Where Does Faith Dwell?

Then were there brought unto him little children, that he should put his hands on them, and pray: and the disciples rebuked them.
But Jesus said, Suffer little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven.

Matthew 19: 13-14


Love now consists in word and not in deed,
Faith depends on reason not on the Scriptures, as it used to be;
Religion has ascended from the heart to the head
It now dwells in the brains, and the heart, alas! is empty.

-Jeremias de Dekker

The liberals’ response to the recent Islamic terror attack was the standard response. Theresa May said there is no such thing as an Islamic terrorist attack, there are only Islamist terror attacks, which means (when translated) that no true Moslem ever does anything evil. And the Moslem mayor of London told us that we have to “accept” a certain amount of Islamic terror attacks if we live in a major city. Why must we accept such attacks? I suppose we must accept such attacks because Tony Blair and his ilk have told us that we must be culturally diverse.

Then there is the Britain First party, the party that claims to be for Britons first, but its proponents do not believe in a white Britain. They believe in a multi-racial Britain in which people of all races sing “God Save the Queen.” What was their response to the Moslem attack? Jayda Fransen told her fellow Brits to come out and protest. From whence comes this mystical faith in protests? Do protests work? Yes, they work if those in power are sympathetic to your cause. The British government wanted to get out of India because they were sick of the white man’s burden, so they responded to Gandhi’s protests. The U.S. government wanted to establish black supremacy throughout the United States, so they responded to the black protest movements. But when the whites in Kenya lined the streets to protest the British government’s plan to turn Kenya over to the Mau Maus, the whites’ protests were ignored. And when prolifers in the U.S. took signs, Bibles, and rosaries out to protest the slaughter of the innocents, their protests fell on deaf ears and hearts of stone. When will white people realize that liberals do evil because they are evil? They will not respond to anti-Moslem protests because they want to see the Islamic flag over England’s green and pleasant land and they want to build the kingdom of Satan on earth with the blood of the innocents in the womb and the blood of the ‘irredeemable’ white race. You can’t protest such creatures away. Would there have been a Western civilization if Charles Martel had waited until the Moslems entered Europe, slaughtered over half the population, and conquered Europe, before he got off the couch and marched around with a protest sign deploring the Moslem invasion?

The boast of Britain, the United States, Sweden, Holland, and so many of the Western nations is that they have peaceful transitions of power from one democratic administration to the next. (That has changed slightly in the U.S. due to Trump’s victory.) But if you have peacefully turned your country over to satanic liberals and colored heathens is that something to brag about? And if, once you have turned your nation over to the forces of Satan, you pat yourself on the back for confining your protests to letters to the editor and protest marches, should you be proud of your pacifism? Peaceful protests are only effective when you are protesting something, such as garbage removal, that the powers-that-be do not have a vested interest in opposing. But to peacefully protest the extermination of an entire race of people and the murder of the innocents is not only counter-productive, it is immoral. If you and your family were being besieged by an armed force of colored marauders and government storm troopers, would you feel comforted if your “friends’ said they were going to organize a march to protest the murder of you and your family? This issue of European survival is a very basic, provincial issue; it cannot be universalized away any longer. It is not an abstraction that is being slaughtered, it is our people.

Before proceeding any further let me respond to the American exceptionalists. Every time a European nation has an Islamic terrorist attack, and most particularly when there is a terror attack in Britain, the American nationalists, the exceptionalists, come out of the woodwork to 1) insult the manhood of the Britons, and 2) to laud the exceptional nature of America – ‘It can’t happen here because… well, because we are Americans and we are immune from the problems of Europe.’ But such is not the case. The United States is only exceptionable in a negative sense. Unlike the nations of Europe, the United States never had a traditional, Christian, European government. Our government was always secular and always committed to the destruction of all things Christian and all things European. The Southern rebellion was a rebellion of the European people against liberty, equality, and fraternity. It ended in the 1950s when the Southern people finally decided to love the negro.

What is exceptionable about America, other than its exceptionable anti-European origins? Haven’t we surrendered to the same anti-European forces that are destroying Europe? Are Americans committed to driving the Moslems from their nation? Have Americans made any attempt to end the negroes’ reign of murder, rape, and pillage? The mere ownership of guns does not make American men more manly than the males of Britain and other European nations who do not own guns. If wishes were horses, then beggars would ride, and if gun ownership in and of itself made a man a man, we would not have a white genocide crisis; we would have a land without Moslems, a land in which blacks were segregated form whites, and a land in which liberals were locked up instead of given positions of power and authority. There is something greater than Americanism and guns that is needed before Britain, America, and all the nations of Europe can become the green and pleasant lands they once were.

The Christian theologians do not like phrases such as “England’s green and pleasant land” because such descriptions of European nations suggest that there was something called Christian Europe that was distinct from and better than the non-European nations. How can that be, since murder, lust, avarice, and all the other deadly sins can be found in Europe as well as in the non-European nations? The theologians are morally blind, because they see with their mind’s eye instead of through their heart’s eye. If you read straight European history you will see only the external events. But if you see European history “feelingly” through the eyes of the heart as such poets as Scott, Shakespeare, and Dickens do, you will see a Europe that differs from the Europe that the analytical theologians see. You will see that there once was a living, breathing entity called Christian Europe. What the theologians’ wisdoms could not bring to light was brought to light by the European bards’ faithful chronicles of their people. The bards saw through a glass darkly, but they did see: They saw that Jesus Christ was the founder of European civilization.

The colored heathens have a great advantage over the modern Europeans; the colored heathens are not divided against themselves. They see life as barbarians see life, and they act accordingly. But the Europeans are different. Some, such as the liberals and the neo-pagans, think they have left Christianity behind, but their rejection of Christianity has not been total: They reject Christ’s divinity but they retain a Christian eschatology. The liberal sees a brave, new utopian world, devoid of white men and presided over by noble black savages while the neo-pagan sees a utopian future of great white minds ruling over a world of inferior minds. But in both cases, the liberal and the neo-pagan, it is the Christian belief that history has an end which comes to the forefront. No pagan Greek thought that history had an end; history was circular, not linear, to the Greek. Nietzsche said he wanted to go back to the pagan Greeks, but his Übermensch is of the future not the past. The liberal and the neo-pagan try to be like unto the pagans, but they always fail. What they achieve is the worst of all possible worlds. They have no God to guide them, yet they believe in moving forward. Toward what? Toward whom? They don’t know.(1)

The modern Christian is also operating under a considerable disadvantage. He wants to be a Christian in the liberals’ anti-Christian world without fighting against liberalism. If he leaves the God who had a local habitation (Europe) and a name (Jesus Christ) behind, he can be an intellectual Christian who gets to affirm his religious faith while rejecting the antique Europeans. The modern Christian, who is an apostate Christian that serves the devil, always appeals to the conscience of the liberal ruling class when he wants to stop something like legalized abortion or the Islamic invasion. But he is acting according to the older Christian European ethos, which he has repudiated, when he makes such protests. He refuses to see that only believing Christian Europeans will be concerned about the human things. Inhuman liberals do not care about man’s inhumanity toward man. If you want the benefits of living in a truly Christian society you cannot allow liberals to rule nor can you keep a foot in each world. If you are not an all-or-nothing Christian, fully committed to your people and their God, you will be a divided man, completely incapable of fighting against the enemies of your people and their God.

The squabbles between the neo-pagans, the liberals, the conservatives, and the intellectual Christians are family quarrels. They differ, but they all stay in the family. Judge Gorsuch gave a perfect example of that family togetherness when he said you could disagree with the 9th Circuit Court judges’ opinions, but you must not question their motives. The Britain First protestors and the pro-lifers also represent the ‘one family’ belief of the whites who no longer have a white identity – they peacefully protest white genocide and infanticide as if they are politely disagreeing on the food to be served at Grandma’s 90th birthday party.(2) What binds these people together when, by their professed beliefs, they should be mortal enemies? They are bound together by their willingness to cut off all ties to the Europeans of the past. The liberal and the neo-pagan must sever all ties to the past in order to build their new dystopian worlds. And the rationalist Christian must sever all ties to the antique Europeans because he also envisions a brave new world, a world where pure Christianity, shorn of the racism, sexism, and the anti-Semitism of the old European Christianity can thrive and flourish. The rationalist, New Age Christian never asks himself why nothing good has come from the new blended Christianity. He just blindly affirms Christianity while undermining faith in Christ by repudiating the people who gave Him a place by their racial hearth fire.

If we look at the great divide between old Europe, in which Europeans fought to protect their racial hearth fire, and new Europe, in which the Europeans do not fight to protect their racial hearth fire, we see one striking difference The men and women of old Europe had a childlike faith in Christ; they were not afraid to be considered stupid by clever people. That is the devil’s temptation. He always depicts a childlike faith as a stupid faith.

In the Garden of Eden Satan told Adam and Eve not to be fooled by God – they were told that only stupid idiots believed God’s story about the forbidden fruit. And we must not be stupid, we must be smart, like the devil. C. S. Lewis depicts this ‘don’t be stupid’ gambit of the devil in his book called The Last Battle. The dwarves refuse to acknowledge the grace of God, because they don’t want to be stupid.

Our ancestors believed that the foolishness of God was wiser than the wisdom of men. They believed in the greatest fairy tale ever told, and because they believed in that fairy tale of the Christ, they slew pagan dragons, fought wicked liberal wizards and witches, and married women who were, spiritually, fair princesses. There is no magic formula that a modern rational-minded man can concoct to connect us to old Europe. We can only reconnect to those people through the human heart. If we don’t do that we will surely perish. If we do reconnect with those people we shall not perish as a people nor shall we die in pagan despair; we shall rise again through Christ our Lord. The two resurrections are intimately connected: The ‘like unto a child’ faith in Christ is our people’s only hope, as well as our own personal hope that He has gone to prepare a place for us. +


(1) Neither the European Christian nor the pagan Greek viewed history as something that was evolving toward a kingdom of heaven on hearth. That pernicious heresy is a product of neo-paganism, liberalism, and intellectual Christianity.

(2) The California state court has decided to prosecute the people who released the tapes of Planned Parenthood employees talking about harvesting the body parts of the babies they had slaughtered. Do we really want to keep acting like our disagreements with liberals are family squabbles that can be peacefully resolved through the democratic process?

Posted in Christian Europe, churches as halfway houses | Tagged

The Wheel Has Come Full Circle

And when they agreed not among themselves, they departed, after that Paul had spoken one word, Well spake the Holy Ghost by Esaias the prophet unto our fathers, Saying, Go unto this people, and say, Hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and not perceive: For the heart of this people is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes have they closed; lest they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them. Be it known therefore unto you, that the salvation of God is sent unto the Gentiles, and that they will hear it. – Acts 28: 25-28

The ruling elites and a sizeable portion of the white, gentile, working class populations in every European nation have become spiritual Jews. They have closed their eyes and their hearts to the Son of God. There have been thousands of death-of-the-west type books (and quite possibly if an accurate tally was made, the figure would be higher) since Spengler wrote his famous death-of-the-West book, The Decline of the West, in 1918. But the death of Western civilization and the demise of the white race, which founded Western civilization, can be summed up in those four verses of Acts. We must not see Jewishness as an exterior sign of a people who were predestined to play the villains in a divine drama. Jewishness is a spiritual disease that can strike any race of people who reject the light of the world. On the cross, while in mortal pain, our Lord spoke of mercy and forgiveness: “Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do.” To whom was He referring? Was He referring to the Romans, to the Jews, or to both? I don’t know, quite probably if we look at it from His eyes, which is hard for us to do, He was referring to all those who did not know who He was because of circumstances that were not solely determined by a willful hardness of heart. But what of those who did know who He was and did willfully harden their hearts? Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for the modern day Jewish gentiles who have hardened their hearts against Christ.

Our destiny as a people and as individuals is centered on this issue of the hardened heart. The poets of Christian Europe knew this, but unfortunately – no ‘unfortunately’ is not the right word, let us say ‘tragically’ – the theologians did not concern themselves with the heart. But the prophets were concerned with the heart, Christ was concerned with the heart, and so was St. Paul. And if my concordance of the Bible can be trusted, it seems that the prophets, Christ, and St. Paul were obsessed with what was in a man’s heart, because the Bible is filled with references to the heart. If we take the Bible seriously, we must conclude that what is in a man’s heart defines the man.

The drama of the Europeans’ descent from His “kingdom come on earth as it is in heaven” to the kingdom of hell on earth is the drama of the hardened heart. Let us return to Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice in order to fully understand the Europeans’ transformation from Christ-bearers to Shylockian Jews, for it is in The Merchant of Venice that we see, in the Christian Venetians, what we, as a people, once were. And we see, in Shylock, what we, as a people, have become.

Shylock makes his reasons for hating Antonio quite clear –

I hate him for he is a Christian.
But more for that in low simplicity
He lends out money gratis, and brings down
The rate of usance here with us in Venice.

It’s bad enough that Antonio is a Christian, but he becomes a monstrosity to Shylock when he acts according to Christian principles. Our modern liberals, the spiritual heirs of Shylock, hate all professed Christians, but it is the Christians who try to act according to Christian principles who earn their special hatred. It is the uncompromising Europeans, the men and women who champion the Christian things, that receive the liberals’ particular hatred.

Shylock doesn’t get his pound of flesh, because the Venetians, as representatives of Christian Europe, stand “shoulder to shoulder in phalanx” against Shylock’s attempt to turn Christian law, which is of the spirit, into legalese, which is the law of Satan. Scott describes Satan’s strict formalism in his novel The Black Dwarf:

Once upon a time this old hag is said to have crossed the moor, driving before her a flock of geese, which she proposed to sell to advantage at a neighbouring fair;—for it is well known that the fiend, however liberal in imparting his powers of doing mischief, ungenerously leaves his allies under the necessity of performing the meanest rustic labours for subsistence. The day was far advanced, and her chance of obtaining a good price depended on her being first at the market. But the geese, which had hitherto preceded her in a pretty orderly manner, when they came to this wide common, interspersed with marshes and pools of water, scattered in every direction, to plunge into the element in which they delighted. Incensed at the obstinacy with which they defied all her efforts to collect them, and not remembering the precise terms of the contract by which the fiend was bound to obey her commands for a certain space, the sorceress exclaimed, “Deevil, that neither I nor they ever stir from this spot more!” The words were hardly uttered, when, by a metamorphosis as sudden as any in Ovid, the hag and her refractory flock were converted into stone, the angel whom she served, being a strict formalist, grasping eagerly at an opportunity of completing the ruin of her body and soul by a literal obedience to her orders. It is said, that when she perceived and felt the transformation which was about to take place, she exclaimed to the treacherous fiend, “Ah, thou false thief! lang hast thou promised me a grey gown, and now I am getting ane that will last for ever.”

It was the fate of the Jews to see a small sect of Nazarenes, the devotees of a blasphemer, become the rulers of a world in which they were a small, hated sect. Now the wheel has come full circle: the Shylockian liberals rule the world, and the Christian Europeans are a small, hated sect in that world. Is there a symmetry of faiths — first one side rules and then another with no difference between the two? No, the liberals’ Shylockian world is devoid of mercy; it is a return to paganism. The entire Old Testament is a struggle between belief in the God of Isaiah and belief in the nature gods to whom the Israelites continually return. Once Isaiah’s prophecies were fulfilled and the majority of the Jews rejected the Light, the Gentiles, the Europeans, became the Christ-bearers –

And when they opposed themselves, and blasphemed, he shook his raiment, and said unto them, Your blood be upon your own heads; I am clean: from henceforth I will go unto the Gentiles. – Acts 18:6

What does Shylock say at the trial? “My deeds upon my head! I crave the law, the penalty and forfeit of my bond.” Thus it is and always shall be. The blasphemers crave the law, the law devoid of the mercy of God. It is the devil’s formalism which will ultimately bring ruin upon the men of the hardened hearts who look to Satan for salvation.

Shylock asserted that the Christian Europeans were like all other people, they were without mercy, because mercy does not exist. But what happens when Shylock himself is caught in the clutches of his own mind-forged merciless law? The man who would not extend mercy receives mercy:

Por. Shylock, there’s thrice thy money offer’d thee.

Shy. An oath, an oath, I have an oath in heaven:
Shall I lay perjury upon my soul?
No, not for Venice.

Por. Why, this bond is forfeit;
And lawfully by this the Jew may claim
A pound of flesh, to be by him cut off
Nearest the merchant’s heart:—Be merciful;
Take thrice thy money; bid me tear the bond.

Shy. When it is paid according to the tenour.
It doth appear you are a worthy judge;
You know the law, your exposition
Hath been most sound: I charge you by the law,
Whereof you are a well-deserving pillar,
Proceed to judgment: by my soul I swear,
There is no power in the tongue of man
To alter me: I stay here on my bond.

And when he is caught?

Por. Thou has contriv’d against the very life
Of the defendant; and thou has incurr’d
The danger formerly by me rehears’d
Down therefore and beg mercy of the Duke.

And then there is that incredible, breathtaking response of the Christian, European Duke: “That thou shalt see the difference of our spirit, I pardon thee thy life before thou ask it.” Of course there is a condition placed on Shylock: he must conform, at least outwardly, to the ethos of Christianity. There will be no more pound-of-flesh money-lending. The modern critics who see nothing but European cruelty in Shylock’s forced conversion are willfully blind. Shylock has shown himself opposed to the light, and he must be prevented from attacking the people who have infused that light into their civilization. It is a miracle of God’s grace that Shylock’s life is spared. And Shylock does not have to be Shylock. He can be like his daughter who responds to the light and becomes a Christian.

Portia assumes the mantle of Christ in the fourth act, which is the climactic act, and then reverts in the fifth act to a playful, giddy school girl. That Shakespeare places a divine drama within a comedy should not make us dismissive of what the play entails. Are not our lives like unto The Merchant of Venice? Amidst the trivialities of life we are involved in the great drama of salvation – we can side with Satan and his legions, who have hardened their hearts against the light, or we can bend our knees to the God of mercy, who is Christ the Lord.

Bassanio is a bumbling everyman, like all of the gentile Europeans, but he has that within him which is the stuff on which Christendom was built. When he steps forth and chooses the leaden casket over the gold and silver caskets, he exhibits the moral vision that separates the European people from all others.

So may the outward shows be least themselves;
The world is still deceiv’d with ornament.
In law, what plea so tainted and corrupt,
But, being season’d with a gracious voice,
Obscures the show of evil? In religion,
What damned error, but some sober brow
Will bless it and approve it with a text,
Hiding the grossness with fair ornament?
There is no vice so simple, but assumes
Some mark of virtue on his outward parts.
Thus ornament is but the guiled shore
To a most dangerous sea; the beauteous scarf
Veiling an Indian beauty. Therefore, thou gaudy gold,
Hard food for Midas, I will none of thee:
Nor none of thee, thou pale and common drudge
‘Tween man and man. But thou, thou meagre lead,
Which rather threat’nest than dost promise aught,
Thy plainness moves me more than eloquence,
And here choose I. Joy be the consequence!

Yes! The Europeans chose Christ’s mercy over Satan’s law, the law of the hardened heart. And joy was indeed the consequence. It was not the joy of utopia, a joy that is always postponed into a future that those living in the present will never know, but it was a real joy, the joy that comes to us, within this veil of tears, when we realize that our death and our loved ones’ deaths have been destroyed by Christ’s love:

Thy bosom is endeared with all hearts,
Which I by lacking have supposed dead;
And there reigns Love, and all Love’s loving parts,
And all those friends which I thought buried.
How many a holy and obsequious tear
Hath dear religious love stol’n from mine eye,
As interest of the dead, which now appear
But things removed that hidden in thee lie!
Thou art the grave where buried love doth live,
Hung with the trophies of my lovers gone,
Who all their parts of me to thee did give,
That due of many now is thine alone:
   Their images I loved, I view in thee,
   And thou (all they) hast all the all of me.

Shakespeare’s Sonnet 31 

What a people we once were to believe all our buried loves still lived with the God whose mercy passeth the understanding of the mind, but can be known by those who have not hardened their hearts like unto the unrepentant Jews!

We have come full circle. The liberals, who stand with Shylock, rule. We are governed not by the law of mercy, but by the law of the hardened hearts. There can be no living under or compromise with the Shylockian Europeans. In the confirmation hearings of Gorsuch, the much lauded (by conservatives) candidate for the Supreme Court, there was a telling moment when he defended Trump’s right to criticize the judges of the 9th Circuit Court, but then went on to admonish anyone who criticized the motives of those sainted judges. For shame, you hideous, treacherous, backsliding, halfway-house Christian. Of course we must criticize the motives of the 9th Circuit judges. Like Shylock they have made it abundantly clear whom they serve and whom they hate. They serve Satan and they hate the Christ-bearing race. They crave the law, the satanic law that allows for a pound of flesh nearest the heart to be taken from every white European that remains connected to His Europe. The history of the European people in the latter half of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st century is a history of rats fleeing a sinking ship. But they know not to what they flee. They flee to the hell-bound ship. Christ is still at the helm of Europe and He will sustain all of those who do not abandon His European vessel.

There can never be a blending of Shylockian law and Christian law, the law that is above “the sceptered sway” and is enthroned in the hearts of Christian kings. But there can be a blending of the colored heathens and the Shylockian liberals, because the colored heathens, like the liberals, do not believe in the Christian God. The liberal has hardened his heart against the merciful God and the colored heathen’s heart remains hardened, because his savage heart cannot comprehend a God of mercy:

The film represented in silent form the trial and crucifixion of Jesus Christ. At the scene in the Palace where the Roman soldiers struck Him with whips and placed a crown of thorns upon His head, excited cries of ‘Pika! Pika!’ rang out from the Congolese. Pika means hit or strike, and quite naturally, as in a Western film we cheer on the goodies and boo the baddies, they were encouraging the strong against the weak.

Another film depicting in symbolic form the ending of the Arab slave trade by the white man was greeted with equal enthusiasm—each slash of the long whip on the wretched black men’s back was cheered wholeheartedly, and when in coming to grips with the Arab the white hero is momentarily thrown to the ground—their shouts reached a crescendo of support for the Arab—not as representing a race, creed or idea—but simply because he symbolized power and force. – D. P. Dugauquier, Congo Cauldron

Thus the two races, the colored heathens and the Judaized Europeans, are joined in an inharmonious union, grounded in a hatred of the Light of the world. The halfway-house rationalist Christians will only go so far with the European Christians. There is a line they will not cross. They will not leave the world of law, of Jewish law, and return to the world depicted in Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice. Why won’t the halfway-house Christians cross the line? Because they are Christian utopians — they want the French Revolution without all the beheadings. But that is what utopia is all about, Mr. Rational, Anti-racist Christian. It is about the execution of Christian kings and the extermination of the white, Christ-bearing race. Side with Shylock, while mildly chiding him for his bloodthirstiness, if you must, but don’t tell me that you are taking the Christian middle ground. There is no Christian middle ground. You either cross the line and stand with Shakespeare’s Venetians or else you stand with Shylock and the devil. +

Posted in Charity, legalism, Quality of mercy | Tagged , ,

In This Hope We Live

The ash grove, how graceful, how plainly ’tis speaking
The wind through it playing has language for me.
Whenever the light through its branches is breaking,
A host of kind faces is gazing at me.
The friends from my childhood again are before me
Each step brings a memory as freely I roam.
With soft whispers laden the leaves rustle o’er me
The ash grove, the ash grove alone is my home.

Down yonder green valley where streamlets meander
When twilight is fading I pensively roam
Or in the bright noon tide in solitude wander
Amid the dark shades of the lonely ash grove.
‘Twas there while the black bird was cheerfully singing
I first met my dear one, the joy of my heart
Around us for gladness the bluebells were springing
The ash grove, the ash grove that sheltered my home.

My lips smile no more, my heart loses its lightness;
No dream of the future my spirit can cheer.
I only can brood on the past and its brightness
The dear ones I long for again gather here.
From ev’ry dark nook they press forward to meet me;
I lift up my eyes to the broad leafy dome,
And others are there, looking downward to greet me
The ash grove, the ash grove, again is my home.

-The Ash Grove


Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: And whosoever liveth and believeth in me shall never die. Believest thou this?

John 11: 25-26

The prolife movement was and is a failure, and Trump’s victory will fail to stop the extermination of white people. And the reason for the prolifers’ failure to protect the unborn and Trump’s failure to protect white people is one and the same. Before proceeding to that reason, let me explain what I mean by failure. During the course of my involvement in abortion clinic protests, I saw some women who were dissuaded from abortion by the protestors, and I think many white lives will be saved by Trump’s policies on illegal immigration. Those victories are meaningful, because human life is precious, but they are rearguard victories. The prolifers are in retreat — in fact they never attacked — before the forces of Satan, and Trump has never claimed he was going to attack liberalism, he only promised to make room for whites within Liberaldom. In both cases, the prolife movement and the Trump movement, when the smoke of battle clears, there is one victor. The liberals still hold the field; they are still killing babies and they are still destroying the white race.

Now we come to the reason the prolife movement and the Trump movement have failed. They have failed because white people do not have a mythic faith in Christ. They no longer believe that Christ is the true Hero-God. No people can survive as a people without faith in a sacred myth that encompasses their God (or gods) and defines them as a people. Their God must be a mythic God or else their God is not God, and the people must be a mythic people or else they are not a people. And by the use of the term ‘mythic’ I do not mean to suggest something that is not true; I mean to suggest a faith that encompasses a man’s whole being, his whole heart, mind, and soul. A purely rational faith is not a faith. When the Greeks no longer believed in Zeus and the other Olympians, they tried to replace their mythic faith with rationalism. It didn’t work – it never has and it never will. No people can survive without a mythic faith.

The Christian theologians, especially the scholastics, made a great error when they over emphasized the rational aspects of Christianity in order to separate the one true God from the pagan gods. Their rationalist minds were incapable of understanding what the poetical heart of St. Paul did understand – Men must love with their whole heart, mind, and soul in order to know the one true God. You cannot love a rational, catechism-God with your whole heart, mind, and soul. All sacred, mythic stories have some elements of truth, but only the Christian story is the Truth. If you make Christ a philosopher, you have cut your people off from the true faith. You have left Christians naked to their pagan enemies. John Sharp Williams, the magnificent defender of the Southern people’s heroic resistance to the liberal leviathan, was one of the last white men (Anthony Jacob was the very last) to articulate a defense of the one true mythic God and the European people who championed that God:

But there was something else, and even a greater cause than local self-government, for which we fought. Local self-government temporarily destroyed may be recovered and ultimately retained. The other thing for which we fought is so complex in its composition, so delicate in its breath, so incomparable in its symmetry, that, being once destroyed, it is forever destroyed. This other thing for which we fought was the supremacy of the white man’s civilization in the country which he proudly claimed his own; “in the land which the Lord his God had given him;” founded upon the white man’s code of ethics, in sympathy with the white man’s traditions and ideals. Our forefathers of the forties and fifties and sixties believed that if slavery were abolished, unless the black race were deported from the American States, there would result in the Southern States just such a condition of things as had resulted in San Domingo, in the other West Indies Islands, and in the so-called republics of Central and South America—namely, a hybridization of races, a lowering of the ethical standard, and a degradation, if not loss, of civilization.

Williams was merely asserting what the European faithful of the 19th century believed, that their race and faith were one. They had a mythic faith in Christ and their people’s connection to Christ. This was not just a Southern thing, it was a European thing. The leadership of the North — the academics, the “free” press, the clergymen, and the government officials – was adhering to a new Jacobin, rationalist faith, while their people were still clinging to the old mythic faith. So long as the Southern people maintained their mythic faith, they remained a free people even under the infamous Reconstruction period:

There is no grander, no more superb spectacle than that of the white men of the South standing from ‘65 to ‘74 and ‘75 quietly, determinedly, solidly, shoulder to shoulder in phalanx, as if the entire race were one man, unintimidated by defeat in war, unawed by adverse power, unbribed by patronage, unbought by the prospect of present material prosperity, waiting and hoping and praying for the opportunity which, in the providence of God, must come to overthrow the supremacy of “veneered savages,” superficially “Americanized Africans”—waiting to reassert politically and socially the supremacy of the civiliza­tion of the English-speaking white race.

But when the Southern people, along with the European people in every nation, succumbed to the rationalism of the academics, the “free” press, the clergymen, and the government, they lost their faith and their place in the world: they became spiritual nomads, wandering over the face of the earth looking for a God with a local habitation and a name. Can they not see that they have a God and a people? No, they cannot. They have severed all ties to their mythic past, where He dwells with His people. Whither do they go without the one true God, the God of the European hearth fire?

The mad-dog liberals have made gods of the colored heathens, with the negro at the pinnacle of the heathen pantheon. The colored heathens worship their race, devoid of the spirit, and the rationalist Christian sects have gone whoring after the various heathen gods, be they the Jews, the Moslems, and/or the negroes. There is a direct connection between the type of rationalist, syncretic Christianity recommended by Peter Kreeft in his book Ecumenical Jihad and the atheism of the modern, mad-dog liberals. All anti-racism in the name of a universalist God and a multi-racial people ends up as atheism. Men such as St. Paul, Edmund Burke, and R. L. Dabney, who upheld chattel slavery, also believed in a God with a local habitation and a name. Men such as Blackstone, Montesquieu, Locke, and Rousseau, who believed in the equality of the races (Rousseau actually believed in the superiority of the black savage), also believed in an impersonal, rationalist, non-mythic God. Such creatures always end up adding a ‘natural savage’ to their rationalism in order to obtain the mythic strength that their rational system lacks.

There is a curse for future generations of white Southerners and their fellow Europeans contained in Williams’ address to the Confederate veterans: “The other thing for which we fought is so complex in its composition, so delicate in its breath, so incomparable in its symmetry, that, being once destroyed, it is forever destroyed.” The “other thing,” Christian Europe, has been destroyed. Must we then simply despair and die? I do not think Williams, being a man of mythic Europe, would recommend despair. He was praising the brave sons of the South in his speech, not prophesying.

We, the remnant Europeans, must acknowledge that the worst has happened: Christian Europe is no more. But if it once was, and our honored dead tell us that Christian Europe once existed, then we must rebuild it. It is quite likely that all the paintings, sculptures, and architectural wonders and monuments that tell the story of the Europeans’ connection to Christ will be destroyed. You can’t invite colored heathens to rule in what were formerly European nations and expect to retain any of the artistic testaments to old Europe. But the word of God and the history of His people that is contained in the works of the European bards and chroniclers will survive, because the Holy Scriptures and the literary works that were inspired by the Holy Scriptures can be circulated in the European underground as a testimony to the fact that there once was a European overworld in which the white Europeans thought and felt mythically. They saw their race and their faith as one entity, and when they fought the colored heathen and the whites who betrayed their race, they did not fight democratically, they fought as they loved, with their whole heart, mind, and soul.

We, the European people, have entered into the world depicted in C. S. Lewis’s Chronicle called The Silver Chair. The liberals have conquered the Overworld, and they keep telling us that there never was a Christian Narnia. The dystopian novel Fahrenheit 451 was wrong about the nature of the future, in that book the author projected a right-wing dystopia (only Orwell, C. S. Lewis, and Kipling wrote of left-wing dystopias), but the author did accurately present the way out of a dystopian state. The hero starts to reconnect with his European past, he starts to read a copy of David Copperfield. When the European people sicken of modernity and seek to reconnect with their mythic European past, they will throw off the yoke of their liberal oppressors. Until that time they will continue to be sacrificial victims that the liberals offer up to their colored heathen gods.

The liberals have their colored gods, the colored heathens have made gods of themselves – they believe in “the race” – and the white, neo-pagans have made a god of their minds. Which of those three groups will die before they come to maturity? The mind-forged neo-pagans, of course. Men must have a mythic god. The liberal and the colored heathens will completely rout the alt-right, which is an alternative version of liberalism — rationalism without a God — and they will completely rout the rationalist Christians. Only the mythic Christ, the one true God, the God of the European people when they were the European people, can defeat the satanic forces arrayed against the white race.

The liberals have created a mythic culture of the noble colored savage, which they support with their whole heart, mind, and soul. They hate the antique Europeans because the antique Europeans supported a different myth, the one true myth of the one true God. The rationalist Christians and the rationalist neo-pagans share the liberals’ hatred of the Europeans of the past. But both groups are ambivalent about God. What is to be done in their world, a world without faith? Can rationalism replace faith?

There is no mythic opposition to the liberals. When there is such an opposition, liberalism will crumble. Castle Liberaldom is only a cardboard castle, but even a cardboard castle must have someone willing to knock it down before it can be replaced. The white man is in a mind-forged prison. He can’t believe in the Christian myth, so he must submit to the liberals’ rule. There are places to hide in America, because of the country’s size, and there are places to hide in the nations of Eastern Europe, because of their poverty (i.e., the colored heathens prefer the wealthier European nations), but all the European people are in imminent danger of becoming a non-people, because they do not think of themselves and their God in mythic terms. It’s not true that we can’t go back to the past. We can’t literally go back in time, but we most certainly can and must grab hold of those sacred ties of honor and faith that link us to the past. We must be like unto them, the antique Europeans, because they were of mythic Europe, which is our world. We need no other world, nor should we seek any other world.

The liberals treat white pietas as a disease that must be stamped out. When I was growing up, they used the Monkey Vomit method of treating the disease (see The Gingerbread House) — they didn’t actually ban the literature and the historical chronicles of the past, they simply poured the monkey vomit of ‘racism,’ ‘sexism,’ and ‘religious intolerance’ on the European past so that our sacred heritage appeared as a loathsome pestilence. Now, although the monkey vomit method is still used, it is not used as often as the iron-fisted ban on all things European. The young people of my generation knew about European history, but they learned about it through the eyes of the Christ-hating, white-hating Jacobin liberals. The young whites of today, more often than not, do not even know anything of old Europe. They only know of that civilization as some hideous monstrosity that must be avoided and combated as a plague should be avoided and combated. And how do you combat a plague? You kill the breeding grounds for the plague.

When the AIDs plague started spreading, the liberals did not close down the gay bath houses which were the breeding grounds for the plague, because they refused to acknowledge that the AIDs epidemic was a plague caused by men acting according to the ethos of liberalism. But white pietas is different. That is a plague. And the breeding ground for white pietas is the European hearth fire where the Christian, European myth is honored and revered. Should the love that dwells there, for God, for kith, and for kin, spread, the liberals and the colored heathens would be driven to the swamps and the hinterlands of the European nations where they would be treated as a disease that had to be guarded against and combated. I’m well aware of the fact that church, state, academy, and media have declared war on the plague of mythic Europe. And I’m well aware of the fact that they have been quite successful. There seems to be nothing left of the Christ-centered, mythic Europe of the past, but there is a line of George MacDonald’s poetry that keeps coming to the forefront of my memory: “Of hopes not credible until they are.”(1) If we are still, by some miracle of God’s grace, connected to mythic, Christian Europe, then we must act according to the code of the people who dwelt therein, despite the fact that our actions seem a hundredfold more Quixotic than the actions of Don Quixote. All or nothing must be our battle cry. We will settle for nothing less than the Savior, who presides over the Europeans’ racial hearth fire, and His kingdom come on earth as it is in Heaven. “In this hope we live” – without that hope, we perish. +


(1) Go, my beloved children, live your life.
Wounded, faint, bleeding, never yield the strife.
Stunned, fallen-awake, arise, and fight again.
Before you victory stands, with shining train
Of hopes not credible until they are.
Beyond morass and mountain swells the star
Of perfect love–the home of longing heart and brain

Diary of an Old Soul

Posted in blood faith, Europe as the Christ-bearer, resurrection | Tagged

A World Without Mercy

I am sorry for thee; thou art come to answer
A stony adversary, an inhuman wretch,
Uncapable of pity, void and empty
From any dram of mercy…


But mercy is above this sceptred sway,
It is enthroned in the hearts of kings,
It is an attribute to God himself;
And earthly power doth then show likest God’s
When mercy seasons justice. Therefore, Jew,
Though justice be thy plea, consider this,
That in the course of justice none of us
Should see salvation; we do pray for mercy,
And that same prayer doth teach us all to render
The deeds of mercy.

The Merchant of Venice by Wm. Shakespeare

The liberals are behaving like the villain in an old mystery movie, who, having committed a murder, must now kill everyone who can connect him to that murder. Sometimes the villain feels remorse, but in many cases the villain is a pre-repentant Raskolnikov: like the liberals, he is following a ‘higher’ morality. Some inconsequential, worthless nobody is standing in the way of his happiness, so he must kill that worthless, inconsequential nobody. And if other inconsequential, worthless nobodies try to connect him to the first murder, he kills them as well.

The liberals have murdered the image of God in Man, which is Christ the Lord, because He was an inconsequential nobody who stood in the way of their happiness. And now they must kill all the inconsequential nobodies who were connected to Him and will continually accuse them, the liberals, of murder. Unlike the villain in the mystery movie, the liberals will not confine their murderous rampages to those people whom they know are directly connected to the first victim, they feel compelled to kill all those whom they suspect might be connected to the first victim, even tangentially. This is why the entire white race, minus the liberals, must be eliminated. There must be none left that can stand in the way of the liberals’ multi-racial utopia, presided over by Atticus-Finch liberals. Of course such a utopia is not the vision of the colored barbarians; the colored barbarians do not want any whites, not even Atticus Finch, in their world, but the liberals have never had any connection to the stranger called ‘Reality.’ If they did, they wouldn’t be liberals.

The liberals can’t, in reality, eliminate Christ by exterminating the white race, but the liberals do not believe in the reality of the Son of God. They think He is a mind-forged creation of racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-Semitic, Islamophobic whites. So they think that they can eliminate that mind-forged evil by eliminating the white race. It seems suicidal, because are not the liberals white? Yes, in reality (there’s that irksome word again) they are white. But again, we need to emphasize that the liberals have no connection to reality; they live in an abstract fantasy world where all other whites will be destroyed while they, the illuminati, have gone beyond whiteness to … That higher state varies from liberal to liberal, but it is always a higher elevation from which they hurl thunderbolts at the hideous white race. The liberals’ hatred of the white race is even greater than the colored barbarians’ hatred, because the liberals are in a constant state of dread. They fear that they might be placed among the damned, the racist whites. Hence, their constant, fervent busyness in defense of the non-white and in defiance of the white. Look at their opposition to Trump, a 1950s liberal. The liberals have gone beyond mad-dog liberalism in their opposition to him: they have bared their satanic fangs. Why? There is only one explanation – they are possessed. They hate whites with a passion fueled by Satan. Trump has done nothing that places him outside the parameters of what classical liberalism is supposed to be, but classical liberalism was never really liberal, in the moral sense, at heart. It was not about compassion for the poor or the enfranchisement of the disenfranchised. It was, and is, about the destruction of the white, Christ-bearing race. You will be eternally pushing Sisyphus’s rock up the democratic hill unless you come to grips with that essential fact – Liberalism is from the devil. Through the liberals and the colored barbarians, Satan strikes back at Christ by attacking the Christ-bearing race. The race war is a religious war. Satan does not care if he has to kill every white on the face of the earth in order to kill the tiny remnant of whites still connected to Christ. Non-Christian whites are collateral damage in the great war between Satan and Christ.

When I speak of Christ as the true God, I am speaking of a very specific Christ. I am speaking of the Christ of old Europe. That Christ is not a time-bound Christ of an archaic culture, He is the Christ of the Gospels, the Christ whom St. Paul encountered on the road to Damascus. People of other races can come to the Savior, but only if they respond to the light emanating from the hearth fire of the antique Europeans. When Ben Gunn says he has not had a Christian diet for three years, there is no need for him to explain that he has not had any European food for three years. Stevenson’s readers knew that Europe and Christ were an incorporate union. That union was not perfect because we are not perfect, but our Lord chose, with a charity that passeth the understanding of the mind, but that can be understood by the heart, to forgive us our trespasses and take the European people onto Himself, because the European people loved much. It is only now, when the Europeans have ceased to love much (for how can they love an abstract Christ without a local habitation by their racial hearth fire?) that they feel forsaken and have gone whoring after heathen gods and heathen systems, such as the negroes, the Islamic hordes, and science.

In every century since the European people joined their hearts and souls to Christ, there have been creatures called ‘liberals’ who sought to destroy the incorporate union between Christ and the European people. Initially the subversive element came from outside of clan Europe. The subversives were predominantly the unrepentant Jews who refused to believe that the Messiah had come. But as intellectual Christianity, the Christianity of the false Aslan, took hold in Europe, the Christian churches started turning out anti-Christian soldiers who were more dangerous than the Jews, because a wolf in sheep’s clothing is worse than a plain wolf. As terrible as George Soros and his ilk are, they are not as harmful to the Christian remnant as Pope Francis and his legions of wolves in sheep’s clothing. In the name of Christ, these anti-Christian wolves assault Christ and His people. I know that the neo-pagans would like to sum up the tragedy of the European people with, “Jew, Jew, Jew!” But Satan is much more subtle than that. The problem is liberalism. A great deal of Jews are liberals, but still it is not Jews who currently fill up the ranks of the liberals’ armies – it is lapsed Christians who have become, like the neo-pagans themselves, as adamantly opposed to the light of the world as the Jews. For every George Soros, whom we should oppose as we would oppose the devil himself, there are ten Pope Francises and twenty more Hillary Clintons. Our enemies are legion, and they are not just confined within the ranks of the Jews.

The obsessive focus on the exterior Jew only is the weakness of the biological-determinist type of conservative. If it is only the visible, identifiable Jew who is the enemy, the biological-determinist conservative, the neo-pagan, does not have to look inside his own soul. The Christian knows that he must not only fight the liberalism that is without, he must also fight the liberalism from within. We all, if we look within, have too much of Ivan Karamazov in us. We do not like the way God has ordered the world, so we are tempted to re-order the world according to our own will. Only Christ could say, “not my will, but thy will be done,” with complete sincerity. Nevertheless, there is a great difference between the Christian European who fights the Ivan Karamazov within himself and the liberal who gives himself over to the Ivan Karamazov within. It is the difference between heaven and hell. Our people, the people who formed an incorporate union with Christ and fought the good fight, loved Him through their people, because of His promise to be with them “alway even unto the end of the world.” Such was the incorporate union between Christ and the European people.

By the beginning of the 20th century, most of the European, intellectual elites had either embraced intellectual Christianity, which is simply another form of atheism, or they had become outright liberals, whoring after new gods. But even though Christian belief faded in Europe during the first half of the 20th century, a Christian ethos remained until the latter half of the 20th century. Europeans were living on what Herbert Butterfield called the “fumes” of Christianity. There was still, in the 20th century, a Christian hangover. The liberals retained some remnants of mercy, but now the hangover is over. The era of ‘no mercy’ has begun. This is not a theory, it is a sad new chapter of European history. There are no remnants of Christianity left in the liberals. They are preceding toward utopia, which must be built with white blood, without the mercy that used to separate the European from the colored barbarians. The woman of Calais’s heartfelt cry for mercy would have moved any human heart from another era, but in the era of ‘no mercy’ her plea fell on deaf ears. The liberals do not care about the suffering of whites. Quite the contrary, they delight in their suffering. The liberals, whether they are Jew or Gentile, have become Shylock. They want a pound of flesh nearest the heart from every white man, woman, and child. Their satanic god demands it, and they know no higher law than his will.

It’s not pleasant to be at the mercy of an enemy that has no mercy, but there is no escaping it: we are in the hands of an enemy who has left every last remnant of Christianity behind and ventured into a brave new world where faith, hope, and charity are considered blasphemies, while murderous cruelty is considered noble and inspiring. In his novel Pierre, Herman Melville wrote that a man in dangerous straits is like unto a drowning man: “Well enough he knows he is in peril, well enough he knows the cause of that peril, but the sea is the sea and the drowning man does drown.” That is true enough if we have placed our hopes in reason. We can’t reason with the liberals, because human beings are not governed by reason. They use their reason to defend their passions:

In every doctrine which wins men over to it, the sophistry it contains is less potent than the promises it makes; its power over them is greater through their sensibility than through their intelligence; for, if the heart is often the dupe of the head, the latter is much more frequently the dupe of the former. We do not accept a system because we deem it a true one, but because the truth we find in it suits us. Political or religious fanaticism, any theological or philosophical channel in which truth flows, always has its source in some ardent longing, some secret passion, some accumulation of intense, painful desire to which a theory affords an outlet;

The French Revolution by Hippolyte Taine

If reason governed liberals, would they claim to love children while sponsoring the wholesale slaughter of babies in the womb? Would they claim to be against rape while encouraging the wholesale sexual abuse of women by Moslems? Would they claim to love black people while condemning the white people who actually helped black people, such as the apartheid white South Africans and the pre-Civil War Southerners? Would they claim to be in favor of peaceful, non-violent government while fomenting violence and anarchy every time an election doesn’t go their way? Would they claim to be against nuclear war and remain at enmity with a rival nuclear power because that nation is a nationalist nation and not a communist one? And would they actually believe that the white race, the Christ-bearing race, the only race that gave the world a vision of the incarnate God, is the source of all evil in the world? None of those “would theys” are rational; they can’t be explained by Socratic reason, they don’t make sense philosophically. But we can understand the rational contradictions of the liberals if we look at man through the eyes of the poet rather than with the mind of the philosopher. Man is not governed by his reason. He is governed, for good or evil, by his passion. The liberals are possessed of a passionate hatred for Christ and the Christ-bearing race. There might be an occasional road to Damascus conversion in their ranks, but in the main they will remain what they have become, the spawns of Satan. They are no longer human beings, they are like unto Lady Macbeth who invited Satan to fill her, “from the crown to the toe top-full of direst cruelty! Make thick my blood; Stop up th’ access and passage to remorse, That no compunctious visitings of nature Shake my fell purpose, nor keep peace between Th’ Effect and it!” Is it any wonder that such creatures from hell have joined with the colored barbarians in a holy war against the white race? It is the passion of Satan, which consists of dire cruelty, against… It should be Satan and his minions against the European people who stand with Christ, who is the spiritual fount of Europe. But Europeans no longer feel that they need to put on the whole armor of God to do battle with the devil and his minions. They don’t believe in such things any more. They believe in science, reason, and the democratic process. We have become too intelligent to believe that men with a passionate love for their people and the God who loved so much that He was crucified for their sake, can triumph over Satan and his minions.

The passionate love of kith, kin, and God will bring us safely home. Dr. Verwoerd, of sacred memory, enjoins us not to “consider ourselves wise or learned or big when we abandon our people.” Anthony Jacob tells us that, “charity not only begins at home, it perishes without one.” And St. Paul, the passionate apostle, tells us that he will show us a better way than reason and prophecy:

Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.

But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.

When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.

For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.

And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.

1 Corinthians 13: 8-13

Only one people, as a people, actually tried to make charity the heart and soul of their civilization. Are we now going to completely step away from those blessed Europeans and cede everything to the liberals and the colored heathens? It seems like we are. But there is something in the civilization of the antique Europeans that provides us with hope. The people who loved much knew that the divine love of Christ would ultimately lead them out of the valley of the shadow of death into the light. The people of old Europe, our people, believed in the triumph of the light over darkness: “In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed.” Neither the liberals nor the colored heathens shall have power over us if we become what our ancestors were, and what we are destined to be – the Christ-bearing people, who love their people and their God with a passionate intensity that passeth the understanding of the liberals, the colored heathens, and Satan himself. “Thus is our faith tested” – our faith has been burned into our hearts: “Charity never faileth.” +

Posted in Charity, liberals are the true haters | Tagged ,

For God, for Hearth, and for Race


The noon-day train will bring Frank Miller
If I’m a man I must be brave
And I must face a deadly killer
Or lie a coward, a craven coward
Or lie a coward in my grave.

-from “The Ballad of High Noon”


The Europeans have been to the mountain and have stood on holy ground. And they have stood on holy ground because they embraced the little human things that lead us to God. St. Paul is the greatest of all theologians because his epistles are addressed to small groups of individual human beings. All transcendent thought comes from a concern for particular human beings. Shakespeare’s “simple” stories take us to the heights and depths because Shakespeare is concerned with the human heart, not with theories about humanity. And likewise the incomparable Burke; his letters are irreplaceable works of genius because he wrote them from his heart, without moral blinders on, to stir the hearts of other human beings who still had hearts that lived.

Modern Europeans have contracted a brain fever that has gotten into their blood. Until that fever breaks, there is nothing that can be done with them. They will continue to worship the negro and try to appease the lords of Liberaldom. But if that fever should finally break! It would be like water released from a gigantic dam. All of Liberaldom would be washed away. Do we know the day and the hour of that great cleansing?  Of course we don’t, because the human heart and God’s grace are mysteries. But when the European’s fever breaks, the moral blinders will be removed from his heart, and he will dream dreams and see visions again of a Babe in a Manger and a Man of Sorrows.



On the instant stood revealed, as though he had blown down the ages, a pure Goth, unchanged in any essential since his fathers had left their forests and through all obstacles, even through ranks of Roman legionaries, sword in hand had hewn their way straight to the goal of their desires. He was a Goth in all his appetites and habits, a Goth unchanged, unfettered. True to his instincts, true to his traditions, fearing nothing, loving only his own, loving and hating with all his heart—a Goth.

-Thomas Nelson Page in Under the Crust

The liberals spew out venomous lies on a regular basis and call the lies ‘news stories.’ And then they have the audacity to call the real news sites, such as Breitbart, ‘fake news’ sites. Of course the liberals know that they are lying, but lying is permissible in a war, and the liberals are engaged in a holy war against the white race. In a war you never tell the enemy the truth and you try to win adherents to your side by putting out wartime propaganda. CNN and their ilk throughout the European world are propaganda networks, they are not news networks.

The alternative news sites, which are the only genuine news sites, do not put out lies, but they do, unwittingly, perpetuate a lie. That lie is the modern democratic lie, which says that people of different races and different religions can somehow come together and form a nation in which whatever differences they might have can be settled democratically. This cannot be, and the United States and the other democratic, anti-white nations of Europe have shown that a democratic, multi-racial, multi-religious state cannot be.

It is the liberals, not the Breitbart conservative types, who understand what is happening. We are engaged in a full blown war, but only one side, the liberal side, is fighting. While the liberals have made a commitment to do whatever it takes to turn Christendom into Satandom, the conservatives, the believers in democracy, persist in playing ‘pretend.’ They want to pretend that if you keep doing the democratic things – putting out news stories that are truthful, engaging in debates with your liberal opponents, and exhorting people to support the proper political candidates, you can win the democracy game. But the liberals are not willing to play by the rules of the democracy game. They are at war with the Christ-bearing people. It is no good to leave Christ out of the picture and claim you want nothing to do with Him, that you just want to be democratic. The liberals won’t listen — if you are white, you cannot be redeemed, you must be destroyed. The tragedy of the alternative right conservatives is that they have a vague desire to defend the white race, but they have no religious foundation from which to launch an attack on Liberaldom. Hence, they attack liberals through the democratic process. And that process is a circular road that winds around through hell.

The alternative news sites people give out mixed signals. The news they report gives us clear evidence that we are in a war with the liberals and the colored barbarians. Yet, the conservatives who put out the news act like we are living in a world where we are all in agreement about what is fundamentally important, while simply differing on the details of how we should remain true to what is fundamentally important. This disconnect, to report on the liberals’ satanic agenda and the colored barbarians’ atrocities as if it is simply business as usual, breeds despair in the white remnant. The white everyman tries to make himself believe that the old democratic ways will work, that he can vote, petition, and democratically debate his troubles away. But late at night, when he is alone in the darkness, he has a sense of impending doom. Something is wrong, there is a dreadful beast pursuing him, and he cannot shake the beast off by taking refuge in the democratic process. And the reason he can’t take refuge in the democratic process is because it is the democratic process that has loosed the beast upon the white everyman.

What is missing in the business-as-usual reportage of the conservatives is the passionate advocacy of an Edmund Burke or an Anthony Jacob. Those men not only reported on the liberals’ blasphemies and the colored barbarians’ atrocities, they were also advocates for the Christian European hearth fire. They didn’t just disagree with the liberals, they hated them. And they didn’t prefer a white system over other systems because they thought the white system was the ‘smart’ way to govern, they preferred their people over all other people because they loved their people. And that is the crux of the issue – the conservatives want to preserve some of liberalism – they are not comfortable with an outright advocacy of a white, Christian nation. But you can’t have just a little bit of liberalism, just as you can’t have a little bit of cancer. Once the cancer has appeared, it must be eradicated, or it will kill you.

Let me stay with the cancer analogy because, sadly, we all are familiar with that hideous disease. If a doctor tells you all the gruesome details of your cancerous disease, he is being no more than truthful, he is doing his job just as the Breitbart reporter who reports on the liberals’ blasphemies and the colored barbarians’ atrocities is doing his job. But what if the doctor tells you the horrific details without telling you about your chances for survival? Has he told you the whole truth? Or what if he tells you that your cancer can be cured by drinking enormous quantities of Coca-Cola and consuming large amounts of Twinkies? All of the grim atrocity stories should be followed by an advocacy of the Christian things – of honor, of kinship, and of the charity that never faileth. We should steer whites away from Coca-Cola and Twinkies political solutions, and toward the faith, blood, and soil solutions of our European ancestors.

I recently saw an interview with one of the practical, realistic breed of conservatives, who was discussing Europe. His conclusion was that Europe, particularly Germany, was finished. His analysis was quite rational and logical – Germany was being overrun by Moslems and Africans and the German people were incapable and/or unwilling to resist them. Rape, murder, and pillage is the German people’s destiny – that was the realistic, factual conservative’s irrefutable conclusion. Let me make a brief aside before responding to the conservative’s ‘realistic’ assessment: I’ve been blessed with many children. Yes, contra Planned Parenthood, I believe that children are a blessing. And of course, I love all my children, but I’ve noticed over the years that the intensity of my loving concern for an individual child is determined by his or her need. If one child is physically sick or especially troubled, my concern for that child is intensified. So it is with Europe. I love the European people with all my heart, mind, and soul. I am of Europe, and I only know Him in and through Europe. Ratty’s river and my Europe are one.(1) But my extra special concern right now is Germany. That nation, that child, is the most besieged and despised nation of Europe. Germany is, in terms of her danger and the hatred directed against her, a surrogate for all European nations. Our danger differs in degree, not in kind, from the danger that Germany is now facing. Like Will Kane and Shane, the German people, and all European people, are facing that “immediate and implacable moment” when they must choose to fight as Europeans were meant to fight – for God, for hearth, and for race – or to run like craven cowards before the liberals and their colored allies.

Let us go back to the practical, realistic conservative – “Europe, particularly Germany, is finished.” Case closed? No, it is not closed. The practical conservative has ignored, like Ivan Karamazov, the elephant in the room. Ivan makes a very good case, the very best case that can be made, against God. He places suffering humanity before Alyosha and challenges him to refute that crystal clear fact of existence: We suffer and die. What is Alyosha’s response? He simply says that Ivan has left out the one thing that tips the balance in favor of a loving God. Ivan has left out the Man of Sorrows, our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.

There are other facts of history besides Spengler’s facts of biological destiny. Human beings are not just biological entities. They have souls. Christian Europe is a ‘fact’ of history. The Europeans spiritual ascent in the past, as a people, is just as much a fact of history as is their current spiritual decline. Our individual biological destinies are written. We shall die in the flesh – but our spiritual destiny? That is not determined solely by biology. No nation of Europe is finished, because there is no telling what will happen if the European people act in and through the Christ of the European hearth fire. Certainly, the Germans — and the rest of Europe is close behind – have their backs to the wall. But we must not be willfully blind and accept Ivan Karamazov’s verdict as the final verdict. There is the Man of Sorrows: nothing is impossible with and through Him.

I’ve often pondered, and even more so now as the European light fades from off the face of the earth, why our Lord thought it was necessary to bring St. Paul front and center on the stage (for all the world is indeed a stage) of our salvation history. What did St. Paul bring to the church that the other apostles could not bring, at least not as well as St. Paul? The other apostles preached the Gospel, and St. Peter, albeit with divine prodding, extended the Christian message to the Gentile as well as the Jew. So what did St. Paul bring to the church? It is crystal clear if you read his epistles with your heart. St. Paul brought a passionate intensity to the Christian faith that was unconquerable. All the other apostles preached Christ crucified, Christ risen, but St. Paul set that message on fire and drove it into the hearts of his convertites. And St. Paul’s Christ was the Christ of the early Europeans who turned the more intellectual, Romanized faith back to its passionate Pauline roots:

The Nordic religion was not a religion of dread, or of magic formularies to propitiate hostile powers. Instead of covering its temples with frescoes of the tortures of the damned, it taught people not to be afraid of death. Its ideal was the fellowship of the hero with the gods, not merely in feasting and victory, but in danger and defeat. For the gods, too, are in the hands of fate, and the Scandinavian vision of the twilight of the gods that was to end the world showed the heroes dying valiantly in the last hopeless fight against the forces of chaos—loyal and fearless to the last. It is an incomplete but not an ignoble religion. It contains those elements of character which it was the special mission of the Nordic peoples to add to modern civilization and to Christianity itself.

G. M. Trevelyan in History of England

The Europeans of the 19th century (see “The Sacred Heritage”) were faced with the same Jacobin and colored barbarian threat that we face now. But they turned back the liberal and colored heathen tide by returning to their Pauline roots. Charity, not rationalism, never faileth. It is not over: We are not facing the death of Europe, we are facing a possibility of death, “if these shadows are not altered.” The shadow of death, the death caused by liberalism, can be altered. We are not being defeated in every European nation because of the superior might of the colored heathens: We are being defeated because we do not see ourselves as one people, bound to each other by unbreakable bonds of faith and race. Once we unite what should never have been separated, our faith in Christ and our racial kinship, we will see the same European miracles that Alfred, Charles Martel, and the soldiers of Rorke’s Drift saw. +


(1)`I beg your pardon,’ said the Mole, pulling himself together with an effort. `You must think me very rude; but all this is so new to me. So–this–is–a–River!’

`THE River,’ corrected the Rat.

`And you really live by the river? What a jolly life!’

`By it and with it and on it and in it,’ said the Rat. `It’s brother and sister to me, and aunts, and company, and food and drink, and (naturally) washing. It’s my world, and I don’t want any other. What it hasn’t got is not worth having, and what it doesn’t know is not worth knowing.

-Kenneth Grahame in The Wind in the Willows

Posted in blood faith, Christ the Hero, democracy | Tagged , , ,

From the Dark Night of Negro Worship into the Light of Europe

dore_betrayal_and_journey_to_emmaus It has appeared to some that the South has not done its full duty by the negro. Perfection is, without doubt, a standard above humanity; but, at least, we of the South can say that we have done much for him; if we have not admitted him to social equality, it has been under an instinct stronger than reason, and in obedience to a law higher than the one in the statute books: the law of self-preservation. Slavery, whatever its demerits, was not in its time the unmitigated evil it is fancied to have been. Its time has passed. No power could compel the South to have it back. But to the negro it was salvation. It found him a savage and a cannibal and in two hundred years gave seven millions of his race a civilization, the only civilization it has had since the dawn of history.

We have educated him; we have aided him; we have sustained him in all right directions. We are ready to continue our aid; but we will not be dominated by him. When we shall be, it is our settled conviction that we shall deserve the degradation into which we shall have sunk. – Thomas Nelson Page in The Old South (1892)


Yes, in other words the ignorance of our Western liberal intellectuals is killing us. The distortion of their university-adjusted vision is such that even when they clearly perceive every detail of a given situation, the picture in the mirror of their intellects is invariably upside down. It is a form of insanity, ethical as well as intellectual; an insanity which takes the form of a blind belief in the efficacy of so-called ‘good’ principles regardless of the circumstances in which they are applied; such as the giving of The Vote to people who cannot read or write, and the granting of ‘National Self-determination’ to tribes of stark naked cannibals. It is a ‘sideways with the people’ insanity; one of the deadliest of its manifestations being the belief that true goodness consists in depriving oneself of the power to do good. It is an insanity compelling liberal politicians to delight in bringing about the utter subjugation of their own white race. – Anthony Jacob in White Man, Think Again! (1965)


The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light. – Romans 13: 12


Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. – Ephesians 6: 11

If a politician began a public speech one hundred years ago with the Lord’s Prayer, it would not have been an act of courage. It could have reflected a deep conviction of the politician or it might have simply been a formalistic ritual, a condescending nod to the public sentiment, but in either case the politician would not have needed a great deal of courage to say the prayer. That is not the case today. In a Jacobin age, in which “separation of church and state” has become a God phrase, to begin a state speech with the Lord’s Prayer is an act of courage. And I thought the First Lady’s foreign accent added particular grace to the moment. Mrs. Trump’s prayer emphasized that the only legitimate immigration is white immigration. And when we place into the equation the fact that Melania Trump knows that the enemy has pictures of her posing in lingerie that they can splash all over the internet to make the case that she is a hypocrite, we must applaud her courage. I do not applaud courage that is not for the Christian things, but when it is courage in His name, I honor it.

Sadly – actually it is worse than sad, it is tragic – the Trump phenomenon is not grounded in something substantial. There is an under-current of white pietas in the Trump movement, which is why the liberals hate him more than Richard Nixon, but the stated purpose of Trump’s crusade is still within the confines, or to be more accurate, the chains of racial and global universalism. This will not do. The black supporters of Trump should be the leaders of either a separate Bantu state as in Dr. Verwoerd’s South Africa, or the leaders in a separate black state within a white nation. Blacks cannot be part of a white nation, because they are incapable of living amongst whites without bringing death and destruction to whites. In point of fact they are incapable of self-government, but they can rise above the level of complete barbarism if they are aided by Christian whites, as was the case in the pre-Civil War South and in Dr. Verwoerd’s South Africa.

That liberals do not care about blacks is made crystal clear when we see the calumny that is heaped on the aforementioned civilizations which have the distinction of being the only civilizations that ever improved the blacks’ lives materially and spiritually. If you had a very sick child, wouldn’t you, if you loved your child, opt for a medical procedure that had been used successfully in the past? Or would you choose a medical procedure that was a proven failure?

Liberals always choose utopian remedies for all social ills, because they have rejected the traditional Christian faith of the European people. And, having rejected that faith, they must come up with an alternative faith to sustain them. The liberals’ alternative faith is Jacobinism, which entails a worship of a theoretical aggregate called ‘the people.’ Haiti, after the French revolution, represents Jacobinism in its purest form. The rest of the European nations moved toward utopia more incrementally, from a white aggregate of proletarians to a black aggregate of pure, natural savages. Any political movement that does not attack the very core of liberalism, which is the satanic ideology of negro worship, will be absorbed by liberalism.

The liberals, like the Ancient Mariner, have shot the albatross, but unlike the Ancient Mariner they are not repentant. They continue to build their new world as if there was no fall of man and no Redeemer. Indeed, if there was no fall of man why do we need a Redeemer? But the liberals still have a plan of salvation – God the Father is the abstracted intellect of man, the Savior is the natural black savage in the aggregate, and science is the Holy Ghost. As regards the Holy Ghost – didn’t Pope Francis just tell us that Islamic terrorism is a myth, while global warming is a scientific fact? We must not be blasphemers against the liberals’ Holy Ghost.

The Jacobin revolution never could have succeeded, and it would never have spread, if the traditional bred-in-the-bone European Christianity had not been replaced by the worship of the Church as an organization dedicated to religious and racial universalism. That type of Church, as opposed to the church of faithful hearts united to His heart, can be made compatible with Jacobin utopianism – witness Price, Priestly, Belloc, John Paul II, Pope Francis, and the legion of modern, anti-Christian, anti-European churchmen who have placed themselves in the liberals’ camp, opposed to their people and their God.

When the spirit of God enters human hearts, through Christ our Lord, the spirit of satanic abstraction dies, and the charity that never faileth takes hold. Christian civilizations are always imperfect because Christian men are still sons of Adam. But the sons of Adam who are repentant Christians have that within which constitutes the only humane civilizing influence on a nation. The inhumane, unrepentant liberals can only mock and destroy all that is good and noble, which is why they are driven to destroy every last vestige of antique Europe. A movement based on turning back the clock to a milder, gentler Jacobinism can never succeed, because the essence of Jacobinism is ever-onward to a Haitian-style state devoid of faith, hope, and charity – a state in which all people worship darkness and not the light.

The last Christian state on the face of the earth was the aforementioned South Africa, presided over by Dr. H. F. Verwoerd, the last great Christian European leader in a leaderless world. The dagger to his heart (which came from a half-breed Marxist zealot) was a dagger to the heart of the Christian European people. It was Dr. Verwoerd who first used the term ‘negro psychosis’ to describe the great sickness of the European people. He knew, because he loved his people and his God, that the Church of Christ consisted of one’s people, one’s kith and kin, who love a personal God, not an abstract, satanic liberal trinity.

What are we in South Africa going to do in that future? My answer is that this will depend on the question of whether we will be able to maintain our anchors. For me this means that we should keep our identity as a people, that we should not become international, that we should not consider ourselves wise or learned or big when we abandon our people. But secondly – and this is the most important – this anchor must ensure that we keep our faith. If we can stay anchored in our faith and thus in our Church, those big changes can do nothing that spells danger to us as a people who hold fast to God and his Word.

–Verwoerd Speaks

Of course it was not to be, the South African leaders after Dr. Verwoerd did not stay loyal to their people or to the Word of God. And are not the two inseparable? Can there be an abstract Christian church without a local habitation in the collective heart of the European people? And can the European people be a people if they do not take Christ into their hearts? Faith and kith and kin must be joined or else all is cheerless, dark, and deadly. Trump’s concern for working class whites and his wife’s public prayer show us that the Trump movement has some remnants of grace, but it is still a movement from within liberalism. And there can be no reconciliation, no peaceful accord, with liberalism. White South Africa is the world. Any resistance to black rule, which is the rule of Satan, will be dealt with by the use of lying, cheating, and then, if those tactics fail, by assassination and murder. No European nation is immune from the fatal disease – the negro psychosis. Even in nations of Eastern Europe, where the people have shown some resistance to the Moslem invasion, we see the ‘I am not racist’ flag, which is the flag of surrender to the devil, being raised. Our skin color is part of our spiritual essence. If we place the white race in subservience to the black race – and diversity means black dominance – we have put the Christ-bearing race at the service of Satan. And that is precisely what the liberals want, because they worship darkness and not the light. Our white ancestors knew about the connection between the Sons of Ham and the devil. They knew about such things, because they were connected to His sacred heart, the source of all true wisdom. They were prejudiced in favor of the sacred things and prejudiced against Satan and his works. Our people used to know instinctively that the negro was death to the white man’s civilization. Burke talks about this in Letters on a Regicide Peace:

How must we feel, if the pride and flower of the English Nobility and Gentry, who might escape the pestilential clime, and the devouring sword, should, if taken prisoners, be delivered over as rebel subjects, to be condemned as rebels, as traitors, as the vilest of all criminals, by tribunals formed of Maroon negro slaves, covered over with the blood of their masters, who were made free and organized into judges, for their robberies and murders?

And again, in his essay, “On the Sublime and Beautiful” –

Perhaps it may appear on inquiry that blackness and darkness are in some degree painful by their natural operation, independent of any associations whatsoever. I must observe, that the ideas of darkness and blackness are much the same; and they differ only in this, that blackness is a more confined idea. Mr. Cheselden has given us a very curious story of a boy, who had been born blind, and continued so until he was thirteen or fourteen years old; he was then couched for a cataract, by which operation he received his sight. Among many remarkable particulars that attended his first perceptions and judgments on visual objects, it gave him great uneasiness; and that some time after, upon accidentally seeing a negro woman, he was struck with great horror at the sight. The horror, in this case, can scarcely be supposed to arise from any association. The boy appears by the account to have been particularly observing and sensible for one of his age; and therefore it is probable, if the great uneasiness he felt at the first sight of black had arisen from its connexion with any other disagreeable ideas, he would have observed and mentioned it. For an idea, disagreeable only by association, has the cause of its ill effect on the passions evident enough at the first impression; in ordinary cases, it is indeed frequently lost; but this is, because the original association was made very early, and the consequent impression repeated often. In our instance, there was no time for such a habit; and there is no reason to think that the ill effects of black on his imagination were more owing to its connexion with any disagreeable ideas, than that the good effects of more cheerful colours were derived from their connexion with pleasuring ones. They had both probably their effects from their natural operation.

There are four forces present in the United States, which are also present in all of the other European nations as well. The first force is that of the mad-dog liberals. They rule most of the European nations and their credo is quite simple – the white race must be destroyed immediately and by ‘any means necessary.’ The second force consists of the conservative-liberals, who rule in a few European nations, but their credo differs only in degree, not in kind, from the mad-dog liberals. Their credo is that the whites must be destroyed, but only incrementally; they should not be destroyed immediately nor should they be dispossessed violently; they must be democratically phased out. The third force consists of populists such as Donald Trump and Le Pen. This group wants white people to be accorded the right to live and work in the nations that they founded and sustained. The liberals will never allow such a faction to exist within the confines of Liberaldom, because liberalism is based on the destruction of the white race. Populists are always puzzled by the liberals’ hatred of them, because they say nothing against, in their view, the tenets of liberalism. What the populists do not understand is the Orwellian nature of liberalism. “All are equal, but some are more equal.” Liberalism is not about equality, liberty, and fraternity, it is about merciless cruelty and the extermination of the white race. In a recent conversation with an elderly Trump supporter, I was asked why the liberals hate him so. I told the woman it was because Trump does not want to exterminate the white race. “But why do the liberals want to exterminate the white race?” was her next question. “Because they worship darkness and not the light,” was my reply.

The fourth faction within Liberaldom is the colored heathens – the blacks, the Moslems, the Mexicans, etc. They are the liberals’ shock troops, and they are, collectively, the second person of the liberals’ unholy trinity. In a perverse parody of the Christ story, the colored heathens have become incarnate in Liberaldom, they have come to save the liberals from sin and death, which, in the eyes of the liberals, is personified in the white race. The liberals fervently believe that if the white race dies so does sin and death.

When there was a Western civilization, men such as Edmund Burke, Thomas Nelson Page, Anthony Jacob, and H. F. Verwoerd stressed that it was the European people and their Christian faith that must be conserved, not democracy nor Churchianity. Now that there are no conservatives who want to conserve Christian Europeans, the liberals have turned Europe into Heathendom. What must men who still love old Europe do? We must be counterrevolutionaries. We cannot look to conservative liberals or even to populist leaders to lead us out of the darkness of liberalism. We must look to counterrevolutionary leaders such as … Jesus Christ, who is “the beginning and the end, the first and the last.” The Lord’s Prayer is the start of the European counterrevolution – “Thy will be done on earth as it is in Heaven.” Surely it is not His will that the Christ-bearing race should abandon Christ and fall down on their faces to worship the negro. +

Posted in Christ the Hero, counterrevolution, Jacobinism | Tagged ,

The End of Democracy Is the New Dawn of Europe

Constable_Landscape-Boys_Fishing They never will love where they ought to love, who do not hate where they ought to hate.

-Edmund Burke


O worthy Duke,
You bid me seek redemption of the devil.

Isabella in Measure for Measure

 When the irReverend Dr. Price exulted when Louis the XVI was led in triumph through the streets of Paris by the Jacobins, Burke demanded to know why Dr. Price should exult in the King’s humiliation and dethronement:

But the Reverend Pastor exults in this “leading in triumph,” because truly Louis the Sixteenth was “an arbitrary monarch;” that is, in other words, neither more nor less than because he was Louis the Sixteenth, and because he had the misfortune to be born king of France, with the prerogatives of which, a long line of ancestors, and a long acquiescence of the people, without any act of his, had put him in possession. A misfortune it has indeed turned out to him, that he was born king of France. But misfortune is not crime, nor is indiscretion always the greatest guilt. I shall never think that a prince, the acts of whose whole reign was a series of concessions to his subjects, who was willing to relax his authority, to remit his prerogatives, to call his people to a share of freedom, not known, perhaps not desired by their ancestors; such a prince, though he should be subjected to the common frailties attached to men and to princes, though he should have once thought it necessary to provide force against the desperate designs manifestly carrying on against his person, and the remnants of his authority; though all this should be taken into consideration, I shall be led with great difficulty to think he deserves the cruel and insulting triumph of Paris and of Dr. Price. I tremble for the cause of liberty, from such an example to kings. I tremble for the cause of humanity, in the unpunished outrages of the most wicked of mankind.

-Burke in Reflections on the French Revolution

So must I demand to know why Hillary Clinton exulted in the 9th District Court judges’ refusal to uphold Trump’s order to temporarily restrict Moslem immigration from a handful of Moslem countries. Why would a citizen of the United States or any other European nation object to such a small restriction on Moslem immigration, especially considering that a complete ban on Moslem immigration and the deportation of every single Moslem in the European nations is necessary for the protection of the European people? Hillary exulted for the same reason that Dr. Price exulted: The Moslems are committed to the destruction of the white Christian race, just as the Jacobins were, and Hillary is, committed to the destruction of the white Christian race.

There has never been, nor can there ever be, a multi-cultural or multi-racial nation. There might be little counter-cultural enclaves and other slave races within a dominant racial culture, but there will always be one dominant culture and one dominant race within a nation. The striking thing about the European nations of the late 20th and early 21st centuries is that the majority culture, the people who were in charge of the government, willingly made the colored heathens into the dominant culture and the dominant race. There was, in South Africa, before the ascendency of the black government, a minority culture ruling a majority culture. But in that case, the colored heathens did not willingly give up their dominance. It was taken from them as was also the case in British India. It is only the European people who willingly ceded their racial dominance and cultural identity to the heathens of other races. Why have they done this? Let us turn to Herman Melville for an answer, as he describes in Moby Dick, the man keeping watch atop the masthead:

There is no life in thee, now, except that rocking life imparted by a gently rolling ship; by her, borrowed from the sea; by the sea, from the inscrutable tides of God. But while this sleep, this dream is on ye, move your foot or hand an inch; slip your hold at all; and your identity comes back in horror. Over Descartian vortices you hover. And perhaps, at mid-day, in the fairest weather, with one half-throttled shriek you drop through that transparent air into the summer sea, no more to rise for ever. Heed it well, ye Pantheists!

A religion based on philosophical speculation cannot sustain a people. Once faith in the God-Man, Jesus Christ, was replaced by organized propositional religion, the Europeans became Pantheists; they blended their Lord and Savior with philosophy and the heathen faiths. At the moment such a philosophical blending takes place the stage is set for racial blending and then racial suicide. The white race is the first and only race to commit racial suicide, because the white race is the only race that attempted to love the Savior in spirit and truth. But if you falter, having once taken up the cross, what will happen? You will hover over “Descartian vortices” for a certain time and then plunge to your death in the sea of racial and religious universalism.

First the Americans and then the French tried to build a culture over the “Descartian vortices” of religious, racial, and cultural universalism. Then one by one all the nations of Europe followed the lead of the Americans and the French Jacobins. What the European clergymen had wrought came to fruition in the Europeans’ culture – they became the first race to commit racial suicide.

I had hoped, before Trump’s victory, that his election would serve as a rearguard action for the European people – that it would give them some time to prepare for the real battle, the fight against Jacobin democracy. But the rearguard movement has failed. Trump tried, as valiantly as Marshal Ney, but he has been unable to delay the liberal juggernaut. To defeat the liberals was never even a goal of Trump or his supporters, and that is probably why Trump could not even slow down the liberals’ process. If you can’t match the liberals’ passionate hatred of the Christ-bearing race with a passionate hatred for the liberals and the colored heathens, you will never defeat the liberals, and apparently, you will not even put a significant dent in their war machine.

What percentage of Trump’s supporters passionately hate the liberals and all their works? To what extent does Trump hate the liberals? Trumps’ victory has already been nullified because the coalition of whites that voted for him do not hate liberalism, nor does Trump himself. Trump called for inclusion at his inauguration, but how can a man be married to hell? The liberals have created hell on earth; we cannot and we should not try to come to some kind of peaceful accord with them. Firstly, they don’t want a peaceful accord with us – they want to destroy us. And secondly, we should not seek redemption of the devil. Trump is a man of courage and has some of the old bred-in-the-bone Christianity, but he doesn’t have enough of it to defeat the liberals. A European of the old stock, a Walter Scott or an Edmund Burke, would see the liberals for what they are – the spawns of Satan. You can’t deal with them democratically as if they were human beings with normal human feelings and aspirations. They have left their humanity behind and moved onward, to become a sub-human species that must feed on the blood of whites in order to maintain their soulless existence. And why must they hate the white race? They must hate the white race because they hate Him, with an unremitting, relentless hatred that is fueled by Satan.

The liberals always win because there is no passion on the other side. The European clergymen have gone over to the liberals, the conservatives are all pragmatic pantheists, and the grazers follow their pathetic leaders who tell them that civilized men are never passionate about anything. They do not hate with a passion, nor do they love with a passion. They just stand waist-deep in the tepid waters of moderate liberalism, waiting to be drowned by a tidal wave of radical Jacobinism.

Personally, I would like Trump to resign, because I’ve become quite fond of him, and I don’t want to see him and his family tortured any longer. He has, ever since he won the nomination, been playing Gloucester to the Regans, Cornwalls, and Gonerils of Liberaldom. Just as Gloucester was tortured for his defense of King Lear, so is Trump being tortured for his refusal to accede to the extermination of the white race:

Regan. To whose hands have you sent the lunatic King?

Gloucester. I have a letter guessingly set down,
Which came from one that’s of a neutral heart,
And not from one oppos’d.

Cornwall. Cunning.

Regan. And false.

Cornwall. Where hast thou sent the King?

Gloucester. To Dover.

Regan. Wherefore to Dover? Wast thou not charg’d at peril-

Cornwall. Wherefore to Dover? Let him first answer that.

Gloucester. I am tied to th’ stake, and I must stand the course.

Regan. Wherefore to Dover, sir?

Gloucester. Because I would not see thy cruel nails
Pluck out his poor old eyes; nor thy fierce sister
In his anointed flesh stick boarish fangs.
The sea, with such a storm as his bare head
In hell-black night endur’d, would have buoy’d up
And quench’d the steeled fires.
Yet, poor old heart, he holp the heavens to rain.
If wolves had at thy gate howl’d that stern time,
Thou shouldst have said, ‘Good porter, turn the key.’
All cruels else subscrib’d. But I shall see
The winged vengeance overtake such children.

Cornwall. See’t shalt thou never. Fellows, hold the chair.
Upon these eyes of thine I’ll set my foot.

Gloucester. He that will think to live till he be old,
Give me some help!- O cruel! O ye gods!

Regan. One side will mock another. Th’ other too!

Cornwall. If you see vengeance-

1st Servant. Hold your hand, my lord!
I have serv’d you ever since I was a child;
But better service have I never done you
Than now to bid you hold.

Regan. How now, you dog?

1st Servant. If you did wear a beard upon your chin,
I’ld shake it on this quarrel.

Regan. What do you mean?

Cornwall. My villain! Draw and fight.

1st Servant. Nay, then, come on, and take the chance of anger.

Regan. Give me thy sword. A peasant stand up thus?

[She takes a sword and runs at him behind.]


1st Servant. O, I am slain! My lord, you have one eye left
To see some mischief on him. O! He dies.

Cornwall. Lest it see more, prevent it. Out, vile jelly!
Where is thy lustre now?

Gloucester. All dark and comfortless! Where’s my son Edmund?
Edmund, enkindle all the sparks of nature
To quit this horrid act.

Regan. Out, treacherous villain!
Thou call’st on him that hates thee. It was he
That made the overture of thy treasons to us;
Who is too good to pity thee.

Gloucester. O my follies! Then Edgar was abus’d.
Kind gods, forgive me that, and prosper him!

Regan. Go thrust him out at gates, and let him smell
His way to Dover.

Exit [one] with Gloucester.

How is’t, my lord? How look you?

Cornwall. I have receiv’d a hurt. Follow me, lady.
Turn out that eyeless villain. Throw this slave
Upon the dunghill. Regan, I bleed apace.
Untimely comes this hurt. Give me your arm.

Exit [Cornwall, led by Regan].

2nd Servant. I’ll never care what wickedness I do,
If this man come to good.

3rd Servant. If she live long,
And in the end meet the old course of death,
Women will all turn monsters.

2nd Servant. Let’s follow the old Earl, and get the bedlam
To lead him where he would. His roguish madness
Allows itself to anything.

3rd Servant. Go thou. I’ll fetch some flax and whites of eggs
To apply to his bleeding face. Now heaven help him!

– King Lear

Yes, may heaven help him. He is facing traitors from within and the devil’s minions from without. All this without the support of a Christian people and without a full understanding of the extent of the evil forces arrayed against him. May Christ defend him and his family against the wickedness and snares of the devil and his minions. And if you ask me why I feel outraged by the treatment Trump is receiving, I will reply to you with the words of Burke: “It is natural that I should.” Should not any man with a heart that still lives feel drawn to a “still strong man in a blatant land” that fights alone against the forces of evil?(1)

I’ve often wondered why Burke’s critique of the spirit of Jacobinism was completely ignored in the West once Robespierre died. “Everything is fine now, and we can go on with the business of democratizing the world,” was the attitude of the intellectuals in the European nations. And in the 20th century when Burke’s heir, Antony Jacob, condemned democracy as the great enemy of the white man, he was ignored. There was no need to vilify Jacob, because Anthony Jacob didn’t have a parliamentary platform from which to speak. Go through the back files of “respectable” conservative journals such as the National Review and see if Anthony Jacob’s magnificent prophetic work White Man Think Again! is mentioned. It is not. Burke and Jacob were kith and kin Christian conservatives who rejected the democratic, racial universalism of the liberals. For this reason, the one was vilified and the other was ignored.

We can no longer ignore the kith and kin Christians of old Europe. Their passion is what is needed. We can’t “think” our way out of this democratic hell that the liberals have imposed on us. But we can love and hate with all our heart and fight our way out of this kingdom of Satan on earth. We must love Him and His people, the antique Europeans, and we must hate the liberals enough to fight as Alfred fought, as Forrest fought, and as Lee fought. Violence is not a magic panacea for every ill. But the conservatives and other democracy-loving white nationalists act like we have evolved beyond the need for violence. Only Gnostic men, who think we are all pure mind can believe that. Human beings inhabit bodies. When we are combating the evil that liberals do we cannot just beat them in debates and think all is well. The prolifers always win the debate – of course the child in the womb is a human being and the right to the privacy is an invented right of the liberals. And of course white people should be accorded the right to live and rule in the nations that were created and sustained by them. But both the right to life of the unborn and of whites to rule in their own countries is categorically denied by the liberals despite the fact that reason and humanity are on the side of the unborn and the whites. What is our recourse? The liberals never shun violence, they will do whatever it takes to maintain their rule. So what is the white man to do? If you love much, you will fight to preserve your people and your faith. And a Christ-centered heart will keep your battle within the bounds of Christian chivalry. The liberals will not renounce violence, they will do whatever they deem necessary to destroy the white race. They are possessed by one passion, the hatred of the white, Christ-bearing race. If we refuse to match their hate for our people with our passionate love of our people, a love that inspires us to fight, then there is no hope for the white race, despite all our cleverness.

The new right and the old white nationalists, call them what you will, when they are not condemning Christians by treating them as Jews, are constantly telling them not to be so fussy about supporting white nationalist candidates. But it is not a question of supporting a white nationalist over a liberal – of course a Christian European should support a pagan white nationalist against a liberal. But the pagan white nationalist does not see the whole picture. If the European does not act in Christ’s name, he will not be able to defeat the liberals.

Christ’s name cannot be invoked with any success by those who do not believe in Him. We cannot judge a man’s eternal soul, we don’t know the reasons for his unbelief, but we must, if we are Christians, hold to the belief that no cause has any chance of success, nor does it deserve success if its champions do not go forth in His name. And it must be in His name, the Christ of the European hearth fire, not the universalist Christ of organized Christian Jewry or organized Churchianity which has become the Negroid-Moslem church of Satan. From whence comes the Promethean fire to defy the gods of Liberaldom if it does not come from Christ? Why did the Europeans once rule Europe and the colored nations? Was it because they played rationalist hopscotch better than the heathens? No, it was rationalism, devoid of faith, that destroyed the European people. A passionate connection to His passion is what made the European people the light of Europe and the world. You don’t win every battle because you invoke His name. Lee and Stonewall lost the war, for instance. But their people survived as a people until they ceased to invoke His name in the 1950s. We will only survive if our passion for our people and our Savior fills our heart. Without that passion we perish in the Descartian vortices of liberalism. +


(1) It is better that Trump resigns instead of remaining in office to be the target for liberal violence and libel. Every day he spends in office gives liberals the chance to show their power. They attack him and his family with impunity. The Federal law enforcement officials do not go after any of the vermin who encourage people to assassinate Trump, while the vanguard of Satan’s armies, the media, spew out their hatred of Trump every minute of their fake news broadcasts. Where is the spiritual reciprocity? Why is there no white passion to match the liberals’ passionate hatred? Ask not for whom the bell tolls. The attack on Trump is an attack on thee and me as well as on Trump. The liberals have rejected the love of God, which comes to those who are humble enough to receive that love at the European hearth fire. So we must make them know the wrath of God that will come to them through the Europeans who still cherish the God and the people of the European hearth fire.

Addendum: Trump’s courage was on display at the press conference, but the great weakness of the white people of the United States and throughout the world was also on display. It is always a given that we must help the blacks, yet it is always a given that we must not help them as the white Southerners of the pre-Civil War South helped them – by controlling their baser instincts and teaching them to conform, at least outwardly, to the ethos of Christianity. Is it really white people’s fault that blacks murder, rape, and pillage their own people as well as white people? Trump said he is not a racist. No, he is not. And that is his Achilles’ heel and the Achilles’ heel of the European people. If you don’t love your own people above all others you will not have the heart to extend some of that love to the stranger. The only people who ever helped the blacks were white “racists.” We should never lose sight of the fact that the liberals use the word ‘racist’ to destroy white pietas. Nothing good will ever happen to the white race until white people love their own above all others without apology and without the fear of being called racists.

Posted in Europe as the Christ-bearer, Jacobinism | Tagged , ,