The liberal media has a fascination with white gangsters and white serial killers. Every day, if you so desire, you can hear a story about John Gotti or a creature like Richard Speck. Such cruel inhuman men are outside the pale of humanity and fill us with horror. The liberals, who claim to abhor violence, do us no service by continuing, day after day, to give us detailed portraits of such brutish animals. The loving, detailed reporting of their crimes desensitizes people and deflects their attention away from a criminal race of people, the negroes, who have made murder, rape, and torture commonplace.
There is a huge contradiction in the liberals fascination with white gangsters and white serial killers. The white gangsters and the white serial killers are moral pariahs, a shocking reminder of the potential evil in the human soul. But such men shock us because they are so unusual and because we as white people do not believe that hideous, inhuman barbaric acts are normal, funny, or justifiable. Unless – and this is the liberal contradiction – the hideous barbaric acts are committed by blacks upon white people. Then what is rightly considered barbaric and hideous when done by white criminals is considered by the liberals to be normal, funny, and justifiable when committed by black people. The atrocities committed by white people are done by a tiny criminal class while the atrocities done by black people are committed by an entire criminal race. There is no such thing as an atrocity story in the black culture because they do not look on murder, rape, and torture as atrocities. Such activities are just normal expressions of their nature, so how could such things be considered criminal atrocities? A South African farmer is beaten and left for dead by four African thugs. And when he goes to court, shortly before his death from injuries sustained in the beating, the black apes just laugh at him. A 44-year-old British mother of twins has acid thrown in her face by a black monstrosity and his Pakistani companions, and they laugh with glee. Are such commonplace crimes, commonplace wherever the African barbarians are allowed to roam, the result of poverty or of white oppression? No, the crimes are the result of a lack of white oppression. The black race is a race of violent savages. They commit crimes of violence for the sheer joy of committing crimes of violence, and only a fear of white reprisals will stop blacks from behaving like barbarians. This is so obvious that I shouldn’t even have to write it down. Yet all the traditional vehicles of culture – press, church, state, and schools – tell us with unremitting, relentless repetitiveness, that it is the white male that we have to worry about. He is racist, he is sexist, and therefore he is not human. If only, the united liberal voices tell us, the white man could be eliminated from the life of the nations then all mankind, minus the white man, will be happy. White females will be allowed in the brave new world so long as they agree to breed colored children, thus becoming the harbingers of a new Babylonian kingdom of Satan. The utopians promised us heaven on earth, but they have given us hell on earth.
This new Tower of Babel culture that the liberals have built, this hell on earth, has come to us in the same way as the old Tower of Babel culture came to us, through the negro. Just as Nimrod, the descendant of Ham, founded Babel (“And the beginning of his kingdom was Babel”), so has the elevation of the negro to divine status served as the cornerstone of the New Tower of Babel. Every last vestige of a people committed to the living God is being eradicated under the banner of the negro, who was and always shall be the conduit to a universalist culture of the devil:
And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech… And they said, Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven; and let us make us a name, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth. And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded. And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech. So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city.
We must conclude, when we see that even “scripture-based Christians” ignore the Biblical connection between negro worship and devil worship, that there must be a desire for truth actuating the human heart before Scripture, church documents, or good counsel can move a man to embrace the living God. As we love so we shall be. The modern Christian loves the negro as the antique Europeans once loved Christ, and as a result the modern Christian is not a Christian, he is a devil worshipper. Just assume for a moment that there is a devil who roams about the earth seeking the ruin of souls. His greatest foe is Christ, whose one weakness (from the devil’s point of view) is that He cares for those miserable creatures called men. So the devil seeks to attack God by attacking the creatures Christ cares about. He disregards the colored tribesmen, because they already belong to him. He concentrates on the Europeans, the Christ bearers. And what better way to convert the Europeans to devil worship than to go into the Christian churches and present Satanism as Christianity? ‘Thou shalt have no other gods before me,’ becomes ‘Thou shalt worship the negro and him only shalt thou serve.” And in serving the negro, the European becomes the willing servant of Satan, at war with Christ and His people.
There are alternative news sites on the internet that provide the European people with information the liberal news media will never mention. These sites tell of the unceasing, relentless attacks on white people by colored barbarians. I certainly don’t want to see such sites shut down, but there is something lacking in the websites that merely catalog atrocities against whites. Where is the call to arms? Where is the awareness that we are in a religious war which we cannot afford to lose? Nor will we lose it, if we fight with the same passion and zeal against principalities and powers that our European ancestors fought with. The internal battle is everything. Once the modernist shackles are taken off, the seemingly hopeless war against Babylon will no longer be hopeless.
I’ll state the obvious because I don’t see the obvious being stated. The white man won’t fight unless he has something to fight for. And he doesn’t believe he has anything to fight for because under the guidance of the clerics and academics he has become a universalist. He is not attached to his racial hearth fire:
To be attached to the subdivision, to love the little platoon we belong to in society, is the first principle (the germ as it were) of public affections. It is the first link in the series by which we proceed towards a love to our country, and to mankind. The interest of that portion of social arrangement is a trust in the hands of all those who compose it; and as none but bad men would justify it in abuse, none but traitors would barter it away for their own personal advantage.
The white man is not stirred to a rage when he sees atrocities being committed against white people because he thinks in terms of universals. Those people, the white victims of black atrocities, don’t strike a sympathetic chord in the hearts of the white grazers because the grazers have said in their hearts, “We have no people,” which is the same as saying, “We have no God,” because we come to know God in and through our people. And the liberals delight in the black atrocities against white people because every atrocity brings them closer to paradise on earth. They are the men of the hardened hearts, and no amount of pleading or reasoning will move them, for their sympathies are with their gods, and their hate is directed against the white man.
White people are different from the people of color: they are the only people who cannot be stirred to fight solely for self-interest. Yes, the criminal class of whites can be stirred by self-interest only, but whites as a people must have a religious raison d’être. The liberals fight for their new Christless, messianic, negroized utopia. What do the grazers fight for? For nothing, which is why they are passive spectators in the ongoing extermination of the white race.
The colored tribesmen have always been against the white race. When the white race was strong they feigned sympathy for whites because it was in their self-interest to do so. When the white race became weak the colored tribesmen bared their fangs and showed the folly of those who thought that Haiti was an aberration, rather than a look into the soul of the black man. What changed in the 20th century was not the black man but the white man. A ruling class of post-Christian liberals emerged who needed a new god to replace Christ. These demonic creatures hate the white man with a religious zeal that knows no bounds. Crimes against blacks by word or deed are punished with the greatest severity because such crimes are blasphemy. Witness the recent national news story, delivered by white broadcasters with funeral dirge looks on their faces, about – horror of horrors! – a white football player who had used the word “nigger.” The sport commentators could not even bring themselves to say the word: they reported that a white football player had used the ‘n-word.’ Is it not crystal clear that the civil rights movement, which would have been wrong in and of itself, is not a civil rights movement? This ‘civil rights’ movement is a religious war The liberals want to dethrone Christ and replace Him with the negro, the conduit to Satan. And in order to kill Christ, the liberals have had to kill the hearts of the European people, where Christ dwells. They think they have done just that – killed Christ by removing Him from the hearts of His people. Have they?
At present there seems to be only one spiritual force, albeit a demonic force, within the body of the European people. All the European societies are structured around the hatred of the European and the love of the colored stranger, particularly the negro. The passionate haters, the liberals, might even be a minority in terms of numbers, but the grazers, who have lost their racial hearth fire and have no passion, are as nothing. They are waiting for… they know not what.
The godless Raymond Chandler – at least in his outward statements of belief – was groping for an answer when he wrote about the hero: “Down these mean streets a man must go who is not himself mean, who is neither tarnished nor afraid.” A dim racial memory of Christ? Yes, I think such dreams of the hero are subterranean, nighttime memories of Christ, which the rational, daytime mind of the white man rejects. When the Christian hero emerges he will know, unlike Philip Marlowe, why he walks down the mean streets, and he will know who sustains him against the terror by night and the arrow that flieth by day. The good man, the European, fights for what he loves. Once the European sees what he has lost, his racial hearth fire warmed by the living God, he will return to his racial hearth fire and defend it against all the world. But of course the white man must see what was lost. This is why the European, who by some miracle of grace has remained connected to the European past, must not despair and leave the liberals in sole possession of the field. Christ’s Europe must not perish. So long as one knight refuses to let go of the vision, eternal Europe lives, even in the face of the liberal terror and the colored barbarians’ arrows.
Reading the accounts of black atrocities against whites avails us nothing if we don’t use such stories to move us closer to our race and the God of our race. The kingdom of heaven, and the glimpses of heaven vouchsafed to men here on earth, comes to those who love much. The European was different from other races because he saw, and loved, the divine humanity in the Man of Sorrows. By His sign only, the sign of the cross, we conquer. +