Through a Glass Darkly

Dore_Scripture_reader_in_a_night_refugeAll men that are ruined, are ruined on the side of their natural propensities. There they are unguarded. Above all, good men do not suspect that their destruction is attempted through their virtues. This their enemies are perfectly aware of: and accordingly, they, the most turbulent of mankind, who never made a scruple to shake the tranquillity of their country to its center, raise a continual cry for peace with France. Peace with Regicide, and war with the rest of the world, is their motto.   – Burke


For some reason the liberal governments of Britain and the United States have decided that Somalis should inhabit the more northern climes. The British government sends them to Scotland, and the United States government sends them to Minnesota. One Minnesotan grazer spoke for the entire Western world when he said the Somalians were quite difficult to live with but he was trying to understand them. “Understanding” our fellow man is supposed to be a good thing, because understanding brings about peace and accord between peoples. Does it? Or is “understanding” merely another myth of the liberal world? Burke understood the Jacobins so well that he wanted to go to war with them. I understand the liberals, and I am at war with them because they are evil. As for the Somalians, if you truly understand them then you will refuse to let them into your nation, because they are monsters of cruelty that worship the savage gods of blood and sex.

In the margin of Melville’s copy of King Lear, right after a fiery soliloquy by Edmund, the bastard son of Gloucester, Melville notes, “There is an energy and fire to demonism that mere virtue often lacks.” The virtuous brother Edgar, “[w]hose nature is so far from doing harms, [t]hat he suspects none…,” is unable to help his father, who has both eyes plucked out, or anyone else until he “understands” that there are evil men in the world who will not stop doing evil until they are confronted by men who have more than mere virtue in their hearts. Evil must be confronted by men who love and hate with a passion greater than the men who worship darkness and not the light. It’s not enough to know the good – every moral theologian knows what is good – one must love the good enough to fight for it. But a fighting faith is outside the ken of moral theologians and philosophers. We must go to the realm of the poets, where men see with blinding sight and love and hate with all their hearts, to know how to deal with satanic liberals and their colored minions. When Edgar sees the evil that men do to his kith and kin, he leaves mere virtue behind and confronts evil:

Despite thy victor sword and fire-new fortune,
Thy valor and thy heart—thou art a traitor,
False to thy gods, thy brother, and thy father,
Conspirant ‘gainst this high illustrious prince,
And from th’ extremest upward of thy head
To the descent and dust below thy foot
A most toad-spotted traitor. Say thou “No,”
This sword, this arm, and my best spirits are bent
To prove upon thy heart, whereto I speak,
Thou liest.

Edgar is a Minnesotan grazer at the beginning of King Lear, but he is a Goth by the end of the play. The white Europeans are re-enacting King Lear, because they will not understand evil. The French Revolution is still glossed over as a much-needed, democratic reform taken a little too far by Robespierre. Likewise the Communist revolution: “Uncle Joe was too extreme, but the communists’ hearts were in the right place.” The refrain is always the same. White people do not believe that anyone means them harm. Liberals are nice people and so are the colored barbarians: we are all nice people. The only worry is people like thee and me who talk about negro worship and the satanic nature of liberalism. That is extremism, which is bad.

It is not physical courage that is lacking in the white nations. There are always men willing to fight for the official government. What is lacking is moral courage, the will to fight for the good, for kith and kin, despite the unpopularity of the fight. It is moral courage that distinguishes a white man from the barbarians of color and the beasts of the jungle who only fight when they have the upper hand. To call the soldiers of the pro-abort, negro-worshipping government of the United States or the soldiers of all the other negro-worshipping pro-abort nations of Europe “our troops” is blasphemous. Our troops are those whites who fight for white, Christian Europe, not those who fight for liberals.

A nation is a moral essence, not a spot on the map. If Britain becomes a colored Muslim state, it ceases to be Britain, just as France ceases to be France, and so on. It’s not the colored people who are forcing the white people out of their own nations, it is white liberals, who have brought the colored barbarians into the white nations and protect those same colored barbarians from white retaliation, that are turning white nations into colored nations.

There are still white grazers enough to resist the colored invasion. My N.R.A. neighbor, for instance, would gladly bring his arsenal of weapons along on a campaign to rid our nation of colored barbarians, if the government gave the word. And that is the key. The respective governments of all of the white nations will not give the word to drive the colored barbarians from their lands. The exact opposite is the case. The governing elites in all the European nations are committed to the extermination of white people, so the grazers sit back and watch the colored barbarians cannibalize the whites.

Nothing will be done to stop the colored barbarians so long as the white grazers do not see that every aspect of their fast dwindling world is dominated by Satanists. Our governments, our churches, and above all, our educational establishments, are committed to the extermination of whites. The liberals are very clever: they have ecumenical services with Muslims, they call our attention to “Christian” black rappers, and they enjoin us to be tolerant and kind to black barbarians, because under the skin we are all alike. But that is precisely the point: under our skins we are not all alike. White skins envelop white souls. And white souls differ from black, brown, and yellow souls. The liberals acknowledge this when they demonize whites and deify the colored races. When they want to move Somalians into the grazers’ neighborhoods, they tell them we are all alike under the skin; but their actions belie their words. The colored people are sacred and the whites are demons: that is the liberals’ faith. This brings us back to the central point. The liberals are Satanists. If you accept their theology you will be serving Satan. “I shall not serve,” was Satan’s defiant declaration to God. “We shall not serve,” should be our response to the rulers of Satandom.

If white souls differ from colored souls, how do they differ? The answer should be obvious to us, but in this age of anesthetized souls it no longer is obvious to most people. So let me quote from D. P. Dugauquier’s book Congo Cauldron:

Africans have respected power deriving from force for too many centuries to acquire any moral shackles—they admire and follow the man with strength. Here is an illustration, amusing but unfortunately quite true. In a school run by the Catholic Church for young men showing aptitudes which might befit them for eventual priesthood, a film was being shown. The film represented in silent form the trial and crucifixion of Jesus Christ. At the scene in the Palace where the Roman soldiers struck Him with whips and placed a crown of thorns upon His head, excited cries of ‘Pika! Pika!’ rang out from the Congolese. Pika means hit or strike, and quite naturally, as in a Western film we cheer on the goodies and boo the baddies, they were encouraging the strong against the weak.

Another film depicting in symbolic form the ending of the Arab slave trade by the white man was greeted with equal enthusiasm—each slash of the long whip on the wretched black men’s back was cheered wholeheartedly, and when in coming to grips with the Arab the white hero is momentarily thrown to the ground—their shouts reached a crescendo of support for the Arab—not as representing a race, creed or idea—but simply because he symbolized power and force.

This inability to grasp the essential point of Christianity, God’s divine charity, is not confined to the black race alone. I recall the story of a white missionary, having spent many years in China, relating how he showed a film of the crucifixion of Christ to a large gathering of Chinese. Their intense interest in the film encouraged the missionary. Later, the Chinese in the audience had gone out, ambushed a caravan of whites, and crucified them. Enough said. The theologians of the West are fond of telling us that the history of the European people is not different from that of the colored people, because all the seven deadly sins are present among whites just as they are present amongst the colored people of the world. But a man who becomes a theologian has made an a priori decision about existence. He has already decided that truth can be seen with, not through, the eye. That a priori decision makes the theologian blind to all things that exist in the realm of the spirit. There is hell and redemption in the soul of the white man. He can become like unto Satan, an intellectualized demon with a burning desire to strike the Creator by defacing his image in man, or he can, by adhering to His will, bear witness to the Light of the World. That the Europeans, prior to their rejection of Christ in the 20th century, bore witness to the Light of the World is clear to all those who have eyes to see and ears to hear. A civilization based on “that charity of honor” was created right before their eyes, and the theologians knew it not. They opened up their minds while closing their hearts to God, who comes to us in and through our people.

The colored tribesmen know only hell. They had no redemption in them, until they saw the light emanating from the hearth fires of the Europeans. Now the humanoid-demons who have consecrated their souls to the devil, the liberals, have joined forces with the savage hordes of color to build a kingdom of Satan on earth. God so loved mankind that He gave His only begotten Son to redeem us from sin and death. The Europeans made that belief a part of their white souls; hence the attack on Christ’s divinity and his humanity always comes by way of an attack on the European people. The Jews sought to kill Lazarus after Jesus raised him from the dead:

But the chief priests consulted that they might put Lazarus also to death; Because that by reason of him many of the Jews went away, and believed on Jesus.

Because of the Europeans, our beloved forefathers, our brethren in Christ, many believed in Christ. This is why the liberals will be forever at war with the European people: the Europeans are the Christ-bearers. Even though they are currently grazing in the fields of oblivion, there is always a chance they might return to life, which is why the liberals are forever vigilant, committed to destroying everything white and Christian.

The one essential difference between the colored races and the white race is not intelligence. It is something much greater than intelligence: it is charity. Only the Europeans loved Christ for His divine charity – “because He first loved us.” The people who saw life feelingly were the antique Europeans. Against all reason, against the wisdom of the world, the Europeans made the suffering servant, a man crucified between two thieves, their Lord and Savior. The true faith is revealed when Europeans act in accord with His reign of charity. “This slaughter of whites shall not go on, in the name of charity, it shall not go on.” That is the only war cry that will put an end to white genocide.

The liberals have blinded their eyes and hardened their hearts: His divine charity does not move them; they regard it as something that must be purged from the earth so that utopian, heartless, sterile liberalism can prevail. In order to kill charity the liberals must pluck it out of every European heart. They have already purged it from their own hearts. But does it still exist in some European hearts? That is the question that haunts the liberals. Yes, charity still lives in some European hearts. And it is a fire that will destroy liberalism. A love that passeth all understanding moves the Europeans who have that charity of honor. The liberal techno-barbarians and the colored barbarians will fall before those hearts of fire. +

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Charity, Grazers and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.