The Higher Law

William_Tell_and_son We must fall back on Christianity, which embraces man’s whole nature, and though not a code of philosophy, is something better; for it proposes to lead us through the trials and intricacies of life, not by the mere cool calculations of the head, but by the unerring instincts of a pure and regenerate heart. The problem of the Moral World is too vast and complex for the human mind to comprehend; yet the pure heart will, safely and quietly, feel its way through the mazes that confound the head.

-George Fitzhugh, Cannibals All! Or Slaves Without Masters


Shane tells young Bob Starrett that, “A gun is just a tool. No better and no worse than any other tool, a shovel – or an axe or a saddle or a stove or anything. Think of it always that way. A gun is as good – and as bad – as the man who carries it. Remember that.” So it is with sport. If it is used, as in Tom Brown’s Schooldays, as a means of teaching young men the code of chivalry, it is a beneficial activity. There was a great deal of truth in the English assertion that, “The battle of Waterloo was won on the playing fields of Eton.” But if sport is used as a means of teaching young men, and society at large, the doctrines of liberalism it ceases to be beneficial: it becomes evil.

I’ve known Catholic Jansensists and Protestant Cromwellians who thought sports were intrinsically evil. And I’ve known good solid American conservatives who thought organized sports were the solution to every evil under the sun. Obviously both groups needed a strong dose of Shane: ‘Sport is as good or bad as the people who organize and control it.’

In the late 1950s and through the 1960s, the liberals derided sports because they felt that participation in sports tended to make the participants into reactionaries who were unfit to take their place in a progressive society. Coaches said prayers before games when prayers were banned in the more progressive classrooms, and sport clichés that enjoined young men to be strong and resolute in the face of adversary, which went against the ethos of Liberaldom, were in constant use. I remember a very liberal high school English teacher (I didn’t know what a liberal was at that time of my life) telling me that I was demeaning myself and wasting my “gifts” by participating in sports. But in the 1970s, the liberals, under Satan’s guidance, began to change their position vis-à-vis organized sports. They did to sports what they had already done to the churches. Instead of abolishing sporting activities they turned them into vehicles for liberalism. This certainly did not start in the 1970s. The South integrated their Little League teams in the 1950s, and professional baseball integrated in 1947, but the wholesale use of sport for the spread of liberalism commenced when the liberals consolidated their power over every aspect of society, including sporting events. Now sodomy awareness days, Mexican awareness days, black awareness days – everything but white awareness days – are celebrated at the various sporting events. Organized sport in America and throughout the European world is a blasphemous mix of paganism and liberalism.

I no longer watch sporting events, because I regard them as liberal religious festivals, but I am always glad to hear about a white athlete such as Mike Trout, Tom Brady, or Fedor Emelianenko who does well. How do I justify such a contradiction? By referencing Fitzhugh’s observation about the Christian heart guiding us through the trials and intricacies of life. I home schooled my children and gave them white heroes, such as Wallace, Havelock, Forrest, Lee, Alfred, Walter Scott, Lou Gehrig, and Bob Mathias to look up to. But what do white children who are not home schooled have? To whom do they look for heroic examples? They have nothing. They are taught to worship black athletes and liberals who paved the way for ‘diversity.’ The self-esteem of the young white male is at the lowest possible level; he does not feel that he deserves to live. My heart goes out to such white children. I wish I could tell them of their heroic past, a past that would inspire them to become like unto the heroes of Christian Europe. But I don’t have access to those suffering white children, so how can I not hope that they will at least find some solace, some hope, from a white athlete who is successful in the pagan-liberal arena? I liken this to a Christian living in the catacombs who finds it heartening to hear that one of his Christian brethren wrenched a spear from a Roman soldier and slew a lion that was about to attack his fellow Christians in the arena. The event itself was evil, but the Christian’s heroism was heartening. Of course the modern white athlete is not forced, as the catacomb Christian was, to participate in the liberal pagan spectacles, but is not the modern white athlete a spiritually crippled young man? To what extent can I blame him for competing in the only available market for his talents? By the same token I wish that young white American soldiers would not fight in the liberals’ wars, but I don’t want any harm to come to the misguided white boys who fight those wars. Is there a contradiction there? Ask your heart.

What is happening in the sporting events is a mirror image of the larger arena of politics. In sports the liberals will permit some whites to participate providing that they support ‘diversity’ and providing that they only occupy supporting roles for the athletes of color. Any white athlete who obtains prominence in his field is vilified. And if, as in the cases of Curt Schilling and Tom Brady, they express conservative political views, they are demonized. The only reason white athletes are not banned from all sporting events is because most white athletes keep to the liberals’ code of conduct and do not express views contrary to liberalism. Tom Brady was suspended because he was not adhering to the liberals’ code of conduct, and Curt Schilling was fired and denied access to the Hall of Fame because he also violated the liberals’ code of conduct by denouncing transgender bathrooms and professing a belief in Jesus Christ.

When we turn to that other arena, the larger political arena, we see the same liberal rules in place. Whites can participate in politics, but they must support liberalism. They can only hold office if they do not say or do anything that runs counter to liberal orthodoxy. McCain and Romney were allowed to run for election and lose, because they did not offend liberal orthodoxy. The only reason Trump got into office was because the liberals, with arrogant self-confidence, did not think he had a chance to win. When he won, the liberals nullified the democratic process and have set out to destroy Trump by whatever means necessary. After all, he has broken the rules — he has not called for the extermination of the white race, which always has been and always will be the ultimate goal of the liberals.

Just as the victory of a Trump-supporting white coach and white quarterback will not change the essential white-hating, negro-worshiping nature of American athletics, neither will the electoral victory of Trump change the essential white-hating, negro-worshiping nature of the United States. The liberals will not allow a glitch in the system to destroy their system. When Obama won, he was given dictatorial powers by the other liberal branches of the government. He was never required to make his Executive Orders comply with the Constitution or to comply with common human decency. In contrast, now that Trump is President, the judges disregard Executive Orders that are constitutionally proper and morally necessary for the defense of the nation. If Trump as President cannot issue an order to restrict dangerous aliens from entering the United States, how can he protect and defend the United States? He can’t. And of course the liberals do not want him to protect the United States, because the liberals do not believe in a United States composed of white Europeans. They believe in a multi-racial nation, dedicated to the extermination of the white race.

The Trump victory highlights the great divide between white Europeans and the liberals who have denounced their whiteness and given their heart and soul to Satan. The two groups of people are from different worlds. Paper and ink democracy cannot bind such divergent peoples together into a nation. How can whites find common cause with a brood of anti-white and anti-Christian creatures from hell whose vision of peace is one mass grave with ‘Here lies the white race’ engraved on the headstone?

Mere conservatism is useless — actually it is worse than useless if its sole purpose is not the preservation of the European people and the faith that bound them together as a people. What do I care if there are less taxes levied in a nation that has purged my people and my God from its midst? That is all the ‘conservatives’ stand for – less taxes. Trump was vilified during the campaign and is being demonized now that he has become President, because he has said things – and his actions have coincided with his rhetoric – that indicate he has some antique notions of faith and race mixed in with his Americanism. Hence he is an anathema. Why have German, Irish, and a whole international cabal of European politicians called for Trump’s assassination? Obviously, because they do not want the slightest tiny ripple of white pietas to surface anywhere in the European world, because if white pietas becomes commonplace, the reign of the liberals and the colored barbarians will come to an end.

Irvin Cobb, the author of the Judge Priest stories set in the post-Civil War South, stated in his autobiography that the Gospel of Christ was a very sublime book, but anyone who based his life on the Gospel would be run aground on the rocks of reality. Cobb was not a Jacobin – he admired his people and always spoke well of those who fought in the War for Southern Independence — but like all modern conservatives, he did not want to conserve his people and their sacred heritage. His people, who did not separate what was ‘realistic’ from what was good, felt honor-bound to defend their Christian heritage whether it seemed practical or not. And ultimately, is it practical to lose your soul to gain the whole world?

Democratic solutions to the liberal-sponsored onslaught of the Moslem and colored heathens are not practical, because they do not reach the soul of the European, they do not stir his heart and make him feel honor-bound to defend his people. As Burke tells us, we can’t become attached to a description of a square measurement or feel pride in being one statistic in an inhuman aggregate. But if the Christ-centered heart of the European is stirred, he will rise and ride in defense of his people. Then, instead of trying to vote the aliens out of his nation he will drive them out of his nation by whatever means that are necessary. Without the honor code that comes from a Christ-centered heart, what the old Europeans called chivalry, there will be no European restoration. (1) The white athlete who competes in the liberals’ religious festivals and the white politician who tries to change liberalism from within will not be able to do any lasting damage to the liberal juggernaut. Only Europeans, acting as the impractical, unrealistic Europeans of the past acted, can turn the tide of battle and defeat the liberals. The foolishness of God is wiser than the wisdom of men. We need more Third Dumb Brothers who are grounded in the Europeans’ vision of Christ rather than the conservatives’ vision of an ever-changing, ever-evolving conservatism that is always slightly to the right of the mad-dog liberals but forever opposed to the European people.

The only good that has come out of Trump’s election is that the liberals have made it clear to all but the willfully blind that modern democracy means death for the European people. Now that it has become clear, there is no need for politics as usual. There is no need for useless pro-life movements, for passionate pleas to the liberals to respect life in the womb, because nothing but fear for their own miserable lives will make liberals stop murdering the innocents. And there is no need to look for white candidates who will protect the rights of white people – such candidates will be ground up in the satanic mills of Liberaldom and be forced to abandon all their attempts to stop the ongoing Moslem, Mexican, and African invasions.

It’s not ‘last post’ for white people unless they remain nonviolent and democratic. The liberals and the colored heathen will not stop the slaughter of whites because of an electoral loss or any type of plea for mercy from white people. Both the liberals and the colored heathen are devoid of mercy. What is left to do? An enemy that has no mercy must be made to fear his intended victims. The sheep must become, in the name of mercy, just as fierce as the wolves. No war is more just, no war is more necessary, than the war we must fight against the satanic liberals and their heathen allies. That charity of honor, bequeathed to us by the antique Europeans, is worth more than all the kingdoms of this world. It is the only thing worth fighting for.

I don’t believe that the European people will remain as sheep to the colored wolves and grist for the liberals’ satanic mills forever, but I have no concrete evidence that I can point to in order to substantiate my hope. Still, St. Paul’s words that Handel placed at the center of the Messiah are burned into my soul: “In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.” Surely, if we do not forsake Christ, He can change our dead civilization into His Europe once again. +

____________________

(1) Before Trump’s election many anti-immigration whites were saying that if Trump was not elected we were doomed. Well, Trump has been elected and we are still doomed, not because Trump is not keeping his promises, but because you cannot expect fair play form Satanists. The liberals shout ‘the rule of law,’ when it suits their purpose. And since they own the courts, they almost always shout, ‘the rule of law.’ But whenever the rule of law does not suit their purpose they defy the law in the name of a higher law. Why do Europeans never oppose the liberals’ law in the name of a higher law? This respect for the law, independent of whether the law stems from our Christian-European traditions or from the Jacobin-Marxist traditions of the liberals, is not just a sickness of the European Americans. It is a sickness that has taken hold of all the European people throughout the world. Is it a sickness unto death? Of course it is, if we do not look to the past and see what they saw – the Star of Bethlehem shining above provincial Europe.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in democracy, Muscular Christianity and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.