They borrowed a bed to lay His head
When Christ the Lord came down;
They borrowed the ass in the mountain pass
For Him to ride to town;
But the crown that He wore and the cross that He bore
Were His own–
The cross was His own.
Recently, while rereading Pickwick Papers, I was struck by the fact that the consummate villain, Mr. Jingle (who repents at the end of the book), was a pioneer in the use of internet English. He never speaks in complete sentences. Instead, his conversation consists of a few short phrases that he uses in rapid fire fashion. For instance, if Mr. Jingle was ordering food in an Italian restaurant, he would proceed along the following lines:
Waiter: What is your order, sir?
Jingle: Spaghetti with sauce – not too sweet – red wine – 1831 – good year, very.
When the waiter comes to collect the check, Jingle is equal to the task:
Jingle: Won’t pay – service slow, wine undrinkable, spaghetti terrible.
It is tempting to adopt Jinglese or internet lingo, especially when you have a wide variety of topics you want to discuss and you feel it is too difficult to weave them into coherent sentences and paragraphs. If I were to write in Jinglese, my weekly blog would look like this – Liberals hypocritical, very – Prince Charles, blasphemer – Drexel prof demonic – Pope the Antichrist—American media Satanic, very – and so on. But let us leave Jinglese behind, because after all he was the villain of Pickwick Papers for at least 750 pages, and put our New Year’s attack on Satandom into a more coherent form.
That the liberals have only one agenda, the destruction of the white Christ-bearing race, is glaringly apparent at every time of the year. But their demonism seems particularly, vividly clear at Christmas time, because it is at Christmas time that the much-maligned and spit-upon image of the Christ child still stirs the hearts of a small band of Europeans who stand as a sign of contradiction to Satanism.
Such Europeans stand outside the confines of Satandom. They are a hated and despised remnant of Christian Europe. That is what we must grasp before there can be a successful Christian European counterrevolution. Satan is now a conservative. When Madison, Jefferson, and Franklin were framing that pernicious, radical document called the United States Constitution, Satan aided them, because it was his goal to undermine all things traditionally European and Christian.(1) And when the French Jacobins took the satanic principles of Jefferson, Madison, and Franklin to their logical conclusions, Satan aided them as well. In those days Satan was a radical. But now it is his job to defend and extend the Kingdom of Satan on earth. That is what liberalism is all about: the defense and spread of Satanism.
If the spread of liberalism throughout the world was about anything other than the destruction of the white Christ-bearing race, there would not be such glaring discrepancies between what the liberals say and what they do. For instance – let us look at the Moslem invasion of Europe, which the liberals have welcomed with an evangelical zeal. Why should they do this when the Moslems seem to be opposed to every aspect of liberalism? The liberals claim to be concerned about the dehumanization of women. They do not think women should be treated like cattle or sex toys of men. But that is exactly how women are treated by the Moslems. Rape was supposed to be a very bad thing, yet the feminists of the West scream, “Better rapists than racists!” Hmmm, “There’s something wrong here,” as Walt Disney’s Goofy is fond of saying. And what about the Moslem’s religious intolerance? I thought freedom of religion was supposed to be one of the liberals’ sacred cows. Of course we know why the liberals do not oppose the Moslems. They never cared a fig about white women or religious liberty. What concerns them is the destruction of the white race, and that is all that concerns them.
The Trump election and the liberals’ reaction to it has shown us that the liberals do not nor have they ever believed in democratic government – they only believe in power. When they lose, they demand the system, which liberals created, should be changed. If it is not changed to suit them, they will go outside the law. At all costs liberal rule must be conserved and extended. And liberal rule means that the temperature of the liberal cauldron in which the white frogs are being boiled must always be increased and never turned down. Trump has never suggested that the white frogs be removed from the cauldron. He has only suggested that the temperature should not be increased. And because of that, he has become, in the liberals’ eyes, a combination of Adolph Hitler and the Bogeyman.
Let’s add the liberals’ reaction to Putin and Russian nationalism to the list of the liberals’ sins of hypocrisy. It wasn’t so long ago when Russia was a communist nation that we were told, by the liberals, to get along with the Russians. First, it was Uncle Joe, who was just like us, and then it was every Russian premier after Stalin whom we had to be nice to. When Reagan called communist Russia the “Evil Empire,” he was considered a reckless cowboy beyond the ken of liberal humanity. But what could possibly be wrong with applying the term “Evil Empire” to communist Russia? It was wrong, from the liberal perspective, because communist Russia was a mirror image of American liberalism. Both systems were Jacobin in origin with the satanic goal of eradicating the image of God in man by eliminating the white Christ-bearing race. Any critique of communism was a critique of liberalism. Putin’s return to Russian nationalism is not a return to Christian Russia, but he represents, like Trump, a step back toward older, more traditional European values. For that reason the liberals hate Putin and revere the precious memory of communist Russia and the sainted Fidel Castro.
Even mad-dog liberals such as Benjamin Netanyahu have fallen out of favor with the ‘beyond-mad-dog’ liberals of the new millennium. The state of Israel has come under fire for being insufficiently liberal! What is at work in the anti-Israel process is the dynamic that R. L. Dabney wrote about. Conservatism without a Christian basis is always one step behind radical Jacobinism, but it soon catches up to it, because it lacks a spiritual foundation. Its adherents never cry, “This must not go on!” — “Go a little slower,” is the pathetic battle cry of modern conservatives while the radical Christ-hating Jacobins cry, “Full speed ahead.”
The New Age liberals have placed Islam ahead of Judaism because they perceive that Islam is a more dynamic, radical anti-Christian force than Judaism. But a Christian European dare not chose one over the other (the Evangelicals have chosen Judaism, while the Roman Catholics have chosen Islam). The Christian European must cling to the one true God who cannot be blended with Judaism or Islam. There is only one morning star of Europe and his name is Jesus.
The liberals’ greatest hypocrisy has been reserved for the sacred negro. Under the guise of civil rights and equality the liberals have set up the black race as savage gods who have been given carte blanche powers to eliminate the white race. What does the massacre of whites have to do with equality? Can liberals actually live in a world dominated by the people they profess to love? Of course they can’t. If they get their way, they will suffer the same fate as Steven Otter, the anti-white activist from South Africa. That would not be a bad thing, but unfortunately the liberals will not be the only whites who are slaughtered.
The four monsters of Babylon – Church, State, academia, and the media – all bared their fangs during the Christmas season. In Church, it was Pope Francis, who kissed the Koran while exhorting the faithful to shun any contact with God that does not come through the mediation of the church. But if the Pope mediates in favor of Muhammad over Christ, the faithful will become Moslems. What is the Church? Is it an organization dedicated to the propagation of the nature religions of Islam, Judaism, and Voodoo, or is it the blood faith of loving hearts connected to Christ, the God above nature? If the pagan ideal of church, propagated by Pope Francis, the high pontiff of Babylon, falls, then the rest of Babylon will fall, because it is on that pagan theology that all of liberal Babylon stands – the idea that nature is God. The Roman Catholic cannot fight liberalism so long as he maintains his faith in organized naturalism. Nor can the Protestant who has returned to the paganism of organized Jewry. The “religious” devotees of Christian naturalism will always end up supporting the other three monsters – the liberal state, academia, and the media – unless they break with naturalism. If we keep Christmas in our hearts for 365 days of the year, as the ghost of Christmas present advises us to do, Babylon will crumble and fall. “Do you really believe such mush?” Yes, I do. There is a world of difference between faith in a system and faith in Christ. When the Europeans recapture the latter faith, we shall see miracles.
When Prince Charles enjoined his countrymen to think good thoughts about Muhammad at Christmas time, he was speaking for the leaders of Liberaldom throughout the West. They have already said, in their hearts, that there is no God. So why not cozy up with the powers of this-world-only? White Britons will only be able to live in a white Britain when they have leaders who cry, “Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord.” Trump’s victory does not place white Americans outside the Babylonian night that is enveloping Europe. The black menace alone, independent of the Mexican and Islamic menace, is enough to destroy the white American remnant.(2) And Trump has said nothing about fighting negro worship. I am glad that he got elected – he will keep the heat slightly below the complete annihilation level, but to defeat liberalism we need the whole “European thing” – we need Ivanhoes, William Tells, and Alfreds as our leaders.
The Drexel prof who said that his Christmas wish was for white genocide as in Haiti was only unusual in his explicitness. The liberals usually are a little more careful about their phraseology. The prof, realizing he might have been too explicit, tried to pass his statement off as a little ‘joke.’ But he was not joking; he expressed the deepest aspiration of the liberals – their satanic desire to eradicate the white, Christ-bearing race. The Drexel prof was academia’s Christmas present to white Europeans. He reminded us that there can never be a Christmas truce with liberals.
And finally we come to the media. Is there one media spokesman in print or television who we can appoint as a spokesman? No, because they are legion. They no longer resemble anything human. Having renounced all things European and Christian, they have made themselves over in the image of Satan. The New Year will be just like the old year. Like the prophet Jeremiah, we look – even as Europe crumbles – for the coming of the Lord:
“The days are coming,” declares the Lord, “when I will make a new covenant with the people of Israel and with the people of Judah. It will not be like the covenant I made with their ancestors when I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt, because they broke my covenant, though I was a husband to them,” declares the Lord. “This is the covenant I will make with the people of Israel after that time,” declares the Lord. “I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people. No longer will they teach their neighbor, or say to one another, ‘Know the Lord,’ because they will all know me, from the least of them to the greatest,” declares the Lord. “For I will forgive their wickedness and will remember their sins no more.” Jeremiah 31: 31-34 +
(1) Andrew Lytle correctly labeled our Constitution, “the cynical balancing of powers.” And George Fitzhugh also recognized the deficiencies of ink-and-paper, Gnostic government:
Bill of Rights, Acts of Religious Freedom, and Constitutions, besprinkled with doctrines directly at war with all stable government, seem to be the basis on which our institutions rest. But only seem to be; for, in truth, our laws and government are either old Anglo-Saxon prescriptive arrangements or else the gradual accretions of time, circumstance and necessity. Throw our paper platforms, preambles and resolutions, guaranties and constitutions, into the fire, and we should be none the worse off, provided we retained our institutions – and the necessities that begot, and have, so far, contained them.
All our necessities were begot and contained by the European people’s faith in the baby Jesus born on Christmas day.
(2) We should never forget the warnings of men like Anthony Jacob and R. L. Dabney – Negro worship is Satan Worship:
But while we believe that “God made of one blood all nations of men to dwell under the whole heavens,” we know that the African has become, according to a well-known law of natural history, by the manifold influences of the ages, a different, fixed species of the race, separated from the white man by traits bodily, mental and moral, almost as rigid and permanent as those of genus. Hence the offspring of an amalgamation must be a hybrid race, stamped with all the feebleness of the hybrid, and incapable of the career of civilization and glory as an independent race. And this apparently is the destiny which our conquerors have in view. If indeed they can mix the blood of the heroes of Manassas with this vile stream from the fens of Africa, then they will never again have occasion to tremble before the righteous resistance of Virginian freemen; but will have a race supple and vile enough to fill that position of political subjection, which they desire to fix on the South.