Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away. For we know in part, and we prophesy in part. But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.
– I Corinthians 13:8-10
I can live no longer by thinking. – Orlando, As You Like It
Prior to the advent of Ray Harryhausen, the greatest special effects creator of all time, monsters in movies were usually just photographically enlarged lizards. Harryhausen gave a reality to film monsters that was truly amazing. I still vividly remember the monsters that he created for the movie The 7th Voyage of Sinbad, which I saw in my childhood. I saw the movie in an enormous movie theater, the type of theater that no longer exists, armed only with a $.25 box of popcorn big enough to last through two showings of the movie.
Toward the end of the movie a Cyclops has a battle to the death with a dragon. My sympathies were entirely with the Cyclops. But in the end the dragon kills the Cyclops. If it had been Sinbad that killed the Cyclops I wouldn’t have minded, because Sinbad was the hero, he was one of my own, he was human. My sympathy with the Cyclops stemmed from the fact that the Cyclops, through the brilliance of Harryhausen’s animation, seemed to have more human traits than the reptilian dragon. I also rooted for King Kong over the Tyrannosaurus Rex in the original King Kong movie for the same reason. Now, what is the point of such nostalgic meanderings? When I see Trump battling with Ann Coulter, Nancy Pelosi, and the rest of the reptilian lizards of Liberaldom, my sympathies are with Trump, because at least he has some humanity. He is not one of my own, he is not an antique European, but he has not, like the Coulters of Liberaldom, completely left his humanity behind.
Why do I say that Trump has some humanity? There are two reasons. The first reason is that Trump, unlike the two Bush-men and Reagan, has actually tried to appoint prolife judges. The second reason is that Trump, unlike the two Bush-men and Reagan, has actually tried to include white people in the American dream. Trump will fail in both instances just as Sisyphus failed to push the rock up the hill, but there is a certain nobility, at least in my judgement, in his efforts.
Those who claim Trump has betrayed them on the immigration issue have never listened to any of Trump’s speeches. He has never, even though the liberals call him a white supremacist, been a believer in a white America. He believes in real diversity, that white, black, brown, red, and yellow can and should live together in the great American melting pot. The liberals hate Trump because their diversity is an Orwellian diversity: “Everyone is equal, but some are more equal than others.” Trump’s Americanism is completely against reality, because a diverse people are not a people, but he has not suddenly betrayed his ideals now that he is President; he is being true to his Americanist beliefs.
As for the wall, it might, if built, save some white lives, so it will not be a total waste, but the wall issue is not really the central issue. We need to evict every single non-white and every single liberal from our nation, because the colored tribesmen and the liberals are committed to the destruction of the white race. The wall is the bandaid on a wound that needs to be cauterized, which I spoke of a few weeks ago; it is not the solution to the problem of white genocide.
The reason that Trump has earned the ire of the reptilian Republicans such as Ann Coulter and of the reptilian Democrats is because he is not a fully initiated reptilian himself. Mark him well — you will not see his like again in any elected office in any white nation. The liberals will not permit even one particle of valiant dust in the satanic mills of democracy. If that is the case then wither goes the white man — what is his recourse if the satanic mills reject him?
Turn and fight — that is the white man’s only recourse. If the liberals tremble before a man who has only a small modicum of valiant dust, what would they do if they had to face an army of integral Europeans with valiant blood? They would crumble before such an army. But valiant blood, the valiant blood necessary to defeat the liberals, cannot be purchased on the cheap in the markets of democracy and organized Christian Jewry. Valiant blood comes from within; people who look without, to man-made intellectual systems, will always be defeated by those who have a blood faith. The liberals cling to the colored heathens in order to fuse their Gnostic hatred of all things white and Christian with a blood faith grounded in the hatred of all things white and Christian. The two entities, the liberals and the colored heathens, constitute the incarnation of Satan in the midst of what was once Christendom.
The intellectual systems that have destroyed the European people come from the two sources that St. Paul makes reference to in I Corinthians 1: 22-23: “For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom: But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness.” Our Lord is crucified anew whenever an intellectual system based on Caiaphas’s kangaroo court and on Socrates dialectic is substituted for a heart-to-heart connection to Him. The organized churches have fused the two strands together, the Greek element and the Judaic element, to form a bulwark against Christ. The democratic systems of the European nations are the secular counterparts of the anti-Christian systems of the churches. Thus the secular entity, the Jacobin system, has fused with the Church systems in order to ensure that Satan shall reign in church and state.
Ivan Karamazov claimed he did not reject God so much as he rejected God’s world. But isn’t that tantamount to rejecting God? Let us take a look at heaven, prior to our Lord’s incarnation. And let us suppose our Lord has gathered a team of experts from earth, five PhDs, to advise Him on the best way to reach out to mankind.
Christ: I’ve decided to reveal myself to mankind.
PhD#1: That is good, but you must be careful to market yourself so that you appear in the best possible light.
Christ: I’ve decided to enter the womb of a virgin, be born in a stable, and live an obscure life as the son of a carpenter. Then I intend, when I reach manhood, to heal the sick, cure the lame, heal the blind, and raise some poor souls from the dead.
PhD#2: I don’t think the virgin birth stuff is a good idea — the people aren’t going to buy that. The healing the sick, curing the lame, and making the blind see is okay, but you’ll need some reliable witnesses, preferably men of science, to attest to the cures. As for the raising of the dead, that is ridiculous. I wouldn’t try it.
PhDs#3, 4,and 5: (in chorus) Yes, we wouldn’t try it.
Christ: Then I intend to allow the Jews to condemn me to death and the Romans to crucify me. Afterwards, I shall rise again from the dead on the third day, appear to my followers in the flesh, and return to my Father in heaven while leaving the Holy Ghost here on earth to comfort my people.
(The five PhDs look at each other and at Christ with worried looks on their faces. Finally PhD #4 speaks up.)
PhD#4: I think you should go with a less fantastical plan of reaching out to mankind. I suggest you leave things in our hands. We have some great think tanks on earth that can come up with a great organizational plan for your entry down there on earth. Leave things in our hands, and we’ll clean up your act in order to make it more practical and appealing to mankind. After all, we’ve had a lot of organizational experience and you haven’t had any experience.
PhDs#1, 2, 3, and 5: Yes, PhD #4 is right, just leave it to us. We’ll come up with the right plan to suit your needs and ours.
PhD#1: Where did He go?
PhD#2: I don’t know, He just suddenly disappeared.
PhD#3: Well, He isn’t going to get very far as a God if He won’t talk to people.
PhD#4: I tried to talk with Him, but I don’t think He listened to me.
PhD#5: What will we do if He proceeds with His own crazy plan?
PhD#1: We’ll just have to work like hell to redirect Him. We’ll have to turn His plan into something more acceptable to the human mind.
PhD#2: Gosh, He’s a pain in the you-know-what.
PhD#3: (looking at PhD#1) You mentioned hell – maybe it’s time to start working with that other guy.
PhD#4: Well, he is certainly easier to work with, and he is also much smarter than Christ.
PhD#5: If he is willing, let’s go with him.
PhDs#1, 2, 3, 4 and 5: Agreed.
Christ decided to enter history by way of the human heart. And He prepared us for His entry by constantly urging His people, through the prophets, to turn from the worship of Baal, which is the worship of the sensual material world, and look to a personal God who is more than the sum total of the divergent parts of the natural world. But the Caiaphases of Jewry and the Greeks who reject the foolishness of the Incarnation hold to the religion of Baal, because if God can be contained within the confines of their systems, which consist only of what can be analyzed, dissected, and catalogued by the human mind, then they control God; in fact they become greater than God, because their minds tell us who and what God is. The pride of intellect is the original sin, and Satan can frame that sin in the form of virtue. The virtuous churchmen of Europe are proud of their knowledge of God, but that pride kills love, and faith can only be engendered by love. The darkness deepens — Lord with me abide.
There is no point in writing with the hope of enkindling some remnant spark of humanity in the European people if the European people are irredeemable. And it does seem like the systems analysis people have triumphed. Conservative and liberal are all of one mind on the subject of God: he or she or it is the sum total of their mind-forged vision of the natural world. Anyone who tries to inject an element of pietas into church politics or state politics is met with the intellectual sneer and more often than not public censure in the form of economic disenfranchisement, imprisonment, and sometimes execution, all in the name of virtue, because white pietas is not part of the religion of the modern liberals. So why bother?
I look to Edmund Burke, who felt compelled, despite what seemed to be the impossibly of putting a dent in the armor of the Jacobins, to stay true to something inside of him that urged him to fight on. And Anthony Jacob picked up where Burke left off. He took up the defense of the European people and their God in spite of the intellectual sneer and the condemnation of the intellectuals in church and state. It all seems hopeless, but that is what Satan wants. There is a world of pure delight that is more, much more, than the sum parts of the natural world, and the way to that world is through the love of our own in and through that mysterious stranger who is Christ the Lord. +