Proper deformity seems not in the fiend
So horrid as in woman.
Men can be great when great occasions call:
In little duties women find their spheres,
The narrow cares that cluster round the hearth.
-R. H. Stoddard
This feeding frenzy over sexual harassment is like unto the feeding frenzy of the French Jacobins. They not only executed the French aristocrats, they also turned on each other. No one was pure enough. But the new age Jacobins are less inclusive than the original Jacobins. In revolutionary France the white proletariat was still ‘the people’; now all white males are aristocrats who can be executed any time the liberals choose. When will white male liberals ‘wake up’ and realize that they must stop the feminist Robespierres before they fall under the axe? The answer is never, unless the white male liberals have an internal conversion and see the world with the eyes of a Christian European. So long as their moral vision is distorted by liberalism, they will continue to try to pin the ‘racist’ and ‘sexist’ label on their opponents while holding onto the delusion that they will escape the axe themselves.
The ‘conservatives’ display their liberalism when they join in the attack on the lefties who fall under the sexual harassment axe. Don’t they see that these sexual harassment charges are liberal ploys, just as charges of racism are liberal ploys to destroy the enemy, which is all white males?
No liberal of the female sex has a right to scream ‘sexual harassment.’ By embracing feminism she has left her humanity and her rights as a woman behind. Why should I or any male be concerned about the alleged sexual harassment of feminist harpies who welcome Moslem and black rapists into our nations while screaming about the sexual harassment of the pornographic actresses in Hollywood? The Victorian maiden and mother has a right to be protected from sexual harassment in word or deed. The modern feminists have no such rights. If we accord them any rights or sympathy, we are supporting the continual reign of terror of our modern legions of Lady Macbeths.
Come, you spirits
That tend on mortal thoughts, unsex me here
And fill me from the crown to the toe top-full
Of direst cruelty! Make thick my blood,
Stop up the access and passage to remorse,
That no compunctious visitings of nature
Shake my fell purpose nor keep peace between
The effect and it! Come to my woman’s breasts,
And take my milk for gall, your murd’ring ministers,
Wherever in your sightless substances
You wait on nature’s mischief! Come, thick night,
And pall thee in the dunnest smoke of hell
That my keen knife see not the wound it makes
Nor heaven peep through the blanket of the dark
To cry, “Hold, hold!”
The feminists, who rule in state and church, do not express themselves as poetically as Lady Macbeth, but her doctrine is their doctrine. I ask you – can a people who teach their young women the ethos of Lady Macbeth survive as a people? Of course they can’t. And that is what the devil wants. He does not want the white Christ-bearing race to survive.
Madeline Albright, with Gloria Steinem and Hillary Clinton at her side, told an audience of women that any woman who voted for Trump deserved a “special place in hell.” Leaving aside the hypocrisy of a woman who doesn’t believe in the resurrection of the dead invoking an eternal hell for sinners, let’s look at the meaning of Albright’s statement. Whatever you might think of Trump, he has become, in the sick, distorted minds of the liberals, the symbol of the white Christian resistance to liberalism. So it follows that any woman who is still woman enough to support a white Christian male is damned. It’s ironic that feminists invoke the devil in order to condemn women who support what the feminists perceive to be a white Christian counterattack, because it is the feminists, not the white Christians, who are in lock-step with the devil. The devil got to Adam through Eve. And Adam, instead of accepting his guilt for acquiescing to Eve’s desire to be equal to God, tried to blame God for his sin – “The woman that thou gavest me…” Adam’s sin was not that he loved his wife but that he loved her outside the orbit of God’s love, and such a love is not love, it is sin. Macbeth ‘loves’ his wife outside of God’s grace, and he ends up completely indifferent to her death:
SEYTON. The Queen, my lord, is dead.
MACBETH. She should have died hereafter;
There would have been a time for such a word.
Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow
Creeps in this petty pace from day to day
To the last syllable of recorded time;
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
Life’s but a walking shadow, a poor player
That struts and frets his hour upon the stage
And then is heard no more. It is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Yes, how could a man who has sold his “eternal jewel” to the devil in order to please the satanic will of the woman whom God gave him come to any other conclusion about life: “It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”
It is not masculinity that the feminists hate, it is Christian masculinity that they hate. Lady Macbeth loves her husband when he is willing to fight for her reign as Queen of the kingdom of hell on earth. It is only when Macbeth balks at the idea of killing Duncan that she threatens to withdraw her love from him:
LADY MACBETH. What beast wast then
That made you break this enterprise to me?
When you durst do it, then you were a man,
And, to be more than what you were, you would
Be so much more the man. Nor time nor place
Did then adhere, and yet you would make both.
They have made themselves, and that their fitness now
Does unmake you. I have given suck and know
How tender ’tis to love the babe that milks me-
I would, while it was smiling in my face,
Have pluck’d my nipple from his boneless gums
And dash’d the brains out had I so sworn as you
Have done to this.
We see in Lady Macbeth’s relationship with Macbeth the relationship the feminists have formed with the technological white male and the black male. The technological male is tolerated if he helps support the feminists’ reign of terror. So long as he provides the abortion services and the other modern scientific advances that aid the new, satanic woman, the technological male will be allowed access to the womb, not the womb of life and love, which produces white babies, but the womb of lust, which leads a man to hell. And the males of color? They are the natural companions of the feminist who yearns for the destruction of all things white and Christian. So it is natural, natural as defined by the feminists, that the mademoiselles of feminism should welcome colored rapists and murderers into their nations and their bodies in order to hasten the destruction of the white race.
When I was growing up, all my favorite writers, with the exception of Shakespeare, were from the late 1700’s through the 1800’s. The liberals’ attack was fiercer in those years than in previous centuries, but the resistance was also very fierce. I love the authors, such as Scott, Stevenson, Le Fanu, and Dickens, who fought back against the liberal leviathan. But there was always one thing that troubled me about the works of the late 18th and 19th century authors. I was troubled by what I called the ‘creatures of light.’ I loved little Dorrit, Maud Ruthyn, and Jeanie Deans, but I thought Scott, Dickens, and Le Fanu were projecting their male fantasies of the perfect woman into their works. I didn’t believe they were writing realistically about women when they wrote about the creatures of light. I was wrong. Since I did not see any creatures of light in the modern world, I assumed that there were none. But I have watched my youngest daughter, who was raised by a good Christian mother to revere Our Savior and the civilization that was consecrated to our Savior, grow up and become like unto the heroines in the novels of the Christian authors of the 19th century. What a revelation! Our people, the antique Europeans, were right. When the love of Christ, as distinct from a rational affirmation of the existence of God, lies at the heart of a civilization, that civilization will produce the type of heroines and heroes that the novelists of the ancient times celebrated. We must not only remember the past, we must recreate the spiritual climate of the past. We currently live in a world woefully lacking in Christian women, because there are very few Christian men willing to put them in their place. That place is an exalted place, it is by a Christian hearth fire in a Christian home, but a man does have to face the forces of hell in order to champion the Christian hearth fire. But what are our lives without the warmth of that hearth fire? Liberated women that have forsaken the Christian hearth fire still seek to be warmed by the sparks from that fire, no matter how liberated they claim to be. They try to use the sparks to create a new hearth fire in the midst of Liberaldom, but they always fail and become more bitter and more hate-filled. I once saw a diamondback rattlesnake rear up and strike. Every time I see a feminist, I am reminded of that rattlesnake. The un-women, the feminists, are truly creatures from hell.
We must not take the liberals’ statements of policy at face value, because they are the spawns of Satan, and Satan always lies. When they say they are for ‘civil rights,’ what they mean is that they are in favor of the destruction of the white Christ-bearing race. And when the feminists say they are against the sexual harassment of women they mean they are against the God-given role of woman as the life-bearers and life-nurturers. When the people who believed in the empty tomb were replaced by the people of the empty womb, Europe ceased to be Europe, it became Satandom, and it shall remain Satandom until feminism and its ideological kissing cousin, negro worship, are eradicated from the face of the earth.
The reason that modern ‘Christians’ are so easily fooled by Satanic liberals who pontificate about sexual harassment and civil rights is because they have forsaken their racial hearth fire for a propositional faith in a propositional God. The unconditional support of Israel by Robert Jeffress and other intellectual Christians runs counter to the European Christianity which is the common heritage of the European people. (1) The Word took flesh in the hearts of the antique Europeans. It is that Gospel we should embrace, not the doctrines of propositional Christians who pull new doctrines from the muddled minds of religious enthusiasts. Look to your people, Jeffress, who were and are the men and women of the European hearth fire. Then you will be able to attack the feminists and the negro worshippers who have made the hatred of Christ and the white race their raison d’être. +
(1) Every form of organized Christianity runs counter to the Gospel of Christ because it is not grounded in the human heart. Without that solid ground, Christianity lacks a local habitation. I don’t care about recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel as a geopolitical strategy. It may be tactically wise or tactically foolish; that is more than I know. But I am horrified by and disgusted with the religious deification of the secularized Jew in the name of the Christian God. How did we come to this state of affairs? An alleged Christian Pope kisses the Koran, and a large segment of the Protestant Evangelical community bows down to the Jews who are opposed to our Lord and Savior. Prince Hal, when he becomes King Henry V, advises Falstaff to leave gormandizing and fall to his prayers. It would be a great blessing if the Evangelicals would leave their intellectual speculations and return to the Christian faith of the antique Europeans.