with you, young boys and girls, to remember that the only thing in this world which is not “rot” is sentiment. That thing is rot which can last a man only a lifetime—which rusts and corrupts and decays—that thing, in other words, which can rot. Your cotton and produce are “rot;” your bank exchange is “rot;” your talk about mere material prosperity, as the chief aim and object and existence of man, is “rot,” because when you come to lie down and die and be placed within your narrow habitation, six or seven feet by three or four, not one of these things, nor things gained in this way, can you carry with you, nor present as a part of yourself at the chancel of God.

Issues of the War Discussed by John Sharp Williams


This brings us to the necessity of concluding that the upholders of mere dialectic, whether they appear in this modern form or in another, are among the most subversive enemies of society and culture. They are attacking an ultimate source of cohesion in the interest of a doctrine which can issue only in nullity. It is no service to man to impugn his feeling about the world qua feeling. Feeling is the source of that healthful tension between man and what is – both objectively and subjectively. If man could be brought to believe that all feeling about the world is wrong, there would be nothing for him but collapse.

Visions of Order by Richard Weaver

he other day I mentioned Heidi to a mid-twenties shop clerk and got a disturbingly blank stare. The young woman thought I was calling her a prostitute. I tried to explain that Heidi was a Swiss mountain girl in a story by Johanna Spyri. Still no light. This type of incident has happened much too often to me in recent years. It’s not as if someone has never heard of Marcel Proust or Samuel Becket. In addition to Heidi, I’ve gotten blank stares when I’ve mentioned Treasure Island, William Tell, Roland, Paul Bunyan – the list is a long one. Now, you might say, “So what if our young people have never heard of the classic stories of the European people, they won’t die without reading or hearing the stories.” I would disagree. Ignorance of one particular classic story from the European past will not kill a person, but what that ignorance represents, a total disconnect from the antique Europeans, will kill; it will kill the soul.

Our young people know computers by age five, they know everything about the biological facts of life by age seven, yet they know nothing of the people who built a civilization based on their sentimental attachment to Jesus Christ. And I use the word ‘sentimental’ without shame. We all, even those who claim to be devoid of sentiments, get sentimental about something. The liberal waxes sentimental over the negro, the Marxist gets sentimental about ‘the people’ (in the abstract, of course), and so it goes. I get sentimental over the marriage between Christ and the European people – Tom Brown’s defense of little Arthur, Pip’s loyalty to Magwitch, and Havelock’s relief of Lucknow make me weep. If you spit on such sentiment, you are my enemy.

It was Burke, the indefatigable Christian warrior, who sounded the alarm and rode, alone and unafraid, to the sound of the revolutionary guns. Burke saw that the French Revolution was not, as terrible as that war was, merely a French version of England’s War of the Roses. It was not a bloody quarrel between rival claimants for the throne. The French Revolution marked a divorce from Christ, from that one great sentimental attachment which was the lifeblood of the European people, the attachment upon which European civilization was built. It was not enough to depose Robespierre, Burke maintained; that was merely scotching the Jacobin snake; the Jacobin snake had to be destroyed. But the snake was not destroyed. It resurfaced again in the democratic Revolutions of 1848 and in the Northern rebellion against the Christian south, a war that marked the last defense of the sentimental attachment, which made the European people a people unlike all other people. The European people left Christ and hid in the belly of the liberal leviathan.

The conservatives of the 20th century did not choose to do battle with the liberal leviathan. Instead they tried to make life more comfortable inside the belly of the leviathan. That is not following in the train of the antique Europeans; it is following in the satanic train of the liberals. A true man of Europe, a man with a sentimental attachment to his people and our common hope, must fight his way out of the belly of the leviathan and then turn and attack the leviathan.

What happened to the conservatives was that they thought a mere Gnostic connection to a Christian system could replace a sentimental attachment to Christ and the European people. There is a world of difference between defending our “Judaic, Greco-Roman, Christian heritage” and defending Him who is “our common hope.” Even those conservatives who quoted Burke favorably failed to see that it was his passionate love of his people and his God that guided his mind and pen:

But vehement passion does not always indicate an infirm judgment. It often accompanies, and actuates, and is even auxiliary to a powerful understanding; and when they both conspire and act harmoniously, their force is great to destroy disorder within, and to repel injury from abroad. If ever there was a time that calls on us for no vulgar conception of things, and for exertions in no vulgar strain, it is the awful hour that Providence has now appointed to this nation. – Letters on a Regicide Peace

It is very significant that Burke’s 20th century counterpart, a man who placed his mind at the service of his heart and defended sentimental, European Christianity while denouncing in the strongest terms the New Age intellectual Christianity, is absent from all the survey books of modern conservatism. Anthony Jacob, the last great European, was too European, too Christian, to fit into the liberal-conservative system. His vision was one with Burke’s vision – they saw the European people as the Christ-bearers who must maintain their distinctiveness as a people if they, and their faith, were to survive.

What Europeans such as Edmund Burke, John Sharp Williams, and Anthony Jacob perceived was that it was the Europeans’ sentimental attachment to Christ that needed to be conserved, not our ‘democratic system’ or some ecclesiastical system. I saw the satanic temptation close-up in the ‘systems analysis’ Catholic traditionalist movement. Having fought free of the leviathan’s belly, I found myself in the open seas. Any old port in the storm can lead one to the wrong port. Once aboard the traditionalist ship, I was ushered into a room marked, “For Sentimentalists.” There was a chute in the room (like in the board game Chutes and Ladders), which put me right back into the sea, with the leviathan bearing down on me. Eschewing all the other ecclesiastical ships, I found a safe harbor in that tiny island where Alexander Smollet, that European sentimentalist, has raised the flag of Christian Europe in defiance of the forces of Babylon that have taken the form of a monstrous leviathan.

Intellectual conservatism in church or state does not ‘conserve’; it is part of the forward movement, a movement toward hell, of Jacobinism. The more liberal branches of organized Christianity, which are now part of organized Jewry, go whoring after the black Messiah in order to feel attached to something human. And the traditionalist branches of organized Christian-Jewry have embraced the practical materialism of the Grand Inquisitor: “Of what use is the human element when we have a system?” But does St. Paul give us a ‘system’? Do the Gospels point us to a ‘system’ or to a savior, who is Christ the Lord? That deeply held sentiment, the heartfelt conviction that, “Truly this man was the Son of God,” was what moved our ancestors to fight the forces of ruin and death in order to build Christian Europe. It is those ancestors we must look to for succor, and it is to their faith that we must come if we are going to rebuild Christian Europe.

It is definitely a rebuilding that needs to occur, a spiritual rebuilding. Most of the actual buildings of old Europe still stand, but they no longer house Christian Europeans. In the old dwellings reside the new Babylonians, an assortment of white apostates, Muslims, and colored barbarians. That does not strike the modern Europeans as something tragic. Tony Blair’s statement that, “We must be multi-cultural,” has become the ruling ethos of every European nation. But neither the Jews, the Muslims, nor the colored barbarians believe in multiculturalism. They believe in conquest and the imposition of their culture on people who haven’t enough faith in their God or their people to fight for them. We are back with Peter. By denying incarnational Europe we have denied, like Peter, our Lord. “Lovest thou me?” Christ asks. And we reply, “Lord, thou knowest that we love thee.” “Then,” He tells us, “Rebuild Christian Europe.”

The first apostles had one great advantage over us: They saw Christ face to face. Is it possible to believe with their intensity, without that material confirmation of Christ’s divinity? Christ seemed to think that it was, because He mildly rebuked Thomas for His lack of faith: “Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou has believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.” Therein lies the profound miracle of Christian Europe. Our people believed without seeing the material Christ! They saw Him feelingly, and made Him, by virtue of a sympathetic communion of hearts – the divine Heart with human hearts – the center of their civilization. Christian Europe revealed, at its poetic core, the face of Jesus Christ. All attempts to scientize the European Christ, to make Him accessible to human beings by way of the syllogism or the science lab, had the end result of making Christ inaccessible to the human heart. The church men and their modern neophytes go whoring after the heathen gods of color, because they have nothing to hold onto “if but for sympathy.” They have no sympathy with anything human, because they walk in the valley of the shadow of abstractions in which the devil fills their minds with dreams of an earthly paradise presided over by the devil gods of color. There is no mystery, no depth, in such a world. The only real mystery is God’s grace and the human heart. Great miracles have already occurred in old Europe, because of that marriage. Isn’t it more than possible, isn’t it quite probable, that miracles will occur again once the Europeans rely on God’s grace working in human hearts instead of relying on human minds with pygmy souls trying to create their Jacobin version of heaven on earth? The former response to existence resulted in Christian Europe; the latter response has brought us Babylonian Europe.

The liberals’ ‘ascent’ has been a descent. If we retrace our steps and go through the provincial European door we will find ourselves back on the time-worn and time-honored path of our people, the Christ-bearers. And we shall stay with them till the end of time, because of our sentimental attachment to those people of our own hearth fire and to the God of that simple European hearth fire. +

Posted in antique Christianity, Europeans and Christ | Tagged

Breaking Free of the Pagan Wheel of Fire

Browne_King-Lear_ActIV-Scene7You do me wrong to take me out o’ th’ grave
Thou art a soul in bliss; but I am bound
Upon a wheel of fire, that mine own tears
Do scald like molten lead.

-King Lear


And the angel answered and said unto the women, Fear not ye: for I know that ye seek Jesus, which was crucified. He is not here: for he is risen, as he said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay. And go quickly, and tell his disciples that he is risen from the dead; and, behold, he goeth before you into Galilee; there shall ye see him: lo, I have told you. And they departed quickly from the sepulchre with fear and great joy; and did run to bring his disciples word.

-Matthew 28: 5-8

When I was in my early twenties, abortion was legalized in the United States, and in reaction to the liberals’ technological barbarism a number of ‘pro-life’ groups sprung up. I belonged to several pro-life groups until we parted ways over the proper way to defend the unborn. I thought, considering what abortion was, that the ‘war against abortion’ should entail all that the word war implied. Nathan Bedford Forrest put it quite well: “War means fighting, and fighting means killing.” There was a lack of proportionality, which has increased over the years, between what the pro-lifers said abortion was – the murder of an innocent child – and what they proposed to do about abortion – write letters to their congressmen and educate liberals. Congress turned a deaf ear to anti-abortion protesters, and the liberals refused to be educated, because legalized abortion was not the result of a misunderstanding – the liberals knew they were sanctioning mass murder. What was needed were Christian warriors who were willing to do unto abortion doctors and liberals according to what the abortion doctors and liberals were doing unto babies. That never happened. What did happen was what always happens when the lukewarm try to fight a satanically-inspired enemy with empty platitudes instead of hearts of fire. The pro-lifers were absorbed by the liberals and became the greatest opponents of anti-abortion violence. Being polite to liberals so that they would not be able to label pro-lifers as ‘violent’ and ‘undemocratic’ was more important to pro-lifers than the lives of unborn babies. Thus legalized abortion became a sacred rite, and the pro-lifers assuaged their consciences by protesting against the sale of the murdered babies’ body parts. This is supposed to be a much more practical and democratic means of ‘fighting’ abortion. Really? Wouldn’t it be more ‘practical’ to stop the abortions by killing the abortionists before the babies were murdered rather than trying to reprimand the body parts’ salesmen after the fact? The pro-life movement was dead from its inception, because pro-lifers appealed to ‘our democratic tradition of equal rights for all,’ in order to put an end to legalized abortion. But it was our democratic tradition of equality, fraternity, and liberty that brought legalized abortion upon us. Why should we seek redemption from the devil? The pro-lifers condemned their Christian European past (they regularly equated abortion with Southern slavery in order to curry favor with the liberals), and by condemning their past they thought the liberals would end abortion, based on a secularized myth of equal rights. How little the pro-lifers understood the Jacobin nature of American democracy. ‘Some are always more equal than others.’

The white nationalist movement, to the extent that it is a movement, has followed in the path of the pro-lifers. The white nationalists do not look to the European people’s Christian past for the strength to fight the liberals and the barbarians of color. Instead they condemn the Christian Europeans – some have even gone so far as to condemn the white South Africans for practicing apartheid – and look to a new pagan, white Übermensch, who will play a leading role in the New World Order. But once you choose to fight secularized Jacobins with the atheistic assumptions and democratic platitudes of those same Jacobins, you will be absorbed by the Jacobins and destroyed by them.
There is no strength, no blood, in our Nordic, Greco-Roman heritage if we see that heritage as an end in and of itself. Those pagan civilizations only have significance because in the end the best of the pagans bent their knees to Christ. Europeans do not have a Nordic, Greco-Roman heritage, they have only one heritage, just as there is only one God. Christ became the Europeans’ hero God, the one true God to whom all the heroes of the Norsemen, the Greeks, and the Romans gave way. The philosophers of Greece and Rome never did give way to Christ, and they have always constituted a fifth column in the ranks of the Christian Europeans.

The result of Hardy’s management was that Tom made a clean breast of it, telling everything, down to his night at the ragged school, and what an effect his chance opening of the Apology had had on him. Here for the first time Hardy came in with his usual dry, keen voice, “You needn’t have gone so far back as Plato for that lesson.”

“I don’t understand,” said Tom.

“Well, there’s something about an indwelling spirit which guideth every man, in St. Paul, isn’t there?”

“Yes, a great deal,” Tom answered, after a pause; “but it isn’t the same thing.”

“Why not the same thing?”

“Oh, surely, you must feel it. It would be almost blasphemy in us now to talk as St. Paul talked. It is much easier to face the notion, or the fact, of a demon or spirit such as Socrates felt to be in him, than to face what St. Paul seems to be meaning.”

“Yes, much easier. The only question is whether we will be heathen or not.”

“How do you mean?” said Tom.

“Why, a spirit was speaking to Socrates, and guiding him. He obeyed the guidance, but knew not whence it came. A spirit is striving with us too, and trying to guide us–we feel that just as much as he did. Do we know what spirit it is? Whence it comes? Will we obey it? If we can’t name it–we are in no better position than he–in fact, heathens.”  –
Tom Brown at Oxford

The pagan wheel has come full circle. Platonic Gnosticism serves as the intellectual backdrop, and paganism, devoid of faith, serves as the white nationalists’ flag. Their quarrel with the Jacobin left is an internecine quarrel that can only result in the absorption and then the destruction of the white nationalist movement at the hands of the Jacobin left.

St.Paul speaks to us still: he speaks of a better way, he speaks of the true faith, the only faith for men of blood, the faith in the God-man who knows not Kismet, who knows not demographics: He knows only charity, and He comes to us only through charity. The bards of Christian Europe confirm the Biblical truth: God has written the European people into His story. If we stay true to that story, we will not be defeated by “the terror by night; nor for the arrow that flieth by day; Nor for the pestilence that walketh in darkness; nor for the destruction that wasteth at noonday.”

Lear feels that he is bound upon a wheel of fire, that his “own tears do scald like molten lead.” It is Cordelia’s charity that lessens Lear’s pain on that existential wheel of fire, and it is Christ’s divine charity that lessens our pain on that same wheel of fire, and gives us hope that the endless circular wheel of paganism, the wheel of fire, can be turned into a straight path that leads to His Father’s house. Our people did not ‘will’ a God of their own making into existence by virtue of their minds. They found their creator because they had hearts of flesh, willing to receive Him. We are the Christ-bearing people, not the God-creating people. Pride of race, pride of intellect belong to the heathens of color and the philosophers, theologians, and scientists – the fifth column. The Christ-bearing European has the love of race, a mind subordinate to His mind, and a heart in communion with His heart. This was our ancestors’ faith, and it is the type of faith that makes a man stand athwart the pass and cry ‘halt’ to the heathen invasion of Europe.

I first came across the blasphemy that the white man ‘created’ his own God in an article by Kevin Strom. Since that time I have seen it repeated countless times in articles by the intellectual brain trust of the new white nationalists. This won’t do. If a man doesn’t believe in Christ, he will serve Satan. Even though the non-believer doesn’t believe in Satan, the archangel still exists, and he will use the Christian apostate to serve his purposes. He will come to him in one of his many disguises. He comes to the liberal church men in the form of the black messiah; he comes to the white nationalists in the form of a disembodied white intellect who plays at demographics, democracy, and science. The battle against the colored hordes has not yet begun, because the true European, the Christian European, has yet to enter the lists. When he does, he will draw others to him, just as Christ does, and the counterrevolution will begin.

Nothing better illustrates the lack of an integral Christian European influence in the modern world than the perpetual apologies that are on the lips of every white European. The apologies are cheap, vicious apologies, because they are not personal apologies. They are apologies for dead white males who stand before the liberal docket accused of racism and sexism. And they stand before the white nationalist tribunal accused of idiocy and a lack of scientific acumen. (They actually believed that Christ rose from the dead on the third day!) But it is God Himself whom the liberals and the neo-pagans have placed in the dock when they continually apologize for the white Christians of old Europe, because our people’s vision of God was true. If they stand condemned, then so does God. Where will the moderns go, to whom will they turn now that they have placed the Christian God in the dock and found Him wanting? We have seen where they will go. They have returned to the pagan wheel of fire. And to whom? Their saviors are legion – the black messiah, the yellow gods, the white, disembodied intellect – the gods who are legion are as infinite as the sands of the desert. The apology culture of the new Europeans leaves us in a vast empty universe that is devoid of all faith, honor, and love.

Portia begs Shylock to be merciful, but he will have his pound of flesh:

Why, this bond is forfeit!
And lawfully by this the Jew may claim
A pound of flesh to be by him cut off
Nearest the merchant’s heart.—Be merciful.
Take thrice thy money. Bid me tear the bond.

When it is paid according to the tenor.
It doth appear you are a worthy judge.
You know the law. Your exposition
Hath been most sound. I charge you by the law,
Whereof you are a well-deserving pillar,
Proceed to judgment. By my soul I swear
There is no power in the tongue of man
To alter me. I stay here on my bond.

Therein lies the tragedy of the post-Christian European. He has become like unto the unrepentant Jew: he will have his pound of flesh from the ancient Europeans, because they are responsible for every evil under the sun. But from whom is the modern European really demanding a pound of flesh? Who stands behind the antique Europeans? It is the God who said, “I will have mercy, and not sacrifice.” +

Posted in Charity, Christ the Hero, Christian Europe | Tagged ,

When Babylon Is Dust

Dore_TheNewJerusalem“Why!” exclaimed Peter. “It’s England. And that’s the house itself—Professor Kirk’s old home in the country where all our adventures began!”

“I thought that house had been destroyed,” said Edmund.

“So it was,” said the Faun. “But you are now looking at the England within England, the real England just as this is the real Narnia. And in that inner England no good thing is destroyed.”

The Last Battle by C. S. Lewis

And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.

Revelations 21:2

In her book Familiar London, Rose Barton quotes Samuel Johnson: “’He who is tired of London is tired of existence.’” She goes on to say why she agrees with Johnson: “I never leave London without a pang. I never come back to it without realizing afresh its beauty and its turmoil and its rush. I love the Town.”

I understand Rose Barton’s sentiments completely, because I share them. In fact, I feel that way about all of Europe: I love her. It’s not a question of which do I love more – my family or Europe. I love my family in and through Europe; I can’t separate the two loves. A nation, like a man, has a soul. Millions upon millions of individual men and women lived and died in that nation and left their spiritual mark, for good or ill, upon their nation. At the mystical core of Europe, after thousands of years of turmoil and strife, is Jesus Christ, true God and true man. That is why I can’t separate my love of Europe from the love of my family. We cannot live outside His love. If our nation has Christ at its mystical center, and all European nations do have Christ at their mystical core, we cannot leave our nation, because all that we love – our God and our kith and kin – are there.

Europeans do not feel any great desire to defend themselves against the Muslim and colored hordes, because they no longer love the mystical core of their nation. They don’t see their people and their God as one incorporate union. With every word they utter, our churchmen proclaim their opposition to European pietas. The churchmen hate Christ. Let us never lose sight of that fact. As Burke said of the French Jacobins, so it is with the modern churchmen. They can’t strike out at God directly, so they seek to destroy His image in man. This is why Muslims, negroes, Chinamen, etc., are all welcome in the European nations, but white people are not welcome. He is at the mystical core of the European people, and He is hated by the European liberals in church and state.

The land mass called Europe is nothing more than a land mass without the white race. When I first walked through a fog on a London street, I was excited because it was a London fog, not because I loved fog in and of itself. It was the same when I traveled through the Scottish Highlands. The scenery was quite beautiful, but that was not what made the trek akin to a pilgrimage for me. It was because of Walter Scott, the great Christian poet, that I saw Scotland as sacred ground. The same type of scenery in a heathen nation would have no effect on me. How could it be otherwise? Our race is part and parcel of our soul. When we place our racial imprint on a land mass, we infuse our spirit into that land mass, and it becomes a nation. For centuries the nations of Europe were Christian, “agreeing in the fundamental parts, varying a little in the ceremonies and in the subordinate doctrines,” but Christian at their mystical core. And they were Christian because the European people took Christ into their hearts; they were not Christian nations because of any religious system. Just as we must grasp the fact that Jacob Marley was really dead before anything wonderful can come from A Christmas Carol, so must we grasp the fact that to systematize God is to kill Him, before we can step away from the systems and find the Christ of old Europe. Caiaphas would not acknowledge the living God because he had already created a pagan system that excluded God. So he ordered the death of the living God. All subsequent religious systematizers have imitated Caiaphas and ordered the death of the living God so that their religious system could survive and flourish. Faith does not reside in the organized churches, it resides in the Christian folk, who are, as Fitzhugh maintained, the only truly infallible source of the Christian revelation. It is less systematic and much messier to rely on human hearts infused with the love of His divinely human heart, but what choice do we have? The systems have failed; isn’t it time that we reject the satanically inspired Grand Inquisitors who told us the truth in honest trifles, while lying to us in deepest consequence about the one great thing?

The invasion of Europe and her European satellites is proceeding at an ever-increasing and deadly rate at present, because of the so-called sanctuary movement of the Muslims from Syria to the various European nations. This current invasion of Europe was made possible by the fact that the European people have lost contact with their mystical core. Their great cathedrals, their art museums, and their monuments are no longer symbols of a living history. They are lifeless relics of a people that once lived in the hand of the living God. Without their mystical core, the Europeans had already surrendered, long before the actual invasion, to the Muslims and the colored savages. A Shakespearean theater in Britain only has value to Christian Europeans. Why should modern, Christ-hating Europeans care if Muslims destroy that theater and replace it with a mosque? They don’t care; in fact, the liberal Stentors seem to delight in the destruction of everything that reminds them of Christian Europe. “Let all that we inherited from our Christian ancestors dissolve and be replaced by Babylon,” is the great desire of the Christ-hating elite of the European world.

Against the European liberals and the Babylonian hordes stand the Europeans who still cling to the mystical core of their people, for “there reigns love and all love’s loving parts.” We should fight for every inch of Christian Europe. We should fight until every last Muslim and colored savage has been driven from Europe. But even if the liberals and the Babylonians take over the land mass that we once called Europe they still will not have conquered sacred Europe. That Europe is a spiritual entity that will always exist so long as two or three Europeans are gathered together in His name. It is vital that we hold on to that essential truth of existence – there is a spirit above the pagan dust of this world. If we stay at the mystical center of Europe, we will know the name of that spirit and we will champion His cause against all the world. I always liken the Christian Europeans’ plight in the modern world to that of Alexander Smollet’s plight when he and a few followers are surrounded by superior numbers of pirates on a tropical island far away from their native England:

Now you’ll hear me. If you’ll come up one by one, unarmed, I’ll engage to clap you all in irons and take you home to a fair trial in England. If you won’t, my name is Alexander Smollett, I’ve flown my sovereign’s colours, and I’ll see you all to Davey Jones.

We no longer have a Christian nation to which we can take prisoners, should we take any prisoners in this war against principalities and powers. In point of fact, should we return with Babylonian prisoners we would be locked up and executed for the sin of racism, because Europe has become the defender of Babylon. But Alexander Smollett is still our exemplar. It is his spirit of uncompromising defiance against the forces of Babylon that we must maintain. Smollett has the wise blood of a European. He cares nothing for numbers when he fights for Christian Europe, because he knows he does not stand alone, he stands with the God who is at the mystical center of Europe. There is no dichotomy between the child in the manger and the Alpha and the Omega. He is the same man. He is the hero that appears in thousands of European story books, who steps forth when all seems lost, to comfort the mourner and to fight for that charity of honor. The hero is the child in the manger, and He is the Alpha and Omega – He is our Lord and our kinsman, Jesus Christ.

For many years I avoided reading the book of Revelation, because its devotees seemed to be deranged and something apart from traditional Christianity. But when it came time to home school my children, I wanted to acquaint them with the entire Bible, which included the book of Revelation. I found such comfort in that magnificent story book! It’s not a book which tells us of the day and the hour, nor is it a mystical puzzle book. It is His story book, the greatest of the European story books, that tells how a seemingly dumb peasant boy conquers every evil of the world armed only with a heart on fire with divine charity. This is what sustains the European – His story of divine charity:

Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God, and he shall go no more out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name.”

The Babylonian hordes will invade the European nations, but that will not change the mystical core of Europe. That core consists of those Europeans who know that His name is Jesus, the morning star of Europe, the star that will still shine over Europe when Babylon is dust. +

Posted in defense of the white race, Europe as the Christ-bearer | Tagged